nLab
(2,1)-algebraic theory of E-infinity algebras

Contents

Idea

The (∞,1)-algebraic theory whose algebras are E-∞ algebras is the (2,1)-category of spans of finite sets.

Definition

Definition

Let

2Comm:=Span(FinSet)2Comm := Span(FinSet)

be the (2,1)-category of spans of finite sets:

  • objects are finite sets;

  • morphisms are spans X 1YX 1 in FinSet;

  • 2-morphisms are diagrams

    Y X 0 X 1 Y\array{ && Y \\ & \swarrow && \searrow \\ X_0 &&\downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}}&& X_1 \\ & \nwarrow && \nearrow \\ && Y' }

    in FinSet with the vertical morphism an isomorphism.

Observation

The homotopy category of 2Comm is the category Comm that is the Lawvere theory of commutative monoids.

Proof

The Lawvere theory of commutative monoids has as objects the free commutative monoids F[k] on k generators, and as morphisms monoid homomorphisms.

By the free property, morphisms

f:F[k]F[l]f : F[k] \to F[l]

are in natural bijection to k-tuples of elements of F[l]. Such elements in turn are sums a 1+a 1++a 1+a 2+a 2++a 2+a 3+ of copies of the l generators, hence are in bijection to sequences of natural numbers (n 1,,n l). Hence morphisms f:F[k]F[l] are in bijection to k×l-matrices with entries in the natural numbers.

One checks that under this identification composition of morphisms corresponds to matrix multiplication.

Remark

For instance the spans

{1,2}id{1,2}{1}\{1,2\} \stackrel{id}{\leftarrow} \{1,2\} \to \{1\}

and

{1,2}{2,1}{1}\{1,2\} \stackrel{\simeq}{\leftarrow} \{2,1\} \to \{1\}

describe the operation

(a,b)a+b(a,b) \mapsto a + b

and the operation

(a,b)b+a,(a,b) \mapsto b + a \,,

respectively. Clearly, in Comm both these operations are identified. In 2Comm however they the are only equivalent

{1,2} id {1,2} {1} {2,1}.\array{ && \{1,2\} \\ & {}^{\mathllap{id}}\swarrow && \searrow \\ \{1,2\} &&\downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}}&& \{1\} \\ & {}_{\mathllap{\simeq}}\nwarrow && \nearrow \\ && \{2,1\} } \,.

Properties

Observation

Let Comm be the ordinary Lawvere theory of commutative monoids. There is a forgetful 2-functor

2CommComm.2Comm \to Comm \,.

This exhibits 2Comm as being like Comm but with some additional auto-2-morphisms of the morphism of Comm.

This is discussed in (Cranch, beginning of section 5.2).

Proposition

The (,1)-category 2Comm has finite products. The products of objects A,B in 2Comm is their coproduct AB in FinSet.

This appears as (Cranch, prop. 4.7).

Proposition

An (∞,1)-category with (∞,1)-product is naturally an algebra over the (2,1)-theory 2Comm.

This appears as (Cranch, theorem 4.26).

Theorem

An algebra over the (2,1)-theory 2Comm in (∞,1)Cat is a symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category.

This appears as (Cranch, theorem 5.3).

Theorem

There is a (2,1)-algebraic theory E whose algebras are at least in parts like E-∞ algebras.

This is (Cranch), prop. 6.12, theorem 6.13 and section 8.

Examples

Free algebras

The free algebra over 2Comm in ∞Grpd on a single generator is 2Comm(*,):2CommGrpd. Its underlying ∞-groupoid is therefore

2Comm(*,*)=Core(FinSet),2Comm(*,*) = Core(FinSet) \,,

the core groupoid of the category FinSet. This is equivalent to

nBΣ n,\cdots \simeq \coprod_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \mathbf{B} \Sigma_n \,,

where Σ n is the symmetric group on n elements and BΣ n its one-object delooping groupoid.

Notice that this is indeed the free E-∞-algebra, on the nose so if we use the Barratt-Eccles operad P as our model for the E-∞-operad: that has P n=EΣ n. The free algebra over an operad is given by nP n/Σ n, which here is = nEΣ n/Σ n= nBΣ n.

References

Revised on July 7, 2011 10:14:49 by David Corfield (217.43.115.247)