Todd Trimble elementary sequence question

We address here a MathOverflow query, given here. (Since clicking the link produces “404 Page Not Found”, I’ll reproduce the post here.)

I have a question regarding whether or not π\pi encodes the sequence of primer numbers. It is common knowledge that

ζ(2)=∑ i=1 ∞1n 2=∏ p∈ℙ11−p −2=π 26. \zeta (2) = \sum_{i = 1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \prod_{p \in \mathbb{P}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}.

Now let MM denote the set of all ascending sequences of natural numbers ≥2\geq 2, so, for instance, the complete sequence (2,3,4,5,6,…)(2,3,4,5,6,\ldots) is an element of MM, just as the sequence of prime numbers (2,3,5,7,…)(2,3,5,7,\ldots). Now consider the function f:M→ℝf: M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}, given by

(a 1,a 2,…)↦∏ i≥111−a i −2. (a_1,a_2,\ldots) \mapsto \prod_{i \geq 1}\frac{1}{1-a_i^{-2}}.

So we know that for the sequence of primes, the value of ff is π 2/6\pi^2/6. My question is now: Is the sequence of primes the only element of MM for which the value of ff is π 2/6\pi^ 2/6? Or in other words: Is f −1(π 2/6)={(2,3,5,7,…)}f^{-1}(\pi^2/6) = \{ (2,3,5,7,\ldots) \}?

As Gerald Edgar said below the query: “of course not”. But let us give a more constructive answer (at least more constructive in a technical sense). We describe first a very general result on sequences and series, after which the answer to the query falls out as a special case.

Let f:ℕ→ℝ >0f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}_{\gt 0} be a function that decreases to 00, and suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. For some finite set F⊂ℕF \subset \mathbb{N}, ∑ j∈Ff(j)<a\sum_{j \in F} f(j) \lt a,

  2. ∑ j∈Ff(j)+(∑ n>maxFf(n))>a\sum_{j \in F} f(j) + \left( \sum_{n \gt \max F} f(n) \right) \gt a,

  3. For every k>maxFk \gt \max F, we have f(k)<∑ n>kf(n)f(k) \lt \sum_{n \gt k} f(n).

Define by recursion an increasing infinite sequence n jn_j where F={n 1,…,n i}F = \{n_1, \ldots, n_i\} and for all k≥ik \geq i, we have that n k+1n_{k+1} is the least integer greater than n kn_k such that f(n 1)+…+f(n k+1)<af(n_1) + \ldots + f(n_{k+1}) \lt a. (Note that n k+1n_{k+1} exists at each step since the f(n)f(n) decrease to 00.) In other words, if we put S={n j} j∈ℕS = \{n_j\}_{j \in \mathbb{N}}, then by construction:

Lemma

For k>maxFk \gt \max F, we have k∈Sk \in S if and only if f(k)+∑ j∈S:j<kf(j)<af(k) + \sum_{j \in S: j \lt k} f(j) \lt a.

Proposition

∑ j∈Sf(j)=a.\sum_{j \in S} f(j) = a.

Proof

We first note that ¬S≔ℕ∖S\neg S \coloneqq \mathbb{N} \setminus S is infinite. To see this, observe that by condition 2, ¬S\neg S has an element greater than maxF\max F. If ¬S\neg S were finite, then there exists a maximal k∈¬Sk \in \neg S, so that S={j∈S:j<k}∪{n:n>k}S = \{j \in S: j \lt k\} \cup \{n: n \gt k\}. Then we have

  • ∑ j∈Sf(s)≤a\sum_{j \in S} f(s) \leq a (since for all finite partial sums we have ∑ j∈S:j<nf(j)<a\sum_{j \in S: j \lt n} f(j) \lt a);

  • therefore (∑ j∈S:j<kf(s))+(∑ n>kf(n))≤a(\sum_{j \in S: j \lt k} f(s)) + (\sum_{n \gt k} f(n)) \leq a;

  • hence (∑ j∈S:j<kf(s))+f(k)<a(\sum_{j \in S: j \lt k} f(s)) + f(k) \lt a (by condition 3);

  • hence k∈Sk \in S by the lemma, contradicting k∈¬Sk \in \neg S.

Now we show ∑ j∈Sf(j)=a\sum_{j \in S} f(j) = a. Suppose instead that ∑ j∈Sf(j)<a\sum_{j \in S} f(j) \lt a. Pick k∈¬Sk \in \neg S so large that f(k)+∑ j∈Sf(j)<af(k) + \sum_{j \in S} f(j) \lt a. Then also f(k)+∑ j∈S:j<kf(j)<af(k) + \sum_{j \in S: j \lt k} f(j) \lt a, but this implies k∈Sk \in S by the lemma, contradiction.

Application

There are multiple infinite sets SS of integers greater than 11 such that

∏ j∈S11−j −2=π 26.\prod_{j \in S} \frac1{1 - j^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}.

One such set is the set of primes. But there are many such sets. For example, putting n 1=2n_1 = 2, n 2=3n_2 = 3, and n 3=4n_3 = 4, we have

∏ j=1 311−n j −2=1.6<π 26\prod_{j = 1}^3 \frac1{1 - n_j^{-2}} = 1.6 \lt \frac{\pi^2}{6}

and then, proceeding recursively, for k≥3k \geq 3 we define n k+1n_{k+1} to be the least integer greater than n 1,…,n kn_1, \ldots, n_k such that

∏ j=1 k+111−n j −2<π 26.\prod_{j=1}^{k+1} \frac1{1 - n_j^{-2}} \lt \frac{\pi^2}{6}.

This places us essentially in the situation of the preceding section, by putting f(n)=log11−n −2f(n) = \log \frac1{1-n^{-2}} and a=logπ 26a = \log \frac{\pi^2}{6}. All we need to check is condition 3, which here boils down to the statement that for k>4k \gt 4 we have

11−k −2<∏ n>k11−n −2\frac1{1 - k^{-2}} \lt \prod_{n \gt k} \frac1{1- n^{-2}}

which follows from the elementary inequality that

11−k −2<11−(k+1) −2⋅11−(k+2) −2\frac1{1 - k^{-2}} \lt \frac1{1 - (k+1)^{-2}} \cdot \frac1{1 - (k+2)^{-2}}

for k>4k \gt 4.

Revised on April 16, 2016 at 22:32:01 by Todd Trimble