Two polygons in the Eucledean plane have the same area? iff they are scissors congruent in the sense that they can be subdivided into finitely many pieces such that each piece of is congruent to exactly one piece of .
Hilbert’s third problem (see Hilbert's problems) was if the analogue of this elementary fact holds for polyhedra in 3-dimensional space. Dehn solved this problem in terms of Dehn’s invariant which, in a modern language, assigns to a polyhedron an element in . If both the Dehn’s invariant and volume of two (3-dimensional finite) polyhedra in Eucledean space are equal then they are scissors congruent.
The generalized Hilbert’s third problem is asking for two finite -polytopes in Eucledean, spherical or hyperbolic -space are scissors equivalent in terms of computable invariants.
The scissors congruence group where is a subgroup of the group of isometries of , is the free abelian group on symbols , for all polytopes in modulo the relations
(i) when ,
In the book
Dupont explains the relations of dilogarithms, Reidemeister torsion, Dehn invariant (which is from 1900) and their role in understanding the 19th century scissors congruence…The subject is very active now. After physicist Anatole Kirillov found the quantum dilogarithm and L. D. Fadeeev and Kashaev published a paper about it (and discovered the pentagon relation), this became an important topic in quantization (Fadeev’s modular double, quantization of Teichmuller spaces, work of A. Fock, L. Takhdajan, Aldrovandi etc.) of hyperbolic spaces and generally the hyperbolic geometry and with relations, together with classical dilogarithm to many other subjects (e.g. to the work of Reznikov and theory or regulators, specially Borel regulator in higher algebraic K-theory, important for study of motives (Goncharov et al.) and, as W. Nahm shown, also relevant for understanding some phenomena in CFT).