\documentclass[12pt,titlepage]{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{ucs}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{hyperref}

%----Macros----------
%
% Unresolved issues:
%
%  \righttoleftarrow
%  \lefttorightarrow
%
%  \color{} with HTML colorspec
%  \bgcolor
%  \array with options (without options, it's equivalent to the matrix environment)

% Of the standard HTML named colors, white, black, red, green, blue and yellow
% are predefined in the color package. Here are the rest.
\definecolor{aqua}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 1.0}
\definecolor{fuschia}{rgb}{1.0, 0, 1.0}
\definecolor{gray}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0.502}
\definecolor{lime}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 0}
\definecolor{maroon}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0}
\definecolor{navy}{rgb}{0, 0, 0.502}
\definecolor{olive}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0}
\definecolor{purple}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0.502}
\definecolor{silver}{rgb}{0.753, 0.753, 0.753}
\definecolor{teal}{rgb}{0, 0.502, 0.502}

% Because of conflicts, \space and \mathop are converted to
% \itexspace and \operatorname during preprocessing.

% itex: \space{ht}{dp}{wd}
%
% Height and baseline depth measurements are in units of tenths of an ex while
% the width is measured in tenths of an em.
\makeatletter
\newdimen\itex@wd%
\newdimen\itex@dp%
\newdimen\itex@thd%
\def\itexspace#1#2#3{\itex@wd=#3em%
\itex@wd=0.1\itex@wd%
\itex@dp=#2ex%
\itex@dp=0.1\itex@dp%
\itex@thd=#1ex%
\itex@thd=0.1\itex@thd%
\advance\itex@thd\the\itex@dp%
\makebox[\the\itex@wd]{\rule[-\the\itex@dp]{0cm}{\the\itex@thd}}}
\makeatother

% \tensor and \multiscript
\makeatletter
\newif\if@sup
\newtoks\@sups
\def\append@sup#1{\edef\act{\noexpand\@sups={\the\@sups #1}}\act}%
\def\reset@sup{\@supfalse\@sups={}}%
\def\mk@scripts#1#2{\if #2/ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\fi \else%
  \ifx #1_ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\reset@sup \fi {}_{#2}%
  \else \append@sup#2 \@suptrue \fi%
  \expandafter\mk@scripts\fi}
\def\tensor#1#2{\reset@sup#1\mk@scripts#2_/}
\def\multiscripts#1#2#3{\reset@sup{}\mk@scripts#1_/#2%
  \reset@sup\mk@scripts#3_/}
\makeatother

% \slash
\makeatletter
\newbox\slashbox \setbox\slashbox=\hbox{$/$}
\def\itex@pslash#1{\setbox\@tempboxa=\hbox{$#1$}
  \@tempdima=0.5\wd\slashbox \advance\@tempdima 0.5\wd\@tempboxa
  \copy\slashbox \kern-\@tempdima \box\@tempboxa}
\def\slash{\protect\itex@pslash}
\makeatother

% math-mode versions of \rlap, etc
% from Alexander Perlis, "A complement to \smash, \llap, and lap"
%   http://math.arizona.edu/~aprl/publications/mathclap/
\def\clap#1{\hbox to 0pt{\hss#1\hss}}
\def\mathllap{\mathpalette\mathllapinternal}
\def\mathrlap{\mathpalette\mathrlapinternal}
\def\mathclap{\mathpalette\mathclapinternal}
\def\mathllapinternal#1#2{\llap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}
\def\mathrlapinternal#1#2{\rlap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}
\def\mathclapinternal#1#2{\clap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}

% Renames \sqrt as \oldsqrt and redefine root to result in \sqrt[#1]{#2}
\let\oldroot\root
\def\root#1#2{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}}
\renewcommand{\sqrt}[2][]{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}}

% Manually declare the txfonts symbolsC font
\DeclareSymbolFont{symbolsC}{U}{txsyc}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{symbolsC}{bold}{U}{txsyc}{bx}{n}
\DeclareFontSubstitution{U}{txsyc}{m}{n}

% Manually declare the stmaryrd font
\DeclareSymbolFont{stmry}{U}{stmry}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{stmry}{bold}{U}{stmry}{b}{n}

% Manually declare the MnSymbolE font
\DeclareFontFamily{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{mnomx}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{mnomx}{bold}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{b}{n}
\DeclareFontShape{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n}{
    <-6>  MnSymbolE5
   <6-7>  MnSymbolE6
   <7-8>  MnSymbolE7
   <8-9>  MnSymbolE8
   <9-10> MnSymbolE9
  <10-12> MnSymbolE10
  <12->   MnSymbolE12}{}

% Declare specific arrows from txfonts without loading the full package
\makeatletter
\def\re@DeclareMathSymbol#1#2#3#4{%
    \let#1=\undefined
    \DeclareMathSymbol{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nequiv}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{46}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Perp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Vbar}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\sslash}{\mathrel}{stmry}{12}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\bigsqcap}{\mathop}{stmry}{"64}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\biginterleave}{\mathop}{stmry}{"6}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\invamp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\parr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77}
\makeatother

% \llangle, \rrangle, \lmoustache and \rmoustache from MnSymbolE
\makeatletter
\def\Decl@Mn@Delim#1#2#3#4{%
  \if\relax\noexpand#1%
    \let#1\undefined
  \fi
  \DeclareMathDelimiter{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#3}{#4}}
\def\Decl@Mn@Open#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathopen}{#2}{#3}}
\def\Decl@Mn@Close#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathclose}{#2}{#3}}
\Decl@Mn@Open{\llangle}{mnomx}{'164}
\Decl@Mn@Close{\rrangle}{mnomx}{'171}
\Decl@Mn@Open{\lmoustache}{mnomx}{'245}
\Decl@Mn@Close{\rmoustache}{mnomx}{'244}
\makeatother

% Widecheck
\makeatletter
\DeclareRobustCommand\widecheck[1]{{\mathpalette\@widecheck{#1}}}
\def\@widecheck#1#2{%
    \setbox\z@\hbox{\m@th$#1#2$}%
    \setbox\tw@\hbox{\m@th$#1%
       \widehat{%
          \vrule\@width\z@\@height\ht\z@
          \vrule\@height\z@\@width\wd\z@}$}%
    \dp\tw@-\ht\z@
    \@tempdima\ht\z@ \advance\@tempdima2\ht\tw@ \divide\@tempdima\thr@@
    \setbox\tw@\hbox{%
       \raise\@tempdima\hbox{\scalebox{1}[-1]{\lower\@tempdima\box
\tw@}}}%
    {\ooalign{\box\tw@ \cr \box\z@}}}
\makeatother

% \mathraisebox{voffset}[height][depth]{something}
\makeatletter
\NewDocumentCommand\mathraisebox{moom}{%
\IfNoValueTF{#2}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}{$\m@th##1##2$}}}{%
\IfNoValueTF{#3}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2]{$\m@th##1##2$}}%
}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2][#3]{$\m@th##1##2$}}}}%
\mathpalette\@temp{#4}}
\makeatletter

% udots (taken from yhmath)
\makeatletter
\def\udots{\mathinner{\mkern2mu\raise\p@\hbox{.}
\mkern2mu\raise4\p@\hbox{.}\mkern1mu
\raise7\p@\vbox{\kern7\p@\hbox{.}}\mkern1mu}}
\makeatother

%% Fix array
\newcommand{\itexarray}[1]{\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}}
%% \itexnum is a noop
\newcommand{\itexnum}[1]{#1}

%% Renaming existing commands
\newcommand{\underoverset}[3]{\underset{#1}{\overset{#2}{#3}}}
\newcommand{\widevec}{\overrightarrow}
\newcommand{\darr}{\downarrow}
\newcommand{\nearr}{\nearrow}
\newcommand{\nwarr}{\nwarrow}
\newcommand{\searr}{\searrow}
\newcommand{\swarr}{\swarrow}
\newcommand{\curvearrowbotright}{\curvearrowright}
\newcommand{\uparr}{\uparrow}
\newcommand{\downuparrow}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\duparr}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\updarr}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\gt}{>}
\newcommand{\lt}{<}
\newcommand{\map}{\mapsto}
\newcommand{\embedsin}{\hookrightarrow}
\newcommand{\Alpha}{A}
\newcommand{\Beta}{B}
\newcommand{\Zeta}{Z}
\newcommand{\Eta}{H}
\newcommand{\Iota}{I}
\newcommand{\Kappa}{K}
\newcommand{\Mu}{M}
\newcommand{\Nu}{N}
\newcommand{\Rho}{P}
\newcommand{\Tau}{T}
\newcommand{\Upsi}{\Upsilon}
\newcommand{\omicron}{o}
\newcommand{\lang}{\langle}
\newcommand{\rang}{\rangle}
\newcommand{\Union}{\bigcup}
\newcommand{\Intersection}{\bigcap}
\newcommand{\Oplus}{\bigoplus}
\newcommand{\Otimes}{\bigotimes}
\newcommand{\Wedge}{\bigwedge}
\newcommand{\Vee}{\bigvee}
\newcommand{\coproduct}{\coprod}
\newcommand{\product}{\prod}
\newcommand{\closure}{\overline}
\newcommand{\integral}{\int}
\newcommand{\doubleintegral}{\iint}
\newcommand{\tripleintegral}{\iiint}
\newcommand{\quadrupleintegral}{\iiiint}
\newcommand{\conint}{\oint}
\newcommand{\contourintegral}{\oint}
\newcommand{\infinity}{\infty}
\newcommand{\bottom}{\bot}
\newcommand{\minusb}{\boxminus}
\newcommand{\plusb}{\boxplus}
\newcommand{\timesb}{\boxtimes}
\newcommand{\intersection}{\cap}
\newcommand{\union}{\cup}
\newcommand{\Del}{\nabla}
\newcommand{\odash}{\circleddash}
\newcommand{\negspace}{\!}
\newcommand{\widebar}{\overline}
\newcommand{\textsize}{\normalsize}
\renewcommand{\scriptsize}{\scriptstyle}
\newcommand{\scriptscriptsize}{\scriptscriptstyle}
\newcommand{\mathfr}{\mathfrak}
\newcommand{\statusline}[2]{#2}
\newcommand{\tooltip}[2]{#2}
\newcommand{\toggle}[2]{#2}

% Theorem Environments
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{cor}{Corollary}
\newtheorem*{utheorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem*{ulemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem*{uprop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem*{ucor}{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}
\newtheorem{example}{Example}
\newtheorem*{udefn}{Definition}
\newtheorem*{uexample}{Example}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
\newtheorem{note}{Note}
\newtheorem*{uremark}{Remark}
\newtheorem*{unote}{Note}

%-------------------------------------------------------------------

\begin{document}

%-------------------------------------------------------------------


\section*{2009 July changes}

\hypertarget{archive}{}\subsubsection*{{Archive}}\label{archive}

[[!include all changes]]

Archive of changes made during July 2009. The substantive content of this page should \textbf{not} be altered.


\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
\hypertarget{20090731}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-31}}\label{20090731}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]] fixed a mistake at [[axiom of foundation]].


\item [[Ronnie Brown]]: Added in [[connection on cubical sets]] a reference to a recent preprint of Maltsiniotis showing that cubical sets with connections form a \emph{strict test category in the sense of Grothendieck}, thus correcting a well known disadvantage of cubical sets in comparison with simplicial sets.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: added a version (in my understanding) of main definitions in [[almost scheme]] and made a longer heuristical quote from Gabber-Romero Introduction chapter. Created stub [[Catégories Tannakiennes]] about the Deligne's seminal paper and [[Des catégories abéliennes]] about Pierre Gabriel's thesis.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item wrote a long ``Idea'' section at [[twisted cohomology]] and polished/expanded the rest, following comments by [[Jim Stasheff]]


\item added to the ``Idea'' section at [[differential form]] a paragraph that gives some categorical or otherwise abstract nonsense description of how to make precise the statement that ``a differential form is something that may be integrated''.


