Stable homotopy theory is homotopy theory in the case that the operations of looping and delooping are equivalences.
As homotopy theory is the study of homotopy types, so stable homotopy theory is the study of stable homotopy types. As homotopy theory in generality is (∞,1)-category theory (or maybe (∞,1)-topos theory), so stable homotopy theory in generality is the theory of stable (∞,1)-categories.
More specifically, if one thinks of classical homotopy theory as the study of (just) the (∞,1)-category $L_{whe}$Top $\simeq$ ∞Grpd of topological spaces modulo weak homotopy equivalence (∞-groupoids), or rather of its homotopy category $Ho(Top)$, then stable homotopy theory is the study of the corresponding stabilization: To every suitable (∞,1)-category is associated its corresponding stable (∞,1)-category of spectrum objects. For $L_{whe}$Top this is the stable (∞,1)-category of spectra, $Sp(L_{whe}Top)$. Stable homotopy theory is the study of $Sp(Top)$, or rather of its homotopy category, the stable homotopy category $Ho(Sp(L_{whe}Top))$.
For detailed introduction to the stable homotopy theory of spectra see at Introduction to Stable homotopy theory.
By definition a stable homotopy type is one on which suspension and hence looping and delooping act as an equivalence. Historically people considered in plain homotopy theory statements that became true after sufficiently many suspensions, hence once the process of taking suspensions “stabilizes”. Whence the name.
The study of monoid object in a monoidal (infinity,1)-category in a stable (∞,1)-category is the homotopy-theoretic version of commutative algebra, hence higher algebra and higher linear algebra.
A tool of central importance in stable homotopy theory and its application to higher algebra is the symmetric monoidal smash product of spectra which allows us to describe A-∞ rings and E-∞ rings as ordinary monoid objects in a model category that presents $Sp(Top)$. (“brave new algebra”).
When the spaces and spectra in question carry an infinity-action of a group $G$ the theory refines to
Stable homotopy theory began around 1937 with the Freudenthal suspension theorem. $[$…$]$ Stable phenomena had of course appeared earlier, at least implicitly: reduced homology and cohomology are examples of functors that are invariant under suspension without limitation on dimension.
Stable homotopy theory emerged as a distinct branch of algebraic topology with Adams’ introduction of his eponymous spectral sequence and his spectacular conceptual use of the notion of stable phenomena in his solution to the Hopf invariant one problem.
Its centrality was reinforced by two related developments that occurred at very nearly the same time, in the late 1950’s. One was the introduction of generalized homology and cohomology theories and especially K-theory, by Atiyah and Hirzebruch. The other was the work of Thom which showed how to reduce the problem of classifying manifolds up to cobordism to a problem, more importantly, a solvable problem, in stable homotopy theory $[$ Thom spectrum $]$.
The reduction of geometric phenomena to solvable problems in stable homotopy theory has remained an important mathematical theme, the most recent major success being Stolz’s use of Spin cobordism to study the classication of manifolds with positive scalar curvature.
In an entirely different direction, the early 1970’s saw Quillen’s introduction of higher algebraic K-theory and the recognition by Segal and others that it could be viewed as a construction in stable homotopy theory. With algebraic K-theory as an intermediary, there has been a growing volume of work that relates algebraic geometry to stable homotopy theory. With Waldhausen’s introduction of the algebraic K-theory of spaces in the late 1970’s, stable homotopy became a bridge between algebraic K-theory and the study of diffeomorphisms of manifolds.
Within algebraic topology, the study of stable homotopy theory has been and remains the focus of much of the best work in the subject.
The original direct definitions of the stable homotopy category (for precursors see at Spanier-Whitehead category) is due to
Early accounts include
Rainer Vogt, Boardman’s stable homotopy category, lectures, spring 1969
J. M. Cohen, Stable Homotopy, Springer Lecture Notes in Math., No. 165, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.
Dieter Puppe, On the stable homotopy category, Topology and its application (1973) (pdf)
Frank Adams, Part III, section 2 of Stable homotopy and generalised homology, 1974
Robert Switzer, Algebraic Topology - Homotopy and Homology, Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen, Vol. 212, Springer-Verlag, New York, N. Y., 1975.
A fun scan of the (pre-)history of the stable homotopy category is in
Quick surveys include
Cary Malkiewich, The stable homotopy category, 2014 (pdf)
Dylan Wilson, Introduction to stable homotopy theory (pdf)
Aaron Mazel-Gee, An introduction to spectra (pdf)
Lecture notes include
See also
Comprehensive discussion of model with symmetric monoidal smash product of spectra are
for S-modules:
for orthogonal spectra:
A survey of formalisms used in stable homotopy theory – tools to present the triangulated homotopy category of a stable (infinity,1)-category – is in
Neil Strickland, Axiomatic stable homotopy - a survey (arXiv:math.AT/0307143)
Mark Hovey, John Palmieri, Neil Strickland, Axiomatic stable homotopy theory (pdf)
An account in terms of (∞,1)-category theory is in section 1 of
Brief indications of open questions and future directions (as of 2013) of algebraic topology and stable homotopy theory are in
Last revised on May 9, 2017 at 11:12:37. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.