Holmstrom Etale cohomology

Etale cohomology

For Thomason’s descent spectral sequence of Atiyah-Hirzebruch type, see Mitchell.


Etale cohomology

See Gereon Quick.

Isaksen: Etale realization on the A^1-homotopy theory of schemes


Etale cohomology

Jardine: Homotopy and homotopical algebra: The etale cohomology rings of the classifying simplicial schemes BGBG fo various group schemes GG have been calculated. (p. 660)


Etale cohomology

In Kahn, there some construction needed for “anti-Chern classes” from etale cohomology to algebraic K-theory (see “On the Lichtenbaum-Quillen conjecture”, Algebraic K-theory and algebraic topology (P.G Goerss, J.F. Jardine, eds), NATO ASI Series, Ser. C 407 (1993), 147-166).

Soule’s K-theory Chern class map:

c i,j:K i(A,/)H et 2ji(A,/) c_{i,j} : K_i(A, \mathbb{Z}/ \ell) \to H^{2j-i}_{et}(A, \mathbb{Z} / \ell)

Here I think AA is a ring containing a primitive \ell-th root of unity.


Etale cohomology

MathSciNet

Google Scholar

Google

arXiv: Experimental full text search

arXiv: Abstract search

category: Search results


Etale cohomology

AG (Algebraic geometry)

category: World [private]


Etale cohomology

Pure, Mixed (?)

category: Labels [private]


Etale cohomology

See also Sheaf cohomology, Weil cohomology, l-adic cohomology, Non-standard étale cohomology


Etale cohomology

Notes from Katz in Motives vol

Cohomology groups H i(X,F)H^i(X, F) defined for any scheme XX, and any abelian étale sheaf on the category of schemes étale over XX. This construction is functorial in the pair (X,F)(X, F).

In order to be able to say anything, let kk be a field and let XX be separated and of finite type over kk.

We could consider H i(X,/N)H^i(X, \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}), but instead we look at H i(X kk¯,/N)H^i(X \otimes_k \bar{k}, \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}), which are NN-torsion groups, with a Galois action.

Want: groups with compact support. Nagata shows that there is an open kk-immersion of XX into some XX' which is proper over kk. For any étale sheaf on XX, on can define the extension by zero of FF on XX', and pull this back to Xk¯X' \otimes \bar{k}. This defines H c i(Xk¯,F)H^i_c(X \otimes \bar{k}, F). These are abelian groups with a Galois action.

If UU is open in XX with closed complement ZZ, then there is an excision l.e.s.

H c i(Uk¯,F|U)H c i(Xk¯,F)H c i(Zk¯,F|Z) \to H^i_c(U \otimes \bar{k}, F|U) \to H^i_c(X \otimes \bar{k}, F) \to H^i_c(Z \otimes \bar{k}, F|Z) \to \ldots

Theorem: For XX separated and of finite type over a field kk, the cohomology groups with compact support and coeffs /N\mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z} are all finite and invariant under extension of k¯\bar{k} to an algebraically closed overfield. Moreover, they vanish for i2dim(X)i \geq 2 \ dim(X).

Finiteness and invariance, but not the vanishing, fails in general for the groups H i(X kk¯,/N)H^i(X \otimes_k \bar{k}, \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}), for example if XX is the affine line and NN is the characteristic of kk. However, there is the following theorem.

Thm: For XX separated and of finite type over a field kk, and NN an integer invertible in kk, the ordinary cohomology groups H i(X kk¯,/N)H^i(X \otimes_k \bar{k}, \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}) are all finite, invariant as above, and vanish as above. If XX is affine, they vanish for idim(X)i \geq dim(X).

Intuition: When NN is invertible, the above groups should behave just like ordinary topological cohomology, and cohomology with compact support. For example, comparison thm for separated \mathbb{C}-schemes of finite type, with topological cohomology.

Def of Tate twist /N(i)\mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}(i).

Thm (PD): Let XX and NN be as above. (1) If XX is geometrically irreducible kk-scheme of dim dd, then H c i(X kk¯,/N)(d)/NH^i_c(X \otimes_k \bar{k}, \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z})(d) \cong \mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}. (2) If in addition X/kX/k is smooth, then for any integers a,ba,b with a+b=da+b=d, and any ii, the cup-product pairing H c i(a)×H 2di(b)H c 2d(d)H^i_c(a) \times H^{2d-i}(b) \to H^{2d}_c(d) is a Galois equivariant pairing which identifies each of the two groups with the /N\mathbb{Z} / N \mathbb{Z}-dual of the other. (Here the argument of the cohomology groups is the same in all three places, and omitted).

Application of PD: Can define the cohomology class of a subvariety. Detials omitted here.


Notation

Etale cohomology of the scheme XX with coefficients in the sheaf \mathcal{F}:

H et i(X,)H_{et}^i (X, \mathcal{F})

category: [Private] Notes


Etale cohomology

Jardine: Cup products in sheaf cohomology


Etale cohomology

Tamme

SGA4 1/2, and SGA4

Milne’s book

Motives volumes article

EMS Vol 35 (Alg geom II), ed Shafarevich. Covers cohomology of coherent sheaves and etale cohomology. In Cohomology folder under AG.

category: Paper References


Etale cohomology

Regarding what happens when p is nnot invertible, see maybe this MO question. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/49887/does-one-need-l-to-be-invertible-in-s-in-order-to-consider-the-l-adic-cohomology


Etale cohomology

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6070/etale-cohomology-why-study-it

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16195/applications-of-etale-cohomology


Etale cohomology

arXiv:1207.3648 Travaux de Gabber sur l’uniformisation locale et la cohomologie etale des schemas quasi-excellents. Seminaire a l’Ecole polytechnique 2006–2008 fra arXiv Front: math.AG av Luc Illusie, Yves Laszlo, Fabrice Orgogozo This book contains notes of a seminar on Ofer Gabber’s work on the etale cohomology and uniformization of quasi-excellent schemes. His main results include (cf. introduction) constructibility theorems (for abelian or non-abelian coefficients), vanishing theorems (e.g. affine Lefschetz), uniformization for the “prime-to-l alteration topology”, rigidity for non-abelian coefficients, a new proof of the absolute purity conjecture, duality, etc.

For the Bloch-Ogus-Gabber theorem, see http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/0169

Kahn: We prove some finiteness theorems for the 'étale cohomology, Borel-Moore homology and cohomology with proper supports of schemes of finite type over a finite or p-adic field. This yields vanishing results for their l-adic cohomology, proving part of a conjecture of Jannsen.

K-theory of semi-local rings with finite coefficients and étale cohomology, by Bruno Kahn

Variations on the Bloch-Ogus Theorem, by Ivan Panin and Kirill Zainoulline: http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/0556

Hoobler on the étale and Galois cohomology of semi-local rings

Probably not so interesting, some thing about mod 2 étale cohomology of real varieties: http://www.springerlink.com/content/x66u20605w22/?p=3c80b59be1374aea82a8a70beebece54&pi=324


Etale cohomology

My own essay (put this online)

Milne’s online notes

A great list of links by Bhatt I think.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/80633/textbook-for-etale-cohomology

nLab page on Etale cohomology

Created on June 10, 2014 at 21:14:54 by Andreas Holmström