\item created an entry [[Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis]] (so far containing just a summary and an incomplete link list) and linked to it from [[synthetic differential geometry]] and [[Ehresmann connection]]

I am thinking that section IV there, \emph{Cohomology and Integration} would be a good candidate for the high-brow abstract nonsense aspect section to be written at [[differential form]]


\item added expositional text to [[Kan fibrant replacement]] prodded by the blog discussion \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/12/groupoidification_from_sigmamo.html#c025677}{here}



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Created [[measure theory]], just because it was linked, to link other things from it.
\item Additions to [[regular space]], [[separation axiom]], and [[Hausdorff space]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090730}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-30}}\label{20090730}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item edited the intro to [[algebraic K-theory]] a bit more


\item added to [[Waldhausen category]] the Weibel reference


\item linked to [[Grothendieck group]] from [[K-theory]] and [[algebraic K-theory]] and [[Waldhausen category]]


\item added to [[Waldhausen category]] an example section with the examples needed at [[Grothendieck group]]


\item added various things to [[Grothendieck group]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More discussion at [[Grothendieck group]] and [[(infinity,1)-categorical hom-space]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: It looks correctly to me (I do not recall what wording I wrote and it looks like reading my mind). Bt it is late night and I should reread the whle entry rested at the day time. I created a stub version of [[schematic algebras]] (with references) and linked it at [[noncommutative algebraic geometry]]. It would be nice to have for comparison a more thorough entry on Gabber's notion of [[almost schemes]] (just created unfinished entry) in commutative geometry, but the reflective localizations are used to define `exotic' affines to start with. Gabber-Lorenzo's book is an egregious sample of how a modern algebraic geometer of Grothendieck's school develops the theory of schemes and in a way it is a build ground-up with requiring sofistication level, but not many concrete details from the usual theory of schemes.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Please check that I rephrased the definition correctly at [[noncommutative scheme]]. The original formulation did not make sense to me, but I think that I understood what was meant.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item replied at [[(infinity,1)-categorical hom-space]]


\item have to think about the question at [[category with weak equivalences]] (which in any case shows that I phrased the sentence too carelessly)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created first draft of [[noncommutative scheme]] (after Rosenberg), and plan in few minutes to start [[schematic algebra]] (after van Oystaeyen). Somebody should also add [[noncommutative projective geometry]] (after Artin and Zhang). It is a pity that only few of the most stubborn contributors use summer to add new material\ldots{}


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] added some clauses to [[Grothendieck group]] and have some comments in a query box: I am thinking what the entry tries to define should be discussed at [[algebraic K-theory]] while ``Grothendieck group'' should be the definition of a group structure on $A \times A$ for a monoid $A$


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item A question at [[category with weak equivalences]].
\item A complaint at [[(infinity,1)-categorical hom-space]].
\item Fixed the links to Sjoerd Crans's papers at [[strict omega-category]]; there may be more.
\item Changes to [[symmetric function]].
\item Added a bit to [[free object]] (yes, that bit).
\item It's clear that the Grothendieck ring of a braided monoidal abelian category is commutative, so I rewrote the question at [[Grothendieck ring]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Created [[cop]] (it should have been maybe created by the police department). I thank people from Indiana math dept who discussed with me in Fall 2002 when I was searching for the appropriate name and discuraged me from using ``mud'' for that amorphous structure. BTW, does anybody know what to do on W XP when you loose permanently language bar ?


\item [[John Baez]]: created [[representation ring]], [[Grothendieck group]], [[Grothendieck ring]], and [[symmetric function]]. Tidied up [[lambda-ring]] a little, but not enough.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Created [[coderivation]] and a new paragraph in [[derivation]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[(∞,1)-categorical hom-space]] with the Dwyer-Kan theorem, linked to it from [[simplicial localization]] and [[model category]] and [[category with weak equivalences]]

in the course of this I alsow expanded/rewrote the introductions to

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[model category]]


\item [[category with weak equivalences]]



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim]]: I changed the e to a \'e{} (easy on a Mac!) in [[Les Dérivateurs]] and created an entry for [[Georges Maltsiniotis]], note his first name has an `s' on the end.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

replied to [[David Roberts|David]] at [[category theory]] -- am waiting for [[Rafael Borowiecki]] to get back to us before taking action outside of the query box


\item [[David Roberts]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added bits to [[Pursuing Stacks]] and [[Les Derivateurs]] linking the two documents. Actually there should be an accent on the first e of Derivateurs, but I leave a polite request to the lab-elves to solve that piece of typographical trickery for me.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[Sjoerd Crans]]

in that context I also added reference to his work to [[model structure on simplicial sheaves]] and [[model structure on presheaves of simplicial groupoids]]

also wrote a quick ``Idea'' section for the latter entry



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Moved [[the homotopy theory of Grothendieck]] to [[homotopy theory of Grothendieck]]. Normally, I don't mention that sort of thing here, but this time there's nothing in the naming conventions about this; it just feels right. Complaints are solicitied.


\item [[David Roberts]]: added comment to discussion at [[category theory]] - possibly Rafael means homotopy types when he says spaces. Added point about Grothendieck's view on Cat as a category of models. Also a stub: [[the homotopy theory of Grothendieck]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090729}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-29}}\label{20090729}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: more reactions in that discussion at [[category theory]] on that one paragraph by [[Rafael Borowiecki]] -- I suggest that this needs to be rewritten \emph{somehow}. I make one suggestion, but chances are that I am still missing [[Rafael Borowiecki]]`s true intention.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Noticed the many wanted links at [[differential form]] and started filling them out; a lot of basic stuff in differential topology. Many will be stubs, and many will be capable of unreported generalisation, internalisation, and categorification. So far:

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[derivation]]
\item [[skew-commutative algebra]] (definitely needs more)
\item [[cotangent bundle]] (and [[tangent bundle]] to go with it)
\item [[exterior algebra]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]] has figured out how categories are spaces at [[category theory]]. (I don't think that Rafael reads this page, so copy comments there.)


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: I have made changes to [[noncommutative algebraic geometry]]. Le Bruyn has kindly added a lot of material with ring-theoretic flavour (mainly references) and placed my unfinished text below his comment part. I have integrated his and my part, more chronologically and balancing categorical and ring-theoretic aspects; role of cyclic homology and many other directions (e.g. 30 years old subject of D-schemes of Beilinson) are missing. I would kindly invite Le Bruyn to write an adiditional separate entry on noncommutative projective geometry of Artin/Zhang flavour (I am not competent) as well on geometry at n, he is expert on. Quantum group aspects are planned to appear in entry [[equivariant noncommutative algebraic geometry]] which I just started.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created a stub for [[Ehresmann connection]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[formally smooth morphism]], [[quasi-free algebra]], [[universal differential envelope]], [[Kähler differential]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Rewrote [[k-surjective functor]] a bit to give the non-evil (`essential') version equal time.
\item Golf department! \emph{Golf} department!! Bwahahahaha!!! Thanks, Andrew and David, I should have gotten that.
\item Completed proofs at [[regular space]], sometimes by deciding not to prove anything obvious. (I wrote more too but forgot to save it when the Lab crashed last night).

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a diagram and a sentence in the section ``The homotopy category'' at [[category of fibrant objects]] that makes the statement given there more explicit: that and how every cocycle out of a weak equivalence can be refined by a cocycle out of an acyclic fibration (i.e. by an ``$\infty$-anafunctor'').


\item slightly expanded and polished the examples at [[Reedy model structure]] further



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]: cleaning up the \href{http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/links#English}{links} is clearly the job of the golf department



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090728}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-28}}\label{20090728}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[John Baez]]: warning: I believe ``[[special lambda-ring]]'' is an old-fashioned name for what almost everyone now calls a [[lambda-ring]]. This is explained by Hazewinkel in his article cited on [[lambda-ring]]. So, I do not believe we should have a separate article on [[special lambda-ring]].


\item Zoran: created [[Dennis trace]] (experts please expand!)


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Incorporated results of discussion into [[effective epimorphism]] and [[regular epimorphism]].


\item Everyone who uses `$\sqcup$' ({\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt ~sqcup}}) should be aware of `$\amalg$' ({\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt ~amalg}}) and `$\coprod$' ({\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt ~coprod}}), as in `$A \amalg B$' and `$\coprod_i A_i$'.


\item Interaction with [[Rafael Borowiecki]] at [[category theory]].


\item Golf department? \emph{Golf} department??

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: aha, I didn't get that either -- but figured it must be me missing some English thing

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]] created [[Kan fibrant replacement]]


\item Zoran: created [[Grothendieck Festschrift]], and quoted it as an addition to the timeline entry.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item spelled out the simplest nontrivial example at [[Reedy model structure]]


\item created [[global model structure on functors]] that was requested long ago as [[projective model structure]] and [[injective model structure]] which I made redirects to it

updated accordingly the list of examples at [[model category]] and interlinked with [[Reedy model structure]]


\item I tracked down a reference that discusses enriched Reedy model structures for enriched functor categories from enriched Reedy categories to enriched model categories -- I made corresponding additions to [[Reedy model structure]] and also created

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[enriched Reedy category]]

\end{itemize}

\item thanks, Lab Elf. I just donated something to the \emph{Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare} for that.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey|Lab Elf (service department)]]: The problem was that there was a reference to a theorem in the section that you wanted to remove. By removing that section, you were trying to create a non-existent link. By reformatting that sentence, I was able to remove the section. Another [[Toby Bartels|Lab Elf (golf department)]] may be along later to clean up the links since I just did what was necessary to remove the section.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item split off [[Reedy model structure]] from [[Reedy category]] -- added an ``Idea'' section and started expanding on some of the technical details

by the way: it's funny I can't \emph{remove} the old section ``Model structures'' from [[Reedy category]] which is now reproduced and expanded at [[Reedy model structure]]: I always get an ``Internal server error'' when I try to do that. I am familiar with the occurence of this error when one \emph{adds} certain things (such as double-dollar included displyed math without line breaks before and after) but I couldn't figure out which problem the \emph{removal} of that paragraph causes. So that section is still sitting there, duplicated now.


\item added clarifying remarks to the references at [[K-theory]]


\item in a similar vein to the below comment i added to the beginning of [[delooping]] a remark how the one-object groupoid $\mathbf{B}G$ and the classifying space $B G$ are the same object under the homotopy hypothesis


\item from private discussion with somebody it became clear to me that the entry [[homotopy hypothesis]] failed to get across one of the main points with the required emphasis. I now added the central theorem about the Quillen equivalence between Top and SSet right at the beginning. The disucssion of all the subtleties and generalizations should come after that.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Mathematical and non-mathematical stuff going on at [[Tall-Wraith monoids]]. Folded up the mathematical bit of the middle discussion (on what's so special about $AbGrp$) into the main text, but probably not in the nicest and clearest way. Also continued the discussion on fonts and the like further down.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a few words to [[(infinity,1)-topos]] (in particular pointed out that the equivalence of the two definitions given is a main theorem, and added the links to the entries on models)

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090727}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-27}}\label{20090727}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item replied a bit at [[effective epimorphism]] -- but don't trust me, it's way beyond my bed time -- see you tomorrow :-)


\item moved [[Jim Stasheff]]`s insertion at [[cohomology]] one paragraph further down not to have it tear apart the main definition -- this should eventually be merged more with the rest of the entry, it overlaps in parts.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More discussion at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]] (not actually about math) and [[effective epimorphism]] (actually about math!).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: added to [[effective epimorphism]] a remark on how the 1-categorical case is a special case of the $(\infty,1)$-categorical case and replied to the discussion


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Reorganised [[integration]] (another new, unlogged page!).
\item A question about [[special lambda-rings]] (a new, unlogged page!) at [[Lambda-ring]].
\item Discussion at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]], with and without lab elves.
\item A question about [[effective epimorphisms]] in an $(\infty,1)$-topos.
\item Added the $1$-categorial concept to [[effective epimorphism]], with related material at [[regular epimorphism]] and [[quotient object]].
\item Discussion with Zoran at [[quasigroup]] about the infestation of centipedes crawling around the Lab lately.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Lab Elf|Lab Elf (service department)]]: `Recently Revised' now gets redirected to this page. This redirection happens at the \emph{server} level (i.e. before anything gets to instiki) so shouldn't affect performance. This also means that the `Recently Revised' pages for labs \emph{other than} then n-lab work as they ought to. If hitting those slows up the system then Other Steps Will Be Taken.

