http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/nerve+and+realization
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117401/is-every-functor-inducing-a-homotopy-equivalence-a-composition-of-adjoint-functor claims that any adjoint functor induced homotopy equiv on the nerve
For any (small?) category , one defines a simplicial set , called its nerve. The -simplices of a category is the set of functors , see Dundas, page 24, for details. This construction is an extension of the Yoneda embedding , and embeds as a full subcategory of . The nerve has a left adjoint.
If is given by a group , then is a space.
Every nerve of a group is a Kan complex, but not every nerve of a category. Actually, a nerve of a small category is a fibrant simplicial set iff the category is a groupoid.
Remark: Every simplicial group (regarded as a simplicial set) is fibrant.
Cox: Homotopy limits and the homotopy type of functor categories; has an alternative description of the nerve of a small category. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0407022
Ref: Page 10 of Baues: Homotopy types (e)
Nerves for bicats, see http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5058
Q from Maltsiniotis to ALGTOP: Let be the nerve functor from categories to simplicial sets and its left adjoint. It is well known that (or equivalently ) is not compatible with weak equivalences, but what about weakly contractible objects? Grothendieck asks in Pursuing Stacks to find a weakly contractible simplicial set such that (or ) is not weakly contractible, or prove that no such exist.
nLab page on Nerve