nLab symmetric powers in a symmetric monoidal (Q plus)-linear category

Contents

Contents

Idea

A conjectural characterization of symmetric powers in symmetric monoidal +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-linear categories is given on this page. The description in terms of universal properties would be equivalent to a much longer one but much more constructive in algebraic terms. It would be similar to the characterization of products known as Fox theorem but where products are replaced by symmetric powers. We work in symmetric monoidal categories enriched over modules over a +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra. The adaptation to CMon-enriched symmetric monoidal categories would involve symmetric and divided powers which are equal in this simpler setting. This conjecture seems to be true and if it is really the case, the proof is not trivial.

Conjecture

We suppose that the symmetric monoidal categories are strict monoidal categories.

Definition

We say that a symmetric monoidal category 𝒞\mathcal{C} possesses the nn-th symmetric power (n0n \ge 0) iff it possesses this coequalizer for every A𝒞A \in \mathcal{C}: and r n(A):A nS n(A)r_{n}(A):A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A) is a natural transformation.

Definition

A functorial special bicommutative graded bimonoid in a CMonCMon-enriched symmetric monoidal category is given by:

  • a family (S n:𝒞𝒞) n0(S_{n}:\mathcal{C}\rightarrow \mathcal{C})_{n \ge 0} of endofunctors
  • a family ( n,p:S n(A)S p(A)S n+p(A)) n,p0(\nabla_{n,p}:S_{n}(A) \otimes S_{p}(A) \rightarrow S_{n+p}(A))_{n,p \ge 0} of natural transformations
  • a family (Δ n,p:S n+p(A)S n(A)S p(A)) n,p0(\Delta_{n,p}:S_{n+p}(A) \rightarrow S_{n}(A) \otimes S_{p}(A))_{n,p \ge 0} of natural transformations

such that:

  • S 0(A)=IS_{0}(A)=I

  • S 1(A)=AS_{1}(A)=A

  • for every A𝒞A \in \mathcal{C}, (A,( n,p) n,p0,(Δ n,p) n,p0)(A,(\nabla_{n,p})_{n,p \ge 0}, (\Delta_{n,p})_{n,p \ge 0})) is a special bicommutative graded bimonoid ie.:

  • γ; p,n= n,p\gamma;\nabla_{p,n} = \nabla_{n,p} (commutativity)

  • Δ p,n;γ=Δ n,p\Delta_{p,n};\gamma = \Delta_{n,p} (cocommutativity)

  • n,0=1\nabla_{n,0}=1 (unitality)

  • Δ n,0=1\Delta_{n,0}=1 (counitality)

  • ( n,p1); n+p,q=(1 p,q); n,p+q(\nabla_{n,p} \otimes 1);\nabla_{n+p,q} = (1 \otimes \nabla_{p,q});\nabla_{n,p+q} (associativity)

  • Δ n+p,q;(δ n,p1)=Δ n+p,q;(1Δ p,q)\Delta_{n+p,q};(\delta_{n,p} \otimes 1) = \Delta_{n+p,q};(1 \otimes \Delta_{p,q}) (coassociativity)

  • if n+p=q+rn+p = q+r, then n,p;Δ q,r=a,b,c,d0 a+b=n c+d=p a+c=q b+d=r(Δ a,bΔ c,d);(1γ1);( a,c b,d)\nabla_{n,p};\Delta_{q,r} = \underset{\substack{a,b,c,d \ge 0 \\ a+b=n \\ c+d=p \\ a+c=q \\ b+d=r}}{\sum} (\Delta_{a,b} \otimes \Delta_{c,d});(1 \otimes \gamma \otimes 1);(\nabla_{a,c} \otimes \nabla_{b,d}) (compatibility multiplication/comultiplication)

  • Δ n,p; n,p=(n+pn)\Delta_{n,p};\nabla_{n,p} = \binom{n+p}{n} (specialty)

Conjecture

Let RR be a +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra. Let 𝒞\mathcal{C} be a symmetric monoidal category enriched over RR-modules. Let (S n:𝒞𝒞) n0(S_{n}:\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C})_{n \ge 0} be a family of endofunctors such that S 0(A)=IS_{0}(A)=I and S 1(A)=AS_{1}(A) = A. Then, there is a bijection between families of natural transformations (r n(A):A nS n(A)) n0(r_{n}(A):A^{\otimes_{n}} \rightarrow S_{n}(A))_{n \ge 0} which make (S n(A))(S_{n}(A)) symmetric powers and families of natural transformations ( n,p:S n(A)S p(A)S n+p(A)) n,p0,(Δ n,p:S n+p(A)S n(A)S p(A)) n,p0(\nabla_{n,p}:S_{n}(A) \otimes S_{p}(A) \rightarrow S_{n+p}(A))_{n,p \ge 0}, (\Delta_{n,p}:S_{n+p}(A) \rightarrow S_{n}(A) \otimes S_{p}(A))_{n,p \ge 0} which make (S n(A))(S_{n}(A)) a functorial special bicommutative graded bimonoid.

