nLab
fundamental infinity-groupoid of a locally infinity-connected (infinity,1)-topos

Context

(,1)-Topos Theory

(∞,1)-topos theory

Background

Definitions

Characterization

Morphisms

Extra stuff, structure and property

Models

Constructions

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Homotopy theory

Contents

Idea

Every (∞,1)-topos E has a shape Shape(E)ProGrpd. When E is locally ∞-connected then this is a genuine ∞-groupoid Π(E) ∞Grpd. We may think of this as the fundamental ∞-groupoid of the (,1)-topos regarded as a generalized space.

But also every locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos has an internal notion of fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos for objects of E, denoted Π E:EGrpd. Applied to its terminal object this does agree with the fundamental ∞-groupoid of the topos:

Π(E)Π E(*).\Pi(E) \simeq \Pi_E(*) \,.

Conversely, for an object XE, the fundamental ∞-groupoid Π E(X) internal to E can be identified with the fundamental ∞-groupoid of the locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos E/X.

Definition

Definition

For (Π EΓ ELConst E):EGrpd a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos we say its fundamental -groupoid is

Π(E):=Π E(*),\Pi(E) := \Pi_E(*) \,,

where * is the terminal object of E.

In other words, it is the internal fundamental ∞-groupoid of the terminal object of E.

Properties

Let H be a locally -connected (,1)-topos and XH an object. Then also the over-(∞,1)-topos H/X is locally -connected (as discussed there).

We have then two different definitions of the fundamental -groupoid of X: once as Π H(X) – the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos – and once as Π(H/X).

Proposition

These agree:

Π H(X)Π(H/X).\Pi_{\mathbf{H}}(X) \simeq \Pi(\mathbf{H}/X) \,.
Proof

Since XIdX is the terminal object in H/X we have by definition

Π(H/X)=Π H/X(Id X).\Pi(\mathbf{H}/X) = \Pi_{\mathbf{H}/X}(Id_X) \,.

Now observe that Π H/X=Π HX ! since the terminal global section geometric morphism of the over-topos is

H/XX *X *X !HΓ HLConst HΠ HGrpd\mathbf{H}/X \stackrel{\overset{X_!}{\to}}{\stackrel{\overset{X^*}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{X_*}{\to}}} \mathbf{H} \stackrel{\overset{\Pi_{\mathbf{H}}}{\to}}{\stackrel{\overset{LConst_{\mathbf{H}}}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Gamma_{\mathbf{H}}}{\to}}} \infty Grpd

and that X ! in the etale geometric morphism is the projection map that sends YX to Y.

Definition

Let LC(,1)Topos denote the full sub-(∞,1)-category of (∞,1)Topos determined by the locally ∞-connected objects.

Proposition

The (,1)-category Gpd (as the category of local homeomorphisms over Gpd) is reflective in LC(,1)Topos,

GrpdΠLC(,1)Topos\infty Grpd \stackrel{\overset{\Pi}{\leftarrow}}{\hookrightarrow} LC(\infty,1)Topos

with the reflector given by forming the fundamental -groupoid.

Proof

Any ∞-groupoid G gives rise to an (∞,1)-presheaf (∞,1)-topos PSh(G)=[G op,Gpd], which by the (∞,1)-Grothendieck construction is equivalent to the over-(∞,1)-topos Gpd/G. The (,1)-toposes of this form are, by definition, those for which the unique (∞,1)-geometric morphism to Gpd is a local homeomorphism of toposes. This construction embeds Gpd as a full sub-(∞,1)-category of (∞,1)Topos:

PSh():GrpdLC(,1)Topos.PSh(-) : \infty Grpd \hookrightarrow LC(\infty,1)Topos \,.

since in particular the (,1)-toposes PSh(G) are locally ∞-connected.

To show that Π is a left adjoint (∞,1)-functor to PSh() we demonstrate a natural hom-equivalence

LC(,1)Topos(E,(,1)PSh(A))Grpd(Π E(*),A)LC(\infty,1)Topos(E,(\infty,1)PSh(A)) \simeq \infty Grpd(\Pi_E(*), A)

for ELC(,1)Topos and AGrpd.

At shape of an (∞,1)-topos it is shown that we have a natural equivalence

(,1)Topos(E,PSh(A))Γ ELConst EG=:Shape(E)(A).(\infty,1)Topos(E, PSh(A)) \simeq \Gamma_E LConst_E G =: Shape(E)(A) \,.

Now observe that furthermore we have a sequence of natural equivalences

Shape(E)(A) =Γ(LConst(A)) Grpd(*,Γ(LConst(A))) E(LConst(*),LConst(A)) E(*,LConst(A)) Grpd(Π E(*),A)..\begin{aligned} Shape(E)(A) &= \Gamma(LConst(A))\\ &\simeq \infty Grpd(*, \Gamma(LConst(A)))\\ &\simeq E(LConst(*), LConst(A)) \\ &\simeq E(*, LConst(A)) \\ &\simeq \infty Grpd(\Pi_E(*),A). \end{aligned} \,.
Remark

So equivalently, one may say that a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos E has a shape which is representable, and its fundamental ∞-groupoid Π(H) is the representing object.

Examples

Proposition

For X a locally contractible topological space, we have an equivalence

Π((,1)Sh(X))SingX\Pi ((\infty,1)Sh(X)) \simeq Sing X

between the ordinary fundamental ∞-groupoid of X defined by the singular simplicial complex and the topos-theoretic fundamental -groupoid of the (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos (,1)Sh(X) over X.

More generally the shape of an (∞,1)-topos of (,1)Sh(X) reproduces the shape theory of X.

Revised on December 6, 2010 23:10:52 by Urs Schreiber (131.211.233.37)