\documentclass[12pt,titlepage]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{color} \usepackage{ucs} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage{xparse} \usepackage{hyperref} %----Macros---------- % % Unresolved issues: % % \righttoleftarrow % \lefttorightarrow % % \color{} with HTML colorspec % \bgcolor % \array with options (without options, it's equivalent to the matrix environment) % Of the standard HTML named colors, white, black, red, green, blue and yellow % are predefined in the color package. Here are the rest. \definecolor{aqua}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 1.0} \definecolor{fuschia}{rgb}{1.0, 0, 1.0} \definecolor{gray}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0.502} \definecolor{lime}{rgb}{0, 1.0, 0} \definecolor{maroon}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0} \definecolor{navy}{rgb}{0, 0, 0.502} \definecolor{olive}{rgb}{0.502, 0.502, 0} \definecolor{purple}{rgb}{0.502, 0, 0.502} \definecolor{silver}{rgb}{0.753, 0.753, 0.753} \definecolor{teal}{rgb}{0, 0.502, 0.502} % Because of conflicts, \space and \mathop are converted to % \itexspace and \operatorname during preprocessing. % itex: \space{ht}{dp}{wd} % % Height and baseline depth measurements are in units of tenths of an ex while % the width is measured in tenths of an em. \makeatletter \newdimen\itex@wd% \newdimen\itex@dp% \newdimen\itex@thd% \def\itexspace#1#2#3{\itex@wd=#3em% \itex@wd=0.1\itex@wd% \itex@dp=#2ex% \itex@dp=0.1\itex@dp% \itex@thd=#1ex% \itex@thd=0.1\itex@thd% \advance\itex@thd\the\itex@dp% \makebox[\the\itex@wd]{\rule[-\the\itex@dp]{0cm}{\the\itex@thd}}} \makeatother % \tensor and \multiscript \makeatletter \newif\if@sup \newtoks\@sups \def\append@sup#1{\edef\act{\noexpand\@sups={\the\@sups #1}}\act}% \def\reset@sup{\@supfalse\@sups={}}% \def\mk@scripts#1#2{\if #2/ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\fi \else% \ifx #1_ \if@sup ^{\the\@sups}\reset@sup \fi {}_{#2}% \else \append@sup#2 \@suptrue \fi% \expandafter\mk@scripts\fi} \def\tensor#1#2{\reset@sup#1\mk@scripts#2_/} \def\multiscripts#1#2#3{\reset@sup{}\mk@scripts#1_/#2% \reset@sup\mk@scripts#3_/} \makeatother % \slash \makeatletter \newbox\slashbox \setbox\slashbox=\hbox{$/$} \def\itex@pslash#1{\setbox\@tempboxa=\hbox{$#1$} \@tempdima=0.5\wd\slashbox \advance\@tempdima 0.5\wd\@tempboxa \copy\slashbox \kern-\@tempdima \box\@tempboxa} \def\slash{\protect\itex@pslash} \makeatother % math-mode versions of \rlap, etc % from Alexander Perlis, "A complement to \smash, \llap, and lap" % http://math.arizona.edu/~aprl/publications/mathclap/ \def\clap#1{\hbox to 0pt{\hss#1\hss}} \def\mathllap{\mathpalette\mathllapinternal} \def\mathrlap{\mathpalette\mathrlapinternal} \def\mathclap{\mathpalette\mathclapinternal} \def\mathllapinternal#1#2{\llap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}} \def\mathrlapinternal#1#2{\rlap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}} \def\mathclapinternal#1#2{\clap{$\mathsurround=0pt#1{#2}$}} % Renames \sqrt as \oldsqrt and redefine root to result in \sqrt[#1]{#2} \let\oldroot\root \def\root#1#2{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}} \renewcommand{\sqrt}[2][]{\oldroot #1 \of{#2}} % Manually declare the txfonts symbolsC font \DeclareSymbolFont{symbolsC}{U}{txsyc}{m}{n} \SetSymbolFont{symbolsC}{bold}{U}{txsyc}{bx}{n} \DeclareFontSubstitution{U}{txsyc}{m}{n} % Manually declare the stmaryrd font \DeclareSymbolFont{stmry}{U}{stmry}{m}{n} \SetSymbolFont{stmry}{bold}{U}{stmry}{b}{n} % Manually declare the MnSymbolE font \DeclareFontFamily{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{} \DeclareSymbolFont{mnomx}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n} \SetSymbolFont{mnomx}{bold}{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{b}{n} \DeclareFontShape{OMX}{MnSymbolE}{m}{n}{ <-6> MnSymbolE5 <6-7> MnSymbolE6 <7-8> MnSymbolE7 <8-9> MnSymbolE8 <9-10> MnSymbolE9 <10-12> MnSymbolE10 <12-> MnSymbolE12}{} % Declare specific arrows from txfonts without loading the full package \makeatletter \def\re@DeclareMathSymbol#1#2#3#4{% \let#1=\undefined \DeclareMathSymbol{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\neArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{116} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\seArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{117} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nwArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{118} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArrow}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\swArr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{119} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\nequiv}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{46} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Perp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\Vbar}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{121} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\sslash}{\mathrel}{stmry}{12} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\bigsqcap}{\mathop}{stmry}{"64} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\biginterleave}{\mathop}{stmry}{"6} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\invamp}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77} \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\parr}{\mathrel}{symbolsC}{77} \makeatother % \llangle, \rrangle, \lmoustache and \rmoustache from MnSymbolE \makeatletter \def\Decl@Mn@Delim#1#2#3#4{% \if\relax\noexpand#1% \let#1\undefined \fi \DeclareMathDelimiter{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#3}{#4}} \def\Decl@Mn@Open#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathopen}{#2}{#3}} \def\Decl@Mn@Close#1#2#3{\Decl@Mn@Delim{#1}{\mathclose}{#2}{#3}} \Decl@Mn@Open{\llangle}{mnomx}{'164} \Decl@Mn@Close{\rrangle}{mnomx}{'171} \Decl@Mn@Open{\lmoustache}{mnomx}{'245} \Decl@Mn@Close{\rmoustache}{mnomx}{'244} \makeatother % Widecheck \makeatletter \DeclareRobustCommand\widecheck[1]{{\mathpalette\@widecheck{#1}}} \def\@widecheck#1#2{% \setbox\z@\hbox{\m@th$#1#2$}% \setbox\tw@\hbox{\m@th$#1% \widehat{% \vrule\@width\z@\@height\ht\z@ \vrule\@height\z@\@width\wd\z@}$}% \dp\tw@-\ht\z@ \@tempdima\ht\z@ \advance\@tempdima2\ht\tw@ \divide\@tempdima\thr@@ \setbox\tw@\hbox{% \raise\@tempdima\hbox{\scalebox{1}[-1]{\lower\@tempdima\box \tw@}}}% {\ooalign{\box\tw@ \cr \box\z@}}} \makeatother % \mathraisebox{voffset}[height][depth]{something} \makeatletter \NewDocumentCommand\mathraisebox{moom}{% \IfNoValueTF{#2}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}{$\m@th##1##2$}}}{% \IfNoValueTF{#3}{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2]{$\m@th##1##2$}}% }{\def\@temp##1##2{\raisebox{#1}[#2][#3]{$\m@th##1##2$}}}}% \mathpalette\@temp{#4}} \makeatletter % udots (taken from yhmath) \makeatletter \def\udots{\mathinner{\mkern2mu\raise\p@\hbox{.} \mkern2mu\raise4\p@\hbox{.}\mkern1mu \raise7\p@\vbox{\kern7\p@\hbox{.}}\mkern1mu}} \makeatother %% Fix array \newcommand{\itexarray}[1]{\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}} %% \itexnum is a noop \newcommand{\itexnum}[1]{#1} %% Renaming existing commands \newcommand{\underoverset}[3]{\underset{#1}{\overset{#2}{#3}}} \newcommand{\widevec}{\overrightarrow} \newcommand{\darr}{\downarrow} \newcommand{\nearr}{\nearrow} \newcommand{\nwarr}{\nwarrow} \newcommand{\searr}{\searrow} \newcommand{\swarr}{\swarrow} \newcommand{\curvearrowbotright}{\curvearrowright} \newcommand{\uparr}{\uparrow} \newcommand{\downuparrow}{\updownarrow} \newcommand{\duparr}{\updownarrow} \newcommand{\updarr}{\updownarrow} \newcommand{\gt}{>} \newcommand{\lt}{<} \newcommand{\map}{\mapsto} \newcommand{\embedsin}{\hookrightarrow} \newcommand{\Alpha}{A} \newcommand{\Beta}{B} \newcommand{\Zeta}{Z} \newcommand{\Eta}{H} \newcommand{\Iota}{I} \newcommand{\Kappa}{K} \newcommand{\Mu}{M} \newcommand{\Nu}{N} \newcommand{\Rho}{P} \newcommand{\Tau}{T} \newcommand{\Upsi}{\Upsilon} \newcommand{\omicron}{o} \newcommand{\lang}{\langle} \newcommand{\rang}{\rangle} \newcommand{\Union}{\bigcup} \newcommand{\Intersection}{\bigcap} \newcommand{\Oplus}{\bigoplus} \newcommand{\Otimes}{\bigotimes} \newcommand{\Wedge}{\bigwedge} \newcommand{\Vee}{\bigvee} \newcommand{\coproduct}{\coprod} \newcommand{\product}{\prod} \newcommand{\closure}{\overline} \newcommand{\integral}{\int} \newcommand{\doubleintegral}{\iint} \newcommand{\tripleintegral}{\iiint} \newcommand{\quadrupleintegral}{\iiiint} \newcommand{\conint}{\oint} \newcommand{\contourintegral}{\oint} \newcommand{\infinity}{\infty} \newcommand{\bottom}{\bot} \newcommand{\minusb}{\boxminus} \newcommand{\plusb}{\boxplus} \newcommand{\timesb}{\boxtimes} \newcommand{\intersection}{\cap} \newcommand{\union}{\cup} \newcommand{\Del}{\nabla} \newcommand{\odash}{\circleddash} \newcommand{\negspace}{\!} \newcommand{\widebar}{\overline} \newcommand{\textsize}{\normalsize} \renewcommand{\scriptsize}{\scriptstyle} \newcommand{\scriptscriptsize}{\scriptscriptstyle} \newcommand{\mathfr}{\mathfrak} \newcommand{\statusline}[2]{#2} \newcommand{\tooltip}[2]{#2} \newcommand{\toggle}[2]{#2} % Theorem Environments \theoremstyle{plain} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma} \newtheorem{prop}{Proposition} \newtheorem{cor}{Corollary} \newtheorem*{utheorem}{Theorem} \newtheorem*{ulemma}{Lemma} \newtheorem*{uprop}{Proposition} \newtheorem*{ucor}{Corollary} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{defn}{Definition} \newtheorem{example}{Example} \newtheorem*{udefn}{Definition} \newtheorem*{uexample}{Example} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{remark}{Remark} \newtheorem{note}{Note} \newtheorem*{uremark}{Remark} \newtheorem*{unote}{Note} %------------------------------------------------------------------- \begin{document} %------------------------------------------------------------------- \section*{particle} \hypertarget{context}{}\subsubsection*{{Context}}\label{context} \hypertarget{physics}{}\paragraph*{{Physics}}\label{physics} [[!include physicscontents]] \hypertarget{fields_and_quanta}{}\paragraph*{{Fields and quanta}}\label{fields_and_quanta} [[!include fields and quanta - table]] \hypertarget{contents}{}\section*{{Contents}}\label{contents} \noindent\hyperlink{idea}{Idea}\dotfill \pageref*{idea} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{WhatIsAParticle}{What is a particle?}\dotfill \pageref*{WhatIsAParticle} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{FirstQuantizedPerspective}{First quantized worldvolume perspective}\dotfill \pageref*{FirstQuantizedPerspective} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective}{Second quantized perspective}\dotfill \pageref*{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{mixed_perspectives}{Mixed perspectives}\dotfill \pageref*{mixed_perspectives} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{examples}{Examples}\dotfill \pageref*{examples} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{ParticlesAndNonParticlesIn3dTQFT}{Particles and non-particles in 3d TQFT}\dotfill \pageref*{ParticlesAndNonParticlesIn3dTQFT} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{related_concepts}{Related concepts}\dotfill \pageref*{related_concepts} \linebreak \noindent\hyperlink{References}{References}\dotfill \pageref*{References} \linebreak \hypertarget{idea}{}\subsection*{{Idea}}\label{idea} The [[field (physics)|field]] of [[quantum field theory]] started out as a description of the [[fundamental particles]] that are observed in [[experiment]], such as [[electrons]] and [[photons]]. However, even so, abstractly the formalization