nLab
2-crossed complex

Idea

Crossed complexes are a useful extension of crossed modules allowing not only the encoding of an algebraic model for the homotopy 2-type, but also information on the ‘complex of chains on the universal cover?’. The category of crossed complexes is a monoidal closed category equivalent to various types of strict infinity-groupoid?.

To model the homotopy 3-type of a space, we can use either a 2-crossed module or a crossed square (or various other algebraic models to be added some time in the future). A crossed complex is a ‘hybrid’, part crossed module but with a ‘tail’ which is a chain complex. What would be the ‘hybrid’ between a 2-crossed module and a chain complex? Are there examples that are easily constructed? What sort of information do they encode? Are they easy to analyse, understand, … and useful?

Definition

A 2-crossed complex is a normal complex of groups

C n nC n1C 0,\ldots \to C_n \stackrel{\partial_n}{\longrightarrow} C_{n-1} \longrightarrow \ldots \longrightarrow C_0,

together with a 2-crossed module structure given on C 2C 1C 0 by a Peiffer lifting function {,}:C 1×C 1C 2, such that, on writing π=Coker(C 1C 0),

  1. each C n, n3 and Ker 2 are π-modules and the n for n4, together with the codomain restriction of 3, are π-module homomorphisms;

  2. the π-module structure on Ker 2 is the action induced from the C 0-action on C 2 for which the action of 1C 1 is trivial.

A 2-crossed complex morphism is defined in the obvious way, being compatible with all the actions, the pairings and Peiffer liftings. We will denote by 2Crs, the corresponding category.

Examples:

  • As any crossed module gives a 2-crossed module with trivial Peiffer lifting (see the entry on 2-crossed module), it is not unexpected that any crossed complex can be considered as a 2-crossed complex with trivial Peiffer lifting. This gives an embedding of the category Crs into the category 2Crs). This embedding has a left adjoint given by ‘killing off’ the Peiffer lifting.

  • Any 2-crossed module clearly gives a 2-crossed complex (with trivial ‘tail’).

From simplicial groups to 2-crossed complexes

If G is a simplicial group then

C(G) 3𝒩G 2d 0(𝒩G 3D 3)𝒩G 1𝒩G 0,\ldots \to C(G)_3 \to \frac{\mathcal{N}G_2}{d_0(\mathcal{N}G_3\cap D_3)} \to \mathcal{N}G_1\to \mathcal{N}G_0,

has the structure of a 2-crossed complex, where 𝒩G is the Moore complex of G, D n is the subgroup of G n generated by the degenerate elements, and, for n>2,

C(G) n=𝒩G n(𝒩G nD n)d 0(𝒩G n+1D n+1),{C}(G)_{n} = \frac{\mathcal{N}G_n}{(\mathcal{N}G_n\cap D_n)d_0(\mathcal{N}G_{n+1}\cap D_{n+1})},

is the n-dimensional term of the crossed complex, C(G), associated to the simplicial group G as in the entry crossed complex (in the section From simplicial group(oid)s to crossed complexes.)

(There is an obvious extension of the group based definition above to a groupoid based one, and of this construction to one which takes as input a simplicially enriched groupoid.)

The Moore complex of a simplicial group G has the structure of a 2-crossed complex if and only if for each n>2, 𝒩G nD n is trivial. This means that the axioms of a group T-complex are almost satisfied, but not necessarily in dimension 2.