Please remember that this is hopefully a temporary problem and once we migrate to warmer climes, Normal Service can be resumed.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[petit topos]] and made [[gros topos]] redirect to that


\item added the links to both versions of David Spivak's work at [[derived smooth manifold]], [[structured generalized space]] and [[geometry (for structured (infinity,1)-toposes)]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[heap]], [[quantum heap]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[geometry (for structured (infinity,1)-toposes)]]

in that context I also

\begin{itemize}%
\item renamed [[structured generalized space]] to [[structured (infinity,1)-topos]]


\item created a stub for [[effective epimorphism]]


\item created [[simplicial resolution]]



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]] parried the latest Baezian riposte, and whinged about the lack of a

PS Welcome back, Bruce.


\item [[John Baez]]: answered Andrew Stacey's latest comments over at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]].


\item [[Bruce Bartlett]]: Corrected a faulty link to the \href{http://userstyles.org/styles/17934}{nLab Stylish theme} for FireFox at [[HowTo]]. Works now.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item thanks to [[Mike Shulman]] for the comments at [[small object argument]] -- we should give both statements, for the non-locally presentable category, then with that other extra assumption, as well as for the locally presentable case -- I'll work that in later (my notation was following Lurie, by the way, but I agree that it is a bit weird)


\item edited the references section at [[structured generalized space]]


\item added a section with links to higher dimensional and homotopical generalizations to [[group]]


\item started creating [[symmetric monoidal functor]] but then noticed that [[monoidal functor]] didn't even exist yet and postponed this to another time


\item hyperlinked some more keywords at [[HQFT]] and [[sigma-model]].



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: spotted a sneaky paragraph at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]] and put a query for its originator ([[John Baez|John]]?).


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Finished what I wanted at [[regular space]], although there are still some proofs to fill out.
\item Fixed an egregious error in [[normal space]] while translating the definition from closed sets to open sets.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a mention of inverse semigroup in [[semigroup]]. As these relate to partial symmetries and ordered groupoids this may merit being expanded but I cannot do it at present.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied to an anonymous comment at [[evil]].
\item Started [[regular space]], but I have to leave and have not finished it.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090726}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-26}}\label{20090726}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Lots of changes (mostly additions) to [[measure space]]. Please see if the notation is comprehensible. I have to check on a couple of things, but I left query boxes. There are several variations, but I only included things that people can actually get tenure by studying. No [[centipede mathematics]] just for the sake of it! (well, except for one comment, appropriately linked).


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: continued the sparring at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]] (and answered the serious query). I wish I'd known the fascination with centipedes earlier, we caught one today and I could have gotten a good picture of it.


\item [[John Baez]]: inserted centipedes in [[quasigroup]], [[magma]], and the section on weakened definitions in [[group]]. Made a few other small changes in these.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Rearranged the introduction to [[group]], including some stuff that John originally put at [[centipede mathematics]].
\item Merged [[semigroups]] (now [[semigroups -- history]]) into [[semigroup]], as John describes below.

\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]: meddled a bit with [[centipede mathematics]]. Accidentally created a page called `semigroups' --- sorry, Toby; it looks like you're merging it with [[semigroup]], which said a lot of the same stuff in a more sophisticated lingo.


\item [[Mike Shulman|Mike]]: A couple of comments at [[small object argument]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Tricked up John's picture at [[centipede mathematics]], based on code found at [[Jacques Distler]].
\item Objected to the charge of centipede mathematics at [[measurable space]], on the grounds of historical inaccuracy.

\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item asked a question about notation near the top of [[Tall-Wraith monoid]], and tried to polish the proof that a Tall-Wraith monoid in abelian groups is just a ring, and enjoyed bickering a bit more with Andrew Stacey in the big green box near the bottom.


\item had some fun with [[centipede mathematics]] - see also my reply to Toby below.


\item deleted query by Rafael over on [[category]], which had been answered by me and untouched for a while. He'd asked about `categories as 1d CW complexes', but I think the item on categories as `directed graphs with composition law' now answers that --- even for people who don't know what a CW complex is.


\item reduced the number of appearances of the word `isic' over on [[isomorphisms]]; while it's fun to make up new jargon, I don't think we should actually use `isic' when explaining concepts when `invertible' will do. We don't want to convey an impression of quirkiness, and we don't want to require the reader to look through the whole page to understand new jargon when well-known jargon already exists.


\item deleted discussion by Toby and Tom over at [[regular monomorphism]], since Tom said it was okay to do so, and some time has passed.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Todd Trimble]] wrote [[generalized multicategory]], and added a reference at [[Crans-Gray tensor product]] to Sjoerd Crans's papers. Guessed that his papers on teisi might be relevant to an inquiry Mike Shulman made there.


\item [[Toby Bartels]] wrote [[separation axioms]] (and a stub at [[disjoint sets]]).



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090725}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-25}}\label{20090725}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[John Baez]] wrote comments on [[isomorphism]], [[bicategory]], [[measure space]], and under a July 24 comment of Eric's here. Toby has responded to all of them except the one at .


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item As long as we're having a conversation, it should be safe for Eric to assume that I've responded to him if I post something here, even if I don't mention him.
\item A brief list of examples, mostly for the purposes of terminology, at [[isomorphism]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]: Responded to Toby at [[measure space]] and [[ericforgy:Densitized Pseudo Twisted Forms]].


\item [[Tim]]: I have started an entry on [[HQFTs]]. Initially this will summarise Turaev's theory, but I hope to get a bit more daring later on. I hope someone will tell me (then) if I am talking through my hat. (I rarely wear one.)


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Comments for Eric at [[measure space]] and [[Eric Forgy:Densitized Pseudo Twisted Forms|on his web]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090724}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-24}}\label{20090724}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Wrote [[differential form]]; also [[diffeomorphism]], [[restriction]], and [[characteristic function]], which I linked thence.
\item Moved Eric's latest changes to the \textbf{top} so that they would be seen by Urs (and anybody else who checked this page after Urs added his changes below).
\item Added a bit to [[decategorification]].
\item Created [[locally discrete 2-category]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Remembered there IS a beautiful arrow theoretic way to think of measures, i.e. [[Leinster measure]]. Added a comment about it at [[measure space]].


\item Created [[Leinster measure]] with, for now, just a \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2007/03/canonical_measures_on_configur_1.html}{link to the n-Cafe}.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[K-theory spectrum]]


\item created [[Waldhausen S-construction]] and edited [[Waldhausen category]] a bit, but needs still more work -- help is appreciated, I am not sure yet if I found the best literature



\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added more to questions on [[measure space]]. Whenever I see a long convoluted definition, e.g. [[measurable space]], I tend to think there should be some short, concise, arrow theoretic description that incorporates all the little factoids into one pretty picture. A wild guess (that I know is wrong, but hopefully inspires someone to write down what is right): a [[measurable space]] is some kind of [[presheaf]] or maybe a [[representation]] on ????.


\item [[John Baez]]: the definition of measurable space is pretty darn simple and quick: it's a set with a collection of subsets that's closed under complements and countable unions. Such a collection is usually called a $\sigma$-algebra, and all this is explained pretty early on in the page [[measurable space]]. Whoever wrote the longer discussion below was just having fun analyzing the definition into little bite-sized pieces (I have my guess as to who this might be.)

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Guilty as charged.


\item [[John Baez]]: The guilty conscience need not be accused by name. I think we should warn the reader when we go off on an excursion like this. Perhaps just a warning like: \textbf{The following passage might be considered [[centipede mathematics]]}, together with a small version of the following picture. I wish I knew how to center a picture!





\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Tom Ellis]] created [[extremal monomorphism]]


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item edited [[algebraic K-theory]] a bit


\item created [[K-theory]] -- as opposed to my previous take on this which was then moved to the ``Idea'' section at [[topological K-theory]] this time this is aiming for the fully general bird's eye picture with indications how that produces all the special realizations in special cases


\item created [[decategorification]] -- evidently much more can be said here, but it's a start


\item expanded the ``Idea'' section at [[spectrum]] and effectively rewrote it -- added a link to [[combinatorial spectrum]] at the end, which probably should be thought of as a concrete realization of the idea of $\mathbb{Z}$-category -- accordingly I changed the title of the last section from ``Conjectures'' to ``Combinatorial models''.


\item added a reference to Weibel's online book to [[algebraic K-theory]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Tried answering John's questions over at [[Tall-Wraith monoid]]. Probably lots for the [[lab elf|lab elves]] to work on there.

(I confess that I did have the Hogwartian house elves uppermost in mind, but the shoemaker elves were not far off either. Being now in the Nordic realm I probably should have said `lab troll' but trolls already have a place on the internet and it is Not Here)


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started putting material into [[brane]] -- as a preparation for something I plan at [[K-theory]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]: I answered some remarks by Mike Stay and Eric over on [[free cocompletion]]. I also had an hour-long chat with Mike that should eventually push this exposition forward quite a bit: I explained coends to him, which is a lot easier in words than on paper. But I hope we get the explanation into the $n$Lab eventually!


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Answered Eric's first question; I'm not ready to think about the second one yet.


\item [[Eric]]: Asked some questions on [[measure space]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090723}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-23}}\label{20090723}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Remarks on notation at [[measure space]].


\item [[Ben Webster]] created [[Hecke algebra]]


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[Dunkl operator]], [[double derivation]]; it is a start of a series which should include entries on Cherednik algebras, Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection, Calogero-Moser system, Gauss-Manin connection, Calogero-Moser space, deformed preprojective algebras and so on\ldots{}


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item effectively rewrote [[infinity-stack]] -- expanding it considerably, adding the relevant pointers to all the new material that has come together since I first wrote this

\begin{itemize}%
\item removed the discussion of costacks entirely. I'll turn that into a separate entry in its own right eventually


\item John's question there had been about my notation $\to\gt$ -- that was a hack for the symbol for a \emph{fibration}, an arrow with a double tip. In my new version this no longer appear, though it may still appear at [[hypercover]], which is linked to, and elsewhere.

[[Toby Bartels|Toby]] knows how to typeset such arrows correcty. Maybe he could add a section to [[HowTo]] with the relevant information and links to special symbol lists



\end{itemize}

\item added a reference at [[(infinity,1)-functor]] to [[(infinity,1)-category of (infinity,1)-functors]] -- the discussion of this issue that I like most is currently at [[models for infinity-stack (infinity,1)-toposes]]. Eventually that should be discussed better at the relevant entries.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Conversation with [[JCMcKeown]] at [[(n,k)-transformation]].
\item Created [[lab elf]], just a bit of fun; credit [[Eric Forgy]] (I think) for the idea.\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Not me. I think Andrew gets credit for that. I added a link to [[lab elves]] from [[How to get started]] :)
\item \emph{Toby}: Ah yes, with his British references to Hogwarts. But the term made me think of den Br\"u{}dern Grimm instead; in fact, after reading their tale (an English version of which is linked from the new page) again, I see that Rowling's house elves owe more to it that I'd remembered!

\end{itemize}

\item Added my touch to [[How to get started]]; among other things, I didn't like the horizontal rules around the images, but maybe they were there for a reason?

\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Put in some gunk about [[Tall-Wraith monoid]], which Andrew Stacey improved. Later I put in two queries!


\item Put in a query about [[D-modules]].


\item Put in a query under [[infinity-stack]].



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item I would like to make a plea for adding entries to the \emph{top} of this list. There are some comments and entries that I see only because I check every single change in the history; while obsessive behaviour may be correlated with mathematical ability, you can't expect people to see things unless you add them to the top. If that means that you give yourself two entries in one day or even report one day's events in the next day's space, then so be it! (For conversations, I suppose that it depends on whether you think that the person that you're having a conversation with will see your comment; but be aware that they might not.)
\item I wouldn't be very quick to get ban query boxes at [[How to get started]]; people need to be able to ask questions about how to get started! That doesn't really apply to discussion by the regulars about how to explain, of course, but I would want Jim Stasheff, for example, to ask questions there if he wanted to, without people trying to clean up too quickly.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[Dominic Verity]]


\item created [[Verity on descent for strict omega-groupoid valued presheaves]]


\item reworked the [[How to get started]] according to my opinions and our disucssions \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/07/nlab_how_to_get_started.html#c025573}{here}

there are now two sections, one on how to paste source code of a comment one is about to submit to the blog, the other about how to paste non-source code material

in the course of this I have removed lots of the previous discussion on these points -- the goal is to keep that particular page clean of auxiliary discussion and as brief and to the point as possiblle, because that's the point of this page

if anyone feels I removed too much, please use Rollback to grab the deleted material and then cancel the rollback and insert the missing material in a suitable section at the main [[HowTo]] entry



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: I've banned `Recently Revised' for the time being. My method of banning has probably blocked it for all the private webs as well. If that's really annoying then let me know and I'll try to find a more specific method of banning just the nlab one.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]] was pleasantly pleased to stumble across [[Tall-Wraith monoid]]s and made a few minor alterations (mainly style, and added a couple of references). I'll shove this question over on the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=49}{forum} as well, but should we have a lab convention on fonts for categories, functors, objects, and the like?

