There is only one nontrivial -bundle on .
There is only one nontrivial -bundle on , and it lifts to the previous bundle.
Any -bundle on trivialises on pulling back along . Here is the total space of an -bundle
Any -bundle on , when pulled back to , lifts to an -bundle.
Given any fibre and classifying map there is a canonical lift of through . This is because maps to a point in and so we get an up-to-homotopy unique map to the homotopy fibre of .
-bundles on are classified by and , where the latter is subject to the condition , for the Pontryagin square operation. Here “” means under the map .
I guess this means that the 4-type of is . I need to get at the 5-type, most notably the next -invariant, .
Antieau and Williams show this is not trivial, and identify the other independent elements, namely and . In particular, is not either of those.
Might it be something like ? Note that by the description of , it can’t come from a class there, like the other two basis elements for do.
Note that when working on . And so one has .
So if I have an -bundle on which lifts to an -bundle, i.e. , then its pullback to trivialises.
I would like to know what happens when I pull back an -bundle with - will it never trivialise? Or depending on parity? Or always?
The moduli space of -instantons of on has dimension , and we can only have , so it is inahbited only for (cf Buchdahl Instantons on ). In particular, one must take to get a non-liftable -bundle.
If the nontrivial -bundle on arises as a pullback from of a bundle with , then there are instantons on , and in particular, instantons, since the connection clearly lifts to an connection on the (unique) lifted bundle.
Every -bundle on can be lifted to a -bundle. The obstruction to restricting to an -bundle is identical to the obstruction to lift the original bundle to such a thing.
Then is the mod 2 reduction of the first Chern class of the bundle (and presumably is ).
We could then repeat the analysis using -bundles pulled back to .
The tangent bundle of is in some sense detected by the secondary cohomology class of Petersen and Stein (_Annals_ 1962). In particular, it can see that reduces to a rank-4 bundle (hence the -bundle we know and love, but it can’t see this as far as I can tell), but doesn’t reduce to a rank-3 bundle.
However, they only show that is nontrivial by appealing to known results about non-existence of nonzero sections of the resulting rank-4 bundle, rather than calculating .
Also, is the pullback along of the extension along of . This doesn’t seem like it could detect a nontrivial down on !
One thing Nick suggested is to see if one can build an arbitrary -bundle on by deleting a point and gluing two trivial bundles along a ball surrounding it, twisted in some sense by the (nontrivial) line bundle given by , which is the extension of the Hopf fibration, and what detects (and which survives to give a nontrivial , as an -bundle).
Given such an explicit realisation, one could then pull this back, along with the gluing data, to and see if it becomes trivial there.
The nontrivial -bundle on is .
One could ask whether there is descent data for this bundle to , for instance depending on an integer, which would become (if this worked) of the descended bundle.
Two options: either a bundle survives, in which case I know there is an instanton, or no bundle survives, in which case if I find an instanton it would be potentially a new result about the moduli space of such on .
Last revised on September 25, 2016 at 13:47:56. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.