Formalized Homotopy Theory (Rev #12, changes)

Showing changes from revision #11 to #12:
Added | ~~Removed~~ | ~~Chan~~ged

Here are some links to proofs about homotopy theory, formalized in homotopy type theory. Please add!

Maybe we could figure out a way not to duplicate stuff between this page and homotopy groups of spheres?

Ali: Results about homotopy groups of spheres should go there, everything else here.

Cast of characters so far: Jeremy Avigad, Guillaume Brunerie, Favonia, Eric Finster, Chris Kapulkin, Dan Licata, Peter Lumsdaine, Mike Shulman, Evan Cavallo

- To do cohomology with finite coefficients, all we need is the boring work of defining $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ as an explicit group.
- Calculate some more cohomology groups.
- Compute the loop space of this construction and use it to define spectra.

cohomology * To do cohomology with finite coefficients, all we need is the boring work of defining $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ as an explicit group. * Calculate some more cohomology groups. * Compute the loop space of this construction and use it to define spectra.

- Dan’s proof for n-types.

- Dan’s construction.
- $K(G,n)$ is a spectrum, formalized

Eilenberg-MacLane space * Dan’s construction. * $K(G,n)$ is a spectrum, formalized

- Deriving cohomology theories from spectra
- Mayer-Vietoris sequence, with exposition
- Cohomology of the n-torus, which could be easily extended to any finite product of spheres.

cohomology * Deriving cohomology theories from spectra * Mayer-Vietoris sequence, with exposition * Cohomology of the n-torus, which could be easily extended to any finite product of spheres.

~~Implies ~~Freudenthal suspension theorem?~~$\pi_k(S^n) = \pi_{k+1}(S^{n+1})$~~ Implies ~~ whenever ~~$\pi_k(S^n) = \pi_{k+1}(S^{n+1})$~~$k \leq 2n - 2$~~ whenever $k \leq 2n - 2$

- Peter’s encode/decode-style proof, formalized by Dan, using a clever lemma about maps out of 2 n-connected types. This is the “95%” version, which shows that the relevant map is an equivalence on truncations.
- The full “100%” version, formalized by Dan, which shows that the relevant map is $2n$-connected.

- Mike’s proofs are in the book and Favonia formalized it. {{deadlink}}

van Kampen theorem * Mike’s proofs are in the book and Favonia formalized it. {{deadlink}}

- Favonia’s proofs (link in flux due to library rewrite).

Covering space? * Favonia’s proofs (link in flux due to library rewrite).

Blakers-Massey theorem?

- Favonia/Peter/Guillaume/Dan’s formalization of Peter/Eric/Dan’s proof (link in flux due to library rewrite).

category: homotopy theory

Revision on January 19, 2019 at 14:06:38 by Ali Caglayan. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.