nLab
Demazure, lectures on p-divisible groups, I.9, the Frobenius morphism

This entry is about a section of the text

Reminder

Let s:RS be a morphism of rings. Then we have an adjunction

(s *s *):S.Mods *R.Mod(s^*\dashv s_*):S.Mod\stackrel{s_*}{\to} R.Mod

from the category of S-modules to that of R-modules where

s *:AA sSs^*:A\mapsto A\otimes_s S

is called scalar extension and s * is called scalar restriction.

Idea

(Frobenius recognizes p-torsion)

Definition

Let p be a prime number, let k be a field of characteristic p. For a k-ring A we define

f A:{AA xx pf_A: \begin{cases} A\to A \\ x\mapsto x^p \end{cases}

The k-ring obtained from A by scalar restriction along f k:kk is denoted by A f.

The k-ring obtained from A by scalar extension along f k:kk is denoted by A (p):=A k,fk.

There are k-ring morphisms f A:AA f and F A:{A (p)A xλx pλ.

For a k-functor X we define X (p):=X k,f kk which satisfies X (p)(R)=X(R f). The Frobenius morphism for X is the transformation of k-functors defined by

F X:{XX (p) X(f R):X(R)X(R f)F_X: \begin{cases} X\to X^{(p)} \\ X(f_R):X(R)\to X(R_f) \end{cases}

If X is a k-scheme X (p) is a k-scheme, too.

Since the completion functor ^:Sch kfSch k commutes with the above constructions the Frobenius morphism can be defined for formal k-schemes, too.

In terms of symmetric products

We give here another characterization of the Frobenius morphism in terms of symmetric products.

Let p be a prime number, let k be a field of characteristic p, let V be a k-vector space, let pV denote the p-fold tensor power of V, let TS pV denote the subspace of symmetric tensors. Then we have the symmetrization operator

s V:{ pVTS pV a 1a nΣ σS pa σ(1)a σ(n)s_V: \begin{cases} \otimes^p V\to TS^p V \\ a_1\otimes\cdots\otimes a_n\mapsto \Sigma_{\sigma\in S_p}a_{\sigma(1)}\otimes\cdots\otimes a_{\sigma(n)} \end{cases}

end the linear map

α V:{TS pV pV aλλ(aa)\alpha_V: \begin{cases} TS^p V\to\otimes^p V \\ a\otimes \lambda\mapsto\lambda(a\otimes\cdots\otimes a) \end{cases}

then the map V (p)α VTS pVTS pV/s( pV) is bijective and we define λ V:TS pVV (p) by

λ Vs=0\lambda_V\circ s=0

and

λ Vα V=id\lambda_V \circ \alpha_V= id

If A is a k-ring we have that TS pA is a k-ring and λ A is a k-ring morphism.

If X=Sp kA is a ring spectrum we abbreviate S pX=S k pX:=Sp k(TS pA) and the following diagram is commutative.

X F X X (p) X p can S pX\array{ X &\stackrel{F_X}{\to}& X^{(p)} \\ \downarrow&&\downarrow \\ X^p &\stackrel{can}{\to}& S^p X }

Properties

Note that the Frobenius F p is an endomorphism of a field R only if the characteristic of R is p. In this case it is automatically a monomorphism, since field homomorphisms always are.

However if we pass from rings to schemes, in general it is not true that Frobenius is a monomorphism. The following proposition gives necessary and sufficient conditions for the Frobenius to be a monomorphism in case of formal schemes.

Proposition

Let X be a k-formal scheme (resp. a locally algebraic scheme) then X is étale iff the Frobenius morphism F X:XX (p)is a monomorphism (resp. an isomorphism).

Examples

If X=Sp kA is a k-ring spectrum we have X (p)=Sp kA (p) and F X=Sp kF A.

If k=𝔽 is a finite field we have X (p)=X however F X will not equal id X in general.

If kk is a field extension we have F X kk =F X kk .

Revised on July 18, 2012 14:55:21 by Stephan Alexander Spahn (79.227.139.9)