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[John Baez]]: especially given the large and opinionated group of contributors, we probably shouldn't fuss over fonts too much, but I'm in favor of the KISS philosophy: ``keep it simple, sweetheart''. Namely: use capital letters for big things, small letters for little things, and Greek letters when you run out of ordinary letters, or want to show off your erudition.

\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started [[P-ring]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item renamed the new easy-basic-HowTo page to [[How to get started]]

then I reworked the formatting and edited pieces here and there

to [[Bruce Bartlett]]: I think on that particular page we don't want query boxes, as that page is supposed to provide quick unambiguous information that tries to deconfuse people instead of to confuse them -- please see my reply and check if you can work something into the paragraph right before the query box that allows to remove that query box

[[Andrew Stacey]] I concur, but couldn't delete the query box as I made a remark in it and so if I delete the box \emph{now} then that would permanently remove that remark. Someone else could do it (or I could in half an hour's time).



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]: Started [[Lambda-ring]] with some Baezian exposition and an abstract of James Borger. Hmm, is there a difference between $\lambda$-ring and $\Lambda$-ring? This \href{http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~borger/papers/03/lambda.pdf}{paper} uses both.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: thanks, David, I was hoping you would

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]] welcomed [[Sebastian Thomas]] at [[(n,k)-transformation]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090722}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-22}}\label{20090722}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Tim Silverman]]: Answered a \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/07/the_monads_hurt_my_head_but_no.html#c025521}{request from the n-Cafe} by creating [[How to Copy and Paste Material from the n-Cafe and Include Links Back and Forth]]


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item slightly polsihed further at [[strong monad]] and removed the tentative-alert, now that [[Todd Trimble|Todd]] also approved of the statement


\item filled in a bit of text and some references at [[conformal field theory]]


\item added the notion of Frobenius lax-and-oplax functors to [[lax functor]] and provided pointers to their use in CFT


\item added a remark by [[Todd Trimble]] to [[associahedron]] on their relation to [[oriental]]s that I asked him about by private email



\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added more information to [[tensorial strength]]. Some of this should be checked.


\item Added more examples to [[lax functor]]. I'm in a lax mood these days, and I really enjoyed it when Paul-Andr\'e{} Melli\`e{}s told me a definition of `enriched category' in terms of lax functors. This works for categories enriched over a bicategory, not just a monoidal category. Do we have any entry on enrichment over bicategories? If so, maybe someone could add a link.

[[Urs Schreiber]]: we had some old discussion on the blog on this description of enriched categories -- I used to be interested in that in the context of \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/archives/000794.html}{A Note on RCFT and Quiver Reps} -- I'll maybe add something about this to the entry



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[strong monad]]


\item created [[lax functor]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[monad]] the statement that a monad in $B$ is a lax functor ${*} \to B$

\end{itemize}

\item replied at [[(n,k)-transformation]] -- I think that in principle this gives all the required information, but I am aware that eventually someone should describe that all explicitly in detail at that entry



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Copied to [[(n,k)-transformation]] a question that was sent to me by email, and partially answered it. (Urs could probably answer the rest.)


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added references and links to [[vertex operator algebra]]


\item created [[tensorial strength]] with material that [[Todd Trimble]] provided on the blog



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item More discussion with Tom at [[regular monomorphism]].
\item Formatting with {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char43\char45\char45\char32\char123\char58\char32\char46un\char95remark\char125}}\ldots{}{\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char61\char45\char45}} at [[category theory]].
\item Final comments to Urs at [[locally presentable category]].
\item Added somewhat to [[(n,k)-transformation]] \ldots{} although still not a definition!

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added links and references to [[tricategory]]


\item worked on the \emph{Idea} section at [[category theory]]: I reformatted a bit the existing material, included lots of hyperlinks and filled in various further bits, such as a paragraph that lists the fundamental classes of examples and the quote from Barry Mitchell that Todd just mentioned on the blog

\begin{itemize}%
\item I was surprised to find the entry in a much more developed and pleasant state than I remembered it -- maybe I missed the announcement here, or could it be that there was a major edit to the entry that wasn't logged here at Latest Changes? Please remember to alert us here.


\item I am now hopeful that eventually we'll be able to turn what should be the pivotal $n$Lab entry into something decent, too: that on [[higher category theory]]. At the moment that one is not a good advertisement of the $n$Lab project.



\end{itemize}

\item replied and reacted at [[locally presentable category]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]: Asked, ``What is a `component of a cocone'?'' on [[An Exercise in Kantization]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]] where did you see that term used? Maybe the question (or its answer) belongs at [[colimit]]. Do you have an idea what a cocone itself is? It consists of lots of morphisms from the objects of a diagram to the cocone tip. If we regard the cocone as a natural transformation to a constant functor, then the components of that natural transformation are these single morphism from objects to the tip of the cocone. These I would call ``components of the cocone''.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: I gave my answer at [[An Exercise in Kantization]] so that it will not get lost here.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Thank you Toby, your new clarifications in [[essential image]] and [[replete subcategory]] are pretty helpful and clear, and I agree with them. Still I would like to think of more clean scheme of thinking of various kinds of images internally, in connection to various kinds of factorization systems and even multistep factorizations like Postnikov systems. There is probably a framework where, despite the differences all the kinds of images including [[homotopy image]] belong. The crucial is choice of a sort of factorization system: a variety of an image is basically the second morphism in the factorization (or less precisely its domain). In higher categories sometimes multistep factorizations systems are interesting, like Postnikov towers in topology. This way it may satisfy the point of view of Urs, who was IMHO not precise at the beginning but eventually pointed in the right general direction, and the reference of Barwick which he found seems to be really useful.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Tried to explain what sort of evil I meant at [[essential image]].
\item Boldly put the default notion (in the higher-dimensional case) first at [[replete subcategory]].
\item Edited the definition at [[transfinite composition]] to include the possibility that $\alpha = 0$ and also to allow the concept to be interepreted constructively.
\item Reply to Tom (Tom who?) at [[regular monomorphism]].
\item More discussion at [[locally presentable category]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090721}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-21}}\label{20090721}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item after discussion with [[Zoran Skoda]] I split off [[homotopy image]] from [[essential image]], reserving the latter for the essential image of a functor of categories -- I haven't touched the content of [[essential image]] otherwise


\item updated link list at [[Higher Topos Theory]] (mostly under Appendix/Category Theory). For what that's worth, the appendix is now getting pretty close to being fully indexed.


\item added reference to Richard Garner's \emph{Understanding the small object argument} to [[small object argument]]


\item created [[transfinite composition]]


\item made at [[small object argument]] the theorem a formal theorem (with theorem environment and all), added a list of references and -- in the paragraph that is now right before the theorem -- tweaked the former assumptions a bit, which I guess were taken by [[Mike Shulman]] from Hovey's book. My impression is that in the ``modern'' literature the ambient category is assumed to be locally presentable -- but it would be great if an expert checked my modifications (see also the further literature that I list)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]] took the hint and started incorporating the discussion into the main thread at [[paracompact space]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added Jeff Smith's theorem to [[combinatorial model category]] and made [[Smith's theorem]] redirect to that


\item added the Barwick reference also to [[Bousfield localization]], to [[combinatorial model category]] and to [[small object argument]]


\item added an ``Idea'' section to [[essential image]], created subsections for different definitions and created one subsection with the definition of homotopy image as found in Clark Barwick's work and as kindly pointed out by [[John Baez]] on the blog \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2007/08/questions_about_modules.html#c025455}{here}


\item did some editing and have a discussion with [[David Corfield]] at [[group homotopy]]


\item added to [[folk model structure]] a sentence that these model structures present $(\infty,1)$-categories of the collection of the given $n$-categories, as part of a reply to [[Rafael Borowiecki]]`s question to the Cat-theory mailing list that I just posted


\item added to [[(infinity,n)-category]] the reference to Lurie's ``Goodwillie''-article and a few remarks on some pertinent definitions there



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: I actually do not think that Toby's correction to [[essential image]] is correct. I mean that essential image is removing evil from image. No, [[image]] SUBcategory is just a specific and unique internal (subcategory in narrow sense) CHOICE of the (external) image of the functor within Cat as a category. Essential image subcategory is just a specific and unique choice of the bicategorical image of the functor considered as a 2-functor within Cat as a bicategory. The same with higher version. The homotopy image which Urs looks is just about image in external sense and not about the internal choice of which subset of k-cells for every k is chosen. Making a replete choice of subcategory is like taking a maximal atlas of a manifold to remove nonuniquness in the class of all atlases - so in a sense it is a maximal choice with respect to the target; the usual image of a functor is more calculated with respect to the domain of the functor. In bicategory Cat the two are equivalent; in category Cat they are not isomorphic.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: I am not sure I know what you mean by external vs internal. But I supppose one point you are making is that an \emph{essential image} is/should be defined only up to the relevant notion of equivalence. Do you mean by ``external'' a characterization of essential image by a universal property, whereas by ``internal'' you mean a concrete representative of that (unique only up to equivalence)?

Do we agree on what the ``external'' definition should be? Is it the one I suggested it should be? In that case we might reorganize the entry by startiing it with the abstract nonsense definition and then taking the replete version as one concrete realization in Cat.


\item [[Zoran Skoda]] No (I have the feeling that you are not reading what I wrote), we disagree on what external definition should be because the essential image is not a notion which is external. It is a CHOICE of literally a subcategory, not a choice of embedding of categories in abstract sense, it is a choice of a SUBSET of n-cells which is a n-subcategory which is replete. On the other hand there are two (three) DIFFERENT notions of image of a functor. One is the image in external sense, that is image in Cat taken as a category or as a 2-category. Another is image as a subcategory in literal sense. Image in literal sense is of course a very specific representative of an image in Cat 1-categorical sense and essential image is a very specifical choice of an image in 2-categorical sense; actually it is a specifical choice of such 2-categorical image that the embedding of essential image into the codomain is also literally surjective on objects. This is a bit strange from external point of view: you have something what is just equivalent to 1-categorical image, while it additional property is again of 1-categorical type. Thus it mixes the two. Hence it is by no means superimposable to homotopy limits in any case.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item edited [[locally presentable category]] according to my discussion with [[Toby Bartels]] there -- and included links back and forth with [[presentable (infinity,1)-category]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Responded at [[paracompact space]] and [[Froelicher space]]. Incidentally, if the start of a query box is indented for some reason (as on [[paracompact space]]) then it seems that all its contained paragraphs should be indented by at least the same amount.

\begin{itemize}%
\item Thanks, Andrew. Maybe eventually somebody finds the time to move the insights gathered there out of the query box and distill them into proper entry text.

\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item started [[Moore space]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item fixing up some statements at [[paracompact space]]. Added comment about existence partitions of unity being dependent on the category these will be constructed in.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090720}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-20}}\label{20090720}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item thinking about it, I followed Zoran's suggestion and moved the entire ``Idea'' part that I had t-yped into [[K-theory]] to [[topological K-theory]] -- also the query box with the discussion is now there, and [[K-theory]] is once again just a link list\ldots{}


\item brief reply and question at [[K-theory]]: what is the big global picture on K-theory that deserves to be put in the first sentences of the ``Idea'' section and really captures the full topic? Is there even any?


\item have a question at [[essential image]]: we should consider the weak/homotopy version of the definition of limit as the equalizer of the cokernel pair of a morphism, is there any literature/knowledge about that?


\item quick reply to Toby at [[locally presentable category]]: I didn't mean to leave out the ``locally'', but now that we are at it: what's the point of saying ``locally'' here in the first place?



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Added quite a bit to [[free monoid]].


