Showing changes from revision #10 to #11:
Added | Removed | Changed
A pre-regular fibration is a bifibration , where and have finite products that are preserved by and that preserve cartesian arrows, satisfying Frobenius reciprocity and the Beck--Chevalley condition for product-absolute pullback squares of types C, D and E in . A regular fibration is a pre-regular fibration that also satisfies the Beck–Chevalley condition for type-B squares.
The preservation conditions on products are equivalent to requiring that each fibre have finite products and that these be preserved by all reindexing functors .
Here and in my thesis I originally required regular fibrations to satisfy the type-A BC condition, but I now believe that it holds automatically as long as E does.
By Shulman’s construction, a pre-regular fibrationShulman’s construction , over a pre-regular fibration gives over rise to a cartesian equipment , and gives hence rise to a cartesian bicategory equipment . , Type-E and squares hence in a the cartesian bicategory are exact because they satisfy the BC condition in the fibration. . then Type-E becomes squares compact in closed the bicategory, bicategory which are is exact to because say they that satisfy there the is BC an condition equivalence in the fibration. given then by becomes composing compact with closed bicategory, which is to say that there is an equivalence (left given to by right) composing and with (right (left to left), right) where and with is (right the to diagonal left), at where and is the diagonal at the and map from to the terminal map object. from We will write this as for to the terminal object. We will write this as and for for and . Similarly for there is an equivalence , . which Similarly we there will is write an as equivalence , and which we will write as . If and . then If . The then type-E BC condition implies that , . and The therefore type-E BC condition implies that , and also therefore that , and also that . and. (See Carboni–Walters and Walters–Wood for all of this.)
The claim now is that modulo these isomorphisms, the morphisms required to be invertible by exactness of or BC for type-A squares are equal to and . Being the images under equivalences of invertible morphisms, then, they must themselves be invertible.
The following pictures show the essential parts of the proof using string diagrams, which can be read top-to-bottom as morphisms in a cartesian bicategory or bottom-to-top as objects in a monoidal bifibration as in this paper.
A regular fibration posesses exactly the structure needed to interpret regular logic, i.e. the -fragment of first-order logic.
…
A category is regular if and only if the subobject fibration (that sends to ) is regular.
For our purposes, a regular category is one that has finite limits and pullback-stable images.
If is a regular category, then the adjunctions come from pullbacks and images in (Elephant lemma 1.3.1) as does the Frobenius property (op. cit. lemma 1.3.3). The terminal object of is the identity on , and binary products in the fibres are given by pullback. The products are preserved by reindexing functors because (the are right adjoints but also because) and have the same universal property. The projection clearly preserves these products. The Beck–Chevalley condition follows from pullback-stability of images in .
Conversely, suppose is a regular fibration. We need to show that has equalizers (to get finite limits) and pullback-stable images. But the equalizer of is . For images, let as in Elephant lemma 1.3.1. Pullback-stability follows from the Beck–Chevalley condition, which holds for all pullback squares in by Seely, Theorem sec. 8.
Last revised on December 9, 2015 at 17:37:59. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.