Every category gives rise to an arrow category such that the objects of are the morphisms (or arrows, hence the name) of .
For any category, its arrow category is the category such that:
in ;
This is isomorphic to the functor category
for the interval category . is also written , , , or , since and (for the -simplex) are common notations for the interval category.
Proposition 3.1. The arrow category is equivalently the comma category for the case that is the identity functor.
Remark 3.2. plays the role of a directed path object for categories in that functors
are the same as natural transformations between functors between and .
Example 3.3. (arrow category is Grothendieck construction on slice categories)
For any category, let
be the pseudofunctor which sends
an object to the slice category ,
a morphism to the left base change functor given by post-composition in .
The Grothendieck construction on this functor is the arrow category of :
This follows readily by unwinding the definitions. In the refinement to the Grothendieck construction for model categories (here: slice model categories and model structures on functors) this equivalence is also considered for instance in Harpaz & Prasma (2015), above Cor. 6.1.2.
The correponding Grothendieck fibration is also known as the codomain fibration.
Last revised on April 1, 2023 at 16:23:38. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.