\item [[David Corfield]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Carried out some tentative dualising at [[group homotopy]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Moved some discussion on terminology from [[cartesian monad]] to [[locally cartesian category]].
\item Wrote [[locally cartesian category]], [[free monoid]], and [[identity monad]], all quite stubbily, because I linked to them from [[cartesian monad]].
\item Asked a question on terminology at [[locally presentable category]].
\item Wrote a brief \textbf{Idea} section at [[cartesian monad]] and made the previous one a \textbf{Motivation \ldots{}} section.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Asked what was probably a very silly question on [[presheaf]] in an attempt to complete an Exercise on [[free cocompletion]], i.e. ``Find a formula expressing every object in $\widehat{A}$ as a colimit of guys in the image of $Y$.''

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[presentable category]] for questionable reasons


\item added to [[locally presentable category]] the explicit charascterization


\item created [[cofibrantly generated model category]]


\item started adding an ``Application'' section to [[models for infinity-stack (infinity,1)-toposes]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]: imported Patrick Schultz's cafe comment on cartesian monads to [[cartesian monad]], but now have doubts as to whether it ought to appear there first under `Idea'. Are there other uses for cartesian monads? And anyway similar material appears at [[multicategory]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Answered an anonymous question at [[regular monomorphism]].


\item [[Eric]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added a small status update to efforts at [[An Exercise in Kantization]]

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090719}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-19}}\label{20090719}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied to Rafael Borowiecki at [[category theory]] and [[Segal category]].
\item Linked a blog comment from [[cartesian monad]].
\item Comments to Eric at [[Note on Formatting]].
\item Generalised [[refinement of a cover]] to [[refinement]].
\item Replied to Andrew at [[paracompact space]].
\item A brief comment on the latest counterexample at [[Frölicher space]].
\item Referenced the [[adjoint functor theorem]] at [[cocontinuous functor]]. (More generally, there is much at [[continuous functor]] that might be brough there.)
\item Removed some [[?]]s that were seen by the people that they were addressed to.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item I have started [[Dowker's Theorem]], partially because it is useful for the entry on Cech methods, but also because it is relevant to Gavin's problem oposted on the Caf\'e{}. I have given Dowker's proof. It seems to me to be saying something about combinatorial duality. (actually duality in relations and Chu spaces.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Wonders aloud at [[An Exercise in Kantization]] about reformulating things on a [[double category]] and relating it to a \href{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_checkerboard}{Feynman checkerboard} somehow. Maybe even getting back to relating it to [[Position, Velocity, and Acceleration]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090718}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-18}}\label{20090718}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Installed Cygwin so that I could convert Dugger's \emph{Sheaves and Homotopy Theory} from dvi to pdf. I uploaded the pdf to the nLab and added links to all references to the paper.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[comonad]], added more on [[connection for coring]] and [[semifree dga]]. I think David'd confusion might be genuine: not to call with dash or not, that is easy question of exact synonyms, but rather how to cleanly separate DIFFERENT but similar notions of say biadjunction and pseudoadjunction; setups in which they appear: strict and nonstrict 2-categories and Gray categories; and kinds of (pseudo/2)-monads they induce\ldots{}to mention a few. The Memoirs booklet by Tom Fiore and some papers by Lack, Marmolejo, Vitale, Kelly\ldots{}may be useful to compare and decide in this regard.


\item [[David Corfield]]: Added a comment at [[free cocompletion]], which got me looking for ``pseudoadjunction''. I would trigger a new page for it, but don't know optimal naming conventions.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Hi David. Now that we have redirects, you can feel less concerned about naming conventions. For example, if you start a page [[pseudoadjunction]] and people come out with pitchforks saying it should be [[pseudo-adjunction]], we now have the capability to simply change the page name. Better than that, we can add [[redirects]] so that both [[pseudoadjunction]] and [[pseudo-adjunction]] point to the same page and then it doesn't matter. People can use either one when linking to your page.

\begin{itemize}%
\item David: The worry was more about the name itself. I recall John Baez in TWF wishing to avoid the term pseudomonad, and I see [[2-monad]] covers various levels of weaknesses. Oh, I see we have [[lax 2-adjunction]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Would it make sense to add redirects for [[pseudoadjunction]] and [[pseudo-adjunction]] to [[lax 2-adjunction]]?

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: We really need [[2-adjunction]]; that can link to more specialised pages or have more specialised titles redirected to it, as we find appropriate.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim Porter|Tim]]: I have started an entry on [[dg-quiver]]. I have paused because I cannot decide whether this is the right version to put there or whether to use Peter May's discussion in the talk that is linked to from that page.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090717}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-17}}\label{20090717}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]] made a remark at [[free cocompletion]] in between the exchange between [[John Baez]] and [[Eric Forgy]]: the [[Yoneda extension]] discussed there is at least a special case of a left [[Kan extension]]


\item Goncalo Marques replied at [[field]]


\item [[Eric]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added some words on [[Note on Formatting|?]] to reflect Toby's preference for the format ``$L_\infty$-[[L-infinity-algebroid|algebroid]]''. Also added a section with comments on specific pages and moved Toby's comment (and my response) from [[Lie infinity-algebroid representation]] to this section.


\item Requested a PDF copy of Daniel Dugger, \emph{Sheaves and Homotopy Theory} (\href{http://www.uoregon.edu/~ddugger/cech.html}{web}) at [[free cocompletion]]. This reference appears several places and those without the ability to read DVIs could use a PDF copy. Instructions on how to upload files to the nLab are given \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/File+Uploads}{here}. Once we have a PDF copy, I can go around and update links to this reference to make the PDF available.


\item Added some very pedestrian stuff (to help me understand it) to the Decategorified Theorem section of [[free cocompletion]].



\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item wrote a lot more on [[free cocompletion]]. I hope other students of category theory, not just Mike Stay and David Corfield, ask questions or do some of the exercises!

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Thanks for doing this. I've been trying to understand [[Kan extension]] for [[An Exercise in Kantization]]. I promise to try not to stray off topic.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item asked question of John's explanation at [[free cocompletion]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[refinement of a cover]]


\item created [[groupoid of Lie-algebra valued forms]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added an example at [[Froelicher space]] to show why it is not \emph{locally} cartesian closed. It's a simple example, and I think it sheds some light on what actually changes when you go from an ``input only'' to a ``balanced'' category (using neither term in any technical sense, just in case they have any).

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started list of gauge fields at [[gauge theory]], so far I have

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Yang-Mills field]]
\item [[electromagnetic field]]
\item [[Kalb-Ramond field]]
\item [[supergravity C-field]]
\item [[RR field]]

\end{itemize}

\item puny start with [[Yang-Mills theory]] and [[Yang-Mills field]]


\item created [[twisted K-theory]] presenting it as a special case of the discussion at [[twisted cohomology]] -- feeling slightly uneasy about making this public, though, maybe later I get scared and remove that content again, or move it to my private web. Or else, you tell me how obvious and well-known this is, then I can leave it there without further worries.


\item created [[twisted bundle]] and [[bundle gerbe module]]


\item added at [[homology]] an ``Idea'' section that introduces the concept as the image of homotopy under the Dold-Kan correspondence. Also added as an example explicitly the ordinary case of homology in chain complexes of abelian groups


\item yes, the duality mentioned at [[cohomotopy]] is the one called [[Eckmann-Hilton duality]], at leat when the $(\infty,1)$-topos in question is [[Top]]. I have made that explicit now at [[cohomotopy]].


\item yes, thanks for the improvement at [[RR field]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Removed the spurious hyphen from [[RR field]], in accordance with my intuition and the cited references.
\item Is [[Eckmann?Hilton duality]] the sort of duality being referred to at [[cohomotopy]]?
\item Used Eric's [[Note on Formatting]] method for the first time, at [[Lie infinity-algebroid representation]].
\item Added terminological variations to [[normal space]]. At some point I need to write [[separation axiom]] like I did \href{http://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Separation_axiom}{at the English Wikipedia}.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090716}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-16}}\label{20090716}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added links to [[gauge theory]] fields in the example section of [[differential cohomology]]


\item created [[field strength]]


\item created [[RR-field]]


\item created [[differential K-theory]]


\item added an ``Idea'' section to [[free cocompletion]], made John and Mike's central statement a standout box, gave the theorem a theorem environment and added various links. Noticed to my surprise that the entry [[decategorification]] is, as yet, missing.


\item created [[concordance]]


\item created [[vectorial bundle]] (notice the difference to [[vector bundle]])



\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Created [[Note on Formatting]]. Now, when I make a minor cosmetic format change to a page, I leave a little signature at the bottom: [[Note on Formatting|?]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[cohomotopy]] and linked to it from [[cohomology]]


\item added ``Idea''-section to [[K-theory]]


\item expanded further the entry on [[Deligne cohomology]]: gave maps to underlying classes and characteristic forms and made chain maps explicit -- also reorganized slightly, making the perspective of the Deligne complex as the image under Dold-Kan of functors from the path $n$-groupoid the primary one.


\item in order to link to the new article by Martins and Picken I created [[path n-groupoid]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item then from that created [[Gray-groupoid]] and [[path infinity-groupoid]]

\end{itemize}

\item added a pointer to some notes by Daniel Dugger to the discussion of free cocompletion at [[presheaf]] -- Dugger gives a nice pedagogical description


\item added material about infinite-dimensional manifolds to [[paracompact space]], taken from private email discussion that [[David Roberts]] kindly provided -- but I notice that I still have a question, see there



\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item started a pedagogical discussion of free cocompletion at [[presheaf]], then followed Urs' suggestion and moved it to the entry [[free cocompletion]]


\item added remark and question at [[field]]



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090715}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-15}}\label{20090715}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Eric, why don't you make the material on electromagnetism in media that you added into a proper section at [[electromagnetic field]]? Then we could move what is proper discussion between us into a query box, after all, while having the genuine material visible in the netry and not hidden in the section Discussion.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: I've thought about this some more and something still bothers me about the idea. If electromagnetic properties, i.e. $\mu$, $\epsilon$, $\sigma$ can be geometrically incorporated into the Hodge star via the metric, this implies: 1.) Maxwell's equations in inhomogeneous media are \emph{wrong} (although in vacuum they reduce to the familiar form) and 2.) that the Hodge star should involve \emph{convolution}, i.e. the metric should have a \emph{memory}. Has anyone put forward any serious theories of a ``metric with memory''? Asking that questions give me a sense of deja vu (getting old sucks).

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Started tinkering with a draft [[Discrete Causal Spaces]]. Help is more than welcome.


\item Made a few comments on [[electromagnetic field]] and [[electric charge]].


\item Asked a question on [[connection for a differential graded algebra]] (which Urs replied to).



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[twisted cohomology]] the May-Sigurdsson reference, mentioned their definition of twisted cohomology in terms of associated bundles of spectra and added a discussion on how that relates to the rest of the entry


\item it seems to me that linking to a page via a redirect has as a consequence that the linking page is not listed at the bottom of the linked page under \emph{Linked from} . That's too bad.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: This is one of several issues that have arisen due to the new redirects feature that I would not worry about. In the future, this should work as desired. Redirects also produce unnecessary ``Wanted Pages'' on the ``All Pages'' page. See the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=43&page=1#Item_3}{forum}.

\end{itemize}

\item added the reference to Abad and Crainic at [[Lie infinity-algebroid representation]]


\item realized only now that there is an entry [[semifree dga]], so I added to that entry a remark on [[Lie infinity-algebroid]] and conversely added there a pointer to the former


\item replied at [[connection for a differential graded algebra]], remarking that this seems to be essentially the structure discussed at [[Lie infinity-algebroid representation]] -- this concept seems to be reinvented many times, just recently it seems that what Abad and Crainic describe in \href{http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0319}{0901.0319} is the same idea


\item if indeed calling \emph{recently revised} should be avoided for the time being, it is all the more important that you indicate even small changes/additions here at \emph{latest changes}


\item yes, I am relieved to see [[Mike Shulman|Mike]] back, if only temporarily, I was worried that the $n$Lab had lost one of its most valuable contributors



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Welcome back, Mike!
\item My experience is that Recently Revised, All Pages, and especially Search will degrade performance. I need them all, but I try to use them sparingly. Long pages (such as this one sometimes) can also degrade performance, but only temporarily.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman|Mike]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied to discussions at [[replete subcategory]] and [[pseudofunctor]].


