We recall that a commutative square
in a category is said to be cartesian, or to be a pullback, if for every object of and every pair of maps and such that , there exists a unique map , such that and ,
In the category of sets, a square (1) is cartesian iff for every pair of elements such that , there exists a unique element , such that and . In general, a square (1) in a category is cartesian iff the following square in the category of sets is cartesian for every object of ,
Let be the arrow category of a category . A morphism in the category is a commutative square in the category ,
If the category has pullbacks, then the category admits a factorisation system in which is the class of pullback squares. A square belongs to the class iff the map is invertible.
Left to the reader.
Suppose that we have a commutative diagram
in which the right hand square is cartesian. Then the left hand square is cartesian iff the composite square is cartesian.
It suffices to prove the result in the case of a diagram in the category of sets, in which case the proof is left to the reader.
Let us suppose that the ambiant category has pullbacks. Then the category admits a factorisation system in which is the class of pullback squares by lemma . Hence the class is closed under composition and has the left cancellation property by the proposition here. The diagram can be represented by two maps and in the category . We have by assumption. It follows that iff , since the the class is closed under composition and has the left cancellation property.
Suppose that we have a commutative cube
in which the right face is cartesian. If the left and front faces are cartesian, then so is the back face.
If denotes the ambiant category, then the cube (viewed from high above) is a commutative square in the arrow category ,
The faces and are cartesian by hypothesis. Hence also their composite by Lemma . It follows that the back face is cartesian by the same lemma, since the right hand face is cartesian by hypothesis.
The full subcategory of spanned by the cartesian squares is reflective, hence also closed under arbitrary limits.
The category admits a factorisation system in which is the class of cartesian squares by lemma . But the right class of a factorisation system in a category spans a full reflective subcategory of by the proposition here. This proves that the full subcategory of spanned by the cartesian squares is reflective, hence closed under limits.
The category is a projective cone based on the category with three objects and two arrows ,
A square is cartesian iff the projective cone that it defines is exact. It is a general fact, valid for any category , that the full subcategory of spanned by the exact projective cones is reflective.
We shall say that a commutative square in the category of sets,
is epicartesian if the induced map is surjective. In other words, if for every pair of elements such that , there exists an element not necessarly unique such that and .
Suppose that we have the following commutative diagram in the category of sets,
If the two squares are epicartesian, then so is their composite. Conversely, if the right hand square is cartesian and the composite square is epicartesian, then the left hand square is epicartesian.
By diagram chasing.
Suppose that the right hand face of commutative cube in the category of sets is cartesian,
If the left and front faces are epicartesian, then so is the back face.
The cube viewed from high above is a commutative square in the arrow category ,
The faces and are epicartesian by hypothesis, hence also their composite by Lemma . It follows that the back face is epicartesian by the same lemma, since the right hand face is cartesian by hypothesis.
A retract of an epicartesian square is epicartesian.
A retract of a set is the set of fixed points of an idempotent map . Similarly, a retract of a square ,
is the square of fixed points of an idempotent morphism . Let us show that is epicartesian when is epicartesian. Let and be a pair of elements such that . Then there exists an element such that and , since the square is epicartesian by assumption. But then , and we have , . This shows that the square is epicartesian
The class of epicartesian squares is closed under arbitrary products in the category .
Recall from the theory of weak factorisation systems that if is a category and is an ordinal, then a contravariant functor is called an opchain. The opchain is continuous if the canonical map
is an isomorphism for every non-zero limit ordinal . The composite of is defined to be the canonical map . The base of is the restriction of to . We shall say that a subcategory is closed under transfinite op-compositions if for any limit ordinal , any continuous op-chain with a base in has a composite in .
In the category of sets, the subcategory of surjections is closed under transfinite op-compositions.
Let be a limit ordinal, and let
be a continuous opchain with a base in the sub-category of surjections. This last condition means that the “restriction map” is surjective for every . Let us show that the restriction map is surjective. Let be the poset of elements of the presheaf . More precisely, an element of is a pair where and . By definition, we have if and . It follows from the continuity of that the poset is co-inductive (ie every chain in has an infumum). Moreover the minimal elements of are of the form for since the map is surjective for every .
It follows by Zorn lemma that for every there exists an element such that .
The class of epicartesian squares is closed under transfinite op-composition in the category .
More generally, if is a class of maps in a category pullbacks , we shall say that the commutative square (1) is -cartesian if the canonical map belongs to . Recall that a commutative square in
Let be a weak factorisation system in a category with pullbacks . Then the category admits a weak factorisation system in which a morphism belongs to iff the corresponding square
is -cartesian. A morphism belongs to iff is invertible and belongs to .
The category admits a weak factorisation system in which a morphism belongs to iff the corresponding square is epicartesian. A morphism belongs to iff is bijective and is monic.