\documentclass[12pt,titlepage]{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{ucs}
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{hyperref}

%----Macros----------
%
% Unresolved issues:
%
%  \righttoleftarrow
%  \lefttorightarrow
%
%  \color{} with HTML colorspec
%  \bgcolor
%  \array with options (without options, it's equivalent to the matrix environment)

% Of the standard HTML named colors, white, black, red, green, blue and yellow
% are predefined in the color package. Here are the rest.
\definecolor{aqua}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 1.0}
\definecolor{fuschia}{rgb}{1.0, 0, 1.0}
\definecolor{gray}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0.502}
\definecolor{lime}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 0}
\definecolor{maroon}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0}
\definecolor{navy}{rgb}{0, 0, 0.502}
\definecolor{olive}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0}
\definecolor{purple}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0.502}
\definecolor{silver}{rgb}{0.753, 0.753, 0.753}
\definecolor{teal}{rgb}{0, 0.502, 0.502}

% Because of conflicts, \space and \mathop are converted to
% \itexspace and \operatorname during preprocessing.

% itex: \space{ht}{dp}{wd}
%
% Height and baseline depth measurements are in units of tenths of an ex while
% the width is measured in tenths of an em.
\makeatletter
\newdimen\itex@wd%
\newdimen\itex@dp%
\newdimen\itex@thd%
\def\itexspace#1#2#3{\itex@wd=#3em%
\itex@wd=0.1\itex@wd%
\itex@dp=#2ex%
\itex@dp=0.1\itex@dp%
\itex@thd=#1ex%
\itex@thd=0.1\itex@thd%
\advance\itex@thd\the\itex@dp%
\makebox[\the\itex@wd]{\rule[-\the\itex@dp]{0cm}{\the\itex@thd}}}
\makeatother

% \tensor and \multiscript
\makeatletter
\newif\if@sup
\newtoks\@sups
\def\append@sup#1{\edef\act{\noexpand\@sups={\the\@sups #1}}\act}%
\def\reset@sup{\@supfalse\@sups={}}%
\def\mk@scripts#1#2{\if #2/ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\fi \else%
  \ifx #1_ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\reset@sup \fi {}_{#2}%
  \else \append@sup#2 \@suptrue \fi%
  \expandafter\mk@scripts\fi}
\def\tensor#1#2{\reset@sup#1\mk@scripts#2_/}
\def\multiscripts#1#2#3{\reset@sup{}\mk@scripts#1_/#2%
  \reset@sup\mk@scripts#3_/}
\makeatother

% \slash
\makeatletter
\newbox\slashbox \setbox\slashbox=\hbox{$/$}
\def\itex@pslash#1{\setbox\@tempboxa=\hbox{$#1$}
  \@tempdima=0.5\wd\slashbox \advance\@tempdima 0.5\wd\@tempboxa
  \copy\slashbox \kern-\@tempdima \box\@tempboxa}
\def\slash{\protect\itex@pslash}
\makeatother

% math-mode versions of \rlap, etc
% from Alexander Perlis, "A complement to \smash, \llap, and lap"
%   http://math.arizona.edu/~aprl/publications/mathclap/
\def\clap#1{\hbox to 0pt{\hss#1\hss}}
\def\mathllap{\mathpalette\mathllapinternal}
\def\mathrlap{\mathpalette\mathrlapinternal}
\def\mathclap{\mathpalette\mathclapinternal}
\def\mathllapinternal#1#2{\llap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}
\def\mathrlapinternal#1#2{\rlap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}
\def\mathclapinternal#1#2{\clap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}}

% Renames \sqrt as \oldsqrt and redefine root to result in \sqrt[#1]{#2}
\let\oldroot\root
\def\root#1#2{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}}
\renewcommand{\sqrt}[2][]{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}}

% Manually declare the txfonts symbolsC font
\DeclareSymbolFont{symbolsC}{U}{txsyc}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{symbolsC}{bold}{U}{txsyc}{bx}{n}
\DeclareFontSubstitution{U}{txsyc}{m}{n}

% Manually declare the stmaryrd font
\DeclareSymbolFont{stmry}{U}{stmry}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{stmry}{bold}{U}{stmry}{b}{n}

% Manually declare the MnSymbolE font
\DeclareFontFamily{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{mnomx}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{mnomx}{bold}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{b}{n}
\DeclareFontShape{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n}{
    <-6>  MnSymbolE5
   <6-7>  MnSymbolE6
   <7-8>  MnSymbolE7
   <8-9>  MnSymbolE8
   <9-10> MnSymbolE9
  <10-12> MnSymbolE10
  <12->   MnSymbolE12}{}

% Declare specific arrows from txfonts without loading the full package
\makeatletter
\def\re@DeclareMathSymbol#1#2#3#4{%
    \let#1=\undefined
    \DeclareMathSymbol{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nequiv}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{46}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Perp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Vbar}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\sslash}{\mathrel}{stmry}{12}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\bigsqcap}{\mathop}{stmry}{"64}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\biginterleave}{\mathop}{stmry}{"6}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\invamp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77}
\re@DeclareMathSymbol{\parr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77}
\makeatother

% \llangle, \rrangle, \lmoustache and \rmoustache from MnSymbolE
\makeatletter
\def\Decl@Mn@Delim#1#2#3#4{%
  \if\relax\noexpand#1%
    \let#1\undefined
  \fi
  \DeclareMathDelimiter{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#3}{#4}}
\def\Decl@Mn@Open#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathopen}{#2}{#3}}
\def\Decl@Mn@Close#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathclose}{#2}{#3}}
\Decl@Mn@Open{\llangle}{mnomx}{'164}
\Decl@Mn@Close{\rrangle}{mnomx}{'171}
\Decl@Mn@Open{\lmoustache}{mnomx}{'245}
\Decl@Mn@Close{\rmoustache}{mnomx}{'244}
\makeatother

% Widecheck
\makeatletter
\DeclareRobustCommand\widecheck[1]{{\mathpalette\@widecheck{#1}}}
\def\@widecheck#1#2{%
    \setbox\z@\hbox{\m@th$#1#2$}%
    \setbox\tw@\hbox{\m@th$#1%
       \widehat{%
          \vrule\@width\z@\@height\ht\z@
          \vrule\@height\z@\@width\wd\z@}$}%
    \dp\tw@-\ht\z@
    \@tempdima\ht\z@ \advance\@tempdima2\ht\tw@ \divide\@tempdima\thr@@
    \setbox\tw@\hbox{%
       \raise\@tempdima\hbox{\scalebox{1}[-1]{\lower\@tempdima\box
\tw@}}}%
    {\ooalign{\box\tw@ \cr \box\z@}}}
\makeatother

% \mathraisebox{voffset}[height][depth]{something}
\makeatletter
\NewDocumentCommand\mathraisebox{moom}{%
\IfNoValueTF{#2}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}{$\m@th##1##2$}}}{%
\IfNoValueTF{#3}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2]{$\m@th##1##2$}}%
}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2][#3]{$\m@th##1##2$}}}}%
\mathpalette\@temp{#4}}
\makeatletter

% udots (taken from yhmath)
\makeatletter
\def\udots{\mathinner{\mkern2mu\raise\p@\hbox{.}
\mkern2mu\raise4\p@\hbox{.}\mkern1mu
\raise7\p@\vbox{\kern7\p@\hbox{.}}\mkern1mu}}
\makeatother

%% Fix array
\newcommand{\itexarray}[1]{\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}}
%% \itexnum is a noop
\newcommand{\itexnum}[1]{#1}

%% Renaming existing commands
\newcommand{\underoverset}[3]{\underset{#1}{\overset{#2}{#3}}}
\newcommand{\widevec}{\overrightarrow}
\newcommand{\darr}{\downarrow}
\newcommand{\nearr}{\nearrow}
\newcommand{\nwarr}{\nwarrow}
\newcommand{\searr}{\searrow}
\newcommand{\swarr}{\swarrow}
\newcommand{\curvearrowbotright}{\curvearrowright}
\newcommand{\uparr}{\uparrow}
\newcommand{\downuparrow}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\duparr}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\updarr}{\updownarrow}
\newcommand{\gt}{>}
\newcommand{\lt}{<}
\newcommand{\map}{\mapsto}
\newcommand{\embedsin}{\hookrightarrow}
\newcommand{\Alpha}{A}
\newcommand{\Beta}{B}
\newcommand{\Zeta}{Z}
\newcommand{\Eta}{H}
\newcommand{\Iota}{I}
\newcommand{\Kappa}{K}
\newcommand{\Mu}{M}
\newcommand{\Nu}{N}
\newcommand{\Rho}{P}
\newcommand{\Tau}{T}
\newcommand{\Upsi}{\Upsilon}
\newcommand{\omicron}{o}
\newcommand{\lang}{\langle}
\newcommand{\rang}{\rangle}
\newcommand{\Union}{\bigcup}
\newcommand{\Intersection}{\bigcap}
\newcommand{\Oplus}{\bigoplus}
\newcommand{\Otimes}{\bigotimes}
\newcommand{\Wedge}{\bigwedge}
\newcommand{\Vee}{\bigvee}
\newcommand{\coproduct}{\coprod}
\newcommand{\product}{\prod}
\newcommand{\closure}{\overline}
\newcommand{\integral}{\int}
\newcommand{\doubleintegral}{\iint}
\newcommand{\tripleintegral}{\iiint}
\newcommand{\quadrupleintegral}{\iiiint}
\newcommand{\conint}{\oint}
\newcommand{\contourintegral}{\oint}
\newcommand{\infinity}{\infty}
\newcommand{\bottom}{\bot}
\newcommand{\minusb}{\boxminus}
\newcommand{\plusb}{\boxplus}
\newcommand{\timesb}{\boxtimes}
\newcommand{\intersection}{\cap}
\newcommand{\union}{\cup}
\newcommand{\Del}{\nabla}
\newcommand{\odash}{\circleddash}
\newcommand{\negspace}{\!}
\newcommand{\widebar}{\overline}
\newcommand{\textsize}{\normalsize}
\renewcommand{\scriptsize}{\scriptstyle}
\newcommand{\scriptscriptsize}{\scriptscriptstyle}
\newcommand{\mathfr}{\mathfrak}
\newcommand{\statusline}[2]{#2}
\newcommand{\tooltip}[2]{#2}
\newcommand{\toggle}[2]{#2}

% Theorem Environments
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{cor}{Corollary}
\newtheorem*{utheorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem*{ulemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem*{uprop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem*{ucor}{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}
\newtheorem{example}{Example}
\newtheorem*{udefn}{Definition}
\newtheorem*{uexample}{Example}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
\newtheorem{note}{Note}
\newtheorem*{uremark}{Remark}
\newtheorem*{unote}{Note}

%-------------------------------------------------------------------

\begin{document}

%-------------------------------------------------------------------


\section*{2009 September changes}

\hypertarget{archive}{}\subsubsection*{{Archive}}\label{archive}

[[!include all changes]]

Archive of changes made during September 2009. The substantive content of this page should \textbf{not} be altered. The announcement of the change to \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/?CategoryID=5}{the Forum} and the reasons for it have been \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/2009+September+changes/397}{archived}.


\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
\hypertarget{20090930}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-30}}\label{20090930}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: The lab elves are going to try to convince people to use the Forum for latest changes in October; see the new section about this at the top of the page. (If the instructions there are unclear, you can edit them now; I will move the final version to a permanent post on the Forum in 23 hours, after which you won't be able to edit them.)

\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090929}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-29}}\label{20090929}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: created [[blob homology]]


\item [[Jon Awbrey]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added a `blink (= stub-link) at [[higher order proposition]].


\item Added a quote to [[precursors]] in which Hilbert borrows an idea from Kant.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added the example of automorphism 2-groups to [[2-group]]


\item added reference to the new article by Batanin, Cisinki and Weber to [[generalized Gray tensor product]] -- Mike, did you look at that?

\begin{itemize}%
\item Not much yet, though it looks very neat. It looks like they are going the ``non-closed monoidal structure'' route?

