Spahn étale types (Rev #21, changes)

Showing changes from revision #20 to #21: Added | Removed | Changed

Contents

□\Box-closed morphisms

Definition

Let □\Box be an idempotent monad on a presentable (∞,1)(\infty,1)-category CC. A morphism f:X→Yf:X\to Y is called □\Box-closed if

X → □X ↓ f ↓ □f Y → □Y\array{ X&\to &\Box X \\ \downarrow^f &&\downarrow^{\Box f} \\ Y&\to& \Box Y }

is a pullback square.

Theorem

The class of □\Box-closed morphisms CC satisfies the following closure properties:

(1) Every equivalence is □\Box-closed.

(2) The composite of two □\Box-closed morphisms is □\Box-closed.

(3) The left cancellation property is satisfied: If h=g∘fh=g\circ f and hh and gg are □\Box-closed, then so is ff.

(4) Any retract of a □\Box-closed morphism is □\Box-closed.

(5) The class is closed under pullbacks which are preserved by □\Box.

Remark

A class of □\Box-closed morphism which is closed under pullback is an admissible structure defining a geometry in the sense of Lurie’s DAG.

Theorem (Formally étale subslices are reflective andcoreflecive)

(1) Let C/XC/X be a slice of CC. The full sub-(∞,1)(\infty,1)-category (C/X) □↪ιC/X(C/X)_\Box\stackrel{\iota}{\hookrightarrow} C/X on those morphisms into XX which are □\Box-closed is reflective and coreflective; i.e. ι\iota fits into an adjoint triple

(C/X) □←Et↪←L(C/X). (C/X)_\Box \stackrel{\overset{L}{\leftarrow}}{\stackrel{\hookrightarrow}{\underset{Et}{\leftarrow}}} (C/X) \,.

(2) By the Giraud-Lurie axioms C/XC/X and (C/X) □(C/X)_\Box are (∞,1)(\infty,1)-toposes.

(3) In particular C □:=(C/*) □↪CC_\Box:=(C/*)_\Box\hookrightarrow C is a reflective and coreflective subtopos.

Remark

(relation of reflective subcategories and reflective factorization systems)

Example (Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed morphism)

Let HH be a cohesive (∞,1)(\infty,1)-topos equipped with infinitesimal cohesion

(i !⊣i *⊣i *):H→i *H th(i_!\dashv i^*\dashv i_*):H\stackrel{i_*}{\to} H_th

Then the class of formally étale morphisms in HH equals the class of Π inf:=i *i *\mathbf{\Pi}_inf:=i_*i^*-closed morphisms in H thH_th which happen to lie in HH.

Theorem

For the classs EE of Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed morphisms in CC we have in addition to the above closure properties also the following ones:

(1) If in a pullback square in CC the left arrow is in EE and the bottom arrow is an effective epimorphism, then the right arrow is in EE.

(2) Every morphism D→*D\to * from a discrete object to the terminal object is in EE.

(3) EE is closed under colimit (taken in the arrow category).

(4) EE is closed under forming diagonals.

Definition (Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed object)

An object of HH is called formally étale object if there is a formally étale (effective) epimorphism (called atlas) from a 00-truncated object into XX.

Theorem (De Rham theorem for formally étale objects)

The de Rham theorem holds for any formally étale object for which the de Rham theorem holds level-wise in regard to the Cech nerve induced from the atlas.

Derived structures and models

UU-modelled higher manifolds

Definition (Cover, Atlas)

Let U→XU\to X be a morphism in an (∞,1)(\infty,1)-category.

(1) We call U→XU\to X a cover of XX if it is an effective epimorphism.

(2) We call U→XU\to X a relative cover wrt. a class MM of morphisms if its pullback along every morphism in MM is a cover of UU and lies in MM.

(3) We call U→XU\to X a nn-atlas of XX, if it is a cover and UU is nn-truncated. A 00-atlas we call just an atlas.

