# Spahn Clemens Berger, A Cellular Nerve for Higher Categories (Rev #11)

This entry draws from

• Clemens Berger, A cellular nerve for higher categories, Advances in Mathematics 169, 118-175 (2002) (pdf)

## 1. Globular theories and cellular nerves

Contents:

Batanin’s $\omega$-operads are described by their operator categories which are called globular theories.

###### Definition (finite planar level tree)

A finite planar level tree ( or for short just a tree) is a graded set $(T(n))_{n\in \mathbb{N}_0}$ endowed with a map $i_T: T_{\gt 0}$ decreasing the degree by one and such that all fibers $i_T^{-1}(x)$ are linearly ordered.

The collection of trees with maps of graded sets commuting with $i$ defines a category $\mathcal{T}$, called the category of trees.

###### Example

The finite ordinal $[n]\in \Delta$ we can regard as the 1-level tree with $n$ input edges. Hence the simplex category \$\Delta\hookrightarrow

The following ${}_*$-construction is due to Batanin.

###### Lemma and Definition ($\omega$-graph of sectors of a tree)

Let $T$ be a tree.

A $T$-sector of height $k$ is defined to be a cospan

$\array{ y^\prime&&y^{\prime\prime} \\ \searrow&&\swarrow \\ &y }$

denoted by $(y;y^\prime,y^{\prime\prime})$ where $y\in T(k)$ and $y\lt y^{\prime\prime}$ are consecutive vertices in the linear order $i_T^{-1}(y)$.

The set $GT$ of $T$-sector is graded by the height of sectors.

The source of a sector $(y;y^\prime,y^{\prime\prime})$ is defined to be $(i(y);x,y)$ where $x,y$ are consecutive vertices.

The target of a sector $(y;y^\prime,y^{\prime\prime})$ is defined to be $(i(y);y,z)$ where $y,z$ are consecutive vertices.

$\array{ &y^\prime&&y^{\prime\prime} \\ & \searrow&&\swarrow \\ x&&y&&z \\ \searrow&&\downarrow^i&&\swarrow \\ &&i(y) }$

To have a source and a target for every sector of $T$ we adjoin in every but the highest degree a lest- and a greatest vertex serving as new minimum and maximum for the linear orders $i^{-1}(x)$. We denote this new tree by $\overline T$ and the set of its sectors by $T_*:=G\overline T(k)$ and obtain source- and target operators $s,t:T_*\to T_*$. This operators satisfy

$s\circ s=s\circ t$
$t\circ t =t\circ s$

as one sees in the following diagram depicting an “augmented” tree of height $3$

$\array{ T(3)&&&y^\prime&&y^{\prime\prime} \\ &&& \searrow&&\swarrow \\ T(2)&&x&&y&&z \\ &&\searrow&&\downarrow^i&&\swarrow \\ T(1)&&u&&v&&w \\ &&\searrow&&\downarrow^i&&\swarrow \\ T(0)&&&&r }$

which means that $T_*$ is an $\omega$-graph (also called globular set).

Now let $G$ denote the globe category whose unique object in degree $n\in \mathbb{N}$ is $n_G$, and let $\mathbf{n}$ denotes the linear $n$-level tree.

Then we have $\mathbf{n}_*\simeq G(-,n_G)$ is the standard $n$-globe. (Note that the previous diagram corresponds to the standard $3$ globe.)

###### Definition

Let $f:S_*\to T_*$ be a monomorphism.

$f$ is called to be cartesian if

$\array{ (S_*)_n&\stackrel{f_n}{\to}&(T_*)_n \\ \downarrow^s&&\downarrow^t \\ (S_*)_{n-1}&\stackrel{f_{n-1}}{\to}&(T_*)_{n-1} }$

is a pullback for all $n$.

###### Lemma

Let $S,T$ be level trees.

(1) Any map $S_*\to T_*$ is injective.

(2) The inclusions $S_*\hookrightarrow T_*$ correspond bijectively to cartesian subobjects of $T_*$.

(3) The inclusions $S_*\hookrightarrow T_*$ correspond bijectively to plain subtrees of $T$ with a specific choice of $T$-sector for each input vertex of $S$. (…)

###### Definition

(1) The category $\Theta_0$ defined by having as objects the level trees and as morphisms the maps between the associated $\omega$-graphs. These morphisms are called immersions. This category shall be equipped with the structure of a site by defining the covering sieves by epimorphic families (of immersions). This site is called the globular site.

(2) A globular theory is defined to be a category $\Theta_A$ such that

$\Theta_0\hookrightarrow \Theta_A$

is an inclusion of a wide subcategory such that representable presheaves on $\Theta_A$ restrict to sheaves on $\Theta_0$.

(3) Presheaves on $\Theta_A$ which restrict to sheaves on $\Theta_0$ are called $\Theta_A$-models.

###### Lemma

The forgetful functor

$Sh (\Theta_0)\to \omega Graph:=Psh (G)$

is an equivalence of categories.

###### Proof

Let $X\in Psh(\Theta_0)$ and show that $X\in Sh(\Theta_0)$ iff $X(T)\simeq hom_{Psh(G)}(T_*,X)$ by writing $X$ as a colimit of representables.

Revision on November 20, 2012 at 15:19:15 by Stephan Alexander Spahn?. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.