A directed -graph, or -digraph, is a higher dimensional generalization of a directed graph with -dimensional edges spanning -dimensional vertices.
A directed -graph is like an n-category with units and composition forgotten. Indeed, an -category is a directed -graph with extra structure. To formalize this idea, we say there is a forgetful functor
where is the category of directed -graphs and is the category of small -categories. Moreover, this forgetful functor has a left adjoint
sending each directed -graph to the free -category on that -graph. A free -category on an -graph is called an -quiver.
An abstract directed -graph is a category with
objects of -dimensional edges (or -edges) for ;
morphisms , called sources and targets for ;
together with identity morphisms for .
A directed -graph is a functor Set.
A directed -graph in a category is a functor .
An -edge is called an identity (or -loop) if
A morphism sending an -edge to its respective -loop, when defined, is called an identity assigning map. Identity assigning maps satisfy
When identity assignment maps are defined for all , the directed -graph is referred to as a directed -graph with identities.
Let , , .
Any two consecutive objects together with morphism constitute a directed graph. In particular, a directed 1-graph is a directed graph.
One can define a (globular) directed -graph (or directed -graph) in a coalgebraic fashion as follows: A directed -graph consists of a collection of vertices and, for each pair of vertices and , a directed -graph . (This is a definition by structural coinduction?.) Can this be continued to a corecursive definition of -category?
Mike Shulman: I had not seen this page before it was linked from finite category, but I don’t really like ”-graph” as a name for these. When I see ”-graph” I automatically think ”-globular set”, and I expect the same will be true for many category theorists; I’ve seen the phrase used that way in print as well.
Eric: I really like the generality of this definition. Globular sets seem too limited to me, e.g. I like to have square 2-cells, but that is probably due to a less than perfect understanding. You can see some discussion and references on Revision 8 of this page. If we really decide to limit -graph to globular sets we can certainly change the name.
Mike Shulman: But you don’t have square 2-cells here either! A square 2-cell would have to have the composite of two 1-cells as its source and target, but here your 2-cells only have a single 1-cell as their source and target. It sounds like maybe what you really want is an -computad.
Eric: Thanks Mike! Todd mentioned computads in the discussion at finite category, but I didn’t realize we had a nice page: computad. Maybe we can think about how to clean things up. Based on the opening paragraph at computad, they do seem to be what I was after. I need to do some homework now. Thanks again.