Homotopy Type Theory ETCS with elements > history (Rev #6, changes)

Showing changes from revision #5 to #6: Added | Removed | Changed

Contents

In usual presentations of categorical set theories such ascategorical set theories? such as ETCS?, the set theory is usually a theory of sets and functions? in an abstract category, with elements? being defined as the global elements?, the morphisms? out of the terminal object? . However, this approach poses a few conceptual and practical issues, namely that in ordinary mathematical practice, elements are not the same as functions out of the terminal set, although they are isomorphic to each other, and function evaluation of elements defined as function composition of functions out of the terminal set is an abuse of notation.πŸ™\mathbb{1}, although AA is in bijection with the function set A πŸ™A^\mathbb{1}, and function evaluation of elements defined as function composition of functions out of the terminal set is an abuse of notation.

There are other structural set theories?, such as SEAR , which explicitly put in the elements of a set as a primitive of the theory: theory. this In is such equivalent a to theory saying involving that sets and functions, function evaluation would be a primitive of the category theory, is rather an than derived from function composition ofconcrete category rather than an abstract category. In such a presentation involving sets and functions, function evaluation? would be a primitive of the theory, rather than derived from function composition of global elements? , and the axiom of function extensionality is likewise defined directly on the elements. The Such presentation of such a concrete categorical set theory reads more like a traditional presentation of set theory in terms of sets and elements, rather than category theory. However, in contrast toSEAR, this theory is essentially the same structurally as ETCS?: as a theory of sets and functions.

In this presentation, we will be adapting Tom Leinster’s presentation of ETCS to the concrete setting. Some of these axioms might be redundant, but that was true of Tom Leinster’s original presentation.Tom Leinster?’s presentation of ETCS.

Basic primitives

Our theory has the following primitives:

  • Some things called sets;

  • For every set AA, these things called elements in AA, with elements aa in AA written as a∈Aa \in A;

  • For every set AA and BB, these things called functions from AA to BB, with functions ff from AA to BB written as f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B;

  • For every set AA and BB, an operation called function evaluation assigning every element a∈Aa \in A and function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B an element f(a)∈Bf(a) \in B;

  • For every set AA, a function id A:Aβ†’Aid_A:A \to A called the identity function of AA;

  • For every set AA, BB, and CC, an operation called function composition assigning every function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B and g:Bβ†’Cg:B \to C a function g∘f:Aβ†’Cg \circ f:A \to C;

Equality of elements and functions

For every set AA and elements a∈Aa \in A and b∈Ab \in A, there is a relation a=ba = b called equality of elements, such that

  • for every element a∈Aa \in A, a=aa = a
  • for every element a∈Aa \in A and b∈Ab \in A, a=ba = b implies that b=ab = a
  • for every element a∈Aa \in A, b∈Ab \in A, and c∈Ac \in A, a=ba = b and b=cb = c implies that a=ca = c.

For every set AA and BB and functions f:A→Bf:A \to B and g:A→Bg:A \to B, there is a relation f=gf = g called equality of functions, such that

  • for every function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, f=ff = f
  • for every function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B and g:Aβ†’Bg:A \to B, f=gf = g implies that g=fg = f
  • for every function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, g:Aβ†’Bg:A \to B, and h:Aβ†’Bh:A \to B, f=gf = g and g=hg = h implies that f=hf = h.

Basic axioms for functions

Axiom of identity functions. For every set AA and for every element a∈Aa \in A, id A(a)=aid_A(a) = a.

Axiom of composition/evaluation equivalence. For every set AA, BB, and CC, and for every element a∈Aa \in A, (g∘f)(a)=g(f(a))(g \circ f)(a) = g(f(a)).

Axiom of extensionality. For every set AA and BB and for every function f:A→Bf:A \to B and g:A→Bg:A \to B, if f(x)=g(x)f(x) = g(x) for all elements x:Ax \colon A, then f=gf = g.

The associativity and unit laws of function composition follow from the axioms:

  • For every set AA and BB, function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, and element a∈Aa \in A,

    (g∘id A)(a)=g(id A(a))=g(a)(g \circ id_A)(a) = g(id_A(a)) = g(a)

    and extensionality implies that g∘id A=gg \circ id_A = g.