\item Sorry for suddenly disappearing; after graduating (thanks for the thoughts everyone!) I had immediate obligations to three coauthors that took priority, so I lost track of the nCommunity for a bit. (One of those papers, which people here might be interested in, should be appearing on the arXiv shortly.) Unfortunately I'll now be traveling and out of touch for the next month, but then I'll be back.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added three basic examples to [[metric space]]


\item filled more information provided by [[Todd Trimble]] into the entry [[paracompact space]]


\item created [[cup product]]


\item checked by private email with [[Todd Trimble]] and probably see my confusion at [[paracompact space]] now -- replied there and added explicitly the example of second countable fin-dim manifolds


\item created [[magnetic current]] and [[electric current]]


\item I am getting the impression that the server runs much more smoothly when one avoids to call the ``recently revised'' page. This is a pity, because I used to go there all the time to see what's happening, but it would be helpful to figure out if maybe the cause of the performance problems we see can be narrowed down further. Maybe calling ``recently revised'' causes the software to go through the entire database in an inefficient way.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: When you mentioned this via email yesterday, I stopped viewing ``Recently Revised'' (which I had been viewing very frequently prior to that). The performance yesterday was MUCH better. It could very well be that performance is degraded when you view ``Recently Revised'' and possibly seriously degraded when several people attempt to access it simultaneously (which I'm sure happens frequently).

\end{itemize}

\item have a question at [[paracompact space]] concerning what it says there about the ``long line'' compared to what it says at [[locally compact space]] -- this seems to be inconsistent to me



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090714}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-14}}\label{20090714}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added theorems about relation with abelian sheaf cohomology to [[Cech cohomology]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item in the course of that created [[paracompact space]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[Euler number]] (including Euler polynomial(s)) and expanded [[Legendre polynomial]]. Wasted part of the day browsing programming manuals about Ruby\ldots{}interesting. Maybe something prompts me to be doing something about it :)


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: created [[Karoubi K-theory]]


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Stumbled across the discussion at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] on bibliographies and realised that more people were keen for this to be sorted out than I'd thought. A few possibilities are laid out in the corresponding discussion on the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=40}{forum}. Please stop by and let us know what you want from a bibliography system so that we can design it according to what everyone wants rather than just what a few of us want.

On that note, seeing as my mathematical skills are not in the mainstream of the current focus of the n-lab, I'm concentrating a bit more on technical support (stuff like the forum, bibliography, diagrams, useful little scripts like how to download the entire lab for offline browsing). There are lots of things that I (and the others who do a little hacking like this) \emph{could} do but only so much time in which to do it. So if there's something you'd like done, say a bibliography, that you think I could help with then the fact that someone actually wants it done pushes it up my priority list. However, \emph{unless you tell me about it} or mention it somewhere that I will \emph{actually} see it then I'm not going to do anything about it because I won't know about it!


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[Kalb-Ramond field]]


\item expanded the list of examples at [[model category]] and added at the beginning a sentence on combinatorial simplicial model categories


\item after a little reflection I moved the previous content at [[electromagnetism]] to [[electromagnetic field]] and kept just a brief note at the former, for later expansion

then I worked on [[electromagnetic field]]

I renamed the section I was working on into \emph{Mathematical model from physical input} . This now starts with quick and concise derivation of the fact that the EM field is modeled by a Cech-Deligne cocycle based on a quick definition of Maxwell's equations and the quantization condition.

the following sections ``the local picture'' and ``the global picture'' are supposed to provide the remaining details and background. Still needs polishing.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Fixed links at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] until I finally got tired (through 1969).\begin{itemize}%
\item Then had to deal with the agonisngly slow server while I checked this.
\item And finally took a whole \emph{hour} just to get access to this page so I could report on what I did ---nothing else!

\end{itemize}

\item Having a discussion with [[Zoran ?koda]] about transliteration at [[M M Postnikov]].
\item Removed the redirect from [[Cauchy colimit]] to [[Cauchy complete category]] on the grounds that they are not actually discussed there.\begin{itemize}%
\item Restored the link from [[direct sum]] accordingly (but maybe it should not link there?).
\item Changed the example at [[redirect]] accordingly.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090713}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-13}}\label{20090713}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started working on [[electromagnetism]], but no nice entry yet -- will have to call it quits now -- won't mind if anyone feels like improving on the current situation, otherwise I'll continue tomorrow


\item created [[gauge theory]] but only in order to create [[electromagnetism]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[Otto Schreier]] and made some corrections and additions to [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics|timeline]]. Many attributions give too late dates, e.g. [[Vladimir Voevodsky]]`s motives dated to 2000, while 1st versions emerged already around 1995-1996. When I saw his 1996 paper Homology of schemes in 1996 I immediately after reading about a page said to myself this is a Fields medal (and it was only in 2002 to my surprise); his preprint on K-theory arXiv on the solution of Milnor conjecture which was in that circle of methods is 1995 or 1996 as well. Note the usage of some concepts of homological algebra by Cayley before Hilbert.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a remark about the general nonsense at [[nerve and realization]] to [[homotopy coherent nerve]]


\item added some links to new entries to the link list at [[Higher Topos Theory]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[scheme]], [[Nikolai Durov]], [[model stack]], [[pseudomodel stack]]. For timeline enthusiasts, I noticed that there is a big overlap (and some disagreements) with knowledgeable 40-page article

\begin{itemize}%
\item Charles Weibel, \href{http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~weibel/HA-history.dvi}{A history of homological algebra}

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added references to [[John Baez|John]]`s lectures and TWFs to [[generalized (Eilenberg-Steenrod) cohomology]] and to [[Postnikov system]]


\item brought [[models for infinity-stack (infinity,1)-toposes]] to a reasonable completion

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: I just beautified this. By the way, every single instance of plural links on that page contained redirects so you can start saving time for yourself by typing links like instead of

 or even

. Just FYI.



\end{itemize}

\item added [[homotopy coherent nerve]] as a further example at [[nerve and realization]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]: Added a section to [[redirects]] on ``Undoing a Redirect''.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: started fleshing out an example over at [[Frolicher space]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[limit]] the $(\infty,1)$-categorical definition with a pointer to the entry on limits in quasi-categories

\begin{itemize}%
\item I am thinking (now) that generally we should in entries such as \emph{adjoint}, \emph{limit}, etc, list \emph{all} reasonable variations and generalizations, possibly just providing a link to a separate entry but still mentioning the generalized concept

\end{itemize}

\item created [[Cartesian fibration]]


\item added to [[adjoint functor]] the definition for $(\infty,1)$-categories


\item created [[local equivalence]]


\item expanded [[Bousfield localization]] by discussion of localization of model categories


\item replied at [[chain homology and cohomology]] and have myself a comment -- but no time at the moment to work on this entry, will try to come back to it later, unless some helpful soul takes care of it in the meantime


\item created [[models for infinity-stack (infinity,1)-toposes]] -- but still working



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]: Comment at [[chain homology and cohomology]] re: type of space represented by a positive-degrees chain complex. Also comment at [[sphere]] regarding topology on infinite sphere for the purposes of contractibility.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Comments on [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]].
\item Created [[opposite relation]], quite brief.

\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]: Posted kernel of an idea at [[microbundle]] that has been sitting at the back of mind for a while, in the hope someone might be able to use it or do something interesting with it.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Wrote [[subset collection]] (a [[foundations|foundational]] axiom of [[set theory]] intermediate between [[power set]]s and [[function set]]s, justified by [[type theory]] and strong enough to define the located Dedekind [[real number]]s).



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090712}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-12}}\label{20090712}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Wrote [[sphere]] and [[pointed space]] to fill some gaps. The former has a reference to (yet unwritten) [[Whitehead's theorem]] with the provacative claim that this shows that [[generalised (Eilenberg?Steenrod) homotopy theory]] is unnecessary; I don't really intend to defend that, but maybe it will interest the people working on that subject?


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Started a discussion on the n-forum about how to get a snapshot of the n-lab (since this is really an announcement page rather than a discussion page). Discussion is \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=42}{here}.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Added some illustrations to [[simplicial set]], based on those at [[cubical set]], as requested by an [[InterestedAnonymousCoward]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created [[microbundle]]. Note that classical references do not mention morphisms, just isomorphisms or equivalences of microbundles. Did anybody notice my update downstairs on the issue of export\_html (answer to Urs/Toby answers) ? I suggested that once a week an export\_html be posted as a file to be downloaded which is not up-to-date with a warning, as I think (maybe I should be corrected) that Jacques stopped serving export\_html because of long generation/compilation time, while static file and new cimpilation once a week will do less harm. And leave generation of export\_markup as it is, up-to-date.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090711}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-11}}\label{20090711}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item branched off [[chain homology and cohomology]] from [[cohomology]], prodded by the blog discussion \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/06/cohomology_and_homotopy.html#c025198}{here} -- but left somewhat unfinished as I need to run

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Another tip for Zoran: If $\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}$ looks bad, then the problem is on your end. To be sure, it looks bad to me too, but that problem is on my end; it looks good if I use the STIX fonts (as discussed \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/instiki/show/Browsers/}{here}), but I think that those are otherwise pretty ugly, so I don't use them. So the problem is that almost every font doesn't know how to do that sort of thing correctly \ldots{} but the MathML produced by Instiki is correct. (Update: Actually, that example looks just fine in DejaVu Serif too, but I remember that there are other examples that don't.)
\item A question on terminology at [[replete subcategory]]. Possibly the answers should inform [[equivalence]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090710}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-10}}\label{20090710}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added model category version to [[local object]]


\item added remark about relation of Quillen equivalences to the corresponding presented $(\infty,1)$-categories to [[presentable (infinity,1)-category]]


\item created [[combinatorial simplicial model category]]


\item created [[combinatorial model category]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim]]: I have started to reorganise some of the entries on Cech methods since David has started on [[homotopy (as an operation)]] and had an idea about [[Cech homotopy]]. I have encorporated a point made by [[Zoran ?koda|Zoran]] about the history of [[Cech methods]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created a version (to be expanded) of [[Legendre polynomial]] and [[M M Postnikov]] and added references to [[Postnikov system]]. I think historically tower and system differed by inclusion of universal cohomological class representing the fibration into the notion of system (cf. Whitehead's big book, ch.9). This should be still noted: if one does not specify the cohomological class this is I think like missing the choice of isomorphism when the isomorphism exists. Technical issues: I encountered a problem that sqrt\{fraction\} puts sqrt only such that the numerator is under the root. I do not know how one should write correctly. Toby thank you for the tip for getting the SOURCE of old versions. I sometimes write some items partly motivated by need to have them for my students, and plan to incorporate something close to my version into student scripta. You are very knowledgable about wiki world. :) I was also trying to take the export of the whole nlab and succeeded to get the markupML version but not html: when asking nlab/export\_html i get 403 FORBIDDEN message in my browser.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: I also get this error message when trying to export the $n$Lab as html -- I remember the html export was particularly heavy on the server and maybe it was truned off in view of the server being a bit weak -- we are trying to move to a better host eventually


\item \emph{Toby}: Yes, Jacques turned that off because it was such a load on the server; I expect that we can turn it on again when we get a better host. In principle, you can get the HTML by exporting the source and compiling it on a local copy of Instiki, but of course you have to install Instiki to do that. (Also note that you'll need the CSS files if you want the HTML to look the same, including fonts, query boxes, etc.) And neither of these includes old versions; I think that Urs(?) is backing those up periodically in case the server crashes.


\item \emph{Zoran}: could then somebody make one copy of html zip file 2-3 times a month ? It would not be updated but still it would be useful for browsing math when offline. If I get the zip-file I can put it online on my homepage. Or simply could Jacques put one zip file of export\_html weekly with link and warning that it is not up-to-date; and for editing we can anywy use markup version. Then the server does not get heavy with generation, I think that probably generating, compiling all takes time, the shear downloading from time to time would maybe not burden the server ?