of the concept of \emph{particle} within [[QFT]]s is somewhat subtle. If the quantum field theory is on [[Minkowski space]] and comes with a [[Hilbert space|Hilbert]] [[space of states]] on which thus the [[Poincare group]] of translations, rotations and boosts in Minkowski space acts, the massive \emph{particle} excitations of the theory can be found in the discrete spectrum of the time translation operator as the [[irreducible representation|irreducible]] [[unitary representations of the Poincare group]]. For QFTs on [[curved spacetime|curved]] [[spacetimes]] the situation is more subtle. Often, however, QFTs are considered as [[quantizations]] of given [[Lagrangians]]. In these cases one often identifies their particle content with that explicitly encoded by the Lagrangian. Notably when that arises from [[second quantization]] of some 1-dimensional [[sigma-model]], the particles of the theory are those described by these sigma-models. \hypertarget{WhatIsAParticle}{}\subsection*{{What is a particle?}}\label{WhatIsAParticle} The fundamental concept of modern [[physics]] is that of [[quantum field theory]] (QFT); the concept of particle is derived from that, and need not make sense in every case. (``That's why it's called `field theory'.'') In the perspective of the [[Schrödinger picture]], a $(d+1)$-dimensional [[QFT]] is given by a [[functor]] $Z$ on a [[category of cobordisms]] (possibly with [[geometry|geometric]] structure, such as [[pseudo-Riemannian metric]] structure) between $d$-dimensional [[manifolds]] (``[[FQFT]]''). It is crucial to notice that one such QFT always has \textbf{two different interpretations}: \begin{enumerate}% \item a \hyperlink{FirstQuantizedPerspective}{first quantized worldvolume perspective}; \item a \hyperlink{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective}{second quantized spacetime perspective}. \end{enumerate} \hypertarget{FirstQuantizedPerspective}{}\subsubsection*{{First quantized worldvolume perspective}}\label{FirstQuantizedPerspective} If we think of a $d$-dimensional manifold as the shape of a some quantum object -- (as such commonly called a $d$-[[brane]]) -- then a [[cobordism]] between two such is thought of as a piece of [[worldvolume]], a way for parts of such an object to interact with other parts. From this perspective the functor $Z$ assigns to a manifold the [[space of quantum states]] that the [[brane]] of this shape may have, and to a [[cobordism]] the linear map which is the time evolution along the cobordism. Here if $d = 0$ then the [[brane]] is a ``0-brane'' and this is a ``particle'' (or [[D0-brane]]), the worldvolume is the ``[[worldline]]'' and the QFT encodes the [[worldline theory]] of the particle, its [[quantum mechanics]]. If instead $d = 1$ then the brane is a 1-brane, for instance a [[string]] of [[D1-brane]], if $d = 2$ then the brane is a 2-brane also called a [[membrane]], and so on. Given this, one may try to see if this data describes a brane propagating \emph{in} some [[spacetime]] (the ``[[target space]]'' of the brane). It is the topic of [[spectral geometry]] (in the sense of [[Alain Connes]]`s) to try to reconstruct from this data the would-be target spacetime that the brane is propagating in. For instance for $d = 0$ the data of a QFT in this sense here is a [[spectral triple]] and [[noncommutative geometry]] provides a general way to make sense of the target space of the particle. If $d =1$ the QFT data here is that of a [[2-spectral triple]], and so on. \hypertarget{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective}{}\subsubsection*{{Second quantized perspective}}\label{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective} On the other hand, we may think of the $d+1$-dimensional [[cobordisms]] here themselves already as [[spacetimes]]. In this case the QFT describes [[field (physics)|fields]] on