nLab exotic R^4

Context

Differential geometry

synthetic differential geometry

Introductions

from point-set topology to differentiable manifolds

geometry of physics: coordinate systems, smooth spaces, manifolds, smooth homotopy types, supergeometry

Differentials

V-manifolds

smooth space

Tangency

The magic algebraic facts

Theorems

Axiomatics

cohesion

infinitesimal cohesion

tangent cohesion

differential cohesion

graded differential cohesion

singular cohesion

id ⊣ id ∨ ∨ fermionic ⇉ ⊣ ⇝ bosonic ⊥ ⊥ bosonic ⇝ ⊣ Rh rheonomic ∨ ∨ reduced ℜ ⊣ ℑ infinitesimal ⊥ ⊥ infinitesimal ℑ ⊣ & étale ∨ ∨ cohesive ʃ ⊣ ♭ discrete ⊥ ⊥ discrete ♭ ⊣ ♯ continuous ∨ ∨ ∅ ⊣ * \array{ && id &\dashv& id \\ && \vee && \vee \\ &\stackrel{fermionic}{}& \rightrightarrows &\dashv& \rightsquigarrow & \stackrel{bosonic}{} \\ && \bot && \bot \\ &\stackrel{bosonic}{} & \rightsquigarrow &\dashv& \mathrm{R}\!\!\mathrm{h} & \stackrel{rheonomic}{} \\ && \vee && \vee \\ &\stackrel{reduced}{} & \Re &\dashv& \Im & \stackrel{infinitesimal}{} \\ && \bot && \bot \\ &\stackrel{infinitesimal}{}& \Im &\dashv& \& & \stackrel{\text{étale}}{} \\ && \vee && \vee \\ &\stackrel{cohesive}{}& \esh &\dashv& \flat & \stackrel{discrete}{} \\ && \bot && \bot \\ &\stackrel{discrete}{}& \flat &\dashv& \sharp & \stackrel{continuous}{} \\ && \vee && \vee \\ && \emptyset &\dashv& \ast }

Models

Lie theory, ∞-Lie theory

differential equations, variational calculus

Chern-Weil theory, ∞-Chern-Weil theory

Cartan geometry (super, higher)

Topology

topology (point-set topology, point-free topology)

see also differential topology, algebraic topology, functional analysis and topological homotopy theory

Introduction

Basic concepts

Universal constructions

Extra stuff, structure, properties

Examples

Basic statements

Theorems

Analysis Theorems

topological homotopy theory

Contents

Idea

There exists exotic smooth structure on the Euclidean space ℝ 4\mathbb{R}^4 of dimension 4.

(For all other dimensions there is a unique smooth structure, the standard one, see at smooth structure).

Construction

Construction from the failure of smooth surgery theory

Exotic,ℝ 4\phantom{,}\mathbb{R}^4s, i.e. smooth manifolds homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic to ℝ 4\mathbb{R}^4, may be understood by comparison with exotic 7-spheres such as the Milnor spheres. In both cases there are closed topological nn-manifolds MM (n=8n = 8 resp. 44) that admit no smooth structure, but become smoothable once a closed nn-ball is removed. The failure lies in gluing the ball back in. The conclusions differ, though. For n=8n = 8, a neighbourhood of the removed ball can be taken to be diffeomorphic to Σ×ℝ\Sigma \times \mathbb{R}, where Σ\Sigma is homeomorphic to S 7 S^7 but not diffeomorphic to it, since otherwise a smooth disc could be glued in along Σ\Sigma. So Σ\Sigma is an exotic 7-sphere. For n=4n = 4 this cannot happen, since S 3 S^3 has no exotic smooth structure (by Moise's theorem, (Sco. 05, p. 101)). Instead the obstruction lies in an exotic smooth structure on the 4-dimensional collar S 3×ℝ≅ℝ 4∖{0}S^3 \times \mathbb{R} \cong \mathbb{R}^4 \setminus \{0\} itself. This is a manifestation of the failure of smooth surgery theory in dimension 4, which also produces exotic ℝ 4\mathbb{R}^4s.

