nLab
locally n-connected (n+1,1)-topos

Redirected from "locally contractible (infinity,1)-topos".

Context

(,1)-Topos theory

Contents

Idea

A topos may be thought of as a generalized topological space. Accordingly, the notions of

have analogs for toposes, (n,1)-toposes and (∞,1)-toposes

  • locally connected topos

  • locally simply connected (2,1)-topos?

  • locally n-connected (n+1,1)-topos

  • locally -connected (,1)-topos

The numbering mismatch is traditional from topology; see n-connected space. It reads a bit better if we say locally n-simply connected for locally n-connected, since locally 1-(simply) connected is locally simply connected, but being locally n-simply connected is still a property of an (n+1,1)-topos.

Definitions

Definition

A (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos H is called locally -connected if the (essentially unique) global section (∞,1)-geometric morphism

(ΔΓ):HΓGrpd(\Delta\dashv\Gamma): \mathbf{H} \xrightarrow{\Gamma}\infty\Grpd

extends to an essential geometric morphism (,1)-geometric morphism, i.e. there is a further left adjoint Π

(ΠΔΓ):HΓΔΠGrpd.(\Pi \dashv \Delta \dashv \Gamma) : \mathbf{H} \stackrel{\overset{\Pi}{\to}}{\stackrel{\overset{\Delta}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Gamma}{\to}}} \infty Grpd \,.

If in addition Π preserves the terminal object we say that H is an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.

If Π preserves even all finite (∞,1)-products we say that H is a strongly ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.

If Π preserves even all finite (∞,1)-limits we say that H is a totally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.

Remark

In (Lurie, section A.1) this is called an (,1)-topos of locally constant shape.

Definition

For H a locally -connected (,1)-topos and XH an object, we call ΠX ∞Grpd the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos of X. The (categorical) homotopy groups of Π(X) we call the geometric homotopy groups of X

π geom(X):=π (Π(X)).\pi_\bullet^{geom}(X) := \pi_\bullet(\Pi (X)) \,.

Similarly we have:

Definition

For n an (n+1,1)-topos H is called locally n-connected if the (essentially unique) global section geometric morphism is has an extra left adjoint.

For n=0 this reproduces the case of a locally connected topos.

Examples

Over locally -connected sites

The follow proposition gives a large supply of examples.

Proposition

Let C be a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site. Then the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves Sh (,1)(C) is a locally -connected (,1)-topos.

See locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site/∞-connected (∞,1)-site for the proof.

Remark

In (SimpsonTeleman, prop. 2.18) is stated essentially what the above proposition asserts at the level of homotopy categories: if C has contractible objects, then there exists a left adjoint Ho(Π):Ho(Sh (,1)(C))Ho(Grpd).

This includes the following examples.

Example

The sites CartSp top CartSp smooth CartSp synthdiff are locally -connected. The corresponding (,1)-toposes are the cohesive (∞,1)-toposes ETop∞Grpd, Smooth∞Grpd and SynthDiff∞Grpd.

Over locally n-connected topological spaces

Example

For X a locally contractible space, Sh (,1)(X) is a locally -connected (,1)-topos.

Proof

The full subcategory cOp(X)Op(X) of the category of open subsets on the contractible subsets is another site of definition for Sh (,1)(X). And it is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site.

By the same kind of argument:

Example

For n and for X a locally n-connected topological space, Sh (n+1,1)(X) is a locally n-connected (n+1)-topos.

Proposition

For X a locally contractible topological space we have that the fundamental ∞-groupoid of a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos computes the correct homotopy type of X:

the image of X as the terminal object in Sh (inffty,1)(C) under the fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos-functor

Π:Sh (,1)(X)Grpd\Pi : Sh_{(\infty,1)}(X) \to \infty Grpd

is equivalent to the ordinary fundamental ∞-groupoid given by the singular simplicial complex

Π(X)SingX.\Pi(X) \simeq Sing X \,.
Proof

By using the presentations of Sh (,1)(X) by the model structure on simplicial presheaves as discussed at locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-site one finds that this boils down to the old Artin-Mazur theorem. More on this at geometric homotopy groups in an (∞,1)-topos.

Locally -connected over-(,1)-toposes

Proposition

For H a locally -connected (,1)-topos, also all its objects XH are locally -connected, in that their petit over-(∞,1)-toposes H/X are locally -connected.

The two notions of fundamental -groupoids of X induced this way do agree, in that there is a natural equivalence

Π X(XH/X)Π(XH).\Pi_X(X \in \mathbf{H}/X) \simeq \Pi(X \in \mathbf{H}) \,.
Proof

By the general facts recalled at etale geometric morphism we have a composite essential geometric morphism

(Π XΔ XΓ X):H /XX *X *X !HΓΔΠGrpd(\Pi_X \dashv \Delta_X \dashv \Gamma_X) : \mathbf{H}_{/X} \stackrel{\overset{X_!}{\to}}{\stackrel{\overset{X^*}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\X_*}{\to}}} \mathbf{H} \stackrel{\overset{\Pi}{\to}}{\stackrel{\overset{\Delta}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Gamma}{\to}}} \infty Grpd

and X ! is given by sending (YX)H/X to YH.

Remark

If in the above X is contractible in that ΠX* then H/X is even an ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.

Proof

By the discussion there we need to check that Π X preserves the terminal object:

Π X(XX)ΠX !(XX)ΠX*.\Pi_X (X \to X) \simeq \Pi X_! (X \to X) \simeq \Pi X \simeq * \,.

Properties

Proposition

Let 𝒳 be an (,1)-topos and {U i} i a collection of objects such that

Then also 𝒳 itself is locally -connected.

This appears as (Lurie, corollary A.1.7).

Further structures

The fact that the terminal geometric morphism is essential gives rise to various induced structures of interest. For instance it induces a notion of

For a more exhaustive list of extra structures see cohesive (∞,1)-topos.

and

References

Some discussion of the homotopy category of locally -connected (,1)-toposes is around proposition 2.18 of

Undet the term locally constant shape the notion appears in section A.1 of

For related references see