We establish the following result:
If is locally presentable and is given a symmetric monoidal closed structure, then the category of cocommutative comonoids in is cartesian closed and locally presentable.
Let be the category of commutative comonoids in , and the forgetful functor. There are three main tasks:
Show that is accessible. Then, since cocomplete accessible categories are locally presentable, they are also complete (Adamek and Rosicky, …). In particular, has equalizers. (Finite products are given by tensor products in .)
Show that has a right adjoint .
Given the fact that has equalizers and , the category is cartesian closed. Products in are given by tensor products in .
I am roughly following Porst here; see particularly the proposition on page 8 and remarks on page 9. If the first task is completed, then the second is easy: using the fact that is locally presentable and the fact that preserves colimits, it has a right adjoint by the special adjoint functor theorem. In fact, is comonadic. The third task is by a direct construction of the exponential in , using the symmetric monoidal closed structure of , the right adjoint , and equalizers in .
The first task is divided into two subtasks: first is to show that the category of coalgebras for the finitary endofunctor
is accessible. Porst says (fact 5, page 6):
A detailed proof is given by Adamek and Porst (see Theorem IV.2, page 16). The relevant and more general results are given in the following lemma and theorem.
Let be a regular infinite cardinal. If is -accessible and is a coalgebra whose underlying object is -presentable in (i.e., preserves -filtered colimits which exist in ), then is -presentable in . Conversely, the underlying object of a -presentable -coalgebra is -presentable in .
Suppose given a -filtered diagram with colimit ; let denote nodes of the diagram. We must show that preserves this colimit. That is, any coalgebra map must be shown to factor through one of the in , and one should check that any two factorings resolve at a later stage.
The underlying functor preserves and reflects colimits, so is the colimit of the in . Since is -presentable in , any map factors through one of the cone components in , say . Suppose now is a coalgebra map. Then
using the fact that and are coalgebra maps. Since and preserve -filtered colimits, the comparison map
is a bijection; therefore the equality of elements in implies that and belong to the same equivalence class in . In other words, there exists an arrow in the diagram (a coalgebra map) such that
whence , making a coalgebra map. We moreover have
so factors in through one of the nodes . The fact that any two factorings resolve at a later stage is clear.
is finitary; therefore so is
To be continued…
If is locally finitely presentable and is finitary, then is locally -presentable (and often locally finitely presentable). If is an uncountable regular cardinal, is locally -presentable, and is -accessible, then is locally -presentable.
Next, Porst quotes a result from Adamek and Rosicky (Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories, 2.76) which figures in the theorem that the 2-category of accessible categories and accessible functors is closed under lax limits in . If are 1-cells of and are 2-cells, the equifier is the full subcategory of whose objects satisfy .
If and are locally presentable, and are -accessible functors , and are transformations, then are locally presentable.
Suppose is faithful.
If is monic, then so is .
The proof is trivial.
Now suppose is monic in . We know subcoalgebra inclusions are monic by Proposition 1. Hence the pullback is monic as well, as is of course the pullback .
A morphism in the category of finite-dimensional cocommutative -coalgebras is monic iff is monic.
By taking linear duals, this is equivalent to the statement that epimorphisms in the category of finite-dimensional commutative -algebras are surjective. Suppose otherwise, so we have an exact sequence of modules
with nonzero. Apply the functor to arrive at an exact sequence
That the first arrow is an iso is just the characterization of epis in terms of pushouts. Hence , and therefore . On the other hand, considering to be finitely generated as an -module, with a minimal set of generators , then we have surjections
where the second arrow takes to . By minimality, the second arrow is nonzero, with kernel an ideal of , so we have a surjection
and hence a surjection . Hence . But because is an epi in the category of commutative rings, the pushout projection is an iso, and this contradicts properness of .
Now consider the directed system of inclusions of finite-dimensional subcoalgebra inclusions (whose colimit is ). The pulled-back system