(This is partially an account of the paper by Abels and Holz (1993) listed in the references below. It is augmented with some simple examples and discussion.)
For a group $G$ and a family, $\mathcal{H}$, of subgroups of $G$, consider the nerve of the covering of the set of elements of $G$ by the cosets $H g$, for $H\in \mathcal{H}$. Although this is a Čech nerve (and thus we have an established notation for nerves as in Čech method), we will denote it $N(\mathfrak{H})$ as in the source.
The group $G$ is generated by the union of the subgroups $H$ in $\mathcal{H}$ if and only if $N(\mathfrak{H})$ is connected.
The group $G$ is the coproduct of the subgroups, amalgamated along their intersections, if and only if $N(\mathfrak{H})$ is simply connected.
The point of the article is to explore the consequences of the higher connectivity of $N(\mathfrak{H})$, corresponding to ‘higher generation by the subgroups’, but, from the nPOV, perhaps the real questions are to ask in what way does the homotopy type of $N(\mathfrak{H})$ influence the properties of $G$.
The techniques used include the bar resolution construction and homotopy colimits. There are applications to Tits systems and to buildings.
We start with a group, $G$, and a family, $\mathcal{H} = \{H_i\mid i\in I\}$ of subgroups of $G$. Each subgroup, $H$, determines a family of right cosets, $H_g$, which cover the set, $G$. Of course, these partition $G$, so there are no non-trivial intersections between them. If we use all the right cosets, $H_ig$, for all the $H_i$ in $\mathcal{H}$, then, of course, we expect to get non-trivial intersections.
Let $\mathfrak{H} = \coprod_{i\in I}H_i\backslash G= \{ H_i g\mid H_i\in \mathcal{H}\},$ where the $g$ is more as an indicator of right cosets than strictly speaking an index. This is the family of all right cosets of subgroups in $\mathcal{H}$. This covers $G$ and we write $N(\mathfrak{H})$ for the corresponding simplicial complex, which is the nerve of this covering.
More formally:
Let $G$ be a group and $\mathcal{H}$ a family of subgroups of $G$. Let $\mathfrak{H}$ denote the corresponding covering family of right cosets, $H_ig$, $H_i \in \mathcal{H}$. (We will write $\mathfrak{H} = \mathfrak{H}(G,\mathcal{H})$ or even $\mathfrak{H} = (G,\mathcal{H})$, as a shorthand as well.) The nerve of $\mathfrak{H}$ is the simplicial complex, $N(\mathfrak{H})$, whose vertices are the cosets, $H_ig$, $i \in I$, and where a non-empty finite family, $\{H_ig_i\}_{i\in J}$, is a simplex if it has non-empty intersection.
If $\mathcal{H}$ consists just of one subgroup, $H$, then $\mathfrak{H}$ is just the set of cosets, $H\backslash G$ and $N(\mathfrak{H})$ is 0-dimensional, consisting just of 0-simplices / vertices.
If $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1,H_2\}$, (and $H_1$ and $H_2$ are not equal!), then any right $H_1$ coset, $H_1g$, will intersect some of the right $H_2$-cosets, for instance, $H_1g\cap H_2g$ always contains $g$. The nerve, $N(\mathfrak{H})$, is a bipartite graph, considered as a simplicial complex. (The number of edges will depend on the sizes of $H_1$, $H_2$ and $H_1\cap H_2$, etc.) It is just a graphical way of illustrating the intersections of the cosets, a sort of intersection diagram.
As a specific very simple example, consider:
Take $H_1 = \langle a \rangle = \{1, (1 2 3), (1 3 2)\}$, yielding two cosets $H_1$ and $H_1b$.
Similarly take $H_2 = \langle b\rangle = \{1, (1 2)\}$ giving cosets $H_2$, $H_2a$ and $H_2a^2$.
The covering of $S_3$ is then $\mathfrak{H} = \{H_1,H_1b,H_2,H_2a,H_2a^2\}$, and the nerve is a complete bipartite graph? on $2+3$-vertices.
A family, $\mathcal{H}$, of subgroups of $G$ is called $n$-generating if the nerve, $N(\mathfrak{H})$, of the corresponding coset covering is (n-1)-connected, i.e., $\pi_i N(\mathfrak{H}) = 0$ for $i\lt n$.
Rephrasing and extending comments made earlier, we have
There are isomorphisms:
(a) $\pi_0N(\mathfrak{H}) \cong G/\langle\bigcup H_j\rangle;$
(b) $\pi_1N(\mathfrak{H}) \cong Ker(\underset{\cap}{\sqcup} \mathcal{H}\to G).$
Keeping in the case where $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1,H_2\}$, so two subgroups of $G$ then we have that $\underset{\cap}{\sqcup} \mathcal{H}\to G$ is an isomorphism if and only if $N( \mathfrak{H})$ is a tree. This gives one of the basic types of a graph of groups?. In more generality, if $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1,\ldots ,H_n\}$ then there is a complex of groups associated with $N( \mathfrak{H})$.
A more complex family of examples of the above situation occurs in algebraic K-theory. This has the general linear group, $G\ell _n(R)$, of invertible $n\times n$ matrices together with a family of subgroups corresponding to lower triangular matrices, …. but with some subtleties involved.
We say an $n\times n$ matrix, $A = (a_{ij})$ is $\sigma$-triangular if, when $i\stackrel{\sigma}{\leq} j$ is false, $a_{ij}=0$, and all diagonal entries, $a_{ii}$ are $1$.
We let $T_n^\sigma(R)$ be the subgroup of $G\ell_n(R)$ formed by the $\sigma$-triangular matrices and then look at all such subgroups for all $n$, considering the stable general linear group $G\ell(R)$ as the colimit of the nested sequence of all the $G\ell_n(R)$, take $G = G\ell(R)$. Considering the family, $\mathcal{H}$, of all the $T_n^\sigma(R)$, form the corresponding nerve, $N(\mathfrak{H})$. This space has the same homotopy type as the Volodin model for algebraic K-theory, since it is the Čech nerve of the covering $\mathfrak{H}$, whilst the Vietoris nerve of that covering is the Volodin model.