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More at [[SEAR+?]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090928}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-28}}\label{20090928}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Toby is [[SEAR+?|right]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: entry [[internal crossed module]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] created [[differential crossed module]]


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created [[general linear group]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I'm pretty sure that [[SEAR+?]] satisfies $COSHEP$.


\item [[Todd Trimble]]: created [[PRO]], and began (re)adding material to [[cube category]], with a view toward incorporating material from the Grandis-Mauri \href{http://www.emis.de/journals/TAC/volumes/11/8/11-08.pdf}{paper} on cubical sites. Discussion with [[David Corfield]] at [[cubical set]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: added the example of ``derived schemes with $E_\infty$-ring''-valued structure sheaves to [[generalized scheme]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] separated Lurie material, with a link from [[scheme]] to [[scheme as locally affine structured (infinity,1)-topos]].

[[Urs Schreiber]]: thanks, Zoran. I have renamed the entry to say $(\infty,1)$-topos, as I think we agreed to be (more) careful than Lurie is about this.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: added the alternative definition in terms of sheaves on $Aff/X$ to [[quasicoherent sheaf]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] expanded the definition at [[scheme]]:

added a word on the definition of morphisms, gave the sheaf-theoretic version and the definition from the derived scheme perspective. In that context I cited the full paragraph of Jacob Lurie where he argues that the standard definition is misleading in that it asserts an underlying topological space, and that one better thinks of a scheme as having an underlying [[locale]]/[[0-topos]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item Urs why not separating this into another entry like scheme over a locale. There is zillion of things which should still enter into the entry of scheme and people needing basic info on schemes do not want hi-tech things which have no advantage in usual geometry, but rather as a motivation for generalizations ? Moreover this reinterpretation is missing the point of relative point of view. One usually have schemes over $S$, and being a scheme or being affine is a property of the morphism, and it can be done relative to anything. In that case, you do not care what is underlying. For example, nc schemes of Rosenberg have any category as a base while the exactness properties required for schemes are still strictly required.[[Urs Schreiber]]: sure, let's split off sub-entries when it gets too long. You are currently locking the entry, otherwise I would have done it.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]] changes to [[generalized scheme]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item part 3 at [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - E-infinity rings and derived schemes]] -- in that context also created: [[Paul Goerss]], [[n-truncated structured (infinity,1)-topos]], [[Spectral Schemes]], [[Topological Algebraic Geometry - A Workshop]]


\item stub entry for [[derived scheme]] and [[derived Deligne-Mumford stack]]


\item have two questions (green query boxes) at [[algebraic stack]]


\item moved the Deligne-Mumford reference from [[algebraic stack]] to [[Deligne-Mumford stack]]


\item created brief entries on [[representable morphism of stacks]] and [[geometric stack]], but that needs attention


\item added to [[affine space]] a section ``Affine spaces as model spaces''.


\item more details at [[geometry (for structured (infinity,1)-toposes)]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Corfield]]: Carried on the discussion at [[cubical set]]. Now we need to decide whether Pratt's use of the term is sufficiently widespread to justify disambiguation.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item more details at [[generalized scheme]]


\item edited [[derived algebraic geometry]] (a bit structuring by headlines and some paragraphs here and there)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman]]: A reference at [[COSHEP]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090927}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-27}}\label{20090927}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]: In response to the discussion at [[choice operator]], I started [[SEAR+?]] about whether and why adding a non-extensional choice operator is a conservative thing to do to a theory that lacks [[axiom of choice|AC]]. So far I can prove that it is conservative over [[COSHEP]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added potentially enlightening quotes from Hilbert and Ackermann to [[precursors]]. Better lights might be thrown by the original German or the first edition --- all I have on hand right now is the English translation of the second edition.


\item Added a historical note to [[choice operator]].



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Maybe it's just my font choices (DejaVu all the way!), but the TOC at [[generalized scheme]] looks perfectly normal to me.
\item Comments at [[choice operator]] and [[SEAR]].
\item [[Bas Spitters]] joined to make a note at [[SEAR]] that I moved to [[ETCS]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090926}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-26}}\label{20090926}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created entries [[affinoid algebra]], [[rigid analytic geometry]] (just started), [[derived noncommutative geometry]], [[unique factorization domain]].


\item [[David Corfield]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item a couple of queries at [[cubical set]].

[[Urs Schreiber]] I don't know the answer to the first question. Concerning the second: the answer to questions of the form ``shouldn't we do \ldots{}?'' is usually: ``yes, we should, why don't you go ahead and do so?''

[[Todd Trimble]] took a crack at addressing queries.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a remark on Connes' program to [[noncommutative geometry]], but still no genuine content


\item started adding details to [[generalized scheme]]

two formatting problems:

\begin{itemize}%
\item the MathML in the headlines makes the TOC have too much vertical spacing


\item the hyperlinks in the definition/theorem names don't appear as such (I think they used to work there in the old setup)



\end{itemize}
I leave it typeset this way anyway, trusting that we can eventually fix the software instead of working around it


\item worked on [[noncommutative algebraic geometry]]: added lots of links (many to existing entries, some to entries that ought to be created eventually), added more sections and a table of contents, then I expanded the Idea section, trying to give a better idea to laymen. Please check!



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] spun off the speculative archaeology of [[category theory]] to its own page at [[precursors]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] changes to [[generalized scheme]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] added material to [[cubical set]] (on relation to homotopy theory), that [[Ronnie Brown]] had posted to the Alg-Top mailing list


\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item talk at [[choice operator]], TOC at [[pure set]]
\item added a sketch proof of the ZF collection axiom from the SEAR collection axiom to [[SEAR]]

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090925}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-25}}\label{20090925}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Todd Trimble]]: added commentary to Rafael's suggestion at [[category theory]], at the end of the penultimate discussion box.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] created [[exterior differential system]] and related to that [[dg-ideal]] and [[vertical tangent Lie algebroid]]


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Sorry at [[natural numbers in SEAR]].


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Replied at [[category theory]] and suggested changing one of the views what category theory is.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created [[localized coinvariant]], [[universal localization]], [[noncommutative localization]], [[coinvariant]]; new links at [[Zoran ?koda]].


\item [[David Roberts]]: question for Toby at [[natural numbers in SEAR]], in 'alternative approach'.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: [[SEAR]], [[pure set]], [[natural numbers in SEAR]], [[category theory]], [[choice operator]].


\item [[David Roberts]]: fixed up problem at [[natural numbers in SEAR]] pointed out by Mike, and included another, cleaner, definition.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[universal enveloping algebra]], [[enveloping algebra]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090924}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-24}}\label{20090924}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Response/suggestion at [[natural numbers in SEAR]]
\item Created [[choice operator]] in order to ask a question (the second one on the page, not the first).

\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]: polishing up [[natural numbers in SEAR]]. The definition is in, now.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[Ore localization]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: worked on [[geometry (for structured (infinity,1)-toposes)]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item expanded and improved ``Idea'' section


\item in ``References'' section started commented list with explicit pointers to definitions


\item needs expansion -- and warning: I think I missed some $(-)^{op}$s and $Ind(-)$s. But have to run now.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Some discussion is continuing at [[pure set]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] some rough notes on genera and the elliptic genus at [[elliptic cohomology]].


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Who's the emacs guru who put the stuff on the [[HowTo]] about using Emacs?

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]: I guess that would be me.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: Great! I have a \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=85}{forum discussion} for you. Of course, anyone else interested in using Emacs for editing nLab pages is welcome to join in.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Ivo]] created [[free groupoid]] and [[Urs Schreiber]] went over it and added links, and typeset math.


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: A different viewpoint on universes in [[SEAR]].


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Replied at [[category theory]]. Now i understand less than i did before.


\item [[David Roberts]]: A bit at [[Morita equivalence]], on the version for Lie groupoids, and a sketchy start to universes in [[SEAR]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090923}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-23}}\label{20090923}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created a rough outline for [[Ore set]] and plan to have the entry on Ore localization separate.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: created [[Euclidean supermanifold]] and worked slightly more on the stub for [[Clifford algebra]]


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] created a rough outline for [[descent in noncommutative algebraic geometry]].


\item [[Dmitri Pavlov]] Asked two questions at the [[Morita equivalence]] page.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]] Reorganised the [[HowTo]] a little - hopefully haven't lost any information! - so that the automatic table of contents looks like the old one did (almost).

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: thanks, Andrew!!

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item left some new entries unfinished, but have to resume finishing these later today


\item added instructions for automatics TOCs to [[HowTo]]


\item some content fed into [[supermanifold]] -- alse created [[SDiff]], [[SVect]], [[super vector space]], [[super algebra]], [[Grassmann algebra]], [[super Lie algebra]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] is road-testing the ``cylindricity'' symbol $\text{&#9005;}$ (unicode ) for composing functions and relations the \emph{right} way, that is, in arrow order. For example, see [[boolean-valued function]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item I believe a semicolon $;$ is already commonly used by many people for composing things in ``diagrammatic'' order. -Mike


\item Yes, there's a Z-notation semicolon  (unicode ) that I tried for a while, but it always looks more like a (California) stop than a connector --- besides, Kurt Vonnegut says not to use `em.



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090922}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-22}}\label{20090922}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: added automatic TOCs to [[limit]], [[adjoint functor]], [[Kan extension]], [[cohomology]], [[FQFT]], [[category theory]], [[descent]] and maybe some other entries

this feature is great! we should insert it in most entries. Even though I was very much involved with all these entries, I was still surprised to see how long and detailed some of these tables of contents are. They really give an impression of a long entry that is not available otherwise.

one entry that really deserves a TOC is [[category of fibrant objects]] -- but I failed to insert one there. Encountered lots of strange behaviour like truncations of the entry (had to rollbck several times) or error messages after saving. Could it be that this entry exceeds some length limit?

[[Andrew Stacey|Lab Elf (carpentry division)]]: The length limit is \emph{really long} now, about 500 million characters. If we get that long we should contact the Guinness book of records. The problem was actually due to having a wiki-link in one of the headings. Oddly enough, there was no error message on this in the logs but changing it solved the problem (it now says ``see also [[fibration sequence]]'' after the heading). I imagine it's to do with the fact that things in the table of contents are links to the sections in the document so having a wiki-link would mean that one thing (the entry in the table of contents) was a link to two places (the section and the page the wiki-link points to). As the Maruku filter is independent of the wiki, it doesn't know of wiki-links and so doesn't know how to handle them.


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: More at [[SEAR]], including how to eliminate equality entirely, and how to prove the SEAR Collection axiom from ZF.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: many thanks to [[Jon Awbrey]] for providing help with automatic TOCs. Great that it works now, but why does it? What does that funny ``tic'' thing achieve? Let's discuss this on the forum -- \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=82&page=1#Item_1}{here} -- and summarize the result at [[HowTo]] eventually


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Working the foundations at [[SEAR]], [[pure set]], and [[natural numbers in SEAR]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] expanded [[proper map]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item now a bit of real content at [[Brown representability theorem]]


\item added link to Iglesias' PhD thesis to [[diffeological space]] -- the link to this thesis is hidden somewhere on his website, and it was pointed out to me that the thesis contains some noteworthy material which is not in the book (yet), such as discussion of diffeological principal bundles



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]] added references to [[Heisenberg double]] (including my own).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] wrote very stubby stub for [[Brown representability theorem]], in fact just recording a recent reference there


\item [[Lab Elf|Lab Elf (carpentry department)]]: Maruku (the implementation of markdown used here) can do automatic tables of contents (for use \emph{within} a page, it can't do cross-page contents). For an example see [[Froelicher space|this page]] and for the syntax, see the \href{http://maruku.rubyforge.org/maruku.html#toc-generation}{maruku extended syntax page}.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: ah, thanks Lab Elf! I wasn't aware of this. This will save me a few keystrokes. Should be mentioned at [[HowTo]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] tried that at [[differential logic]] and couldn't get it to work. Is there some extra trick to that?