  • For every set AA and BB, function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, and element a∈Aa \in A,

    (id B∘g)(a)=id B(g(a))=g(a)(id_B \circ g)(a) = id_B(g(a)) = g(a)

    and extensionality implies that id B∘g=gid_B \circ g = g.

  • For every set AA, BB, CC, and DD, function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, g:Bβ†’Cg:B \to C, and h:Cβ†’Dh:C \to D, and element a∈Aa \in A,

    (h∘(g∘f))(a)=h((g∘f)(a))=h(g(f(a))=(h∘g)(f(a))=((h∘g)∘f)(a)(h \circ (g \circ f))(a) = h((g \circ f)(a)) = h(g(f(a)) = (h \circ g)(f(a)) = ((h \circ g) \circ f)(a)

    and extensionality implies that h∘(g∘f)=(h∘g)∘fh \circ (g \circ f) = (h \circ g) \circ f.

Thus, these axioms imply that the collection of sets, functions, and elements form a category.

Other axioms

Axiom of singletons. There is a set πŸ™\mathbb{1}, called a singleton, with a unique element *βˆˆπŸ™* \in \mathbb{1}, called a point.

Axiom of Cartesian products. For every set AA and BB, there is a set AΓ—BA \times B, called a Cartesian product of AA and BB, with a function p A:AΓ—Bβ†’Ap_A:A \times B \to A called the projection onto AA and a function p B:AΓ—Bβ†’Bp_B:A \times B \to B called the projection onto BB, such that given two elements a∈Aa \in A and b∈Bb \in B there is a unique element a,b∈AΓ—Ba, b \in A \times B such that p A(a,b)=ap_A(a, b) = a and p B(a,b)=bp_B(a, b) = b.

Axiom of fibers. For every set AA and BB, element b∈Bb \in B, and function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, there is a set f βˆ’1(b)f^{-1}(b) called the fiber of ff over bb with a function i:f βˆ’1(b)β†’Ai:f^{-1}(b) \to A, such that for every element a∈f βˆ’1(b)a \in f^{-1}(b), f(i(a))=bf(i(a)) = b. A fiber of ff over bb is also called the solution set of the equation f(x)=bf(x) = b.

An injection is a function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B such that for every element a∈Aa \in A and b∈Ab \in A, if f(a)=f(b)f(a) = f(b), then a=ba = b.

Axiom of truth values. There is a set Ξ©\Omega called a set of truth values with an element βŠ₯∈Ω\bot \in \Omega called true such that for every set AA and BB and injection f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B, there is a unique function Ο‡ A:Bβ†’Ξ©\chi_A:B \to \Omega called the classifying function of AA such that AA is the fiber of Ο‡ A\chi_A over βŠ₯\bot.

Axiom of function sets. For every set AA and BB there is a set B AB^A called the function set with a function (βˆ’)((βˆ’)):B AΓ—Aβ†’B(-)((-)):B^A \times A \to B such that for every set CC and function f:CΓ—Aβ†’Bf:C \times A \to B there is a function g:Cβ†’B Ag:C \to B^A such that for all elements c∈Cc \in C and a∈Aa \in A, g(c)(a)=f(c,a)g(c)(a) = f(c, a).

Axiom of natural numbers. There exists a set β„•\mathbb{N} called a set of natural numbers with an element 0βˆˆβ„•0 \in \mathbb{N} and a function s:β„•β†’β„•s:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} such that for every other set AA with an element a∈Aa \in A and a function g:Aβ†’Ag:A \to A, there is a unique function f:β„•β†’Af:\mathbb{N} \to A such that f(0)=af(0) = a and f(s(a))=g(f(a))f(s(a)) = g(f(a)).

A surjection is a function f:Aβ†’Bf:A \to B such that for every b∈Bb \in B the fiber of ff at bb is inhabited. A right inverse of ff is a function g:Bβ†’Ag:B \to A such that for all elements a∈Aa \in A, f(g(a))=af(g(a)) = a. A choice set is a set BB such that all surjections into BB have right inverses.

Axiom of choice. Every set is a choice set.

These axioms imply that the collection of sets, functions, and elements form a model of ETCS?.

References

Revision on May 18, 2022 at 05:53:10 by Anonymous?. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.