spacetime. In favorable circumstances this can arise from the previous case by a process of [[second quantization]], meaning that these fields may be thought of as [[condensates]] of branes/particles in the previous sense. Conversely one says that these particles are the \emph{quanta} of the fields that we start with. But generally, given a QFT in this perspective, to extract from it the particle content that it comes from under [[second quantization]] is subtle. One of the common definitions of particle quanta only applies to non [[general covariance|generally-covariant]] [[free field theories]] (e.g. \hyperlink{Haag92}{Haag 92, section VI}). This means that already for quantum field theory on a fixed [[curved spacetime]] there is in general no longer any concept of particle-quanta of the fields. This situation would only become worse were one to think of the given QFT as incorporating also [[quantum gravity]]. The concept of [[field (physics)|field]] here is fundamental, that of particle quanta is not. \hypertarget{mixed_perspectives}{}\subsubsection*{{Mixed perspectives}}\label{mixed_perspectives} Since the formalism of [[FQFT]] does not ``know'' whether we want to think of a given QFT as a \hyperlink{FirstQuantizedPerspective}{first-quantized worldvolume theory} or as a \hyperlink{SecondQuantizedSpacetimePerspective}{second quantized spacetime theory} in general both perspectives may be sensible at the same time. This is indeed so, but of course this mixing only becomes relevant once one really dares to consider higher-dimensional [[branes]] in the first place, hence in [[string theory]]. Indeed, [[perturbative string theory]] is all set up this way: one starts with a 2-dimensional QFT which one thinks of as the first-quantized [[worldsheet]] theory of a [[string]]. But this means that one may start to ask which ``particles'' propagate ``on the worldvolume''. Notably the ``embedding fields'' of the string [[sigma-model]] which describes how its worldsheet sits in [[spacetime]] look, from the perspective of the worldsheet theory, like [[scalar fields]]. Their [[superpartners]] look like [[fermion]] fields. If one considers the string worldsheet before gravitational [[gauge fixing]] then there is also a [[graviton]] on the worldsheet, and so on. Hence in general one may want to/need to consider an intricate pattern of ``branes withing branes''. For instance the [[worldsheet]] [[gravity]] of the [[string]] may itself arises from quantizing other strings for which that worldsheet is target spacetime ([[world sheets for world sheets|Green 87]]). \hypertarget{examples}{}\subsection*{{Examples}}\label{examples} \hypertarget{ParticlesAndNonParticlesIn3dTQFT}{}\subsubsection*{{Particles and non-particles in 3d TQFT}}\label{ParticlesAndNonParticlesIn3dTQFT} We consider a [[QFT]] which is a [[3d TQFT]] of [[Chern-Simons theory]] type and discuss some aspects of the notion of \emph{particle} in that context. Assume for the sake of argument that we agree to think of the 3d TQFT here as a realization of [[3d quantum gravity]], as indicated there. Then this means that as an [[FQFT]] the system assigns to every closed [[surface]] a [[space of quantum states]] to be thought of as the space of states of the [[observable universe]] in that 2+1-dimensional world. A state in here encodes the field of [[gravity]]. It would be somewhat subtle to extract from just the [[FQFT|functorial]] [[3d TQFT]] here the intrinsic notion of particle-quanta. In general, given an [[TQFT]] in the form of an [[FQFT]], there is essentially no established way to going about determining what the particle-quanta would be that an observer ``in this universe'' would see. In fact, an argument due to (\href{A-model#Witten92}{Witten 92}) says that if [[Chern-Simons theory]] [[3d TQFT]] is the [[second quantization]] of anything, then it is not of