\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: It looks like you have to start your headings with single \#`s and use a flush left tag something like this:

\noindent\hyperlink{20090930}{2009-09-30}\dotfill \pageref*{20090930} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090929}{2009-09-29}\dotfill \pageref*{20090929} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090928}{2009-09-28}\dotfill \pageref*{20090928} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090927}{2009-09-27}\dotfill \pageref*{20090927} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090926}{2009-09-26}\dotfill \pageref*{20090926} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090925}{2009-09-25}\dotfill \pageref*{20090925} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090924}{2009-09-24}\dotfill \pageref*{20090924} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090923}{2009-09-23}\dotfill \pageref*{20090923} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090922}{2009-09-22}\dotfill \pageref*{20090922} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090921}{2009-09-21}\dotfill \pageref*{20090921} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090920}{2009-09-20}\dotfill \pageref*{20090920} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090919}{2009-09-19}\dotfill \pageref*{20090919} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090918}{2009-09-18}\dotfill \pageref*{20090918} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090917}{2009-09-17}\dotfill \pageref*{20090917} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090916}{2009-09-16}\dotfill \pageref*{20090916} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090915}{2009-09-15}\dotfill \pageref*{20090915} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090914}{2009-09-14}\dotfill \pageref*{20090914} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090913}{2009-09-13}\dotfill \pageref*{20090913} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090912}{2009-09-12}\dotfill \pageref*{20090912} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090911}{2009-09-11}\dotfill \pageref*{20090911} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090910}{2009-09-10}\dotfill \pageref*{20090910} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090909}{2009-09-09}\dotfill \pageref*{20090909} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090908}{2009-09-08}\dotfill \pageref*{20090908} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090907}{2009-09-07}\dotfill \pageref*{20090907} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090906}{2009-09-06}\dotfill \pageref*{20090906} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090905}{2009-09-05}\dotfill \pageref*{20090905} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090904}{2009-09-04}\dotfill \pageref*{20090904} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090903}{2009-09-03}\dotfill \pageref*{20090903} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090902}{2009-09-02}\dotfill \pageref*{20090902} \linebreak
\noindent\hyperlink{20090901}{2009-09-01}\dotfill \pageref*{20090901} \linebreak




\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[functorial quantum field theory - contents]] and added it as a floating table of contents to relevant entries -- trusting that the related issues currently \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=61&page=1#Item_9}{discussed on the forum} will eventually be solved by CSS means


\item created [[bordism categories following Stolz-Teichner]]


\item created stubs for [[Riemannian manifold]], [[Riemannian cobordism]], [[isometry]]


\item added to [[Gray tensor product]] a link to Mike's new [[generalized Gray tensor product]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied to several comments at [[SEAR]], and rearranged the discussions to be (mostly) next to the text they are discussing. I'm happy about the interest this idea is generating.


\item Wrote [[generalized Gray tensor product]] about a folklore no-go argument that I keep forgetting and having to re-produce.



\end{itemize}

\item [[David Roberts]]: comments at [[SEAR]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item suggestion for renaming - SER (and SEPS for Toby's alternative)


\item comment about the category of SEAR-sets


\item the kick-start of a new project, [[natural numbers in SEAR]]. This is without assuming the axiom of infinity and otherwise assuming as few of the SEAR axioms as possible. A little over a stub at present, and maybe I'm making a big deal of nothing\ldots{}



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090921}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-21}}\label{20090921}

\begin{itemize}%
\item Heated discussion at [[SEAR]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item $\mathbf{Cat}$ fight?

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] is setting some tables at [[differential logic]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created stub for [[supergroup]]


\item created [[geometric models for elliptic cohomology]] with sub-entries so far:

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Axiomatic field theories and their motivation from topology]]


\item [[(1,1)-dimensional Euclidean field theories and K-theory]]


\item [[(2,1)-dimensional Euclidean field theories and tmf]]



\end{itemize}
this comes with this blog entry \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/a_seminar_on_a_geometric_model.html}{here}


\item created stub for [[partition function]]


\item created [[modular form]], but this needs more attention


\item added the promised blurb to [[directed space]] under ``homotopy theoretic perspective'' that is supposed to indicate the idea of the relation to [[(n,r)-category]] without misleadingly sounding as if there were nothing left to do here. Check!



\end{itemize}
I also added links to Grandis' new book on [[Directed Algebraic Topology]] to [[directed space]] and to [[directed homotopy theory]]. Since I haven't had a chance to look at that book yet, I have a question at [[directed space]] about its content.


\item [[David Corfield]]: Why call the page [[Directed Homotopy Theory]] when it's about a book called `Directed Algebraic Topology'? Don't titles of pages for specific texts coincide with titles of the texts?

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: I just wondered about the same thing -- I made [[Directed Algebraic Topology]] now redirect to that entry, but if Zoran is okay with it I would also suggest to rename this. Book entries should carry the title of the book, at least up to abbreviation.


\item Sorry, I am overloaded in last few days and made an error. Funny enough, there is a historical parallel with russian EGA. Russians have published a translation of the the introduction to 1971 EGAI edition. The external pages says Elements of algebraic geometry, while the title on the very first page is Elements of algebraic topology. I have a scan of this funny ``typo''.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: restructured [[moduli space]], linked to it from [[classifying space]] and, notably, added a semilong discussion of the subtleties of the common slogan that `` \emph{Objects with automorphisms don't have fine moduli spaces} . '', summing up some arguments that were exchanged in the blog discussion \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/a_seminar_on_gromovwitten_theo.html}{here}.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090920}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-20}}\label{20090920}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Reply to Mike at [[foundations]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Rafael, your clarification at [[category]] introduced another typo! (-: Now fixed.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: quick reaction at [[(n,r)-category]] -- am still not quite back online, but trying\ldots{}


\item [[Todd Trimble]] responded to [[Rafael Borowiecki]] at [[category theory]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I don't think that those typos in [[(n,r)-category]] were typos, but I tried to clarify them.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: new stub [[K-theory and physics]]. Book entry [[Directed Homotopy Theory]]. Added references to [[basic ideas of moduli stacks of curves and Gromov-Witten theory|basic ideas of GW]].


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Finally took the time to answer at the discussion at [[category theory]]. Also moved some structures to structures that reduces to categories.
\item Amazingly discovered a typo in the definition of a category at [[category]]. Added a clarification in the same definition.
\item Corrected two presumable typos as [[(n,r)-category]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: new entry [[Vladimir Drinfel'd]]. Improvements to [[Q-category]], [[noncommutative algebraic geometry]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Incorporated the discussions at [[Crans-Gray tensor product]] into the entry, and deleted them.


\item [[David Roberts]]: Comment/reference at [[directed homotopy theory]] - Grandis has a book out now on this stuff.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090919}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-19}}\label{20090919}

\begin{itemize}%
\item \href{http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html}{Arrr!}

\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090918}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-18}}\label{20090918}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Arnold Neumaier]] has joined to talk about [[SEAR]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added some (\emph{hopefully}) motivating remarks and lots of pretty pictures to [[differential logic]].


\item [[Andrew Stacey]] I've disabled the export features. They now redirect to a section of the [[HowTo]] which explains how to use {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt wget}} to get a local copy of the n-Lab. If anyone wants to add instructions for other programs or OSes then, of course, feel free.


\item [[David Corfield]]: chipped in at [[(n,r)-category]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Reply at [[SEAR]].
\item Some cold water at [[(n,r)-category]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added more content to [[differential logic]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: [[Yuri Manin]], [[Arakelov geometry]]; small changes to [[moduli space]].


\item [[David Roberts]]: Comments at [[SEAR]]. From what I've seen, I like it.



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090917}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-17}}\label{20090917}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item branched off the seminar notes mentioned below to [[basic ideas of moduli stacks of curves and Gromov-Witten theory]]

in that context created [[moduli space]], currently also being the redirect for [[fine moduli space]], [[coarse moduli space]] and [[moduli stack]]

all still mighty rough, but I think valuable raw material to base further editorial developments on



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]] I have replied to Zoran's points over on the n-Forum at \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=64}{this discussion} since that seems a better place to have a discussion than here.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item am taking notes in a seminar on [[Gromov-Witten theory]]


\item started something at [[deRham theorem]]


\item created [[simplicial sheaf]]



\end{itemize}

\item Zoran: I am strongly against shifting latest changes to the forum. I do not know how to quickly link and do other features like here, it requires more downloading capacity when on expensive network like mobile, it may require account, it does not get recorded when downloading the whole nlab etc etc. Logging to forum is anyway pain when on mobile network. It logges you off for example if you are idle for 30 minutes. I will not do it simply. I quit logging changes if it is to the forum. I will edit nlab without logging changes in that case. Nlab is nlab, and it should be self contained. Forum is about general policies, it is complicated enough to explain to the new userts that there is latest changes notificatiopn, notg in addition now that they have to have an additional account and additional web page with different software. I never use RSS feeds nor want to use them: I do not check latest changes unles sI am generally interested what is there. If I work on the item ``jabberwocky'' I WORK on it. If I want to see latest changes I look at them. It is very important that I can download the whole nlab including the latest changes histories. Forum is different system and it should not be mandatory to use it. I also find useful that I can link and cut and paste formulas and nlab links easily within nlab latest changes the same way as I do the rest, the forum has a bit different formatting and makes it harder. Also nlab item jabberwocky has down there a link that it was mentioned with link in latest changes what I also find useful. I also do not find any argument in the saying that if I log to forum for looking at latest changes I will also see be ``informed on the new things''. Thjis is not a feature but a DISTRACTION when I work hard and follow references and try to format my mathematical text. Forum is about policies and politics, and software.- Nlab is about mathematics. I like to havce that CLEANLY separated. The state of my mind is the prerequisite for working on nlab. The alternative is that I work only in my personal nlab if you impose this new policy of mixing with forum.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: i 2nd that e-motion.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added something to [[directed space]]. Check!


\item added some $(n,r)$-topos cases to the ``special cases'' section at [[(n,r)-category]]


\item added a paragraph at [[About]] in the part starting with ``If you find yourself annoyed by the state some entry is in\ldots{}''. That paragraph is motivated by a recent reaction by somebody on some blog, who had indeed complained about some unfinished entry and after that needed some persuasion to help expand and improve it.



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090916}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-16}}\label{20090916}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created stub for [[(infinity,1)-operad]]


\item added one and updated and commented another reference at [[Jacob Lurie]]


\item am proposing an expanded introduction and a supposedly suggestive \textbf{slogan} at [[(n,r)-category]] -- check and see what you think

\begin{itemize}%
\item That sort of thing doesn't give \emph{me} any idea about what an $(n,r)$-category is \ldots{} although it does tell me what an $r$-directed $n$-type is! It's important, good stuff, but I wouldn't put it in the lede. ---Toby

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[Q-category]] (clearly unfinished; e.g. somebody could type the cosieve and Grothendieck topology-induced $Q^\circ$-categories and $Q$-categories of thickenings from Kontsevich-Rosenberg preprint as examples), [[wave]], [[epipresheaf]]. New remark at [[formally smooth scheme]]. Updates to [[algebra]], [[mathematicscontents]] and to the discussion at [[classical mechanics]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] created entry for [[Constantin Teleman]]


\item [[David Corfield]]: created [[biology]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item noticed that despite all the blog discussion, nobody has so far created [[field with one element]]\ldots{}


\item created [[deRham space]]


\item created [[formally smooth scheme]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]] expanded [[mathematicscontents]] and rearranged a bit -- notably I added [[category theory]], [[higher category theory]], [[topos theory]] and [[higher topos theory]] (the lower case version!) which clearly all deserve to be there. I added some entries to go as sub-entries under [[higher topos theory]] mainly to balance that [[topos theory]] has its natural sub-entries there, but maybe debateable. Then I moved [[homotopy theory]] and its special case [[stable homotopy theory]] from the ``Geometry'' bit up to the ``Structural Foundations'' bit, as that seems to better capture it (anything that cares about things only up to homotopy is not geometry nor even really topology, but is higher category theory in disguise). By this logic, also [[rational homotopy theory]] belongs there, so I moved it up.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: worked on [[HomePage]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added the floating tables of contents for math, physics and philosophy. They are sitting there now to the left of the $n$Lab-contents. I am thinking that here on the HomePage this is a good thing. Besides the introductory text we keep there, we want to make sure that the reader's attention is directed to tables of contents. I have heard of people who were pointed to the nLab, went to the HomePage for a minute and came back with the impression that there is nothing much to be found on the lab. While no table of contents can give an accurate impression of the full scope of the lab, the ideal would be that our main three top-level contents (math, physics, philosophy) will indicate the scope of topics and lure the reader further into the labyrinth. Optimally behind each of the links of the top-level toc the user finds another floating table of contents for the given sub-topic


\item I edited the bit about the forum. With Andrew getting ready to make ``latest changes'' be on the discussion forum, the old material saying that the forum is just for meta-discussion is outdated.


