nLab Tambara functor

Redirected from "Tambara functors".
Note: Tambara functor and Tambara functor both redirect for "Tambara functors".
Contents

Contents

Idea

Tambara functors are algebraic structures similar to Mackey functors, but with multiplicative norm maps as well as additive transfer maps, and a rule governing their interaction. They were introduced by Tambara, as TNR-functors, to encode the relationship between Trace (additive transfer), Norm (multiplicative transfer) and Restriction maps in the representation theory and cohomology theory of finite groups (Tam93).

In the GG-equivariant context for a finite group GG, the role of abelian groups in non-equivariant algebra is played by Mackey functors. The category of Mackey functors is a closed symmetric monoidal category with symmetric monoidal product, the box product. In addition to the expected generalization of commutative rings to simply commutative monoids for the box product, there is a poset of generalizations of the notion of commutative rings to the GG-equivariant context: the incomplete Tambara functors. These interpolate between Green functors, the ordinary commutative monoids for the box product, and Tambara functors. The distinguishing feature for [incomplete] Tambara functors is the presence of certain multiplicative transfer maps, called norm maps. For a Green functor, we have no norm maps; for a Tambara functor, we have norm maps for any pair of subgroups HKH \subset K of GG. (Hill 17)

A Mackey functor is represented by a “GG-equivariant Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum”, … a Tambara functor is represented by a commutative “GG-equivariant Eilenberg-MacLane ring spectrum” (AB15)

Definition

In parts

Given a sequence of maps of finite GG-sets XgYhZX \xrightarrow{g} Y \xrightarrow{h} Z, we define distributor diagram

Δ(g,h)=(XpAqBrZ) \Delta(g,h) = \left( X \xleftarrow{p} A \xrightarrow{q} B \xrightarrow{r} Z \right)

by setting

B{(z,s)zZ,s:h 1(z)X, s.t. gs=id h 1(z)} B \coloneqq \left\{ (z,s) \mid z \in Z, s\colon h^{-1}(z) \rightarrow X, \text{ s.t. } gs = \mathrm{id}_{h^{-1}(z)} \right\}
AY× ZB A \coloneqq Y \times_Z B

and setting p(y,s)=s(y)p(y,s) = s(y), q(y,s)=(h(y),s)q(y,s) = (h(y),s), and r(z,s)=zr(z,s) = z.

Definition

A semi-Tambara functor for the group GG is the data of

  • a GG-coefficient system of sets RR and

  • two GG-semi-Mackey functors (R,T)(R,T) and (R,N)(R,N) with coefficient system RR,

subject to the distributivity condition that, for all distributors Δ(f,g)=(XpAqArZ)\Delta(f,g) = (X \xleftarrow{p} A \xrightarrow{q} A \xrightarrow{r} Z), we have

N gT f=T rN qR p. N_g T_f = T_r N_q R_p.

A semi-Tambara functor is a Tambara functor if (R,T)(R,T) is a Mackey functor.

We often refer to the maps R fR_f as restrictions, T fT_f as transfers, and N fN_f as norms.

Categorically

We define a 2-category to have

  • objects: finite GG sets

  • morphisms: bispan diagrams IpXfYqJI \xleftarrow{p} X \xrightarrow{f} Y \xrightarrow{q} J in finite GG-sets

  • 2-cells: isomorphisms of bispan diagrams

The identity morphisms and 2-cells are as one would expect, and composition is defined by the outer bispan diagram

whose blue inner diagram is defined by the distributor

Δ(g,f)=(X× JYpY× ZBqBrZ). \Delta(g,f) = \left( X \times_J Y \xleftarrow{p} Y \times_Z B \xrightarrow{q} B \xrightarrow{r} Z \right).

Definition

Let 𝒞\mathcal{C} by an ∞-category admitting finite products. Then, a GG-semi-Tambara functor valued in 𝒞\mathcal{C} is a product preserving functor Bispan(𝔽 G)𝒞\mathrm{Bispan}(\mathbb{F}_G) \rightarrow \mathcal{C}. A GG-semi-Tambara functor is a Tambara functor if its underlying additive semi-Mackey functor is a Mackey functor.