Construction from the K3 surface

A concrete construction is the K3 surface K3K3, described by the homogenous equation x 4+y 4+z 4+w 4=0x^4+y^4+z^4+w^4=0 in twistor space ℂP 3\mathbb{C}P^3. (Fre. & Uhl. 84, p. 21, Sco. 05, p. 130) According to Freedman's classification, (Fre. & Uhl. 84, p. 22-24, Sco. 05, p. 240-243) it is homeomorphic to the connected sum 2M E 8¯#3(S 2×S 2)2\overline{M_{E_8}}\#3(S^2\times S^2) of twice the orientation-reversed E8 manifold M E 8M_{E_8} and thrice the complex surface S 2×S 2≅ℂP 1×ℂP 1S^2\times S^2\cong\mathbb{C}P^1\times\mathbb{C}P^1 gained from the product of the Riemann sphere with itself. Although K3K3 is a smooth 4-manifold, 2M E 8¯#k(S 2×S 2)2\overline{M_{E_8}}\#k(S^2\times S^2) isn’t for k=0,1,2k=0,1,2. For k=0k=0, this follows from Donaldson's theorem, (Fre. & Uhl. 84, p. 22-24, Sco. 05, p. 243) and for k=1,2k=1,2, it was also shown by Simon Donaldson, (Sco. 05, p. 248) although Donaldson's theorem itself no longer applies. (A simpler argument was later obtained with Seiberg-Witten invariants.) Hence a smooth surgery along the connecting sphere S 3S^3 to remove one, two or three S 2×S 2S^2\times S^2 from the smooth K3 surface K3K3 must fail. (Fre. & Uhl. 84, p. 24-30) (It is an open question whether this also holds for any connected sum of the K3 surface K3K3, which is known as 11/8 conjecture.) In the simplest surgery of removing three S 2×S 2S^2\times S^2, the failure spawns an exotic R^4 in #3(S 2×S 2)\#3(S^2\times S^2).

Construction from a nine-fold blow-up

The intersection form of the smooth complex surface ℂP 2#9ℂP 2¯\mathbb{C}P^2\#9\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2}, the simplest example of an elliptic surface known as Dolgachev surface, is [+1]⊕9[−1]≅−E 8⊕[+1]⊕[−1][+1]\oplus 9[-1] \cong -E_8\oplus[+1]\oplus[-1] (Sco. 05, p. 250-259) with the isomorphism coming from the Hesse-Minkowski theorem. It is therefore the same as for the topological 4-manifold M E 8¯#ℂP 2#*ℂP 2¯\overline{M_{E_8}}\#\mathbb{C}P^2\#*\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2} using the fake second complex projective space, so Freedman's classification claims both to be homeomorphic. In particular, that makes M E 8¯#ℂP 2#*ℂP 2¯\overline{M_{E_8}}\#\mathbb{C}P^2\#*\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2} smoothable. But a smooth surgery to remove ℂP 2\mathbb{C}P^2 results in the non-smoothable manifold M E 8¯#*ℂP 2¯\overline{M_{E_8}}\#*\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2}, (Sco. 05, p. 240-243 which follows from its intersection form −E 8⊕[−1]-E_8\oplus[-1] being negative definite and not diagonalizable, which Donaldson's theorem forbids if it was smoothable. The failure of this smooth surgery spawns an exotic R^4 in ℂP 2\mathbb{C}P^2.

Construction from a ten-fold blow-up

The previous construction can be expanded: The intersection form of the smooth complex surface ℂP 2#10ℂP 9¯\mathbb{C}P^2\# 10\overline{\mathbb{C}P^9} is [+1]⊕10[−1]≅−E 8⊕H⊕[−1][+1]\oplus 10[-1] \cong -E_8\oplus H\oplus[-1], (Sco. 05, p. 250-259) the same as for the topological 4-manifold M E 8¯#(S 2×S 2)#*ℂP 2¯\overline{M_{E_8}}\#(S^2\times S^2)\#*\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2}, so Freedman's classification claims both to be homeomorphic and in particular the latter to be smoothable. But a smooth surgery to remove S 2×S 2S^2\times S^2 again results in the non-smoothable manifold M E 8¯#*ℂP 2¯\overline{M_{E_8}}\#*\overline{\mathbb{C}P^2}. The failure of this smooth surgery spawns an exotic R^4 in S 2×S 2S^2\times S^2.

Construction from the failure of the smooth h-cobordism theorem

According to Michael Freedman, the four-dimensional topological h-cobordism theorem holds, while according to Simon Donaldson, the four-dimensional smooth h-cobordism theorem doesn’t hold. Let WW be a smooth h-cobordism between smooth 4-manifolds MM and NN, for which there is no diffeomorphism W≅M×[0,1]W\cong M\times[0,1], although there must be a homeomorphism W≅M×[0,1]W\cong M\times[0,1]. In this case there exists an open sub-cobordism U⊂WU\subset W with a homeomorphism U≅D 4×[0,1]≅ℝ 4×[0,1]U\cong D^4\times[0,1]\cong\mathbb{R}^4\times[0,1] and a compact contractible sub-cobordism K⊂UK\subset U, so that WW and UU are indeed smoothly trivial cobordisms outside of KK, hence there are diffeomorphisms:

W∖K≅(M∖K)×[0,1]; W\setminus K \cong(M\setminus K)\times[0,1];
U∖K≅(U∩M∖K)×[0,1]. U\setminus K \cong(U\cap M\setminus K)\times[0,1].

Now UU connects the two open subsets U∩M∖KU\cap M\setminus K and U∩N∖KU\cap N\setminus K, which are homeomorphic to ℝ 4\mathbb{R}^4, but cannot diffeomorphic to ℝ 4\mathbb{R}^4 as this would cause a diffeomorphism W≅M×[0,1]W\cong M\times[0,1]. (Sco. 05, p. 250-259)

Articles on geometry and topology of 4-manifolds:

References

Reviews include:

See also:

Last revised on October 13, 2026 at 09:00:53. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.