hom-set, hom-object, internal hom, exponential object, derived hom-space
loop space object, free loop space object, derived loop space
For $\mathcal{C}$ a category and $X, Y \in \mathcal{C}$ two objects, the internal hom $[X,Y] \in \mathcal{C}$ from $X$ to $Y$ is, if it exists, another object of $\mathcal{C}$ which behaves like the βobject of morphismsβ from $X$ to $Y$. In other words it is, if it exists, an internal version of the ordinary hom set $\mathcal{C} \in Set$ or more generally hom object $\mathcal{C}(X, Y) \in \mathcal{V}$ of a locally small category or $\mathcal{V}$-enriched category.
One way to make this precise is to mimic the basic property of a function set $[X,Y] = \{f : X \to Y\}$ of functions between two sets $X$ and $Y$: that is uniquely characterizes by the fact that for any other set $S$ the functions $S \to [X,Y]$ are in natural bijection with the functions $S \times X \to Y$ out of the cartesian product of $S$ with $X$. Formally this says that the functor $X\times (-)$ of taking the cartesian product with the set $S$ has a right adjoint given by the construction $[X,-]$.
This, then, is, generally, the definition of internal hom in any cartesian monoidal category or in fact in any monoidal category $(\mathcal{C}, \otimes)$: the right adjoint $[X,-]$ to the given tensor product functor $(-)\otimes X$ for all objects $X$. It may or may not exist. If it exists, one says that $(\mathcal{C}, \otimes)$ is a closed monoidal category. Explicity, the condition is that there is an isomorphism(bijection)
which is natural in all three variables. (The rightward map here is often called currying, especially in a closed monoidal category (and more especially for the $\lambda$-calculus).)
In particular this implies that in a closed monoidal category the external hom is re-obtained from the internal hom as its set of generalized elements out of the tensor unit $I \in \mathcal{C}$ in that
using that $I \otimes X \simeq X$ by definition of the tensor unit.
Here βclosedβ in βclosed monoidal categoryβ is in the sense that forming βhom-setsβ does not lead βout of the categoryβ. In fact the internal hom of a cartesian monoidal category is indeed the hom as seen in the internal logic of that category (the function type).
More generally, one can consider objects that satisfy some basic universal properties that an internal hom should satisfy even in the absence of a monoidal structure. If such objects exist one speaks therefore just of a closed category. Every closed category may be seen as a category enriched over itself. Accordingly, an internal hom is after all a special case of a hom-object, for the special case of this enrichment over itself.
Let $(\mathcal{C}, \otimes)$ be a monoidal category. An internal hom in $\mathcal{C}$ is a functor
such that for every object $X \in \mathcal{C}$ we have a pair of adjoint functors
If this exists, $(\mathcal{C}, \otimes)$ is called a closed monoidal category.
Let $(\mathcal{C}, \otimes)$ be a closed monoidal category.
For $X,Y \in \mathcal{C}$ two objects, the evaluation map
is the $((-)\otimes X \vdash [X,-])$-adjunct of the identity $id_{[X,Y]} : [X,Y] \to [X,Y]$.
If $\mathcal{C}$ is specifically a locally cartesian closed category, then in terms of the type theory internal language of $\mathcal{C}$ the evaluation map is the categorical semantics of the dependent type which in type theory syntax is
with function application on the right.
Let $(\mathcal{C}, \times)$ be a closed monoidal category.
For $X, Y, Z \in \mathcal{C}$ three objects, the composition morphism
is the $((-)\times X \vdash [X,-])$-adjunct of the following composite of two evaluation maps, def. 2:
The internal hom is the categorical semantics of what in type theory are function types
type theory | category theory | |
---|---|---|
syntax | semantics | |
natural deduction | universal construction | |
function type | internal hom | |
type formation | $\frac{\vdash\: X \colon Type \;\;\;\;\; \vdash\; A\colon Type}{\vdash \; \left(X \to A\right) \colon Type}$ | |
term introduction | $\frac{x \colon X \;\vdash\; a(x) \colon A}{\vdash (x \mapsto a\left(x\right)) \colon \left(X \to A\right) }$ | |
term elimination | $\frac{\vdash\; f \colon \left(X \to A\right)\;\;\;\; \vdash \; x \colon X}{x \colon X\;\vdash\; f(x) \colon A}$ | |
computation rule | $(y \mapsto a(y))(x) = a(x)$ |
For each object $S$ the (internal hom $\dashv$ tensor product)-adjunction induces a monad $[S, S \otimes (-)]$. In computer science this monad (in computer science) is called the state monad.