\item I included a link to the forum discussion on what the nLab's scope is. As long as noone finds the time to wrap things up, this ongoing discussion is probably the best idea that we can offer as to what we think the nLab is or might be.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added articles or began content development at [[differential logic]], [[differential propositional calculus]], and [[universe of discourse]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: wrote a long bit at [[higher category theory]]. Rearranged some existing material in the process.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[David Corfield]]: Seeing ``comparative $\infty$-categoriology'' there, does anyone have thoughts on Borisov's \href{http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/0909.2534}{work}? Perhaps we need to wait for the sequel.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: Expanding on a \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/towards_a_computeraided_system.html#c026573}{note} and responding to a \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/towards_a_computeraided_system.html#c026593}{query} on the blog, I proposed several sources as ``Precursors'' to category theory. I have discovered a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition that [[category theory|this margin]] is too narrow to contain, but I might try to elaborate on it elsewhere \ldots{} elsewhen.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Talk, talk, talk: [[SEAR]], [[classical mechanics]], [[category theory]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Motivated by recent discussions on the cafe, created [[SEAR]], which has been kicking around in my head for quite some time.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: A bit too close to SOAR. But if you put your terms in alphabetical order you'd have ERAS, which would also be mnemonic for the fact that elementhood is a relation. Hm$^3$, is there such a thing as mnepic?

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[compact-open topology]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090915}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-15}}\label{20090915}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: changes to [[A-infinity ring]]. I had to disagree at [[classical mechanics]]; created [[force]]. Minor changes to few other entries, like [[analysis]], and to contents pages ([[geometry]], [[mathematicscontents]]).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a paragraph to [[enriched category theory]] (you can't miss it, its the only genuine content there so far)

I am dreaming that eventually we'll make the enties [[enriched category theory]] and especially [[higher category theory]] have content as nice as we now have at [[category theory]]. At time of this writing the entry [[higher category theory]] is a shame, given the nature of our project here. But I am growing fond of at least the first, stabilized part of [[category theory]]. It would be cool if we could do similar deeds at other entries of similarly fundamental nature


\item further expanded [[category theory - contents]] and added it as floating table of contents to more entries

(any volunteers for similar floating tables of contents such as [[topos theory - contents]], [[enriched category theory contents]]?)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a subsection on categorical precursors to the References Section of [[category theory]], but that's already such a huge article that people may prefer to spin off a new page if it goes past a few links.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[category theory - contents]] and began adding it as a ``floating'' table of contents to some relevant entries.


\item following \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/towards_a_computeraided_system.html#c026593}{this blog discussion} I added a paragraph ``Terminology'' to [[category theory]]

I also tried to incorporate the content of the query box that used to be in the paragraph on ``Abstract Nonsense'' by [[Zoran Skoda]] and [[Todd Trimble]]. I moved that discussion box to the bottom of the entry now. But if you think more discussion is needed, we'll revive it.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Thanks Urs. I expanded [[2-pullback]] a bit. Weirdly, the direct URL for \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/weak+pullback}{weak pullback} currently takes me to the \emph{old} disambiguation page, which doesn't seem to exist any more. Ordinary links like [[weak pullback]] are correctly redirected to [[weak limit]] however.

[[Lab Elf|Lab Elf (financial department)]]: weak pullback was still cached so a direct call got the cached page without a check to see if there was a corresponding page in the database. I've removed the cached page and it looks like it's correct now.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added some links to the entry on [[Peter May]]


\item created [[stable homotopy theory - contents]] and added it as a ``floating'' table of contents to some relevant entries


\item rewrote [[A-infinity ring]] and [[E-infinity ring]]


\item created [[higher algebra - contents]] and added is as a ``floating'' table of contents to some relevant entries


\item created [[higher category theory - contents]] and added it as a ``floating'' table of contents to some relevant entries


\item moved to [[monoidal (infinity,1)-category]] material that had long been sitting at [[geometric infinity-function theory]] on operadic definitions of higher monoidal structures


\item [[Zoran Skoda]] alerts me that he has added corrections and caveats related to [[formal scheme]] and [[formal spectrum]] at [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - formal groups and cohomology]]


\item reacted to [[Mike Shulman]]`s remarks at [[graph of a functor]], [[cograph of a functor]] and at what used to be [[weak limit]] and is now renamed [[2-limit]] by trying to implement the suggested changes. Mike should please have a look and check if it looks better now. I have to admit that I had forgotten that ``weak limit'' meant something else than [[2-limit]] or other higher limits.


\item added the link to [[stable homotopy theory]] to the main [[mathematicscontents|Mathematics Contents]]


\item created [[coordinate-free spectrum]] and linked to it from [[spectrum]] (whose ``Definition'' section I slightly reorganized)


\item created [[symmetric monoidal smash product of spectra]]

added small paragraph pointing to this new entry to [[stable homotopy theory]], [[smash product of spectra]]


\item created an entry [[inbound citations]] and linked to it from the main table of contents. Let me know what you think of this suggestion. See also the blog entry on it \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/09/inbound_citations.html}{here}.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=71}{link to a Forum discussion} at [[relation theory]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Two questions at [[graph of a functor]]. One of them spills over into [[cograph of a functor]] and [[weak pullback]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090914}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-14}}\label{20090914}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]] slightly rephrased at [[formal spectrum]]: properly speaking that limit over rings gives the global sections of the structure sheaf, of course, not the structure sheaf itself


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] replies to a query at [[relation theory]]. Hey! that rhymes with ``weak and weary''.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: to support the development of entries on the basics of [[formal geometry]] created entry [[adic noetherian ring]] (I would like to warn Toby (who will likely like simpler generality) in advance that one needs to be very careful in treating adic situations without noetherianess, I do not feel competent to write without consulting literature such a more general entry). Thanks [[Urs]] for stimulating the expansion of the entries on the subject.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item from more seminar notes filled in more material at

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - formal groups and cohomology]]

\end{itemize}
and started

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - E-infinity rings and derived schemes]] (not complete yet).

\end{itemize}

\item many thanks to [[Zoran Skoda]] for fixing some nonsense that I committed in the ``Idea'' section at [[formal scheme]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added some stuff about finite dimensional boolean coordinate systems to [[boolean-valued function]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: A little more explanation of terminological variations at [[direct limit]] and [[inverse limit]]; also [[projective limit]] and [[inductive limit]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added an epigraph to [[relation theory]]. Exercise for the Reader: Show that every functional graph factors into an epigraph and a monograph.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a reference to Peter May et al.`s survey article to [[stable homotopy theory]] -- also added a link back to [[stable homotopy category]]


\item filled in formal definition at [[elliptic curve]], also that of the corresponding formal group law and some examples -- but needs polishing/expanding


\item filled in content at [[formal spectrum]]


\item created [[Landweber exactness criterion]]


\item created [[weakly periodic cohomology theory]]


\item since I see entries pointing to ``direct limit'' and ``inverse limit'' I created entries [[direct limit]] and [[inverse limit]]. I know that we could just redirect to [[limit]] and [[colimit]] where the terminology is discussed, but maybe the reader following such a link will appreciated being quickly alerted to the terminological issue before being faced with a long entry on limits and colimits where this is hidden as a remark somewhere


\item slightly edited [[formal scheme]]: added an ``Idea'' sentence and highlighted the definition of \emph{formal spectrum} a bit. In fact, created [[formal spectrum]] planning to have the definition there, but then hesitated. Maybe this needs someone more expert than me.


\item stub for [[structure sheaf]]


\item slightly edited the beginning of [[structured (infinity,1)-topos]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Turned [[set]] into an essay (\emph{Was sind und was sollen die Mengen?}) on the issues involved, particularly trying to keep them (foundational style, smallness, skeletality) separate.
\item Thanks, Urs!

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[adjoint (∞,1)-functor]]

the essential information had before already been in the corresponding section at [[adjoint functor]], to which I added the relevant link.


\item joined the discussion at [[graph of a function]]. I am thinking that this is best understood as a special case of a more general concept, for wich I created now entries

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[graph of a functor]]


\item [[cograph of a functor]]



\end{itemize}
This has some nice applications. For instance one has that two functors $L : C \to D$ and $R : D \to C$ are adjoint precisely if they have the same cograph, up to reversal of arrows. Notice that, because the notion of cograph immediately generalizes to functors between higher categories, this is the basis for a definition of [[adjoint (infinity,1)-functor]].

I have expanded the material at [[graph of a function]] accordingly. Also I made [[cograph of a function]] redirect to that.



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090913}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-13}}\label{20090913}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Not done at [[graph of a function]], Eric!


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] expunged an assortment of ephemeral animadversions at [[graph]].


\item [[Eric]]: After some discussion with [[Toby]], defined [[graph of a function]] as the [[category of elements]] of $F:\mathbf{2}\to Set$.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added at comment to the discussion section at [[relation theory]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Added [[diagonal morphism]] and two ways to look at it in $Set$: [[diagonal subset]] and [[diagonal function]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a bibliography on relations and related subjects to [[relation theory]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090912}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-12}}\label{20090912}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Rejoined the discussion at [[category theory]].
\item Removed the last links to \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/list/lexicon}{category: lexicon} (now all listed at [[differential graded objects - contents]])
\item Arguing with Mike at [[Categories Work]].
\item A fact added to [[line bundle]]; we should still write [[line]].
\item A very stubby [[classical mechanics]], grown out [[classical physics]].
\item Generalised [[internal relation]] somewhat.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Finds his time too intermittent this weekend to do more than potter about in the $n$-garden, but was pleased to discover how to write the old Pascal ``set-equal-to'' as ``$\:\text{:=}\:$'' in a math context.
\item Replies to a query at [[relation theory]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Added a bit to [[tree]].
\item Answered questions from [[Eric Forgy]] at each of the below.
\item Wrote [[graph of a function]] (split off from [[relation theory]]).
\item Redid [[graph]]; please give feedback.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090911}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-11}}\label{20090911}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Andrew Stacey]] there's a \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=64}{discussion} going on at the forum about designing a better system for recording these latest changes. If you have an opinion, please contribute! At the moment, it's going on what Toby, Mike, and I think which may not be a representable sample.

Also, there was a brief glitch in the system that led to entities begin translated into their unicode counterparts (don't worry if that doesn't make sense). Unfortunately, this wasn't compatible with iTeX and there may be a few `Unknown character's lurking around. If you spot one, \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=65}{let me know} and I'll go catch it with my butterfly net. (It's important to let me know rather than just correcting it yourself as it \emph{really} messes up the {\colorbox[rgb]{1.00,0.93,1.00}{\tt diff}}s so I need to fix it properly rather than just papering over the cracks.)


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item A bit at [[lax natural transformation]], which I really only mention since it's been discussed so much lately.
\item Since Recently Revised works again, I've restored the link to it up above, from what it had been in \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/2009+June+changes/947}{June}.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Urs seems to take [[derived algebraic geometry]] (see my answer/note there) as a higher algebraic stacks, and forgets deriving on the other side. Nonabelian cohomology results from right derived picture (quotients = colimits), and the missing part is to take the limits in derived sense, that is taking equalizers, intersections of subschemes etc. in derived sense as well. We should discuss that, replace the paragraph with the better one and after agreeing and explaining, erase the critical paragraph. In another paragraph the things are in place:

\begin{quote}%
Where ordinary algebraic geometry uses schemes modeled on commutative rings, derived algebraic geometry uses structured (∞,1)-toposes modeled on E-∞ rings


\end{quote}
Indeed, the higher stacks are about the (∞,1)-toposes, while the derived stacks ask also for the domain to be E-∞ rings. The ``brave new algebraic geometry'' on the other hand typically takes the second (alg geometry glued from spectra of infinity ring spectra), but not the first (higher stacks instead of schemes).


