Talk notes for the session of
of
Outline
I. String structures
definition
-
is defined to be the homotopy fiber
-
a String structure on is a lift of the classifying map to through
\array{
P && B String
\\
\downarrow &\nearrow& \downarrow
\\
M &\to& B Spin
}
Prop
-
String structure exists iff (essentially by definition through homotopy fiber)
-
- let the pullback to the fiber of , then we have
- $${String structures}/_{homotopy}
- \simeq_{canonical} {String classes}
- {\rho \in H^3(P,\mathbb{Z}) s. t. i_P^* \rho = 1 \in H^3(Spin, \mathbb{Z})}
-
is a torsor for under
Proof. universal example
\array{
K(\mathbb{Z},3) &\simeq& \pi^* E Spin &\to & E Spin
\\
&& B String &\to& B Spin &\to& K(\mathbb{Z}, 4)
}
hm, here is my (Urs) description of the situation:
consider the following pasting diagram of homtopy pullbacks ( is the given -bundle, its String-lift)
\array{
String &\to& \hat P &\to& {*}
\\
\downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow
\\
Spin &\to& P &\to& B^2 U(1) &\to& {*}
\\
\downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow
\\
{*} &\to& X &\to& B String(n) &\to& B Spin(n)
}
Why String structures?
String structure on Spin structure on loop space
but all the reps of this loop group are projective, so there is actually a central extension of in the game
\hat {L Spin} \to L Spin
Need:
\array{
\hat {L Spin} &\to & \hat {L P}
\\
\downarrow && \downarrow
\\
L Spin &\to& L P
}
\rho \in H^3(P, \mathbb{Z}) \mapsto
\array{
(\pi_! ev^*) \rho &\in& H^2(L P, \mathbb{Z})
\\
\downarrow && \downarrow
\\
iniv. ext. && H^2(L G, \mathbb{Z})
}
(on the right: -bundles)
** String orientation ** of tmf = topological modular forms
M O\langle 8\rangle^{-n} = M String &\stackrel{\sigma}{\to}& tmf^{-n}(pt)
M O\langle 8\rangle^{-n} = M String &\stackrel{\sigma}{\to}& tmf^{-n}(pt)
so give a String manifold with a String class on
M , \rho \mapsto [M, \rho] \mapsto \sigma(M,\rho)
\array{
&& tmf
\\
& {}^{\sigma}\nearrow & \downarrow
\\
M String &\stackrel{Witten genus}{\to}& Mod Forms
}
””
(by the way, is surjective on homotopy classes)
warning: I think above my should really be an
II Harmonic representative of
reminder
H^k(M,\mathbb{R}) \simeq_{Hodge} \Delta^*_g \subset \Omega^k(M)
construction
start with
choose a bininvariant metric
g_\rho := \pi^* g_m \oplus g_{spin}
where the direct sum comes from the splitting of tangent spaces using the connection that we have
Introduce scaling factor
g_\rho := \pi^* g_m \oplus \delta^2 g_{spin}
take the “adiabatic limit”
so now there is a 1-parameter family of metric on the bundle, and for each one can look at its Laplacian, so as tends to 0 something becomes singular and one has to be careful, but fortunately others already did that for us…
theorem (Mazzeo-Melrose, Dai, Forman)
the kernel
this means that
\Rightarrow H^k(P, \mathbb{Z})
\stackrel{\simeq}{\to}
\lim_{\delta \to 0}
Ker \Delta_{g_\rho}
=: H^k(P)
Theorem (Redden)
Given and
then
\array{
H^3(P, \mathbb{Z}) &\to& H^3(P,\mathbb{R}) &\to& H^3(P)
\\
S &&\mapsto& CS_3(A)&& CS_3(A) - \pi^* H
}
here is the Chern-Simons 3-form of the spin-connection
and recall here denotes harmonic forms on (should really be script font
remark
in genral
[\rho]_{g_\delta} =
CS_3(A) - \pi^* H + O(\delta) \not\in \pi^* \Omega^3(M)
if we have a product of two groups we accordingly would get CS of one connection minus CS of the other.
What is ?
(first digression)
theorem (Chern-Simons,…)
given
\array{
\Omega^3_{\mathbb{Z}} &\to&
(M)\Omega^3(M) &\stackrel{a}{to}& \hat H^4(M) &\to& H^4(M,\mathbb{Z}) &\to& 0
\\
&&
H &\mapsto& \hat{\frac{1}{2}p_1(A)}
&\mapsto&
\frac{1}{2}p_1(P) = 0
&&
}
in particular
\array{
&& \mathbb{R}
\\
& {}^{\int H} \nearrow & \downarrow
\\
\mathbb{Z}_3(M)
&\stackrel{\hat {\frac{1}{2}p_1(A)}}{\to}&
\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}
}
and secondly
these two properties determine uniquely up to harmonic forms
Equivariance
H_{\rho + \pi^* \psi} = H_\rho + \pi^* H4
where
over all what this says is that if we go from
\array{
Metr(M)\times A(P) \times \{String Class\} & (g,A,S)
\\
\downarrow & \downarrow
\\
\Omega^3(P) & CS_3(A) - \pi^* H_{q,A,S}
\\
\downarrow & \downarrow
\\
\Omega^3(M) & H_{g, A \rho}
}
\array{
&& tmf^{-n}
\\
& \nearrow & \downarrow
\\
M String &\stackrel{}{\to}&
MF
}
conjecture (S. Stolz) if is String and admits a positive Ricci curvature metric, then
question: also ? no, no way!
hypothesis
If is a Spin manifold that admits a metric and String structure and is the Levi-Civita connection
such that
example
p_1 \in H^4(S^3) = 0
H^3(S^3, \mathbb{Z}) = \mathbb{Z} = number of string classes
d H = d^* H = 0 \Rightarrow H \in H^3(S^3, \mathbb{R}) \simeq \mathbb{R}
\array{
String Classes
\\
\downarrow
\\
M String^{-3} = \pi_3^S = tmf^{-3} = \mathbb{Z}/{24}
}
(can’t type the full diagram…)
consider a 1-parameter family of “berger metrics” on
rescaling the fiber in the Hopf fibration
Konrad Waldorf
Urs: I had to miss that and the following two talks, hopefully somebody else has notes. Konrad’s talk is based on his new article
one more
…
Mike Hopkins : Kervaire invariant one
…
Previous day — Main workshop page — No next day