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield|David]]: began an experiment on [[homotopy (as an operation)]] of dualizing the [[cohomology]] page. Began [[generalized (Eilenberg-Steenrod) homotopy]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item rewrote the intro to [[Cech cohomology]] (see there) and started adding a list of examples for the abelian case: the standard series line bundles, line bundle gerbes, with connection, etc. -- but not well written at the moment and no effort to get signs straight


\item created [[nerve and realization]] in order to host Kan's general idea of how a functor into a category with colimits induces an adjoint pair of functors

\begin{itemize}%
\item I think I know what I am doing, but I'd like to ask people like [[Tim Porter]] and [[Todd Trimble]] to have a critical look at it (where is [[Mike Shulman]]??) -- in particular at the moment I allowed myself to assume that we are copowered over the enriching category in order to get nice formulas, I wouldn't object if somebody finds the time to give the more general discussion


\item then of course I adjusted links and made some comments accordingly at [[nerve]], [[geometric realization]] and [[Dold-Kan correspondence]]



\end{itemize}

\item following [[Eric Forgy|Eric]]`s question I typed a quick reply into [[cohomology]] on how the ordinary notion of cohomology in cochain complexes is reproduced. In principle this gives all the necessary information, but I'll try to find the time later to give a long detailed exposition of how this basic important special case arises from the very general perspective


\item added an ``Idea'' section to the beginning of [[Postnikov system in triangulated category]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item in the course of that I noticed that the sub-web of stable higher category links was lacking a bit of coherence. I tried to improve the link lists at [[stable (infinity,1)-category]] a bit accordingly and also added an ``Idea'' piece with links to [[enhanced triangulated category]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: A quick note: I also have been changing {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91apple\char93\char93s}} to {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91apples\char93\char93}} but I will not do it now unless I have reason to think that it was written by someone who prefers {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91apples\char93\char93}}. In general, I do not edit matters of taste; I didn't know that this was a matter of taste, but now I do know that. (Sometimes if I'm changing something else, then I will change matters of taste at the same time, but only if I have substantially rewritten the sentence or if helps to standardise the notation and terminology. And this does not qualify as notation and terminology.) I'm sorry if I caused offence, but please understand that I did not know that there was a difference of style.

\begin{itemize}%
\item PS: If Eric adds {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91\char33redirects\char32apples\char93\char93}} to the bottom of {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91apple\char93\char93}}, then both {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt http\char58\char47\char47ncatlab\char46org\char47nlab\char47show\char47apple}} and {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt http\char58\char47\char47ncatlab\char46org\char47nlab\char47show\char47apples}} should work. I will still add such redirects myself, for the benefit of the style preferred by Urs, Eric, and me; but I will no longer change styles in what Zoran has written.
\item PPS: To see the source of an old version of a page, hit \textbf{Back in time} until you find the right version (or try \textbf{History} to get a list of versions), then hit \textbf{Rollback} to see the source of that version. After you've copied the source, hit \textbf{Cancel} (or \textbf{Submit} if you really want to change it back to the old version).
\item PPPS: You can type  to get {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91apple\char93\char93s}} if you find it convenient to do so.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090709}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-09}}\label{20090709}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Zoran ?koda|Zoran ?k]]oda: but the plurals are NOT there -- if I write

 I did not use the code for plural. Let me clear the issue (I will write round brackets): Eric is doing TWO things 1) he is taking entry ((apple)) and adding the redirection instruction inside to allow for ((apples)). This creates one new version, not too bad, you consider this robust, I can tolerate it. 2) he is changing every occurence of my reference ((apple))s which used to be correct usage from within entries ((banana)), ((pear)), ((ananas)) and ((strawberry)) to new format ((apples)). This amounts to not allowing me to use legitimate ((apple))s from within ((bananas)). This second thing, unlike the first, I can not tolerate, as it has no rational explanation. I do not know if it is [[evil|good :)) ]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: The fact that many items appear as

 on the nLab is an artifact of the period prior to having redirects. Prior to having redirects, we'd have to write that as

 to get it to render correctly which gets old after a while, so people naturally gravitated to the easier

. If we'd had redirects from the beginning, there would be a redirect at

 for

 and no one in their right mind would ever write

 again (which is distracting to look at) if they could just write

 instead. I'm at a total loss as to why you oppose this. Currently, I am trying to reverse the damage so that we can make things cleaner from here. Whenever, I see ``]]s'', I instinctively change this to ``s]]'' and add a redirect if it doesn't exist. In time, this should work itself out and we should have plural redirects for most links that are commonly used. It would work itself even faster if people stopped writing ``]]s'' and used the plural link form instead.


\item Zoran: I disagree that for example I write

 rather than

 beause it is easier. I write it because the appearance of

 I like more: it tells me by the color which part of the name is real URL (as I often type URL), plus I have no dislike for multicolored words. I will continue writing like that. If you like to write your way write, but leave my links the way they are. Otherwise I can not ENJOY writing. It takes sometimes the whole minute to reload the page and I often reload the page is somebody has changes it, and it disappoints if the change is a matter of taste, and is legitimate. Second there may be day when you will have no time to write redirects etc. and one will not memorize which redirects exist and which do not. If I write the way I do, I will never have problem with this. If I want a single-color appearance of the link for some reason, I do not mind writing it long way like

, it is about 2 seconds more, rather than spending far more time to check if there is a created redirect and wait half a minute to load the page, specially if in addition to slowness of the server I have my own internet connection problems what is very often.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item I started going a bit through the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] and added links to $n$Lab entries wherever I saw a possibility

\begin{itemize}%
\item in that context: I like what [[Eric Forgy|Eric]] is doing. It makes the linkage of the Lab more robust. For instance quite a few of the Timeline's imported links \emph{didn't} break (while thousands broke) just because Eric had made sure that some plurals etc were recognized.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran Skoda]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[Postnikov system in triangulated category]]


\item I STRONGLY disagree with creation of spurios PLURAL items when they are of NO use. Namely like Eric just created new version of [[bialgebra cocycle]] to say that it redirects [[bialgebra cocycles]], while it is simpler and better from memory point of view to write [[bialgebra cocycle]]s. Why having whole page archived and one more page to browse in history just to distiguish if s is before or after the brackets ?? Dear Eric we have thousands of items to enter and there will be thousands of new pages in future and why to increase entropy and spend yuor valuable time on this -- please take some book and help us entering something NEW and not messing with plurals and creating new versions for nothing. I have hard time browsing history when something is messed up and if I am going to spend it on such a nonsense than I will leave the idea to enter new items myself.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Hi Zoran. By adding a redirect for plurals, we are not creating spurious pages (but we are creating spurious revisions, but I don't see that as a meaningful issue). In fact, my hope is that everyone will stop writing things like in favor of

 at which point I could stop correcting the links. Please see [[redirect]] for more information. Redirects are a very nice new feature of the nLab (partially motivated by your suggestions wrt symbolic links) and I hope they become a natural part of any contributors arsenal. PS: It is ironic that you complain about creating additional revisions when you just created a THIRD revision by changing my redirect BACK (???). PPS: A good place to discuss this and any other administrative issues is on the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/}{n-forum}. That is a good place for such discussions and once a decision has been made about any issue, the conclusion will be placed on the brand new \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlabmeta/show/HomePage}{nLab meta} site. We're working on decision making processes now and any feedback is more than welcome.



\end{itemize}

\item Zoran: look at my explanation few paragraphs above: I accept your creating redirects, but do not accept not allowing me having my own format of calling links within my own text. I changed your redirect back because I want to assert my right to have the link called any possible way I like it. It functions, it correctly displays and it si even more informative: ((apple))s tells you even the information that s is not the name of the page, and I often TYPE the URL name of the page rather than clicking on the link, because often because of slowness of the server working on laptop and desktop simultaneously. Of course this kind of strange usage is useful just for the author, but if I am in process of improving the page which i largely created i think I have the right for the convenience.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: Hi Zoran. The nLab is a group effort, and as such, it has to have some rules and should probably have at least some (loose) sense of uniformity. I don't think it makes sense for Toby and I to be going around correcting links to have you change them back simply because you want assert yourself. The nLab is already MUCH looser than Wikipedia as far as standards and formats and I think that is a good thing, but I also think there should be some agreed upon ``Matters of Style''. I started a discussion on ``Matters of Style'' on the n-forum \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=41}{here}. We should probably discuss it there. Whatever we all decide on, then we can add a ``Matters of Style'' page to \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlabmeta/show/HomePage}{nLab meta}. Anyone reading this is more than welcome to voice their opinion, but once a ``quorum'' is met, I think we should establish a rule. In a bit, we may also want to remove this discussion from [[latest changes]] since this isn't what the page was intended for.

\end{itemize}

\item created [[bialgebra cocycle]], [[Drinfel'd twist]]


\item by the way how does one download the source of a previous version ? I sometimes create a page and then there are changes after and I want to have my file for other purposes with what I wrote and I do not know how to access it.



\end{itemize}

\item [[John Baez|John]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item I did some work on the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]], and proposed some new guidelines for how it should look.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item am working at [[Cech cohomology]] on the section ``Abelian Cech cohomology'' where my aim is to spell out a derivation of the standard Cech double complex from starting with the general definition of cohomology for the case that the coefficient object is in the image of the Dold-Kan map from chain complexes of sheaves to simplicial sheaves -- I am not really satisfied, but this is how far I got -- check critically

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090708}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-08}}\label{20090708}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[nerve]] an ``Idea'' section and a further ``examples''-section on nerves for chain complexes and the relation to the Dold-Kan correspondence


\item after a bit of work and with a bit of luck, I found the old reference by Kan where the description of the Dold-Kan correspondence is given in terms of nerves -- this is the nice way to do it -- added that reference to the [[Dold-Kan correspondence]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item that reminds me that it would be nice if we eventually had an entry on that verey general nonsense behind nerves (or do we already have that somewhere?)

\end{itemize}

\item by coincidence I came across the old entry [[crossed module]] and noticed that there were meanwhile plenty of links to add to it -- so I did


\item added two further references, by Birgit Richter, on the ($\infty$-)monoidal structure of the Dold-Kan correspondence to [[Dold-Kan correspondence]]


\item added a small section on and a link to [[matching family]] at [[sheafification]]


\item reorganized [[Dold-Kan correspondence]] in an attempt to make the material more systematic -- then I started adding a detailed def/lemma/theorem/proof list of the classical statement, but didn't get very far yet


\item made a remark at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]]


\item pasted a blog comment by [[David Ben-Zvi]] into [[n-categorical physics]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[essential image]], added n-category generalization to [[replete subcategory]], additions to [[image]], [[model structure on chain complexes]], remark due Leinster to [[Gray-category]]; created [[matching family]] following mainly conventions in MacLane-Moerdijk. This last item surely overlaps with [[sheafification]] but the approach and exposition is rather different; created micro-entry [[maximal sieve]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090707}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-07}}\label{20090707}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Gave Tim a link at [[category theory]].


\item Started [[suspension]] to fill links. (We already have [[reduced suspension]]. There's also a suspension defined at [[delooping]] which doesn't seem to be quite the same; what's the connection?)

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]: when passing from topological spaces to spectra, suspension of spaces becomes the suspension mentioned at delooping: that in a [[stable (infinity,1)-category]], I'd say

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield|David]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[co-H-space]]. It's not looking very much like a dual version of [[H-space]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[Cech cover]] and [[Cech model structure on simplicial presheaves]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item in that context also rewrote and expanded the introduction at [[hypercover]] and included corresponding links at [[model structure on simplicial presheaves]].

\end{itemize}

\item I notice that [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] is a renamed version of the original Sandbox(!). (As you can see by clicking on its ``history'' link. But also the current [[Sandbox]]`s very first link claims to lead to the historical Sandbox, but takes on to the Sandbox poage with title ``Timeline of category theory-\ldots{}'') I guess that's not intended.

\begin{itemize}%
\item This came about because [[Rafael Borowiecki]] created the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics|Timeline]] by moving the [[Sandbox]] instead of as a new page. So I was faced with the choice to move it back and then create Rafael's page properly or to just recreate the Sandbox instead. So I recreated the Sandbox but then put a note at the top in case anybody wants to see the history of that page, which is now at the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics|Timeline]]. (But now that it's been more than half an hour, I can remove that note; anyone looking through the history will still see it.) ---Toby

\end{itemize}

\item tried to improve the exposition at [[groupoid object in an (infinity,1)-category]]. More to be done eventually, though.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Eric]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Reminds Urs that he no longer needs to type

 because there is now a redirect from [[Urs]] to [[Urs Schreiber]]., i.e. the link

 points to [[Urs]]. Try it! :)


\item Along similar lines, after seeing

 about a million times, I just added a redirect so that typing

 gets redirected automatically to [[internal to]]. Try it! :)



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090706}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-06}}\label{20090706}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item replied to [[Toby Bartels|Toby]] at [[cogroup]] (yes, that wasn't so good) and to [[David Roberts|David R.]] at [[principal infinity-bundle]] (yes, that was a typo)

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item I would like to suggest that the appearance of links to nonexistent pages is a \emph{feature} that we should not break. Thus we should not create blank pages (or pages that are blank except for redirects) but instead create pages only when we have something to put there. Conversely, we shouldn't change links to go to redirected forms (as at [[geometric infinity-function theory]] currently) unless the redirects have actually been created. If this means that we have things like {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt \char91\char91\char8734\char45foo\char124infinity\char45foo\char93\char93}} (when nobody has written about $\infty$-foos yet), then we're no worse off than before we had redirects, and the appearance of links to nonexistent pages still tells us something. (Note: there is some related discussion now hidden under July 3.)