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Agreement is being reached at [[k-transfor]].
\item Wrote [[2-functor]] as a portal to more precise definitions; also a little at [[semi-strict infinity-category]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Mike Shulman]]: For those who aren't reading at [[(n,k)-transformation]], the proposal is to replace that unlovely term with Sjoerd Crans' word \textbf{k-transfor} (so 0-transfor = functor, 1-transfor = transformation, 2-transfor = modification, etc.). Please comment!


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: stub [[derivator]] including few lines from [[triangulated category]]; maybe more discussion from there should be moved to [[derivator]] and just left a short notice at triangulated category on derivators (it seems in fact one wanted to talk about \emph{triangulated derivators}!!), because t.cat. are a wide topic and the entry may expand in many different directions, while the motivation and the discussion may be useful at derivator. but have no time to decide and think of what is sensitive. Somebody should copy the axioms from Maltsionitis' notes for derivator.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] began watering his trans-plants at [[cactus language]] --- bit by bit, you have to be very incre-mental with cacti --- and started a \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=69}{parallel (tangential?) discussion} at the $n$-forum.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: additions to [[deformation theory]], [[derived algebraic geometry]]; created [[cotangent complex]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I'm perfectly serious at [[(n,k)-transformation]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090910}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-10}}\label{20090910}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Started trying to incorporate the results of the discussion into the entry at [[lax natural transformation]]. (Thanks very much -- \emph{Todd})
\item Comment on alternative terminology at [[(n,k)-transformation]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Todd Trimble]]: commented at [[lax natural transformation]], and suggested a possible compromise at [[graph theory]] which I hope will be considered satisfying to all concerned. Thanks to Mike for creating [[icon]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item Created a stub for [[elliptic curve]], in response to Urs.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]] slightly edited [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - formal groups and cohomology]] and added plenty of links


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More at [[graph]] and [[center]], since there is no \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=64}{RSS feed}.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] is leaving the fray at \emph{The World According To [[graph|Graph]]} --- which is clearly becoming more ``productive'' than ``creative'' --- and suggests, as an interim measure, that he be allowed to store a few standard definitions at [[graph theory]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Replied at [[center]] and [[lax natural transformation]], and created [[icon]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Thanks to David below! I have moved [[barycentric algebra]] to [[convex space]] after being more sure that this name is not already taken (but `convex set' does conflict). Since the concept has been invented many times and has many names, let's use our own, which is a nice one. I forgot about the blog discussion before; I had a nagging feeling that this had come up once and I hadn't gotten around to commenting then, so I'm glad that David remembered.


\item [[Ryan Grady]] has given us [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - formal groups and cohomology]]


\item [[Todd Trimble]]: Finally got around to replying to [[Mike Shulman]] over at [[lax natural transformation]], with some responses of Ross Street and Steve Lack.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] started adding to [[infinitesimal object]] a discussion for how one can understand Lawvere's abstract definition intuitively as encoding infinitesimal extension. But am in a hurry and have to leave it unpolished for the moment.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Replies at [[barycentric algebra]], [[evil]], [[graph]], [[boolean domain]], [[center]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[David Corfield]]: convex spaces and barycentric algebras cropped up \href{http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/04/convex_spaces.html#c023763}{here}. I don't know if there's anything useful there.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: Further discussion and some data at [[graph]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Expanded a bunch at [[center]], and continued discussions at [[graph]] and [[evil]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090909}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-09}}\label{20090909}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More commentary at [[boolean domain]] and [[graph]].


\item [[Todd Trimble]]: added still more to the long discussion at the bottom of [[graph]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Created [[barycentric algebra]], mostly to explain the stuff about convex sets in the discussion at [[semicartesian monoidal category]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: motivated by [[Toby Bartels|Toby]]`s comment there I have now branched off the material at [[limits and colimits by example]] that describes a computer program to [[Paine on a Category Theory Demonstrations program]]. This is now linked to there from the section ``Further resources''. I have moved the pertaining discussion boxes to the bottom of the entry.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: Piecewise discussion at [[boolean domain]], but it will be later before I can get to the rest of the pieces.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Discussions at [[center]], [[evil]], [[graph]], [[boolean domain]], [[limits and colimits by example]], [[semicartesian monoidal category]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item I have a different opinion about the [[center]] of a set.
\item Discussions at [[evil]], [[graph]], and [[boolean domain]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: Continuing discussion at [[graph]]. I won't try to note each entry here, unless that's the rule.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: I added an Idea section to [[relation theory]] with what I can recall of how I got into that. Incidentally, the x-tended code for the amphora symbol (@) now causes Ruby to go off the Rails, so I had to use $\backslash$text\{@\} instead.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: thanks, once more, to [[Todd Trimble|Todd]], for the discussion of monadicity et al at [[limits and colimits by example]]. We should eventually brach that kind of discussion off into an entry in its own right and expand


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] entered the fray of discussion at [[graph]].


\item [[Todd Trimble]]: Per Urs's request below, I checked the limits in under-category he wrote, and added a remark at the end.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: last night my battery bailed out when I was editing several entries so did not log what I have done. Now I do not recall all entries which I updated, except that I created [[deformation theory]] (so far only references and links), expanded [[derived algebraic geometry]], added a reference to [[formal group]] and to [[quasicoherent sheaves]]. I thank lab elf for cograts for my entry 2000 which was however [[Grothendieck connection]] where I also made a small change last night (when saying $n$-costratification, $n$ refers to work with $n$-th infinitesimal neighborhood and not with $n$-categorical descent: the descent data were in Grothendieck 1-descent data). Today we have an excursion during the conference in Sevilla, so I will probably not be able to continue (have much to add to [[deformation theory]] etc.).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added a section on limits in under categories to [[limits and colimits by example]] and a detailed proof of how they are computed by limits in the underlying category -- please check


\item added a linked table of contents at [[limits and colimits by example]]


\item added a query box at [[limits and colimits by example]] in the section titled ``for programmers''. I am suggesting that since the material doesn't actually use a computer program to explain limits and colimits but instead explains how to write such a computer program, the material should be moved elsewhere.


\item added an ``Idea'' section to [[n-localic (infinity,1)-topos]]


\item slightly expanded the remark under ``Generalizations'' at [[localic topos]], trying to indicate the pattern



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: re Toby's remark below:

yes, true, the $(\infty,1)$-topos material is ``Grothendieck-Rezk-Lurie $(\infty,1)$-toposes of $(\infty,1)$-sheaves''. If it weren't so cumbersome to say this, one should make this explicit more often. But maybe we should highlight it at least more at beginning of entries.

Another thing I noticed that maybe requires more emphasis is that the $\infty$-stack-$(\infty,1)$-toposes that one gets from the standard [[models for infinity-stack (infinity,1)-toposes]] are far from being the generic case. Many Grothendieck-Rezk-Lurie $(\infty,1)$-toposes are not equivalent to these. (Compare Lurie's discussion of [[topological localization]], [[hypercompletion]], [[n-localic (infinity,1)-topos]]es, etc.)


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I moved [[free field (algebra)]] to [[free field]] on the grounds that (as with [[field]] itself) the algebraic mathematical meaning is likely to be our default here. But I might be wrong. In a similar vein, I suggested [[physical field]] at [[field]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] made some attempt to reorganize the discussion at [[boolean domain]]. This is one of my main stepping stones, so I'll need to keep the alg\ae{} at a minimum.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item The centre of a set at [[center]].
\item The Hahn--Banach Theorem for separable spaces at [[locally convex space]].
\item A note about the meanings of `convex set' at [[semicartesian monoidal category]].
\item Physics notation at [[Weyl algebra]].

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090908}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-08}}\label{20090908}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]] finished up the basic definitions and expository examples at [[sign relation]].


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I do enjoy it, Urs! But remember that, for Lurie, an `$\infty$-topos' is not only an $(\infty,1)$-topos but in fact a \emph{Grothendieck} $(\infty,1)$-topos. So when he says that a `$0$-topos' is a locale, he similarly means that a \emph{Grothendieck} $(0,1)$-topos is a locale. (An \emph{elementary} $(0,1)$-topos is a [[Heyting algebra]].) I also wrote [[(0,1)-category]], since you linked it; that's a p(r)oset.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item quick unformatted content filled in at [[n-localic (infinity,1)-topos]], to be continued later, have to run now\ldots{}


\item created stub for [[(0,1)-topos]], linked to it from [[locale]] with a small comment -- Toby might enjoy that -- this mainly to remind me to extract the essentce from section 6.4.2 in [[Higher Topos Theory|HTT]] later. Will also create [[(n,1)-topos]] then


\item thanks to Todd for expanding at [[localic topos]]!



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: More at [[evil]]; we might actually be working out some mathematical facts here before too long!

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: I wouldn't \emph{count} on it --- cuz, y'know, that might be \emph{evil}.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Todd Trimble]] added some more to [[localic topos]].


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a bit more content to [[sign relation]] and then broke for lunch. ($n$-tweet?)


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created stubs for [[localic topos]] and [[n-localic (∞,1)-topos]]


\item added to [[Deligne-Mumford stack]] the alternative characterization as a 1-localic $G$-[[generalized scheme]] for $G$ the \emph{etale geometry} (defined there). Also added a brief ``Idea''-section


\item created [[affine scheme]]


\item created \emph{topic cluster floating table of contents} [[(infinity,1)-topos - contents]] and included it in the linked entries


\item created [[object classifier]] and linked to it from [[(∞,1)-topos]] and [[Higher Topos Theory]] and [[subobject classifier]]


\item slightly reorganized and then expanded the \emph{topic cluster} floating table of contents [[cohomology - contents]]. in that context I

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[orientation]], [[Spin structure]], [[Fivebrane structure]] and slightly expanded [[String structure]]


\item briefly discussed/mentioned these in the examples section at [[quantum anomaly]]


\item and on that occasion created an entry for [[Ulrich Bunke]] whose recent article (yesterday!) I cite above, where he makes the old Killingback argument about how a String-structure makes the worldvolume anomaly of the heterotic string vanish rigorous



\end{itemize}

\item corrected the mistake at [[rational topological space]] that [[David Corfield]] spotted below


\item added to [[CW complex]] link to [[geometric realization]]


\item started [[rational topological space]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[David Corfield]]: Asked question there.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added content to [[semiotic equivalence relation]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item More discussion at [[evil]].
\item Started some work on clarifying definitions at [[graph]].
\item Spoke up in defense of the adverb at [[locally presentable category]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: Clarifying at [[graph theory]] and questying at [[evil]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090907}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-07}}\label{20090907}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Replies to Mike at [[evil]] and [[graph]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Started a discussion -- at [[graph]] -- about what may be wrong with that page and how to fix it. I think that a page called [[graph theory]] should be more like the pages called [[topology]] and [[category theory]].
\item Comments at [[evil]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item missed one train. Used the few minutes gained this way to quickly extract the following very brief entries from the notes mentioned below: [[multiplicative cohomology theory]], [[even cohomology theory]], [[periodic cohomology theory]], [[Bott element]] -- all these entries deserve to be greatly expanded, it particular by eyxamples, of course, but it should be a start


\item started turning some talk notes of a seminar into entries, but requires polishing:

the full raw material is at [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - cohomology theories]]. Using this I have so far split off [[cohomology theory]], [[Lazard ring]], [[complex cobordism cohomology theory]] and [[reduced cohomology]]


\item wrote a somewhat revisionist ``Idea'' section at [[Grothendieck connection]]. Notice that it is in particular the Breen-Messing reference cited and discussed at [[infinitesimal singular simplicial complex]] that allows me to do that! (meaning: I am not making this up, but just putting the pieces together)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a page on [[graph theory]]. The page on [[graph]] has become too baroque to fix, but there needs to be a place to record the basic definitions of graph theory that are actually used by the larger schools of math folks who actually dare to call themselves graph theorists. This is stuff that is more in the back of my mind than the forefront of my attention, so I'll add to it over time as other work recurs to it.


