nLab
tangent (infinity,1)-category

Context

(,1)-Category theory

Higher algebra

(,2)-Topos theory

Contents

Idea

For K a locally presentable (∞,1)-category whose objects we think of as spaces of sorts, its tangent (,1)-category

(T K op) opK(T_{K^{op}})^{op} \to K

is an (∞,1)-category over K, whose objects may be thought of as spaces that are infinitesimal thickenings of those of K.

More concretely, the tangent (,1)-category T CC for C=K op is the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration Func(Δ[1],C)C.

This generalizes – as discussed at deformation theory – the classical example of the bifibration Mod CRing of the category of all modules over the cateory CRing of all commutative rings:

the fiber of the tangent (,1)-category T C over an object AC may be thought of as the (,1)-category of square-0-extensions AN of A, for N a module over A. Dually, in K=C op we may think of these as being infinitesimal neighbourhoods of 0-sections of vector bundles – or rather of quasicoherent sheaves – over whatever space A is regarded to be the algebra of functions on.

A remarkable amount of information about the geometry of these spaces/objects in K is encoded in the fiber of the tangent (,1)-category over them. Notably the left adjoint (∞,1)-functor

Ω:CT C\Omega : C \to T_C

to the domain projection dom:T CC turns out to send each A to its cotangent complex Ω(A), to be thought of as the module of Kähler differentials on the space that A is functions on.

A 1-categorical approximation to the notion of tangent (,1)-category is that of tangent category.

Definition

Let C be a locally presentable (∞,1)-category.

Definition

(fiberwise stabilization)

For CC a categorical fibration, the fiberwise stabilization Stab(CC) is – roughly – the fibration universal with the property that for each AC its fiber over A is the stabilization Stab(C A) of the fiber C A over A.

This is (Lurie, section 1.1) formulated in view of (Lurie, remark 1.1.8). There Stab(CC) is called the stable envelope .

Definition

(tangent (,1)-category)

The tangent (,1)-category T CC the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration cod:Func(Δ[1],C)C:

(T CpC):=Stab(Func(Δ[1],C)codC).(T_C \stackrel{p}{\to} C) := Stab(Func(\Delta[1], C) \stackrel{cod}{\to} C ) \,.

This is DT, def 1.1.12.

Properties

General

Proposition

The tangent (,1)-category T C of the locally presentable (∞,1)-category C is itself a locally presentable (,1)-category.

In particular, it admits all (∞,1)-limits and (∞,1)-colimits.

This is (Lurie, prop. 1.1.13).

Relation to modules

We discuss how the tangent (,1)-category construction indeed generalizes the equivalence between the tangent category over CRing and the category Mod of all modules over commutative rings.

Proposition

Let 𝒪 be a coherent (∞,1)-operad and let 𝒞 𝒪 be a stable 𝒪-monoidal (∞,1)-category.

Let

AAlg 𝒪(𝒞)A \in Alg_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C})

be an 𝒪-algebra in 𝒞. Then the stabilization of the over-(∞,1)-category over A is canonically equivalent to Func 𝒪(𝒪,Mod A 𝒪(𝒞))

Stab(Alg 𝒪(𝒞)/A)Func 𝒪(𝒪,Mod A 𝒪(𝒞)).Stab( Alg_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C})/A) \simeq Func_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{O}, Mod_A^\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C})) \,.

This is (Lurie, theorem 1.5.14).

Proposition

Let 𝒪 be a coherent (∞,1)-operad and let 𝒞 𝒪 be a presentable stable 𝒪-monoidal (∞,1)-category. Then there is a canonical equivalence

ϕ:T Alg 𝒪(𝒞)Alg 𝒪(𝒞)× Func(𝒪,Alg 𝒪(𝒞))Func 𝒪(𝒪,Mod 𝒪(𝒞))\phi : T_{Alg_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C})} \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} Alg_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C}) \times_{Func(\mathcal{O}, Alg_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C}))} Func_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{O}, Mod^\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{C}))

of presentble fibrations over Alg 𝒪(𝒞).

This is (Lurie, theorem, 1.5.19).

In words this says that under the given assumptions, objects of T 𝒞 may be identified with pairs

(A,N)(A, N)

where

Cotangent complex

From its definition as the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration cod:Func(Δ[1],C)C the tangent (,1)-category p:T CC inherits a second (,1)-functor to C, coming from the domain evaluation

dom:T CC.dom : T_C \to C \,.
Definition/Proposition

(cotangent complex)

The domain evaluation dom:T CC admits a left adjoint (∞,1)-functor

(Ωdom):T CdomΩC(\Omega \dashv dom) : T_C \stackrel{\overset{\Omega}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{dom}{\to}} C

that is also a section of p:T CC in that

(CΩT CpC)Id C(C \stackrel{\Omega}{\to} T_C \stackrel{p}{\to} C) \simeq Id_C

and hence that C is a retract of T C.

This Ω is the cotangent complex (,1)-functor : for AC the object Ω(A) is the cotangent complex of A.

This is (Lurie, def. 1.1.2, remark 1.2.3).

Examples

Of E -rings

Corollary

Let E be the (∞,1)-category of E-∞ rings and let AE . Then the stabilization of the over-(∞,1)-category over A

Stab(E /A)AMod(Spec)Stab(E_\infty/A) \simeq A Mod(Spec)

is equivalentl to the category of A-module spectra.

(Lurie, cor. 1.5.15).

References

The definition and study of the notion is tangent (,1)-categories is from

and section 7.3 of

Revised on March 19, 2012 18:35:34 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.153.67)