Let be polynomial differential operators. The commutator is the derivative of with respect to its argument, namely .
For convenience, let us introduce a parameter . We want to polarize the operator .
Let , be a double sequence defined as follows: unless , (-th power) and the basic recursion
holds.
Theorem. where and .
Sketch of the proof. We can write . Clearly, . Now
Commuting and we get
and after the renaming of the indices a comparison shows that the recursion relation for is satisfied by . Extending by zero to other values of (and recalling the initial conditions) we see that and
It is clear that stands along in the polarized form of
. Then
translates into
If this is true for some let us prove it for . As this is true identically, we can apply to the identity, multiply by and apply the Leibniz rule for , obtaining
hence
By the induction hypothesis for , all the terms containing clearly cancel. Similarly, the terms with : splits into the sum of and ; the first cancels with the corresponding term on the LHS by hypothesis and the other term with a term which is identical after renaming indices. The remaining terms multiply by . One is left with the identity
Rename the indices so that the two summands on each side have identical labels:
hence by the Pascal triangle we get the identity we needed to prove.