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Replied Todd Trimbles question at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Todd Trimble|Todd]] replied back.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]] started keyword-list entry [[Structured Spaces]] and in that context also started [[generalized scheme]]


\item [[Andrew Stacey|Lab Elf (numerological department)]]: Just thought I'd congratulate Zoran on creating the 2000th page on the nLab. According to the database, it was [[smooth morphism of schemes]]. For those who prefer other coincidences, [[skewfield]] was our 2009th. Of course, in this more modern age we ought to really celebrate [[coherent sheaf]] instead. Whichever we celebrated, it would be Zoran that would get the metaphorical bottle of champagne as he created the lot.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item changed the coding of the floating table of contents [[cohomology - contents]] according to the recent discussion on the forum and added a few recent entries to it


\item slightly expanded [[integral cohomology]]


\item added a web reference by [[Nora Ganter]] (created stub fo that) on [[topological modular form]]s (created stub for that) kindly pointed out by [[David Roberts]] to [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology]] and to [[tmf]]


\item it seems that yesterday I also created [[stable homotopy theory]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added an epigraph to [[evil]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090906}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-06}}\label{20090906}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Created [[single-sorted definition of a category]] and [[collection]]. Afterwards I had the thought that perhaps the former should be called something more like ``category (single-sorted definition)'' -- any thoughts? Do we have a convention for this sort of thing yet?
\item Asked a question at [[Categories Work]].

\end{itemize}

\item [[Todd Trimble]]: responded to something Rafael wrote at [[category theory]], and asked a question at the bottom of the timeline page.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created [[derived algebraic geometry]]


\item wrote a bit of summary at [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology]]


\item started [[elliptic cohomology]]

so far with quick stubs for [[line bundle]], [[cohomology ring]]


\item expanded the content at [[Jacob Lurie]], fixed the links and added [[A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology]]


\item merged the former material at [[∞-topos]] with that at [[higher topos theory]] and expanded and slightly rearranged the latter.


\item coded the ``floating tables of contents'' for the topic clusters at [[mathematics]] and [[rational homotopy theory]] according to [[Andrew Stacey]]`s suggestion on the nForum -- see \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=61&page=1#Comment_743}{here}



\end{itemize}

\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied at [[category theory]].


\item Wrote a little more on [[extended topological quantum field theory]] but don't know the right references. Put that request in a query box.


\item Debate at the timeline.



\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090905}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-05}}\label{20090905}

\begin{itemize}%
\item Note spelling: [[Saunders Mac Lane]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]] inserted and reminded of work of Rezk and To\"e{}n-Vezzosi on [[higher topos theory]] preceding the marvelous [[Higher Topos Theory|Lurie's work]].


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: without wishing to join in the fascinating debate as to whether the timeline should be kept in sync with Wikipedia, I'd just like to expand on my comment about asking the question on the forum. The specific question on timeline is technical in nature (``how do I deal with 1500 links?'') and therefore most likely to be answered by one of the more technically minded people here. Some of those people do check every page on the lab for every revision, but others don't. However, they do check this page and they tend to check the forum as well. The best way to get your question seen is to put a brief note here and link it to a discussion on the forum. Also, the more detailed and precise you can make your question, the easier it is to understand and to answer and therefore the more likely it is to get an answer.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created a stub entry for [[Samuel Eilenberg]] and put hyperlinks under the names of Eilenberg and MacLane at [[category theory]].


\item expanded at [[infinity-stack]] the first paragraph of the ``Definition'' section and added a link to [[sheaf of n-types]].


\item created [[sheaf of n-types]] which was requested in the ``Timeline'' entry. But I made this essentially just a commented redirect to [[∞-stack]], because it's just another word for that.


\item expanded the introduction of [[AKSZ theory]] a little, added the original reference and linked Kontsevich's name there to the new entry on [[Maxim Kontsevich]] and added a paragraph that tries to briefly put this in context with related existing nLab entries. But the entry is still missing a discussion of its subject itself. I have some old blog material on this, but this deserves more spare time than I have at the moment.


\item added links back and forth between the new [[higher topos theory]] and the old [[∞-topos]]. Probably some reorganization of the material over these two entries would eventually be reasonable.


\item added plenty of hyperlinks to the entry on [[Maxim Kontsevich]] -- many of them point to existing nLab entries, many others point to nLab entries still to be created (and lots of them would be highly desireable)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Created a stub [[higher topos theory]] (not to be confused with [[Higher Topos Theory]]).


\item [[Benoit Jubin]]: asked a question at [[monoidal category]] about the necessity of requiring $\lambda_1=\rho_1$.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Todd Trimble]] responded.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090904}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-04}}\label{20090904}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Tim Porter]]: On the issue of stacks, Deligne and Mumford explicitly (p. 97 of their famous paper) use the term `stack' as an English translation of `Champ' and attribute that to Giraud in \emph{Cohomologie non-abelienne}. This latter source was published later than Deligne and Mumford's paper but is refered to by them as `University of Columbia'. Giraud was a student of Grothendieck.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: surely Grothendieck invented stacks in general categorical sense and had a picture in various setups; Deligne and Mumford did invent a particular kind of [[algebraic stack]] and tailored it toward a very specific application.


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item I was before talking about edit 143 of the timeline by Toby Bartels. I am now trying to figure out what it changed. The other edits i understand.


\item Added a query box at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] to hear what others think about the first entry in the timeline regarding Cayleys paper.


\item I must correct you Zoran at a point. I never said the entry must look good but i want the timeline to look good. This means links, easy to read, no stuff that should not be there and it should of course be correct. Those who know the years,names and category theory would see if it was not correct and say it looks bad.


\item Since we are on the subject history. I Credited Deligne-Mumford for inventing stacks. But i recall rumours that it was Grothendieck that invented stacks, without any references.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: added redirects and a reference to [[quasicoherent sheaf]]; expanded [[representation theory]]; created [[EGA]] (just an introduction to the entry, links and toc missing); created [[orbit]] wanted by [[coadjoint orbit]]; more importantly for the present needs, wrote [[Grothendieck connection]] (entry 2000 :)), required both by the timeline and by the current interests of the project pushed by Urs which I try to help and discuss; and it also refers to some things I was many time mentioning (and even to some ideas behind my preprint on cyclic comonads and related papers by Menini-Stefan and B\"o{}hm-Stefan). Wrote [[Poisson manifold]] and [[coadjoint orbit]] (unfinished). No, Rafael, I was not trying to find oldest instance of category theory. But Hilbert's first entry and also things about Whitehead etc. nonabelian invariants require the earlier appearances of such ideas if they existed. Look, the main theorem of Cayley in modern language says that the resultant of polynomials is a determinant of certain Koszul complex. As far as Galois, I think it should absolutely be in timeline, definitely, not only because of the notion of the group, but in fact Galois theory itself is in a spirit and a stimulus of much of the modern category theory -- torsors, Grothendieck Galois theory, equivariant descent, Galois descent, Joyal-Tierney, Hopf-Galois to mention a few (On the other hand, the notion of an abelian group is essentially in Gauss' Disquisitiones Arithmeticae in pretty clean form, according to my friends who read it carefully; I can not judge). The Klein's Erlangen program is a related ideological item, but more disputable. I still do not understand what do you mean by that moving again the wikipedia and overwriting $n$lab version depends on ability to do links. If you change links to wikipedia somehow automatically to the format which finds the true wikipedia pages this will be good for most of the items, but wrong for those few items where we already do have nlab entries. So it is a problem of selection.


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: When i was writing i once by accident updated the timeline at wikipedia and undid the change. If you look at it from the history you will see that i have corrected some of what you wrote and i will with interest look at the rest. I find the dates usually on internet which mean they could be wrong. I did not include Poincares Analysis situs for progress on group theory but topology which is one of the related themes of the timeline. As for Cayleys paper i would like to hear what others think. But it looks to me you tried to find the earliest possible instance of category theory. Then Galois theory is earlier. I think of it of course as a precursor to modern Galois theory but did not include it.


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: I have some opinions on the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]], which I will put \emph{there} where they belong.


\item [[Zoran Skoda]]: created an entry on [[Maxim Kontsevich]] as his name is quoted in timeline and some other places in nlab.


\item [[Zoran Skoda]]: The same way one could say that Poincare's papers done nothing on group theory. He does many things about groups completely in the language of manifolds, but in fact he proves the theorems on fundamental group, and these were transferred to group theory later. The homological algebra of Hilbert is equally linear algebra as is homological algebra of Cayley. Cohomologies in different language were used extensively by early Italian school of algebraic geometry; ask Japanese algebraic geometer Mukai to explain the 1899 paper (I think) of Castelnuovo with Castelnuovo's arguments literally, just with modern names for the quantities (it is all about cohomologies). I do not know why do you care that the entry LOOKS GOOD. I think it would be more important to be CORRECT, I listed once several instances of suspicious dates, and nobody cares about what is more important than syncing. To add new ones it is NOT true that localization is a special case of descent as it says in 1960 entry on descent within wikipedia timeline version; surely localization and descent can be combined in very nice ways, or sometimes phrased in the same language but the descent is descent and the localization is localization. Well descent data and the localized category can be both made comodules or modules over some comonad or a monad but this is a different issue and neither is special case of another. Rosenberg's proof of the reconstruction of scheme is not written first time in the 1998 paperon nc schemes, that paper has just appendix with a SKETCH of the proof which is in its full version in his earlier 1996 Max Planck Bonn preprint (\href{http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/preprints/send?bid=3948}{pdf}), some form of which is published in another journal also in 1998, with submission January 1997; in any case it is a different paper than [[noncommutative scheme]] paper. Similarly, 1960 date for Grothendieck's [[formal schemes]] is wrong, as the Bourbaki seminar paper for 1958/1959 is having a full article with already deep results (like Grothendieck existence theorem) on the subject. Look bibliography to [[formal scheme]]. 1960 for descent theory may also be too late though I am not sure at the moment, I am almost sure that one of the parts of FGA for descent has been published before 1960; just look for FGA (probably in Vistoli's survey you can find the year for the reference). For triangulated categories one should list (unlike wikipedia version of timeline) not only Verdier but also Grothendieck who was the true discoverer (and gave the list of chapters and main theorems to Verdier to prove and write up,a s he was usually doing with his students). You see these complaints I wrote only after 2 minutes of looking superficially at several lines of timeline. The timeline needs tens of such corrections historically and not the syncing,colors and look.


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Zoran, the migration will ultimately depend on if i am able to do the linking. I could completely not care about the nLab timeline but i want it to look good. The long entries will be as short/long as they are now. I will try not to loose anything and discuss the entries i would remove. \href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/algebraic+set+theory}{AST} alteady exist as do pages for the other long entries. Regarding Cayley i have seen the paper long before and have it on my computer. Cayley calculates invariant theory in coordinates. The paper do not define any categorical concept or prove a categorical theorem. Nor do it introduce any method used later in category theory, it is just polynomial algebra. I would say it don't start homological algebra. You could put it as that it anticipated homological algebra but i don't think Cayley thought about this paper that abstractly.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Rafael, when you opened timeline in nlab you did NOT tell us, the conditions/plan of syncing, which is fundamentally incompatible with nlab and wikipedia as each of them has limitations AND advantages. For example, we like book entries in nlab; timeline has some entries in the tabel very short, some hugely long: e.g. the wikipedia has huge entry of about alf a page on a book of Joyal and Moerdijk on algebraic sets. Why not have a separate entry in nlab for that book with all the material and in nlab entry for that book just say book algebraic sets, yeas and that's it. Second new migration would take tens of hours of time to make links compatible with entries in nlab, some of which can not be automatic. How Cayley's paper benefited category theory ? Jee, you have tens of etries on homological algebra; including the Hilbert's which are about the SAME stuff, just much later. How do you expect a collaboration on an entry if you are going to just decide out of your taste what is important ? Even if we talk about papers which wree anticipating developments in other works by over half a century ? You are concerned about syncing and difficulties. There is a wikipedia and there is nlab. When it is easy to borrow and coopearte why not. When it is difficult and creates problem just the heck with it, let's develop aturally two versions. No sync\ldots{}


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Replied at the timeline of category theory. Zoran, my original plan was to have the timelines synced to optimize both timelines and i will try to do so. I will also try to have good links. Right now the wikipedia timeline contains almost all entries and information in the nLab timeline and very much more. So at the moment it would be nLab that benefits most. I will look into your changes once again and try to keep them. It is easier to only copy the links than to find them. You have not seen the new version but, as for Cayley i just don't see how his calculation benefited category theory so i removed it, but this is a discussion for the timeline page. I also recall removing the deRham theorem since it don't really fit with the structure of the timeline. I have not included dualities. But this one i can change back since it was a very important discovery about cohomology and there are no rules to follow any structure. I will check more now. Then i wish people added so much to the timelines it would be impractical to sync them. Now that nLab is fast enough it should go much better to edit the links.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[internal relation]]. I was once working on replacing tens (and spend hours on this) of wikipedia links in timeline with our own links, and even created new entries in nlab to support the new links in nlab. For example I created the entry for [[Otto Schreier]] in nlab to support the quotation for Schreier in nlab version of Timeline. I also do not understand why things like the Cayley 1843 entry are ignored (and hence will disappear in new migration); I spent hours of time looking into references which I recalled vaguely to confirm what I thought about it. I see no reason for wikipedia to overwrite our work on changes. 80 links changed in single day is possible done by me; I recall that I did work once on making many links either more functional (including making the blind link to wikipedia link) or update them with new biography entries in nlab. I would not say that in that particular day only the links changed.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] made a first pass at formatting [[Trimble on ETCS III]] and thinks to have earned himself a nice Labor Day vacation, so if it's messed up don't tell him till Tuesday.


