Engeler’s lemma is one of a number of set-theoretic propositions connected with choice principles and prime ideal/maximal ideal theorems. A key phrase for such set-theoretic propositions is “systems of finite character”; related results include the Teichmüller-Tukey lemma?.
(Engeler’s lemma) Let be a set, and let be a collection of partial functions :
where is the domain of . Suppose the following 3 conditions are satisfied:
For every in and finite subset , the restriction belongs to ;
If is any partial function such that belongs to for every finite subset , then belongs to ;
Every finite subset is the domain of some .
Then, assuming the ultrafilter principle (UP), there exists a total function .
We abuse notation by identifying partial functions with total functions , defining for in terms of the corresponding partial function: . For , the notation means we regard as a partial function, obtain another partial function by restriction, and consider this a function .
Thus defines a subspace . Under UP, the product space is compact Hausdorff. We claim is closed. For suppose is in the closure of . This means that for any finite there exists with . In particular, for any finite there exists such that . In particular for all , so , and so belongs to by condition 1. Since belongs to for all finite , we have that by condition 2. Thus is closed, and therefore compact.
Now we claim that the set is inhabited, which in the partial function interpretation means contains a total function. For, the family of closed sets satisfies the finite intersection property, by condition 3. Thus is inhabited by compactness of .
Created on July 13, 2015 at 03:23:40. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.