nLab
0-dimensional TQFT

Contents

Idea

A 0-dimensional TQFT is a TQFT regarded in the sense of FQFT as a representation of the category of 0-dimensional cobordisms.

This degenerate case turns out to exhibit a nontrivial amount of interesting information, in particular if regarded in the context of super QFT.

Definition

0-Dimensional Cobordisms

The category Cob 0 of 0-dimensional cobordisms is the symmetric monoidal category Cob 0 having the 1-dimensional manifold as the only object and isomorphism classes of compact 0-dimensional manifolds as morphisms. Clearly Cob 0 is equivalent to B

0-Dimensional TQFT

A 0-dimensional TQFT (with values in -modules) is a monoidal functor

Z:Cob 0Mod.Z\colon Cob_0\to \mathbb {Z} Mod \,.

By definition of monoidal functor, one has Z()= and so Z is completely (and freely) determined by the assignment Z({pt}End ()=. In other words, the space of 0-dimensional TQFTs is .

Over a manifold

One can consider TQFTs with a target manifold X: all bordisms are required to have a map to X.

In dimension 0, morphisms in Cob 0(X) are the topological monoid n1Sym n(X). In particular, continuous tensor functors from Cob 0(X) to -modules are naturally identified with degree 0 integral cohomology H 0(X;).

Extended version

The picture becomes more interesting if one goes from topological field theory to extended topological quantum field theory. Indeed, from this point of view, to the 1-dimensional vacuum is assigned the symmetric monoidal 0-category , and consequently, the infinity-version of the space of all 0-dimensional TQFTs is the Eilenberg-Mac Lane spectrum. It follows that the space of extended 0-dimensional TQFTs with target X (taking values in -modules) is the graded integral cohomology ring H *(X;).

Super version

From the differential geometry point of view, a relation between de Rham cohomology of a smooth manifold X and 0-dimensional functorial field theories arises if one moves from topological field theory to (01)-supersymmetric field theory, see Axiomatic field theories and their motivation from topology.

It would be interesting to describe a direct connection between the extended and the susy theory; it should parallel the usual Cech-de Rham argument