In the category Set of sets, regarded as a cartesian monoidal category, the internal hom is given by function sets. This exists, by the discussion there, as soon as the foundational axioms are strong enough, for instance as soon as there are power objects, which is the special case of a function set into the 2-element set.
Let $C$ be a site. Let $\mathbf{H} = Sh(C)$ be the sheaf topos over $C$ or in fact the (β,1)-sheaf (β,1)-topos. We discuss the internal hom of this regard as a cartesian monoidal category/cartesian monoidal (β,1)-category.
The sheaf topos $\mathbf{H}$ is a cartesian closed category / cartesian closed (β,1)-category. In fact it is a locally cartesian closed category / locally cartesian closed (β,1)-category.
Hence the internal hom exist.
=β
For $X, Y \in \mathbf{H}$ two objects, the internal hom-object
is the sheaf/(β,1)-sheaf given by the assignment
for all objects $U \in C$ which on the right we regard under the Yoneda embedding/β-Yoneda embedding $U \in C \stackrel{Yoneda}{\hookrightarrow} \mathbf{H}$.
Here
$U \times X \in \mathbf{H}$ is the cartesian product if $U$ with $X$
$\mathbf{H}(-,-)$ is the hom set-functor / hom space-(β,1)-functor of $\mathbf{H}$.
See also at closed monoidal structure on presheaves.
By the Yoneda lemma/(β,1)-Yoneda lemma we have natural equivalences
and by the defining $((-)\times X \vdash [X,-])$adjunction this is naturally equivalent to
In the (homotopy-)type theory syntax of the internal language of $\mathbf{H}$ the internal hom $[X, Y] \in \mathbf{H}$ is the categorical semantics of the function type
For $X, Y \in \mathbf{H}$, the evaluation map, def. 2,
is the morphism of sheaves which over each $U \in C$ sends a morphism of sheaves $\theta : \mathbf{H}(-,U) \times X(-) \to Y(-)$ (which is the first component by prop. 2) and an $x \in \mathbf{H}(U,X)$ to
See (MacLane-Moerdijk, p. 46).
For $X, Y, Z \in \mathbf{H}$ three objects of $\mathbf{H}$, the canonical composition morphism, def. 3,
is given by the morphism of presheaves/(β,1)-presheaves whose component over $U \in C$ is the morphism of sets/β-groupoids
which sends a pair $(f : U \times X \to Y, g : U \times Y \to Z)$ to the composite
where $\Delta_U : U \to U \times U$ is the diagonal morphism on $U$.
By definition 3 the morphism is the adjunct of the double evaluation map
Since the cartesian product of two sheaves $A, B \in \mathbf{H}$ is computed objectwise
it follows that over each $U \in C$ this double evaluation map is the morphism of sets/$\infty$-groupoids
hence by prop. 2
where now by prop. \ref this is the external evaluation.
Intuitively this says that the composite of a $U$-parameterized family of maps $\{f(u) : X \to Y| u \in U\}$ with a $U$-parameterized family of maps ${g(u) : Y \to Z| u \in U}$ is the $U$-family given by the parameter-wise composite $\{g(u)\circ f(u) | u \in U\}$.
The internal automorphism group/automorphism β-group of an object $X \in \mathbf{H}$ is the subobject
of the internal hom which is maximal subject to the property that the composition of prop. 4 becomes invertible.
The (homotopy-)type theory syntax for this is given by the type of equivalences in homotopy type theory
Let $\mathbf{H}$ be a locally cartesian closed category. This means that for each object $X \in \mathbf{H}$ the slice category $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$ is a cartesian closed category. The product in the slice is given by the fiber product over $X$ computed in $\mathbf{H}$. Fairly detailed discussion of constructions of the internal hom in such slices $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$ is at locally cartesian closed category β cartesian closure in terms of base change and dependent product.
We record some further properties
For $\mathcal{C}$ a locally cartesian closed category and $f \colon X \to Y$ any morphism in $\mathcal{C}$, the inverse image $f^*$ of the corresponding base change adjunction
is a cartesian closed functor.