Towards a proof

n thn^{th} symmetric power in symmetric monoidal categories enriched over modules over a +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra

Proposition

Let RR be a +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra and 𝒞\mathcal{C} be a symmetric monoidal category enriched over RR-modules. Let n0n \ge 0 and S n:𝒞𝒞S_{n}:\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C} be an endofunctor. There is a bijection between natural transformations r n:A nS n(A)r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A) which make (S n(A))(S_{n}(A)) symmetric powers and pairs of natural transformations (r n:A nS n(A),s n:S n(A)A n)(r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A), s_{n}:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow A^{\otimes n}) such that:

  • s n;r n=1:S n(A)S n(A)s_{n};r_{n}=1:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow S_{n}(A)
  • r n;s n=1n!σ𝔖 nσ:A nA nr_{n};s_{n} = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow A^{\otimes n}

Proof

Suppose that we have a natural transformation r n:A nS n(A)r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A) which make (S n(A))(S_{n}(A)) symmetric powers. Define the natural transformation e n=1n!σ𝔖 nσ:A nA e_{n}=\frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow A^{\otimes}. For every permutation ρ𝔖 n\rho \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}, we have ρ;e n=ρ;1n!σ𝔖 nσ=1n!σ𝔖 nρ;σ\rho;e_{n}=\rho;\frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\rho;\sigma =1n!σ𝔖 nσ=e n= \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum} \sigma = e_{n} by using a change of variables in the last step. We thus have this factorization for every A𝒞A \in \mathcal{C}: It is not difficult to show that s n:S n(A)A ns_{n}:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow A^{\otimes n} is a natural transformation.

Moreover r n;(s n;r n)=(r n;s n);r n=e n;r n=(1n!σ𝔖 nσ);r nr_{n};(s_{n};r_{n}) = (r_{n};s_{n});r_{n} = e_{n};r_{n} = (\frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma);r_{n} =1n!σ𝔖 nσ;r n=1n!σ𝔖 nr n=1n!(n!r n)=r n=r n;1 = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma;r_{n} = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}r_{n}=\frac{1}{n!}(n!r_{n})=r_{n}=r_{n};1. We know that r nr_{n} is an epimorphism and thus s n;r n=1s_{n};r_{n}=1.

Suppose now that we have a pair of natural transformations (r n:A nS n(A),s n:S n(A)A n)(r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A), s_{n}:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow A^{\otimes n}) such that:

  • s n;r n=1:S n(A)S n(A)s_{n};r_{n}=1:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow S_{n}(A)
  • r n;s n=1n!σ𝔖 nσ:A nA nr_{n};s_{n} = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow A^{\otimes n}

Suppose that f:A nBf:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow B is a morphism such that σ;f=f\sigma;f=f for every σ𝔖 n\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}. Then r n;(s n;f)=(r n;s n);f=(1n!σ𝔖 nσ);f=1n!σ𝔖 nσ;f=1n!σ𝔖 nf=1n!(n!f)=fr_{n};(s_{n};f)=(r_{n};s_{n});f=(\frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum}\sigma);f = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum} \sigma;f = \frac{1}{n!} \underset{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{n}}{\sum} f = \frac{1}{n!}(n!f)=f. Suppose now that we have a morphism g:S n(A)Bg:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow B such that f=r n;gf=r_{n};g. Then, s n;f=s n;(r n;g)=(s n;r n);g=gs_{n};f=s_{n};(r_{n};g)=(s_{n};r_{n});g=g. s n;fs_{n};f is thus the only morphism S n(A)BS_{n}(A) \rightarrow B such that f=r n;(s n;f)f=r_{n};(s_{n};f). Thus, r n:A nS n(A)r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A) makes (S n(A))(S_{n}(A)) symmetric powers.

With this equivalent definition, we have already replaced the universal property defining symmetric powers by two natural transformations which verify some equations. The work is now to show the equivalence between these two equations and the ones defining a functorial special bicommutative graded bimonoid.

From symmetric powers to creation/annihilation operators

Definition

Let RR be +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra and 𝒞\mathcal{C} a symmetric monoidal category enriched over RR-modules. Suppose that we have a family (S n:𝒞𝒞) n0(S_{n}:\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C})_{n \ge 0} of endofunctors such that S 0(A)=IS_{0}(A)=I and S 1(A)=AS_{1}(A)=A. Creation/annihilation operators are defined as two families (c n:S n(A)AS n+1(A)) n0(c_{n}:S_{n}(A) \otimes A \rightarrow S_{n+1}(A))_{n \ge 0} and (a n:S n(A)S n1(A)A) n1(a_{n}:S_{n}(A) \rightarrow S_{n-1}(A) \otimes A)_{n \ge 1} such that:

Creation followed by annihilation

and:

Annihilation operator followed by creation operator, corrected

where kk must be read as S k(A)S_{k}(A). Be aware that “n.n.” depicts the multiplication by the scalar nn.

Proposition

Let RR be +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra and 𝒞\mathcal{C} a symmetric monoidal category enriched over RR-modules. Suppose that we have a family (S n:𝒞𝒞) 0np(S_{n}:\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C})_{0 \le n \le p} of endofunctors such that S 0(A)=IS_{0}(A)=I and S 1(A)=AS_{1}(A)=A. Suppose that we have a family (r n:A nS n(A)) 0np(r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A))_{0 \le n \le p} of natural transformations which make (S nA) 0np(S_{n}A)_{0 \le n \le p} symmetric powers. We define creation/annihilation operators (for 00 to pp particles) by putting:

From symmetric powers to functorial special bicommutative graded bimonoid

Proposition

Let RR be +\mathbb{Q}^{+}-algebra and 𝒞\mathcal{C} a symmetric monoidal category enriched over RR-modules. Suppose that we have a family (S n:𝒞𝒞) 0np(S_{n}:\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{C})_{0 \le n \le p} of endofunctors such that S 0(A)=IS_{0}(A)=I and S 1(A)=AS_{1}(A)=A. Suppose that we have a family (r n:A nS n(A)) 0np(r_{n}:A^{\otimes n} \rightarrow S_{n}(A))_{0 \le n \le p} of natural transformations which make (S nA) 0np(S_{n}A)_{0 \le n \le p} symmetric powers. We define a (bounded) functorial special bicommutative graded bimonoid by putting:

for all 0n,np0 \le n,n' \le p such that 0n+np0 \le n+n' \le p.

graded codifferential category

Last revised on August 13, 2022 at 19:05:39. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.