Zoran Skoda subalgebra W in H tensor H

Let AA be a braided-commutative left-right Yetter-Drinfeld HH-module algebra with left action ▸:H⊗A→A\blacktriangleright:H\otimes A\to A and right coaction X↦X [0]⊗X [1]X\mapsto X_{[0]}\otimes X_{[1]}. Braided commutativity is the condition X [0](X [1]▸E)=EXX_{[0]}(X_{[1]}\blacktriangleright E) = E X for all E,X∈AE,X\in A. This is equivalent to the condition ((SD [1])▸F)D [0]=DF((S D_{[1]})\blacktriangleright F) D_{[0]} = D F for all D,F∈AD,F\in A. In one direction this is

DF=D [0]((D [1]SD [2])▸F)=D [0][0](D [0][1]▸((SD [1])▸F))=((SD [1])▸F)D [0] D F = D_{[0]} ((D_{[1]} S D_{[2]})\blacktriangleright F) = D_{[0][0]}(D_{[0][1]}\blacktriangleright ((S D_{[1]})\blacktriangleright F)) = ((S D_{[1]})\blacktriangleright F) D_{[0]}

Define W⊂(A♯H)⊗(A♯H)W\subset (A\sharp H)\otimes (A\sharp H) as the smallest subalgebra such that all elements of the form X⊗1X\otimes 1 and of the form SX [1]⊗X [0]S X_{[1]}\otimes X_{[0]} (where X∈A♯1⊂A♯HX\in A\sharp 1\subset A\sharp H) are in WW. Let W +W^+ be the two sided ideal in WW generated by all elements of the form X⊗1−SX [1]⊗X [0]X\otimes 1 - S X_{[1]}\otimes X_{[0]}.

Let W 0 +⊂WW_0^+\subset W be the linear subspace of WW spanned by the elements of the form (X⊗1−SX [1]⊗X [0])(X′⊗1)(X\otimes 1 - S X_{[1]}\otimes X_{[0]})(X'\otimes 1) where X,X′∈AX,X'\in A. Let W 0W_0 be the span of 11 and W 0 +W_0^+. We formulate Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 which together imply W 0=WW_0 = W.

Lemma 1. For E,X∈AE,X\in A, we have (E⊗1)(X⊗1−SX [1]⊗X [0])∈W 0(E\otimes 1)(X\otimes 1 - S X_{[1]}\otimes X_{[0]})\in W_0.

Proof. Multiplying, and using S(f (1)])(f (2)▸E)=S(f (1))f (2)ESf (3)=ES(f)S (f_{(1)]}) (f_{(2)}\blacktriangleright E) = S(f_{(1)}) f_{(2)} E S f_{(3)} = E S(f), we obtain

EX⊗1−ES(X [1])⊗X [0]=EX⊗1−S(X [1])(X [2]▸E)⊗X [0] E X\otimes 1 - E S (X_{[1]})\otimes X_{[0]} = E X \otimes 1 - S (X_{[1]}) (X_{[2]}\blacktriangleright E)\otimes X_{[0]}

so, by braided commutativity,

=X [0](X [1]▸E)⊗1−S(X [1])(X [2]▸E)⊗X [0]=(X [0]⊗1−S(X [0][1])⊗X [0][0])(X [2]▸E⊗1)∈W 0 = X_{[0]} (X_{[1]}\blacktriangleright E) \otimes 1 - S (X_{[1]}) (X_{[2]}\blacktriangleright E)\otimes X_{[0]} = (X_{[0]}\otimes 1 - S (X_{[0][1]})\otimes X_{[0][0]}) (X_{[2]}\blacktriangleright E\otimes 1) \in W_0

Lemma 2. (x⊗1−Sx [1]⊗x [0])(z⊗1−Sz [1]⊗z [0])∈W 0(x\otimes 1 - S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]})(z\otimes 1 - S z_{[1]}\otimes z_{[0]})\in W_0.

Proof.

Map x↦x [1]⊗x [0]x\mapsto x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]} is an antihomomorphism of algebras hence x↦Sx [1]⊗x [0]x\mapsto S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]} is a homomorphism of algebras (with respect to componentwise multiplication).

(x⊗1−Sx [1]⊗x [0])(z⊗1−Sz [1]⊗z [0])= (x\otimes 1 - S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]})(z\otimes 1 - S z_{[1]}\otimes z_{[0]}) =
=(x⊗1−Sx [1]⊗x [0])(z⊗1)+xSz [1]⊗z [0]−xz⊗1+xz⊗1−S(xz) [1]⊗(xz) [0] = (x\otimes 1 - S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]})(z\otimes 1) + x S z_{[1]}\otimes z_{[0]} - x z\otimes 1 + x z\otimes 1 - S (x z)_{[1]}\otimes (x z)_{[0]}
=(x⊗1−Sx [1]⊗x [0])(z⊗1)+(−x⊗1)(z⊗1−Sz [1]⊗z [0])+(xz⊗1−S(xz) [1]⊗(xz) [0]) = (x\otimes 1 - S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]})(z\otimes 1) + (-x\otimes 1) (z\otimes 1 - S z_{[1]}\otimes z_{[0]}) + (x z\otimes 1 - S (x z)_{[1]}\otimes (x z)_{[0]})

so by lemma 1 we are done with proof of lemma 2.

Corollary. W +=W 0 +W^+ = W_0^+ and W=W 0W = W_0.

Let now τ\tau be the antipode of the scalar extension Hopf algebroid A♯HA\sharp H over AA. We know that τ(f♯E)=S(f)S 2(E [1])♯E [0]\tau(f\sharp E) = S(f) S^2(E_{[1]}) \sharp E_{[0]}.

Theorem. m(id⊗τ)W +={0}m (id\otimes\tau) W^+ = \{0\}

Proof. As W +W^+ is span of the elements of the form (x⊗1−Sx [1]⊗x [0])(z⊗1)(x\otimes 1 - S x_{[1]}\otimes x_{[0]})(z\otimes 1) where x,z∈Ax,z\in A, we can easily compute m(id⊗τ)m (id\otimes\tau) on such an element as

xz−S(x [2])zS 2(x [1])x [0]=xz−((Sx [1])▸z)x [0]=0 x z - S (x_{[2]}) z S^2(x_{[1]}) x_{[0]} = x z - ((S x_{[1]})\blacktriangleright z) x_{[0]} = 0

by braided commutativity.

Last revised on October 10, 2014 at 18:24:50. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.