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Urs, i have taken care of that. I first updated the wikipedia timeline to match the nLab timeline. But a discussion might be at place since i have removed some of Zoran \v{S}koda's entries. I was not able to see and do one change thought, there is one revision that changes something in most of the 80 first entries or so. Maybe only links. I only took a quick look, and i am now thinking about the link problem. I found nLabs way of comparing revisions often very hard to read. I think it colors much more than need to be.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: oops, the link to Cartan Seminar at numdam was one char too long at Timeline; sorry. Regarding that the nlab has both different rules, format, link capacity, side resources etc. than wikipedia, that after so many updates are done in nlab version on our side, it woudl make no sense tooverwrite the nlab version of timeline with a new migration of wikipedia. One can update some particular items, but migrating it as a whole would mean relinking the part which is already relinked in nlab version. So, once the original bulk of timeline has once being moved the two timeline entries may live their separate lives and occasionally some individual additions or links could be manually added to borrow from nlab to wiki or other way around, by the criteria and will of nlab contributors while copying news to nlab and wikipedia contributors while copying news to wikipedia. It is too late to do bulk migration again; and wikipedia while better in some items, the nlab is better in some other additions to timeline which never made into wikipedia. Or I misunderstood something. I see no purpose into maintaining the two versions mutually equivalent; who wants to see another version can do this by clicking. The cooperation is rather to start the bulk and then to grow any way it likes.


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] -- question to [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: below you write

\begin{quote}%
The same timeline at wikipedia has/will have soon about 1500 links. When i migrate it to nLab again, and better than the last time, i need to change the links


\end{quote}
What do you mean by ``migrate''? The nLab version of the timeline has now many entries and edits that don't seem to be reflected in the Wikipedia version. No?


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Replied to Zoran's question.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: put a query into the [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics|Timeline]] entry: at numdam one can find the Cartan Sem from 1948, but I can not find there the write up of sheaf theory those some related notions in non-sheaf language can be easily found. Am I blind ? \href{http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/feuilleter?id=SHC_1948-1949__1_}{numdam 1948 Cartan Sem}. Timeline claims 1948 WRITE-UP. So where it is ?


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item slightly expanded [[Lie algebroid]] and added several links to entries that didn't exist back when this was created but do exist now

in this context I made [[Atiyah Lie algebroid]] redirect to [[Atiyah Lie groupoid]]


\item created [[tangent Lie algebroid]]



\end{itemize}

\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item The [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] is repaired thanks to Andrew Stacey. See the new question there about updating links in a new migration.


\item Andrew, i am glad that you are interested in my big problem. But i don't really understand your question. Is it not enough to ask the question at the timeline page and say here that i have added a problem to solve to the page? Perhaps the question at the timeline was not clear. The same timeline at wikipedia has/will have soon about 1500 links. When i migrate it to nLab again, and better than the last time, i need to change the links to link to correct pages at nLab. It is only some of the names that need to be changed to link to correct nLabs pages, which often have different names than those in wikipedia.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[fibration of points]] following [[Borceux-Bourn]].


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: I have implemented all the little database tweaks that were needed and done my best to reverse all the truncations. Please see \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=52&page=2#Item_22}{this comment} for details. Please also check if a long page is how it ought to be (thinking particularly of the timeline).

The main thing to note is that although the limits are larger and are sufficient to accommodate all that was on the old lab, \emph{there are still limits}. In particular, page names and redirects are limited to 100 characters. Page contents is a little bigger!

Talking of the timeline, incidentally, now that I can see Rafael's question, could I ask him to ask the question again over on the Forum with at the very least a link to where I can see what it is that needs to be converted? Thanks.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: additions to [[Ieke Moerdijk]]


\item [[Tim Porter]]: I have removed the blue boxes as suggetsed by [[Urs]] (see below).


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created the entry for the monograph [[Borceux-Bourn]] and extracted some material to add into [[Mal'cev category]]. Created [[Mal'cev variety]] including the definitions and redirects for [[Mal'cev operation]] and [[Mal'cev theory]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item created entries for [[Saunders MacLane]], [[Gonzalo Reyes]] and [[Ieke Moerdijk]] and included links to them where we cite these people as authors (but I will have missed many pages where we do)


\item am asking for discussion of my latest formatting decision concerning these floating tables of contents \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=61}{here} on the forum


\item expanded the entry [[dg-algebra]], moved the discussion there to the bottom, as I think it has been addressed (but Toby, let me know if not)

I find it kind of a pity that this entry exists in parallel with [[differential graded algebra]]. I understand that the motivation was that one entry gives the detailed component description while the other gives the abstract nonsense definition (monoid in chain complexes). But this is a general effect in the nLab and we should keep such things in different subsections on the same page. Maybe let me know what you think


\item added floating table of contents to the ``lexicon'' entries on differential graded structures that [[Tim Porter]] created a while ago. See for instance starting at [[graded vector space]].

(these tables overlap with Tim's blue alert boxes. I am thinking we could remove these boxes now and let the table of comntents server their purpose, but before i do this I want to hear what Tim thinks about. I'll contact him)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] made a first pass at formatting [[Trimble on ETCS II]], but it will need to be checked.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: thanks! That's very useful. i was hoping somebody would find the time to do that eventually. Great that you did it.

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090903}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-03}}\label{20090903}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Todd Trimble]]: wrote article on [[tree]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[formal group scheme]] also far from finished. Maybe [[John Baez|John]] would like to explain connections to the Witt ring ?


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Wrote a hopefully not too long answer to the long discussion at [[category theory]].


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[formal scheme]] but it is far from finished; small changes to few related items (e.g. [[Kähler differential]]).


\item [[Benoit Jubin]] has kindly corrected some fonts at [[monoidal category]]. Welcome, Beno\^i{}t!


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Answered the open question at [[An Exercise in Kantization]].

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: ``Kantization'' makes it sound like you are talking about Immanuel Kant --- I think you should call it ``Kanonization''.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a stub-link at [[semiotic equivalence relation]] --- and I see by the clock on the \href{http://nlab.mathforge.org/nlab/recently_revised}{TARDIS Wall} that the Synchronoplastic Infundibulum has hic$\cup\partial$.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: added some references to [[supermanifold]]. I agree with Urs that the -things when the entries contain predominantly the definitions and non-specific information should be just under the things. However often the cothings are very unlike things in practice. For example, homology and cohomology in abelian categories is just the same and dual; however in geometry homology and cohomology of spaces are rather different; for example there are finiteness conditions in homology which are absent in cohomology. Naively defined ech cohomology is a cohomology theory and ech homology is not, as it fails exactness\ldots{}but the coherent repair works. Or the rings. Artinian and noetherian are dual conditions, but for unital rings the unit breaks the symmetry, hence every unital artinian ring is noetherian but not by far other way around.


\item [[lab elf|Lab Elf (Swiss department)]]: I \emph{think} I've fixed the timezone. I guess the real test is when I submit this page. Let's see now, it's about 12:50 UTC, so click `Submit' and \ldots{} 12:51 is the reported time. Yippee!


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: The memory upgrade has happened. Our IP address has changed so if you can't access the nLab then you need to \ldots{} err \ldots{}


\item [[Urs Schreiber]] made the following keywords all redirect to [[fibration sequence]]: [[cofibration sequence]], [[homotopy fiber]], [[homotopy cofiber]]

(this is supposed to be in line with what I think is a general strategy we should stick to: that all co-things are discussed in the same entry with things, since otherwise we get huge and unreasonable duplication)


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: created [[free field (algebra)]], [[perfect field]], [[algebraic group]].


\item [[lab elf|Lab Elf (children's department)]]: We're getting a memory upgrade sometime soon. This will involve a downtime of approximately 35-40 minutes (they have to shift our ``slice'' to another machine to accommodate the upgrade). I don't know yet exactly when this will occur and I may not get notice in time to post it here (I've requested that it be ASAP). For obvious reasons, if I do get notice of when it will be then I'll put an announcement on the Forum and somewhere appropriate on the Cafe (I guess the `nLab migration' thread seems most suitable).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: expanded [[generalized (Eilenberg-Steenrod) cohomology]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added table of contents to [[cohomology]] and strated adding to related entries

\end{itemize}

\item [[Toby Bartels]]: In answer to Jon Awbrey's question,

\begin{quote}%
What day is it? it's still September 2 UTC, but for some reason the Lab is now on UTC+4, which makes it September 3. Hopefully we can get it back to UTC, which is the standard for international sites; but if not, then I'll probably just edit the `UTC' up above to `UTC+4' and leave it at that.


\end{quote}
[[lab elf|Lab Elf (Swiss department)]]: On the TODO list \ldots{} Actually, maybe the TODO list ought to be a little more explicit. I'll stick it on the forum.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] finished formatting [[triadic relation]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090902}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-02}}\label{20090902}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]] tried to usefully rearrange the table of contents at [[HowTo]] into subsections a bit, just a suggestion, probably not optimal yet, but I felt the reader might wish to have an easier overview


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Made a table of contents for [[HowTo]].


\item [[Mike Shulman]]: A bit more on displaying MathML at [[HowTo]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item expanded the beginning of [[extended topological quantum field theory]], also added further links to existing entries


\item further expanded [[equivariant cohomology]] a bit: made the essential idea a standout box and added group cohomology and local systems as examples.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item Replied at [[Bousfield localization]].


\item Replied and did some minor changes on [[extended topological quantum field theory]]. I am waiting for the experts to improve what i have written before i write more.


\item As for the timeline i am glad that it can be fixed but how about the long titles? Ah. the nForum.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item started an entry on [[equivariant cohomology]]


\item I agree with Andrew: single long pages are not so good for the reader. An entry that becomes very long should be split into an overview page with a linked table of contents and sub-pages. We did this for instance for [[gerbe]].


\item added to [[HomePage]] and to [[HowTo]] a note on software prerequisites for displaying MathML. At [[HowTo]] this discussion should eventually be expanded.


\item I changed links throughout the Lab to the pages [[Chevalley-eilenberg algebra in synthetic differential geomet|Chevalley-eilenberg algebra in synthetic differential geometry]] and to [[Verity on descent for strict omega-groupoid valued presheave|Verity on descent for strict omega-groupoid valued presheaves]] to the new truncated title names, so that they will still work. There are more entries for which this is necessary. See the discussion at the forum.



