Spahn Joyal model structure in HTT (Rev #1)

Theorem 2.2.5.1

The exists a left proper, combinatorial model structure on the category of simplicial sets such that

(C) Cofibrations are precisely monomorphisms

(W) A map pp is a categorical equivalence iff S(p)S(p) is an equivalence of simplicial categories. Where S:sSet→sCatS:sSet\to sCat denotes the functor induced via Kan extension by the cosimplicial object ℭ:Δ→sCat\mathfrak{C}:\Delta\to sCat, Definition 1.1.5.1, HTT.

(transclusion:

Proposition A.3.2.4

Let SS be a combinatorial monoidal model category. Let every object of SS be cofibrant. Let the collection of all weak equivalences in SS be stable under filtered colimits.

Then there exists a left proper, combinatorial model structure on SCatS Cat such that:

(C) The class of cofibrations in SCatS Cat is the smallest weakly saturated class of morphisms containing the set of morphisms C 0C_0 defined in A.3.2.3. (C 0C_0 is some class of ‘’indicating morphisms’’).

(W) The weak equivalences in SCatS Cat are those functors F:C→DF:C\to D which are essentially surjective on the level of homotopy categories and such that Map C(X,Y)→Map C ′(F(X),F(Y))Map_C(X,Y)\to Map_{C^\prime}(F(X),F(Y)) for every X,Y∈CX,Y\in C.

Recall that sSetsSet equipped with the Kan model structure is an excellent model category.

Theorem 3.2.24

Let SS be an excellent model category. Then:

  1. An SS-enriched category CC is a fibrant object of SCatS Cat iff it is locally fibrant: i.e. for all X,Y∈CX,Y\in C the hom object Map C(X,Y)∈SMap_C (X,Y)\in S is fibrant.

  2. Let F:C→DF:C\to D be a SS-enriched functor where DD is a fibrant object of SCatS Cat. Then FF is a fibration iff FF is a local fibration.

)

(transclusion: here: give proof of Proposition 1.2.7.3

Proposition 1.2.7.3

(stated again and proved in 2.2.5)

Let KK be a simplicial set. Then

(1) For every ∞\infty-category CC, the simplicial set Fun(K,C)Fun(K,C) is an ∞\infty-category.

(2) Let C→DC\to D be a categorial equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. Then the induced map Fun(K,C)→Fun(K,D)Fun(K,C)\to Fun(K,D) is a categorial equivalence.

(3) Let CC be an ∞\infty-category. Let K→K ′K\to K^\prime be a categorial equivalence of simplicial sets. Then the induced map Fun(K ′,C)→Fun(K,C)Fun(K^\prime,C)\to Fun(K,C) is a categorial equivalence.

Proof

(1) Fun(K,C)Fun(K,C) is an ∞\infty-category if it is fibrant in the Joyal model structure.

It suffices to show that it has the extension property with respect to every inner anodyne inclusion A⊆BA\subseteq B.

This is equivalent to the assertion that CC has the right lifting property wrt. the inclusion A×K⊆B×KA\times K\subseteq B\times K.

But CC is an ∞\infty-category and A×K⊆B×KA\times K\subseteq B\times K is inner anodyne (Corollary 2.3.2.4).

Let hsSeth sSet denote the homotopy category of sSetsSet wrt. the Joyal model structure. Let [X]∈hsSet[X]\in h sSet denote the homotopy class of XX.

For X,Y∈sSetX,Y\in sSet, we have that [X×Y][X\times Y] is a product for [X][X] and [Y][Y]. (If XX and YY are fibrant this is a general fact. If not, we take fibrant replacements and apply Proposition 2.2.5.7.)

If CC is an ∞\infty-category, CC is a fibrant in sSets Set by Theorem 2.4.6.1.

By Proposition 2.2.5.7 we identify hom hsSet([X]×[X],[C])≃Fun(X,C)hom_{h sSet}([X]\times [X],[C])\simeq Fun (X,C) and there are canonical bijections

hom hsSet([X]×[K],[C])≃hom hsSet([X×K],[C])≃hom hsSet([X],[Fun(K,C])hom_{h sSet}([X]\times [K],[C])\simeq hom_{h sSet}([X\times K],[C])\simeq hom_{h sSet}([X],[Fun(K,C])

It follows that [Fun(K,C)][Fun(K,C)] is determined up to canonical isomorphism by [K][K] and [C][C] in that it is an exponential [C] [K][C]^{[K]} in hsSeth sSet. This proves (2) and (3).

)

Revision on June 28, 2012 at 15:29:17 by Stephan Alexander Spahn?. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.