particles but of [[topological strings]] ([[A-model]]). See also (\href{A-model#Costello06}{Costello 06}) and see at \emph{\href{TCFT#ActionFunctionals}{TCFT -- Worldsheet and effective background theories}} for more on this. Beware, again, that this concerns the quanta for the fields of the QFT regarded as a QFT on a 2+1-dimensional [[spacetime]]. However we may change perspective and instead think of the [[3d TQFT]] here as a first-quantized [[worldvolume]] [[theory (physics)|theory]]. As such it would be a [[membrane]] [[theory (physics)|theory]], often called the \emph{[[topological membrane]]}, naturally. Now if we allow [[boundaries]] of [[worldvolume]], hence consider an [[extended TQFT]] with its [[boundary field theory]], then the boundary theory is a 1+1-dimensional worldsheet theory, hence describes a [[string]]. This way of how a first quantized [[string]] can arise as the [[boundary field theory]] of a first-quantized [[topological membrane]] is an instance of the ``[[holographic principle]]'' known as \emph{[[AdS3-CFT2 and CS-WZW correspondence]]}. Moreover, going further up in [[codimension]], the [[3d TQFT]] may have [[defect field theory|defects]] of codimension 2, hence have inside it a 0+1-dimensional [[defect field theory]]. This hence may be thought of as a first-quantized particle. (Notice that it is a \emph{first quantized} particle, not a quantum of a field of the 3d theory regarded as a spacetime theory, for these particles-as-quanta do not have worldlines given by cobordisms,only their first quantized avatars do, but they are not the first quantized 1d defect theory considered now.) Indeed, these first quantized codim-2-defects/0-branes/1d-particles in [[Chern-Simons theory]] are famous as having ``[[Wilson line]] [[worldline theory]]''. See at \emph{\href{orbit%20method#GaugeAndGravityWilsonLoops}{orbit method -- Nonabelian charged particle trajectories}} for details on their incarnation as [[prequantum field theory]]. After [[quantization]] these first quantized 0-branes/1d-particles are famously represented in the [[Reshetikhin-Turaev construction]] as ribbon lines labeled by [[objects]] in a [[modular tensor category]]. In conclusion, given a [[3d TQFT]] regarded as [[quantum gravity]] of 2+1-dimensional [[spacetimes]], it is at best subtle to extract from it particles in the sense of ``quanta of the fields of the spacetime field theory'', while extracting from it first quantized codim-2 [[defect field theory|defect]] 0-[[branes]] is a famous step in [[Chern-Simons theory]]. \hypertarget{related_concepts}{}\subsection*{{Related concepts}}\label{related_concepts} \begin{itemize}% \item [[sigma-model]] \item [[worldline]], [[worldline theory]] \item [[non-relativistic particle]] \item [[relativistic particle]], [[spinning particle]], [[superparticle]] \item [[virtual particle]], [[antiparticle]] \item [[fundamental particle]], [[standard model of particle physics]] \item [[matter]], [[force]] \item [[brane]], [[string]], [[membrane]] \item [[mechanics]] \item [[vacuum]] \end{itemize} \hypertarget{References}{}\subsection*{{References}}\label{References} Chapter VI of \begin{itemize}% \item [[Rudolf Haag]], \emph{[[Local Quantum Physics]]} (1992) \end{itemize} discusses how to extract notions of particles from a [[local net of observables]] satisfying the [[Haag-Kastler axioms]]. Further discussion of subtleties of the definition of particles \emph{in} (non-[[free field theory|free]]) field theories includes \begin{itemize}% \item [[Jonathan Bain]], \emph{Against particle/field duality: Asymptotic particle states and interpolating fields in interacting QFT (or: Who's afraid of Haag's theorem)}, Erkenntnis 53: 375--406, 2000 (\href{http://faculty.poly.edu/~jbain/papers/lsz.pdf}{pdf}) \end{itemize} [[!redirects particles]] [[!redirects quantum]] [[!redirects quanta]] \end{document}