\end{itemize}

\item [[Andrew Stacey]] I've written enough on the Instiki/MediaWiki issues elsewhere and I'm not going to rehash them here (or even link to them). In short: it ain't gonna happen. The issues we're having is purely a matter of database differences - it's nothing to do with Instiki itself. I doubt many people do a database migration - certainly none of the nonsense (abstract or otherwise) that I've read has mentioned the problems we've had - so the issues aren't well known. I'm finding them out as we go along. I apologise that it's a live test, but there were only three serious beta testers and they didn't pick up on all of these issues as there were only three of them.

I don't know why splitting the timeline up wouldn't feel like 2009. I think that \emph{long} pages are a hangover from the \emph{old days}. We should have shorter pages included in to bigger pages (which, incidentally, is what MediaWiki does only it does it without telling you). ``Pages'' should be layered so that a visitor gets a broad overview first, then clicks through to get finer and finer details. One long page seems to miss the point of hyperlinks.

However, as has been pointed out in elsewhere, this is a lousy place to have a discussion. These are interesting points to discuss, but distracting on this page, so if anyone would like to pursue them further, I suggest we shift it over to the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/}{forum}.

What is more important is to let me know (preferably on the forum) of any other issues with the migrated site. Now that my eyes have uncrossed, I've realised that I was misreading the MySQL article on storage limits and we \emph{can} have superlong pages so we will. Soon. I promise.

(I still say it's a bad idea)


\item [[Mike Shulman]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item Did some editing of [[center]] (added categorifications) and [[normalizer]], and created [[centralizer]].


\item Tried to remove some of the duplication from [[dualizable object]], [[compact closed category]], and [[rigid monoidal category]], but some is still left. Perhaps the latter two should really be combined on one page?



\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item added links back and forth between the new [[extended topological quantum field theory]] and the old [[FQFT]] -- notice that there is a bit of overlap, we may want to rearrange material eventually over these two entries.


\item replied at [[category theory]] (down in the query box at the bottom)



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added a stub and a few links on the subject of [[inquiry]].



\end{itemize}
\hypertarget{20090901}{}\subsection*{{2009-09-01}}\label{20090901}

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Wrote the beginning of the well deserved page [[extended topological quantum field theory]].


\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: Just as an interesting fact the new timeline which is not finished is 113kb, then extract the 4 or so long entries that were moved to separate pages and add literature, references and the long discussions. So how are other sites doing it? It looks like it is just nLab that runs into different troubels (even before the migration). I could mention more such as line breaks that is not working smooth or at all, but not now. I can not compare it to many sites but one is wikipedia. Even for editing as Zoran \v{S}koda mentioned, wikipedia has no problem in editing parts of a page. I don't know which technology nLab is using (except a part of it is called instiki) but how about an upgrade to such technology as wikipedia is using? In fact everything that i noticed don't work here work in wikipedia. In all, the timeline could be split in two year parts and one main page with discussions, but i don't really like it. Then it would not feel like 2009.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Mike Shulman]]: Hmm, \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/comments.php?DiscussionID=28}{deja vu}.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: Thanks, Andrew a lot for all you are doing. Good night! I am loggin here another concern about terminology abstract nonsense. I am moving much in (predominantly noncommutative and algebraic) geometric community and my exprience is that when somebody says they proved a fact by abstract nonsense it is NOT confined to categorical methods only but to any CLEAN and GENERAL methods ``from the book'' as opposed to specific unclean improvizations tailored to a very specific circumstance in question.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: My eyes are beginning to cross when reading the MySQL manual. I may have been misreading a couple of things to do with data storage and it may be possible to get around the timeline problem. However, I still think that long pages could be better split up.

I sincerely hope that the lab survives the night, but I'm going offline now so please be patient with it!


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: of course, this is not a solution to the database problem, but I anyway think the discussion part could be separated from the main table of \emph{Timeline} and the \emph{Timeline} could have a separate part till 1960 say, then 1960 till 1989 and then third since 1990 (for example, better estimates possible). That would be easier for editing, with big file it is difficult to scroll when editing anyway. I created [[normalizer]], [[center]] (with a word on and redirect [[centralizer]]) and [[holomorph]]. Please check, it is elementary, but it was a quick writing.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]] is seriously considering finding The Doctor and borrowing the Tardis to go back and have a Serious Word with the designers of sqlite3. (Anyone who gets the reference, I have a great photograph of a bus seen here in Trondheim that proves that The Doctor's greatest enemies are sneakily planning their next invasion from Norway. But I digress.) The problem with the timeline is the same as that with the long page names (and with an old problem in the testing stage with stylesheets). It's down to a fundamental difference in design between sqlite3 (the old, slow database backend) and mysql (the newer, snappier model). Basically, while both allow you to declare certain entries to be a certain type, sqlite3 then proceeds to \textbf{ignore that type}. Mysql (and just about every other database) enforces it. So when Instiki says ``page names should be at most 60 chars long'', Mysql truncates them to 60 chars while sqlite3 merrily accepts page names as long as Lanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch and back again. Twice. Similarly, where MySQL has a limit on lengths of rows in its database (happens to be 65535 bytes), sqlite3 merrily goes on accepting data as long as it gets it.

You can see where this is going, can't you. Yup, timeline hit that latter limit. It's currently over 80000 \emph{characters}, and some of those are unicode so I've no idea how many actual bytes it is!

Before anyone suggests going back to sqlite3, let me point out that we can't scale up with sqlite3. So that's a non-starter. There are complicated possibilities in which we have more than one row for a page, but the absolute simplest would be to split long pages into smaller ones and then include them from the main one. So we could split the timeline into, say, decades and then an extra bit for the discussion and simply include them all on the main timeline page. That would also make editing the page a bit slicker and quicker.

If that is acceptable, then I can load up the timeline in two segments for someone to carve up into more sensible pieces. It'll be tomorrow now before I get round to doing this (sorry).

I'll also have to figure out whether any more pages are affected by this. I'm afraid that I'll have to roll these back to how they were when the lab was migrated (but presumably no-one's actually tried to edit one of these truncated pages, otherwise there'd've been more bugs noted here).


\item [[Todd Trimble]] added a teeny bit to [[locally convex topological vector space]]. I hope to be more in nLab editor mode soon. Congratulations on a successful migration (with big thanks to [[Andrew Stacey]]).

[[Andrew Stacey]]: I'd hold off on the champagne for a little bit \ldots{}


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: query in [[category theory]]: I think that blaming the terminology \emph{abstract nonsense} to predominantly non-likers is misleading and that the wikipedia is this time more correct than nlab.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Jon Awbrey]]: I have always understood the term ``abstract nonsense'' as a pun on the sense of the word ``sense'' that means ``direction'' --- hence ``abstract nonsense'' suggests something like the ``formal path-independence'' of commutative diagrams. I'm sure I mentioned this to several people back in the day, and they all said something like, ``well, duh.''


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: I never heard of such interpretation; plus this interpretation would not survive in other languages like Russian and French where the direction and sense/nonsense do not mix like that. Russian version of \emph{abstract nonsense} is  .



\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added stubs and links at [[sign relation]] and [[triadic relation]].


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: replied in the discussion at the bottom of [[category theory]] -- and have a question

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Todd Trimble]] chucked in two cents here.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]] WATCH OUT WITH LONG ENTRY NAMES -- see the $n$forum discussion. Some long entry names got truncated in the migration. the entry ``Chevalley-eilenberg algebra in synthetic differential geometry'' for instance is now called [[Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra in synthetic differential geomet]]



\end{itemize}
See ``all pages'' to find out the truncated entry name of an entry that you know should be there but is missing.

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]: To [[Andrew Stacey]]. The whole bottom part of the page [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] is abruptly missing. Which is a lot, not only my question. Since i have the full version loaded in a browser i could try to reconstruct it but i would prefer if you did a rollback if you can.


\item [[Jon Awbrey]] added content to [[hypostatic abstraction]].


\item [[John Baez]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item answered Rafael's plea for a definition of `CW complex' in that big discussion on [[category theory]], and also commented on Urs' remark about `simplicial complexes';


\item completed the definition of [[monoidal category]] by adding the triangle equation;


\item added some remarks on right vs. left duals on [[rigid monoidal category]];


\item noted that the $n$Lab crashed a couple of times while I was doing this. Unfortunately I did not get a screenshot of the fancy error message.

[[Andrew Stacey]]: Yes, we hit our memory ceiling a couple of times. I've lowered a couple of settings to try to ensure that we don't do this again but it's a bit experimental as to what the best settings are. It's all a bit of a learning experience for me! (Perhaps I shouldn't admit to that \ldots{})



\end{itemize}

\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: I restarted the system and now IE renders [[normal subgroup]] correctly. This is strange as it had problems only with new entries [[normal subgroup]] and [[normal closure]] (even after many reloads) and rendered correctly the other entries. Now after reboot even they appear correct.

[[Andrew Stacey]]: Okay, sounds like it was a cache bug. During the changeover, various addresses pointed all over the shop and there are redirects going all ways from Sunday, so it's not surprising that a browser get confused. Clearing caches is probably a good idea. It will take a while before ncatlab.org properly points here for everyone (for example, from my work machine it was working from about midday; now at home then it still resolves to the old lab). But if you type `ncatlab.org' into a browser you will always end up \emph{here}, it just might be via a slightly circuitous route.


\item [[Zoran ?koda]]: I just created [[normal subgroup]], [[normal closure]], but they do not render correctly on my IE. Is this a new-system glitch? The letters and formulas are one across another. Did not make last night logging that I added a paragraph or so on the Jacobi matrix and the application (Alexander polynomial) into the [[Fox derivative]]. I also created [[derived affine scheme]] in the sense of Toen et al.

[[Andrew Stacey]]: No idea! Can you send me a screen shot? Unfortunately, the Windows machine that I have control over can't connect to the wireless network here (Oh, the irony!) and the windows machine that I don't have control over doesn't have MathML support.


\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: The migrating eagle has landed.

There will inevitably be hiccoughs, hangups, and hassles. Please log them over at the \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/}{nForum}. Also, if you notice weird behaviour then there may be an explanation of it over there (just because I know what causes it doesn't mean I've implemented the fix yet).


\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item replied at [[Bousfield localization]]

\end{itemize}

\item [[Jon Awbrey]]:

\begin{itemize}%
\item ``A [[continuous predicate]], as described by [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], is a special type of relational predicate that arises as the limit of an iterated process of [[hypostatic abstraction]].''

\end{itemize}

\item [[Rafael Borowiecki]]:


\item Posed a question at [[Timeline of category theory and related mathematics]] regarding a new migration: How do i handle to update most of 1500 links!?

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Andrew Stacey]]: I've looked for your question and can't find it. I apologise if it's been lost in the migration, but can you ask it again? If it's technical, the forum might be a better place to ask it.

\end{itemize}

\item Suggested that manifold objects should be treated or at least mentioned at [[manifold]].


\item Provided references for my question at [[Bousfield localization]].


\item Split the subsection what is category theory at [[category theory]] into two parts: In the narrow sense and In the wide sense. This makes sense.


\item Added briefly how toposes and higher categories come into category theory as a foundations at [[category theory]].


\item Added what it means for category theory to be a unifying tool and language in mathematics at [[category theory]].


\item Replied to the discussion at [[category theory]].



\end{itemize}
I see the migration went well, at least so far. :)

([[Andrew Stacey]]: actually, it happened \emph{after} you posted this, but thanks all the same!

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Happy September!!!


\item [[Toby Bartels]]: Now, you know it's not September for another half hour, right? ({\tt \symbol{94}}\_{\tt \symbol{94}})

\begin{itemize}%
\item [[Urs Schreiber]]: oops, you are right, I forgot that I am not exactly at GMT +0.

\end{itemize}

\item [[Urs Schreiber]]

\begin{itemize}%
\item moved the accumulated latest changes of last month to [[2009 August changes]] (by renaming the last ``latest changes'' and then creating a new one)

\end{itemize}


\end{itemize}

\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
[[2008 changes|First list]] --- [[2009 August changes|Previous list]] --- \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/?CategoryID=5}{Next list} --- \href{http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/?CategoryID=5}{Current list}


\vspace{.5em} \hrule \vspace{.5em}
category: meta



\end{document}