The basic idea behind a continuous function is that the output of the function can be made to change by only a small amount so long as the input is allowed to change by only a small amount. There are, of course, different ways to make this precise, including uniformly continuous functions and Lipschitz continuous functions. With an absolutely continuous function, you allow multiple changes to multiple inputs to be combined into a single total change (and you consider the absolute values of the changes, so that they won't cancel).
The result is a notion of function that gets along well with the fundamental theorem of calculus in the context of the Lebesgue integral on the real line. Absolute continuity is weaker than Lipschitz continuity but stronger than mere (pointwise) continuity.
The first definition below is the most elementary; that the others are equivalent are important theorems.
Let and be real numbers, and let be a real-valued function on the interval . Then is absolutely continuous on iff:
Given any positive number , for some positive number , given any natural number and any -tuple of elements of , interpreted as an increasing -tuple of nonoverlapping subintervals of , if the total length of the intervals is less than , then the total variation of on the intervals is less than . That is (after and ), given , if
then
Various trivial variations of this may be met with: the comparison with and/or may be weak instead of strict; the number of subintervals may be infinite (so long as they are still nonoverlapping), since an infinite sum (of nonnegative numbers, as we have here) is simply a supremum of finite sums; and of course we may start by specifying that the numbers come in order as the endpoints of the subintervals, rather than starting with any numbers and then putting them in order and forming the subintervals from those. (Note that putting them in order is fine even in constructive analysis, since choosing the th element in order from a list of rational numbers is continuous, so may be extended constructively to real numbers, although we can't assume that the final list is a permutation of the original list.)
For the next definition, fix a model of nonstandard analysis.
Given any hypernatural number in the model and any -tuple of elements of the nonstandard extension of , interpreted as an increasing -tuple of nonoverlapping subintervals of , if the total length of the intervals is infinitesimal, then the total variation of on the intervals is infinitesimal. That is, given hyperreal numbers , if
then
See Tuckey 1993, pages 34–36.
That the next definition is equivalent is the fundamental theorem of calculus for the Lebesgue integral on the real line.
There exists a Lebesgue-integrable function on such that for . (This is a semidefinite integral.)
In this case, must equal the derivative almost everywhere on . (So in particular, is differentiable almost everywhere with a Lebesgue-integrable derivative, although this is not enough without requiring that be an indefinite integral of its derivative.)
The function is uniformly continuous on , is of bounded variation? on , and the direct image under of any null subset of is null.
The Stieltjes measure? is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on .
The last of these is the source of the term ‘absolutely continuous’ as applied to measures.
One may easily generalize the codomain of the elementary definition of absolutely continuous functions to any metric space.
The cube-root function is absolutely continuous (on any bounded interval) but not Lipschitz continuous (on any interval containing ).
The Cantor function? is not absolutely continuous, even though it is continuous, and differentiable almost everywhere, with a Lebesgue-integrable derivative.
Last revised on April 14, 2018 at 06:21:06. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.