In this formalism, given a semi-Tambara functor XX, restriction R K H:X(H)X(K)R_K^H\colon X(H) \rightarrow X(K) is implemented by functoriality under the bispan

G/HG/K=G/K=G/K, G/H \leftarrow G/K = G/K = G/K,

norms by

G/K=G/KG/H=G/H, G/K = G/K \rightarrow G/H = G/H,

and transfers by

G/K=G/K=G/KG/H. G/K = G/K = G/K \rightarrow G/H.

Examples

(under construction…)

Burnside rings, representation rings, zeroth stable homotopy group of a genuine equivariant E E_{\infty}-ring.

the homotopy category of Eilenberg MacLane commutative ring spectra is equivalent to the category of Tambara functors. (Ull13)

Some other examples are related to Witt-Burnside functors, Witt rings in the sense of Dress and Siebeneicher.

Additive completion of semi-Tambara functors

The following is Proposition 13.23 of Strickland 12.

Proposition

The additive completion of semi-Mackey functors underlies a left adjoint sTamb(𝒞)Tamb(𝒞)\mathrm{sTamb}(\mathcal{C}) \rightarrow \mathrm{Tamb}(\mathcal{C}) to the forgetful functor.

The Borel construction

Given SS a semiring with GG-action through homomorphisms, we have a coefficient system S S^{\bullet} whose [G/H][G/H]-value is the invariants S HS^H. We give this the additional structure of a semi-mackey functor by first using the semiring isomorphism

S HHom G(G/H,S) S^H \simeq \mathrm{Hom}^G(G/H,S)

under the pointwise semiring structure, then given a map of transitive GG-sets r:G/KG/Hr\colon G/K \rightarrow G/H, writing

T K H(f)(x)= r(y)=xf(y). T_K^H(f)(x) = \sum_{r(y) = x} f(y).

We then give this the structure of a Tambara functor along q:G/KG/Hq\colon G/K \rightarrow G/H by the formula

N K H(f)(x)= q(y)=xf(y) N_K^H(f)(x) = \prod_{q(y) = x} f(y)

In particular, we may view T K HT_K^H as being defined by a “left Kan extension” formula and N K HN_K^H via “right Kan extension.”

Note that restricting to the value on G/eG/e yields a functor U:sTamb G(𝒞)sRing G(𝒞)U\colon \mathrm{sTamb}_{G}(\mathcal{C}) \rightarrow \mathrm{sRing}_{G}(\mathcal{C}). The following is Example 6.3 of [Strickland 12]

Proposition

The Borel construction is right adjoint to U:sTamb G(𝒞)sRing G(𝒞)U\colon \mathrm{sTamb}_{G}(\mathcal{C}) \rightarrow \mathrm{sRing}_{G}(\mathcal{C}).

Representation Tambara functors

Given HGH \subset G a subgroup, note that (isomorphism classes of) HH-representations correspond with GG-equivariant vector bundles over [G/H][G/H]:

Vect k G([G/H])Rep H. \mathrm{Vect}_k^{G}([G/H]) \simeq \mathrm{Rep}^H.

Restriction gives these the structure of a coefficient system; we may give these a semiring structure under (,)(\oplus,\otimes). Moreover, we lift this to a semi-Tambara structure with transfers given by induction

T K H(V) x r(y)=xV y T_K^H(V)_x \simeq \bigoplus_{r(y) = x} V_y

and norms given by tensor-induction

N K H(V) x q(y)=xV y. N_K^H(V)_x \simeq \bigotimes_{q(y) = x} V_y.

The Representation Tambara functor is the additive completion of this.

Burnside Tambara functors

Let 𝒜(S)\mathcal{A}(S) be the Grothendieck group

𝒜(S)K 0((𝔽 G) /S). \mathcal{A}(S) \coloneqq K_0 \left((\mathbb{F}_G)_{/S} \right).