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric]]: I agree that appearance of links to nonexistent pages is a \textbf{feature} that should not be broken. Currently, one of my self-assigned projects (a.k.a. a labor of love) is to pick a page and systematically ``clean it''. The last major cleaning was [[geometric ∞-function theory]]. I hope that for the most part (with some minor exceptions) most everyone would agree that it looks a lot better now. The issue that brought up your comment, however, came about as a result of me ``cleaning'' [[strict ∞-category]]. Part of my system for cleaning pages involves changing things like to simply

 and adding a redirect from [[categories]] to [[category]]. If I do this enough, then most n-Lab pages will have available redirects for plural forms of nouns. In fact, I would encourage everyone to stop including things like

 and simply use the plural form

. Then either leave the nonexistent link there for someone to add the redirect or add the [[redirect]] yourself. What happened on [[strict ∞-category]] was that there was a link

. My ``system'' suggests that I change that to

 and add a redirect from [[exchange laws]] to [[exchange law]]. In this rare case, [[exchange law]] did not exist yet, so I couldn't add a redirect without creating a blank page for [[exchange law]]. In this rare case, given that I am trying to systematically ``clean'' pages, I thought it was acceptable to break the rule about nonexistent pages. I still think it is justified as long as it doesn't become a habit, which I'm pretty sure it won't be.



\end{itemize}

\item A question at [[cogroup]] about what we really want there. (Surely more than just the empty set?)

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]: we want to say that pointed \emph{spheres} are co-groups, so that maps out of them, called homotopy groups, are, well, groups. Supposed to be dual to the statement that mapping \emph{into} a group coefficient object gives [[cohomology group]]s

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added to [[principal bundle]] a long detailed section called ``the $G$-action from the homotopy pullback'' -- this may look like weird overkill, but the point is that this serves as a warmup for an analogous discussion at [[principal infinity-bundle]]


\item rediscovered that we had an entry [[Cech methods]] and added lots of links to that


\item provided explicit details at [[Cech cohomology]] for the general (nonabelian) case in low degree



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[small fibration]], added more general discussion on [[endomorphism monoids]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]] created [[Cech cohomology]]


\item [[David Corfield|David]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item more suggestions than changes, but it would be good to have entries for [[cogroup]] and [[co-H-space]]. Could [[homotopy group]] and [[cohomology group]] be made to resemble each other more? I.e., must the former be restricted to $n$-spheres as domain? Hmm, is something suboptimal about H-group and H-cogroup, whereas H-space and co-H-space? Perhaps `co' and `H' commute.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]: it would in principle be good to have expositions at [[cohomology]], [[cohomology group]] and [[homotopy]], [[homotopy group]] be more symmetric -- we just have to beware that we'd be going into untrodden territory and should indicate accordingly: while generalized cohomologies of all sorts are becoming familiar, I can't recall having seen mentioned the corresponding dual notion of generalized homotopy anywhere but in our discussion -- so we should maybe tag the corresponding discussion, if we implrement it, with a box saying ``this is research material'' or the like -- but I would enjoy it if we did so

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[groupoid object in an (infinity,1)-category]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a discussion of this at [[delooping]], a brief reference to it at [[quotient object]] and a link to it in the fourth $\inft$-Giraud-axiom at [[(infinity,1)-topos]]

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090705}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-05}}\label{20090705}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Mentioned [[endomorphism monoids]] too.
\item Tried to give Tim some comfort at [[pseudofunctor]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a tiny bit of discussion to [[principal infinity-bundle]] about how the homotopy pullback definition gives the $G$-action and vice versa. But need to say more here.

\begin{itemize}%
\item By the way has anyone seen [[Mike Shulman|Mike]]? I know that he has thought about this, it's related to his [[michaelshulman:exactness hypothesis|exactness hypothesis]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090704}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-04}}\label{20090704}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Mentioned [[automorphism groups]].


\item [[Tim]]: I have asked a silly question at [[pseudofunctor]], but would appreciate an answer. Can I make a plea to someone to provide a more detailed treatment of the Grothendieck construction as well. (I mean the one which is related to the pseudocolimit. At least a general reference to that should be in the entry.)


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Put some stuff at [[equality]], but there is much more that could and should be said there.
\item Added some pretty broad examples to [[evil]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Tim]]: I have added new references to [[distributor]] and [[Grothendieck fibration]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Added a bit to the scandalously short page [[isomorphism]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090703}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-03}}\label{20090703}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Eric Forgy]] created [[exchange law]] blank (perhaps by accident?) and [[Toby Bartels]] wrote a very brief stub there.

\begin{itemize}%
\item \emph{Eric}: This was not an accident. I was cleaning some pages and wanted a redirect for [[exchange laws]], but [[exchange law]] did not exist yet, so I created it so I could insert a redirect assuming (correctly) that someone would fill in some content.
\item \emph{Toby}: I wouldn't agree with your assumption. What I wrote there is not very useful; if I'd waited to write it by choice rather than by necessity, then I would have written rather more.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item edited and expanded the link list at [[generalized smooth space]]


\item created [[smooth infinity-stack]] -- took the liberty of declaring this to be the term for ``$\infty$-stacks on CartesianSpaces''

\begin{itemize}%
\item see the example there to see the relevance of this, with an eye towards the discussion at [[principal 2-bundle]] and [[principal infinity-bundle]]

\end{itemize}

\item created [[smooth space]] -- took the liberty of declaring this to be the term for ``sheaves on Diff'' = ``sheaves on CartesianSpaces''.

\begin{itemize}%
\item this way a ``diffeological space'' is precisely a ``concrete smooth space'' and I

\begin{itemize}%
\item edited [[diffeological space]]


\item and created [[concrete sheaf]] (but [[concrete site]] still missing, and also maybe not the best definition at [[concrete sheaf]] yet)



\end{itemize}
to make this statement.



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Created [[Cauchy sequence]] and [[complete space]], including brief references at the end of each to the relationship with [[Cauchy complete categories]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090702}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-02}}\label{20090702}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started a section ``concrete realizations'' at [[principal infinity-bundle]]. So far I recall the old result by Quillen on certain ``1-categorica topological bundles'' and their $\infty$-action groupoids. Then I start making some remarks on Jardine's approach using what he calls ``diagrams'' and have a remark on how that compares to the Bartels-Bakovi-etc-style. This requires eventually much more discussion, but I have to call it quits for today.

But the point is that Jardine works in the ``petit topos'' perspective where all bundles live over the fixed site. So the terminal object in his setup is not the point, but the underlying space over which one works. This means that the simple picture of a principal $\infty$-bundle as the homotopy pullback of the point no longer works and is the reason why he introduces the yoga of what he calls ``diagrams''.

On the other hand, when one works with simplicial sheaves in the context of a ``gros topos'' such as sheaves on $Diff$ or on open subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$ or equivalent, then the simple conceptual picture remains valid.

Notice that placing oneself into the context of $n$-groupoids internal to diffeological spaces or the like is doing precissely this: working with simplicial sheaves on $Diff$.

Evidently i shouldn't be discussing this here but in some entry. But it's time for me to go to bed now.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created [[grouplike element]]. It contains few words on Amitsur complex for a coring with a (semi-)grouplike. The aim is to soon (using the setup) introduce entries for connections for corings; and then correpsondence between falt connections and descent data in the comonadic and coring setups (after Menini et al; all coming back to the example which is the correspondence between 1-order costratifications and flat connections in the crystalline setup due Grothendieck).


\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started adding the discussion of the model given by (pre)sheaves with values in \emph{simplicial groupoids} to [[model structure on simplicial presheaves]] (contained in a new big diagram containing all Quillen equivalent models for $\infty$-sheaves)

\begin{itemize}%
\item in that context created [[model structure on presheaves of simplicial groupoids]]

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created [[coseparable coring]],[[Sweedler coring]], [[two dimensional sheaf theory]]; expanded [[stratifold]] (which was empty, but existing!), added a reference to [[fibration in a 2-category]] and somewhere else. I think that in K-theory delooping has a bit different multiple meanings which are related but are more procedures making from something what can not be delooped strictly in the sense of [[delooping]] to the delooping of something what is the best approximation of deloopable; there are procedures due to Quillen, Waldhausen, Karoubi etc.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]: the entry on [[two dimensional sheaf theory]] is motivated from some behind-the-scenes discussion Zoran and I are having -- Zoran rightly points out that the present characterization of [[derived stack]] may be wanting, as strictly speaking saying ``derived stack'' should be related to but not be regarded as equivalent to ``higher stack on higher categorical site'' -- what we really need eventually is more details on the To\"e{}n-Vezzosi \href{http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/0579/}{work} on higher topos theory in the context of SSet-enriched categories,

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item replied at [[delooping]]

\end{itemize}

\item \emph{[[Eric]]}: Added a redirect for [[Urs]] so that he no longer has to type

 and can simply type

 and will be redirected to the correct page.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090701}{}\subsection*{{2009-07-01}}\label{20090701}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item proudly presenting what is now the widest (horizontally speaking) $n$Lab entry as yet: at [[model structure on simplicial presheaves]] I added a section ``Map'' where I draw a big diagram that indicates at least part of the collection of model structures, their interrelation, definition and authors

\begin{itemize}%
\item Yeah, I was thinking of reworking that map to run vertically \ldots{}. ---Toby


\item Would that really be better, though? Optimally, eventually we'd produce a \LaTeX\xspace ed pdf diagram. Here and elsewhere. That, however, inhibits joint editing a bit. ---Urs



\end{itemize}

\item replied at [[delooping]], at [[group]], added a bit at [[Notation]]


\item moved the key statement of [[Toby Bartels|Toby]]`s remark to the very beginning of [[group]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Andrew Stacey]] may be interested to see how I've changed the formatting of the goal box at [[Froelicher space]].
\item Incorporated Zoran's new references at [[principal 2-bundle]] into the text.
\item Added a note at [[group]] how $Grp$ is a full sub-$2$-category of $Grpd_*$ (even though not of $Grpd$).

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber|Urs]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item expanded at [[group]] on the statement that ``a group is a groupoid with a single object''


\item added to [[loop space object]] the true definition, added also an ``idea'' section, links to related entries and an introductory blurb to the original material


\item created [[delooping]] for the matter discussed by [[Eric Forgy|Eric]] and [[Toby Bartels|Toby]] at [[Dijkgraaf-Witten theory]]


\item added Jardine-Luo reference to [[principal 2-bundle]] and [[principal infinity-bundle]]


\item added to [[Froelicher space]] an ``Idea'' and a ``Reference'' section, prompoted by the blog entry \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/07/laubinger_on_lie_algebras_for.html}{here}



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item I archived the [[2009 June changes]] by the sneaky method of changing this page's name, copying the header and footer text (with appropriate changes) from the previous archive, and then creating this page anew. Maybe that will keep us from testing Instiki's tolerance for pages with thousands of edits in their history. ({\tt \symbol{94}}\_{\tt \symbol{94}})
\item I've completed migrating all old redirect pages to history pages; all links within the body of the Lab should now take you immediately to the target page. (There are a few victims of a bug, but I'll straighten that out with Jacques.) I have \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=39}{more comments} on the Forum.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
[[2008 changes|First list]] --- [[2009 June changes|Previous list]] --- [[2009 August changes|Next list]] --- \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/?CategoryID=5}{Current list}


\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
category: meta



\end{document}