equivalences in/of -categories
symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
For a locally presentable (∞,1)-category whose objects we think of as spaces of sorts, its tangent -category
is an (∞,1)-category over , whose objects may be thought of as spaces that are infinitesimal thickenings of those of .
More concretely, the tangent -category for is the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration .
This generalizes – as discussed at deformation theory – the classical example of the bifibration Mod CRing of the category of all modules over the cateory CRing of all commutative rings:
the fiber of the tangent -category over an object may be thought of as the -category of square-0-extensions of , for a module over . Dually, in we may think of these as being infinitesimal neighbourhoods of 0-sections of vector bundles – or rather of quasicoherent sheaves – over whatever space is regarded to be the algebra of functions on.
A remarkable amount of information about the geometry of these spaces/objects in is encoded in the fiber of the tangent -category over them. Notably the left adjoint (∞,1)-functor
to the domain projection turns out to send each to its cotangent complex , to be thought of as the module of Kähler differentials on the space that is functions on.
A 1-categorical approximation to the notion of tangent -category is that of tangent category.
Let be a locally presentable (∞,1)-category.
(fiberwise stabilization)
For a categorical fibration, the fiberwise stabilization is – roughly – the fibration universal with the property that for each its fiber over is the stabilization of the fiber over .
This is (Lurie, section 1.1) formulated in view of (Lurie, remark 1.1.8). There is called the stable envelope .
(tangent -category)
The tangent -category the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration :
This is DT, def 1.1.12.
The tangent -category of the locally presentable (∞,1)-category is itself a locally presentable -category.
In particular, it admits all (∞,1)-limits and (∞,1)-colimits.
This is (Lurie, prop. 1.1.13).
We discuss how the tangent -category construction indeed generalizes the equivalence between the tangent category over CRing and the category Mod of all modules over commutative rings.
Let be a coherent (∞,1)-operad and let be a stable -monoidal (∞,1)-category.
Let
be an -algebra in . Then the stabilization of the over-(∞,1)-category over is canonically equivalent to
This is (Lurie, theorem 1.5.14).
Let be a coherent (∞,1)-operad and let be a presentable stable -monoidal (∞,1)-category. Then there is a canonical equivalence
of presentble fibrations over .
This is (Lurie, theorem, 1.5.19).
In words this says that under the given assumptions, objects of may be identified with pairs
where
From its definition as the fiberwise stabilization of the codomain fibration the tangent -category inherits a second -functor to , coming from the domain evaluation
(cotangent complex)
The domain evaluation admits a left adjoint (∞,1)-functor
that is also a section of in that
and hence that is a retract of .
This is the cotangent complex -functor : for the object is the cotangent complex of .
This is (Lurie, def. 1.1.2, remark 1.2.3).
Let be the (∞,1)-category of E-∞ rings and let . Then the stabilization of the over-(∞,1)-category over
is equivalentl to the category of -module spectra.
The definition and study of the notion is tangent -categories is from
and section 7.3 of