This becomes a coefficient system under precomposition. Moreover, colimits in 𝔽 G\mathbb{F}_G are universal, so precomposition along a map of finite GG-sets STS \rightarrow T possesses a both a left and right adjoint; the left adjoint to [G/K][G/H][G/K] \rightarrow [G/H] is called induction and the right adjoint is called coinduction. The Burnside Tambara functor has coefficient system 𝒜()\mathcal{A}(-), transfers given by induction, and norms given by coinduction.

An explicit example

Let G=C 2={e,σ}G = C_2 = \{ e, \sigma \}. Then, a C_2-Mackey functor consists of the data

  • an Abelian group XX with C 2C_2-action,
  • an Abelian group YY,
  • a C 2C_2-equivariant restriction homomorphism R:YXR\colon Y \rightarrow X (under trivial action on YY), and
  • a C 2C_2-equivariant transfer homomorphism T:XYT\colon X \rightarrow Y,

subject to the double coset formula

RT(a)=a+σa. RT(a) = a + \sigma a.

Thus, a C 2C_2-Tambara functor consists of * a semiring XX with C 2C_2-action, * a semiring YY, * a C 2C_2-equivariant semiring homomorphism R:YXR\colon Y \rightarrow X (under trivial action on YY), * a C 2C_2-equivariant additive map T:XYT\colon X \rightarrow Y, and * a C 2C_2-equivariant multiplicative map N:XYN\colon X \rightarrow Y,

subject to the double coset formulas

  • RT(a)=a+σaRT(a) = a + \sigma a

  • RN(a)=aσaRN(a) = a \cdot \sigma a

and the distributivity formula

  • T(aR(b))=T(a)b.T(a R(b)) = T(a) b.

We may explicitly define a C 2C_2-Tambara funcgtor by underlying coefficient system semiring X=[α]/α 2X = \mathbb{Z}[\alpha] / \alpha^2, Y=[β,γ]/(β 2,βγ,γ 2,2γ)Y = \mathbb{Z}[\beta, \gamma] / (\beta^2, \beta \gamma, \gamma^2, 2\gamma), under trivial C 2C_2-action and restriction map

R(i+jβ+kγ)=i+2jα. R(i + j\beta + k\gamma) = i + 2j\alpha.

We may give this a Tambara structure by transfer

T(i+jα)=2i+jβ T(i + j\alpha) = 2i + j\beta

and norm

N(i+jα)=i 2+ijβ+j 2γ. N(i + j\alpha) = i^2 + ij\beta + j^2 \gamma.

References

Originally,

  • Daisuke Tambara, On multiplicative transfer, Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), no. 4, 1393–1420 (pdf).

Other references in homotopy theory,

On variations of Tambara functors,

Relationship with Witt vectors,

In algebra,

  • Hiroyuki Nakaoka?, A generalization of The Dress construction for a Tambara functor, and polynomial Tambara functors, (arXiv:1012.1911)

  • Hiroyuki Nakaoka?, Ideals of Tambara functors (arXiv:1101.5982),

  • Hiroyuki Nakaoka?, On the fractions of semi-Mackey and Tambara functors (arXiv:1103.3991),

  • Hiroyuki Nakaoka?, Biset transformations of Tambara functors (arXiv:1105.0714),

  • Hiroyuki Nakaoka?, Spectrum of the Burnside Tambara functor on a cyclic pp-group (arXiv:1301.1453).

  • Maxine Calle, Sam Ginnett, The Spectrum of the Burnside Tambara Functor of a Cyclic Group, (arXiv:2011.04729)

  • Noah Wisdom, A classification of C p nC_{p^n}-Tambara fields, (arXiv:2409.02966)

  • David Chan?, David Mehrle, J.D. Quigley, Ben Spitz?, Danika Van Niel?, On the Tambara Affine Line (arXiv:2410.23052)

In derived algebra,

In higher algebra,

Last revised on December 21, 2024 at 16:00:57. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.