A total preorder or linear preorder or preference relation or (non-strict) weak order is a preorder whose posetal reflection is a total order, or equivalently it is a preorder which is also a total relation:
In category theory, a total preorder is a thin category for which given two objects and , there exists a morphism in either or . In fact, every total preorder is an unbounded prelattice, a thin locally cartesian category whose opposite category is also locally cartesian.
A cotransitive preorder on a set is a preorder which satisfies cotransitivity/weak linearity:
Cotransitive preorders are total preorders.
Cotransitivity of says that for all and , implies that or , and reflexivity says that for all , is always true. This implies that for all and , or is always true, which is precisely the condition of totality. Since cotransitive preorders are preorders, this implies that cotransitive preorders are total preorders.
Cotransitive partial orders are total orders.
[TBD: figure out if total preorders are cotransitive preorders.]
Total orders are cotransitive partial orders.
Similar to total orders, one could make a distinction between the usual notion of total preorder, and strict total preorders?, which are the irreflexive version of total preorders, and are defined as a strict preorder which is weakly linear and asymmetric.
Using excluded middle, one can move between total preorders and strict total preorders using negation; that is, the negation of a total preorder is a strict total preorder and vice versa. Actually one usually swaps the order too, as follows:
To prove this, it's enough to see that the properties of a strict total preorder are dual to the properties of a total preorder, as follows:
strict total preorder | total preorder | |
---|---|---|
irreflexivity | reflexivity | |
asymmetry | totality | |
transitivity | weak linearity | |
weak linearity | transitivity |
In classical mathematics, the distinction between total preorders and strict total preorders is merely a terminological technicality, which is not always observed; more precisely, there is a natural bijection between the set of total preorders on a given set and the set of strict total preorders on , and one distinguishes them by their notation.
In constructive mathematics, however, they are irreducibly different. To be specific, if one starts with a total preorder and defines as above, then weak linearity does not follow; and if one starts with a strict total preorder and defines as above, then totality does not follow. Nevertheless, at least will be a preorder, and least will be a strict preorder.
An example of a set with a total preorder are the dual rational numbers . The dual rational numbers have a strict weak order given by
for rational numbers , , , and . This strict weak order is not connected because , and thus the negation of the strict weak order, , is not antisymmetric. However, is a total preorder, because the strict weak order is irreflexive, weakly linear, transitive, and asymmetric, which implies that is reflexive, transitive, and total.
More generally, any ordered local ring with strict weak order has a total preorder defined by negation of . The quotient ordered field by the ideal of non-invertible elements results in a total preorder which is also a total order. In constructive mathematics one has to make sure that is also decidable.
Wikipedia, Total preorder
Wikipedia, Weak order
Last revised on December 26, 2023 at 04:33:22. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.