This is discussed in more detail at cartesian closed functor β Examples.
So for $A,B \in \mathcal{C}_{/Y}$ we have isomorphisms
between the image of the internal hom under $f^*$ and the internal hom of the images of $A$ and $B$ separately.
For $\mathbf{H}$ a locally cartesian closed category, $f \colon X \to Y$ any morphism, and $A, B \in \mathbf{H}_{/X}$ two objects in the slice over $X$, there is a natural morphism
Here are two ways to get this morphism:
For any object $U \in \mathbf{H}_{/Y}$ we have a canonical morphism of hom sets
where the first and the last steps use adjunction properties, where the morphism in the middle is the component of the dependent sum functor, and where βFrob.Rec.β is Frobenius reciprocity.
Since this is natural in $U$, the Yoneda lemma implies the claimed morphism.
There is the composite morphism
of the adjunction (co)units and the evaluation map of the internal hom. Its hom-adjunct is
using prop. 5 on the right. The hom-adjunct of that in turn is
and by symmetry the morphism that we are after:
If $Y$ is the terminal object (for simplicity), then the morphism of prop. 6 can be understood as follows: a global element of the dependent product $\prod_f [A,B]$ is given by a commuting diagram in $\mathbf{H}$ of the form
The map in prop. 6 picks out the top horizontal morphism in this diagram.
Consider the site $C =$ SmthMfd of smooth manifolds (and the open cover coverage) or equivalently over the dense subsite CartSp of Cartesian spaces and smooth functions between these.
The sheaf topos/(β,1)-sheaf (β,1)-topos $\mathbf{H} = Sh(C)$ is that of smooth spaces/smooth β-groupoids. So the discussion of internal homs here is a special case of the above discussion In a sheaf topos.
For $X , Y \in SmthMfd \hookrightarrow \mathbf{H}$ two smooth manifolds, the internal hom $[X,Y] \in \mathbf{H}$ is the mapping space between them regarded as a diffeological space.
See at manifold structure of mapping spaces for when this internal hom is representable again by a smooth manifold.
For $X \in SmthMfd \hookrightarrow \mathbf{H}$ the internal automorphism group, example 1, of $X$ is the diffeomorphism group of $X$, regarded as a diffeological group
The category $SVect$ of super vector spaces is the category of $\mathbb{Z}/2$-graded vector spaces. Thus, its objects are pairs of vector spaces $(V_+,V_-)$, with $V_+$ called the even part and $V_-$ the odd part. The morphisms in $SVect$ are likewise pairs of linear maps, i.e. we define $SVect$ to be $Vect \times Vect = Vect^{\mathbb{Z}/2}$, as usual for any sort of graded object. With this definition of the category $SVect$, we capture the concepts of superalgebra and so on in succinct categorical terms.
Because the morphisms in $SVect$ send even things to even things and odd things to odd things, they are sometimes called even linear maps, and one may write
Note that $SVect$ is enriched over $Vect$, i.e. these hom-sets are vector spaces.
Occasionally, however, one does need to refer to the odd linear maps, which send even things to odd things and odd things to even things. That is, an odd linear map $V\to W$ is a pair of linear maps $V_+ \to W_-$ and $V_-\to W_+$. The internal-hom in $SVect$ allows us to capture these as well: it is the following super vector space:
With this definition, $SVect$ becomes a closed monoidal category.
We can equivalently regard a super vector spaces $(V_+,V_-)$ as being the direct sum vector space $V_+ \oplus V_-$ equipped with this direct sum decomposition. If we view the internal-hom $[V,W]$ in this way as well, then we have
In other words, any linear map between these βsummedβ super vector spaces decomposes uniquely as the sum of an even linear map and an odd one.
A similar thing happens in the category $Ban$ of Banach spaces and short linear operators. The external hom consists of only the short linear maps (those bounded by $1$):
This definition of morphism recovers the most specific notion of isomorphism of Banach spaces, as well as defining the product and coproduct as the direct sum completed with $p = \infty$ or $p = 1$ respectively.
But the internal hom is the Banach space of all bounded linear maps:
This is a Banach space and makes $Ban$ into a closed category.
A discussion query (R. Brown, T. Bartels, M. Shulman) about internal hom is at $n$Forum here.