A topos may be thought of as a generalized topological space. Accordingly, the notions of
locally simply connected space?
locally -connected space
locally -connected space
have analogs for toposes, (n,1)-toposes and (∞,1)-toposes
locally simply connected (2,1)-topos?
locally -connected -topos
locally -connected -topos
The numbering mismatch is traditional from topology; see n-connected space. It reads a bit better if we say locally -simply connected for locally -connected, since locally -(simply) connected is locally simply connected, but being locally -simply connected is still a property of an -topos.
A (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos is called locally -connected if the (essentially unique) global section (∞,1)-geometric morphism
extends to an essential geometric morphism -geometric morphism, i.e. there is a further left adjoint
If in addition preserves the terminal object we say that is an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
If preserves even all finite (∞,1)-products we say that is a strongly ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
If preserves even all finite (∞,1)-limits we say that is a totally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
In (Lurie, section A.1) this is called an -topos of locally constant shape.
For a locally -connected -topos and an object, we call ∞Grpd the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos of . The (categorical) homotopy groups of we call the geometric homotopy groups of
Similarly we have:
For an -topos is called locally -connected if the (essentially unique) global section geometric morphism is has an extra left adjoint.
For this reproduces the case of a locally connected topos.
The follow proposition gives a large supply of examples.
Let be a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site. Then the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves is a locally -connected -topos.
See locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site for the proof.
In (SimpsonTeleman, prop. 2.18) is stated essentially what the above proposition asserts at the level of homotopy categories: if has contractible objects, then there exists a left adjoint .
This includes the following examples.
The sites CartSp are locally -connected. The corresponding -toposes are the cohesive (∞,1)-toposes ETop∞Grpd, Smooth∞Grpd and SynthDiff∞Grpd.
For a locally contractible space, is a locally -connected -topos.
The full subcategory of the category of open subsets on the contractible subsets is another site of definition for . And it is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site.
By the same kind of argument:
For and for a locally -connected topological space, is a locally -connected -topos.
For a locally contractible topological space we have that the fundamental ∞-groupoid of a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos computes the correct homotopy type of :
the image of as the terminal object in under the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos-functor
is equivalent to the ordinary fundamental ∞-groupoid given by the singular simplicial complex
By using the presentations of by the model structure on simplicial presheaves as discussed at locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site one finds that this boils down to the old Artin-Mazur theorem. More on this at geometric homotopy groups in an (∞,1)-topos.
For a locally -connected -topos, also all its objects are locally -connected, in that their petit over-(∞,1)-toposes are locally -connected.
The two notions of fundamental -groupoids of induced this way do agree, in that there is a natural equivalence
By the general facts recalled at etale geometric morphism we have a composite essential geometric morphism
and is given by sending to .
If in the above is contractible in that then is even an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.
By the discussion there we need to check that preserves the terminal object:
Let be an -topos and a collection of objects such that
the canonical morphism out of their coproduct to the terminal object is an effective epimorphism;
all the over-(∞,1)-toposes are locally -connected.
Then also itself is locally -connected.
This appears as (Lurie, corollary A.1.7).
The fact that the terminal geometric morphism is essential gives rise to various induced structures of interest. For instance it induces a notion of
For a more exhaustive list of extra structures see cohesive (∞,1)-topos.
locally connected topos / locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos
and
Some discussion of the homotopy category of locally -connected -toposes is around proposition 2.18 of
Undet the term locally constant shape the notion appears in section A.1 of
For related references see