Schreiber
integration of ∞-Lie algebroid valued differential forms

∞-Lie theory

∞-Lie groupoids and -algebroids

∞-Chern-Weil theory

symplectic ∞-geometry

Edit this sidebar


differential cohomology in an (∞,1)-topos

structures in an (∞,1)-topos

Examples

Applications

Edit this sidebar

An integration of ∞-Lie algebroid valued differential forms ω:Π inf(X)𝔞 is an extension ω from the infinitesimal path ∞-groupoid Π inf(X) to the finite path ∞-groupoid Π(X)

Π inf(X) ω 𝔞 Π(x) ω A\array{ \Pi^{inf}(X) &\stackrel{\omega}{\to}& \mathfrak{a} \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \Pi(x) &\stackrel{\int \omega}{\to}& A }

after injecting the ∞-Lie algebroid 𝔞 into one of its corresponding ∞-Lie groupoids A.

Contents

Idea

Assume a context given by a smooth (∞,1)-topos with its notion of ∞-Lie theory.

For A some ∞-Lie groupoid and UC a test domain, a morphism ϕ:Π inf(U)A from the infinitesimal path ∞-groupoid factors – by definition of ∞-Lie algebroid – through the ∞-Lie algebroid 𝔞 of A

Π inf(U)ω𝔞A\Pi^{inf}(U) \stackrel{\omega}{\to} \mathfrak{a} \hookrightarrow A

The first morphism here constitutes the set of ∞-Lie algebroid valued differential forms on U that is encoded by ϕ.

We want to specify what it means to integrate these forms.

Whereas ω colors infinitesimal intervals on U by infinitesimal morphisms in A, its integration should be a rule that labels finite intervals by finite morphisms, such that the restriction to any infinitesimal interval within a finite interval reproduces the assignment of omgea.

Formally, this desideratum clearly means that integration ω of ω is an extension

Π inf(U) ω A ω Π(U)\array{ \Pi^{inf}(U) &\stackrel{\omega}{\to}& A \\ \downarrow & \nearrow_{\int \omega} \\ \Pi(U) }

of ω through the inclusion Π inf(U)Π(U) of the infinitesimal path ∞-groupoid in the path ∞-groupoid.

More generally, we can ask for a relative integration : we may have a situation where a coloring of finite intervals

Π(U)B\Pi(U) \to B

is already given, but infinitesimally there is also a lift specified of this through some map AB, i.e. a diagram

Π inf(U) ω A Π(U) B\array{ \Pi^{inf}(U) &\stackrel{\omega}{\to}& A \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \Pi(U) &\to& B }

Integration should exist when the map AB in principle admits such a lift and should be given by that lift. It should be unique up to equivalence.

Details

We discuss a case in which integration of -Lie algebroid valued forms always exsist.

Let 𝔞 be an ∞-Lie algebroid.

Write for short 𝔞 #:=𝔞 # inf in the following for the image of 𝔞 under the right adjoint of the infinitesimal path ∞-groupoid functor Π inf. And write 𝔞 #0 for the corresponding presheaf of 0-cells.

By the reasoning an ∞-Lie differentiation and integration we have

  • the -Lie algebroid of 𝔞 is 𝔞 itself:

    Lie(𝔞):=Π inf(𝔞 #0)=𝔞.Lie(\mathfrak{a}) := \Pi^{inf}(\mathfrak{a}_{# 0}) = \mathfrak{a} \,.
  • the ∞-Lie groupoid integrating 𝔞 is

    A=Π(𝔞 #0).A = \Pi(\mathfrak{a}_{# 0}) \,.

For X simplicially discrete, every morphism

ω:Π inf(X)𝔞\omega : \Pi^{inf}(X) \to \mathfrak{a}

corresponding by adjunction to a morphism

ω˜:X𝔞 # 0\tilde \omega : X \to \mathfrak{a}_{#_0}

induces a morphism

ω:=Π(ω˜):Π(X)Π(𝔞 #0)=A\int \omega := \Pi(\tilde \omega) : \Pi(X) \to \Pi(\mathfrak{a}_{# 0}) = A

that fits into the diagram

Π inf(X) ω Π inf(𝔞 #0) = 𝔞 Π(X) ω Π(𝔞 #0) = A.\array{ \Pi^{inf}(X) &\stackrel{\omega}{\to}& \Pi^{inf}(\mathfrak{a}_{# 0}) &=& \mathfrak{a} \\ \downarrow && \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \Pi(X) &\stackrel{\int \omega}{\to}& \Pi(\mathfrak{a}_{# 0}) & = & A } \,.