nLab
sub-(infinity,1)-category

Context

(,1)-topos theory

(∞,1)-topos theory

Background

Definitions

Characterization

Morphisms

Extra stuff, structure and property

Models

Constructions

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Notions of subcategory

Contents

Idea

The analog of the notion of subcategory for (∞,1)-categories.

Definition

Say that an equivalence of (∞,1)-categories DC exhibits D as a 0-subcategory of C.

Then define recursively, for n:

an n-subcategory of an (,1)-category D for n1 is an (∞,1)-functor

F:DCF : D \to C

such that for all objects x,yD the component-(,1)-functor on the hom-objects

F x,y:Hom D(x,y)Hom C(F(x),F(y))F_{x,y} : Hom_D(x,y) \to Hom_C(F(x), F(y))

exhibits an (n1)-subcategory.

Special cases

1-Subcategory / full subcategory

A full subcategory is a 1-subcategory, exhibited by a full and faithful (∞,1)-functor.

For sSet-enriched and quasi-categories

Let C and D be incarnated specifically as fibrant simplicially enriched categories. Then for F:DC a full and faithful (,1)-functor, choose in each preimage F 1(c) for each object cC a representative, and let C be the full sSet-enriched subcategory on these representatives.

Then the evident projection functor DD is manifestly an equivalence and the original F:DC factors as

F:DDC,F : D \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} D' \hookrightarrow C \,,

where the second morphism is an ordinary inclusion of objects and hom-complexes.

Reflective sub-(,1)-categories

If the (,1)-functor F:DC has a left adjoint (∞,1)-functor L:CD, then F is full and faithful and hence exhibits a 1-subcategory precisely if the counit

LFId DL \circ F \stackrel{}{\to} Id_D

is an equivalence of (∞,1)-functors. (See also HTT, p. 308).

In this case D is a reflective (∞,1)-subcategory.

2-Subcategory

For sSet-enriched and quasi-categories

Let the (,1)-categories C and D concretely be incarnated as fibrant simplicially enriched categories.

Write hC:=Ho(C) and hD:=Ho(D) for the corresponding homotopy category of an (∞,1)-category (hom-wise the connected components of the corresponding simplicially enriched category).

Let hDhC be a faithful functor. Then if we have a pullback in sSet-Cat

D C hD hC\array{ D &\to& C \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ h D &\to& h C }

D is a 2-sub-(,1)-category of C. This pullback manifestly produces the simplicially enriched category whose

  • objects are those of hD;

  • hom-complexes are precisely the unions of those connected components of the hom-complexes of C whose equivalence class is present in hD.

Therefore the inclusion functor DC is on each hom-complex a full and faithful (∞,1)-functor. Hence this identifies D as a 2-subcategory of C.

If hDhC is an inclusion on objects (which is a bit evil to say) then this is the definition of subcategory of an (,1)-category that appears in HTT, section 1.2.11.

As 2-subobjects

Let core(Set *)core(Set) be the 2-subobject classifier in the (∞,1)-topos ∞Grpd. Then for CGrpd a 1-subobject is classified by an -functor CSet. This factors through the homotopy category of C as ChCSet. Since Set *Set is the universal faithful functor, the pullback

Q Set * hC Set\array{ Q &\to& Set_* \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ h C &\to& Set }

gives an ordinary subcategory of hC. This means that the total pullback DC

D hD Set * C hC Set\array{ D &\to& h D &\to& Set_* \\ \downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow \\ C &\to& h C &\to& Set }

gives a 2-sub-(,1)-category K of X (where both happen to be -groupoids) here.

References

What we call a 2-subcategory of an (,1)-category appears in section 1.2.11 of

Revised on November 18, 2011 10:59:14 by Urs Schreiber (217.232.18.193)