Theorem (Hausdorff manifold)

(1) A manifold XX is a paracompact if there is a jointly epimorphic set of monomorphisms ϕ i:ℝ n→X\phi_i:\mathbb{R}^n\to X such that the corresponding Cech groupoid ζ ϕ\zeta_\phi is degree-wise a coproduct of copies of ℝ n\mathbb{R}^n.

(2) XX is hausdorff if ζ ϕ\zeta_\phi is moreover étale.

Remark and Definition

(1) In a cohesive (∞,1)(\infty,1)-topos HH, ℝ n\mathbb{R}^n can be defined solely in terms of the internal logic of HH.

(2) The previous theorem suggests to call an object X∈HX\in H an UU-modelled hausdorff ∞\infty-manifold or an UU-modelled étale ∞\infty-manifold if there is an étale atlas U→XU\to X of XX.

∞\infty-orbifolds

Definition (κ\kappa-compact object, κ\kappa-compact cover, relatively κ\kappa-compact atlas)

Let CC be an (∞,1)(\infty,1)-category. Let U→XU\to X be a morphism.

(1) UU is called κ\kappa-compact if C(X,−)C(X,-) preserves κ\kappa-filtered colimits.

(2) U→XU\to X is called κ\kappa-compact cover if it is a cover and UU is κ\kappa-compact.

(3) U→XU\to X is called relative κ\kappa-compact cover if it is a relative cover wrt. all morphisms with κ\kappa-compact domain.

Remark

The class of relative κ\kappa-compact covers is closed under composition, pullbacks, and contains all isomorphisms.

Definition (∞\infty-orbifold)

An ∞\infty-orbifold is defined to be a groupoid object in HH posessing a relative κ\kappa-compact atlas which is also Π inf\mathbf{\Pi}_inf-closed.

Corollary (De Rham theorem for ∞\infty-orbifolds)

As a corollary to the De Rham Theorem for étale objects we obtain the de Rham Theorem for ∞\infty-orbifolds.

Observation and Definition (Inertia ∞\infty-orbifold)

The free loop space object of an ∞\infty-orbifold is an ∞\infty-orbifold and is called the inertia ∞\infty-orbifold of XX.

Models

(⋄⊣□)(\diamond\dashv \Box)

What we described so far dualizes to the case of an idempotent comonad. Also the situation where we have adjoint modalities - i.e an adjoint pair (⋄⊣□)(\diamond\dashv \Box) where □\Box is an idempotent monad and ⋄\diamond is an idempotent comonad is of interest.

Synthetic differential geometry

We will describe the foundations of the theory of synthetic differential geometry in terms of adjoint modalities.

The (∞,1)(\infty,1)-topos H thH_th of synthetic differential ∞\infty-groupoids is an infinitesimal cohesive neighborhood of the (∞,1)(\infty,1)-topos HH-of smoooth ∞\infty-groupoids.

Definition

An object X∈H thX\in H_th we call to be an infinitesimal smooth locus if ⋄X\diamond X is contractible.

⋄X≃*\diamond X\simeq *
Lemma (Tangent space)

For every X∈H thX\in H_th the□\Box-unit η X □\eta^\Box_X evaluates in every infinitesimal smooth locus DD to the tangent bundle.

Proof
(η X □:X(D)→(□X)(D))=([D,X]→[D,□X])≃([⋄D,X]≃[*,X]≃X) (\eta_X^\Box:X(D)\to (\Box X)(D))=([D,X]\to [D,\Box X])\simeq( X]\simeq( [\diamond D,X]\simeq [*,X]) [*,X]\simeq X)
Proof Proposition (submersion -, immersion -, and étale map of smooth paracompact manifolds)

In A a morphism reflective subcategory C f ↪ : D X→Y C\hookrightarrow f:X\to D Y a of smooth paracompact manifolds inCH th C H_th -morphism is a monomorphism submersion / imersion / étale morphism iff it the is induced a morphism monomorphism inDD.

In a coreflective subcategory C↪DC\hookrightarrow D a CC-morphism is a epimorphism iff it is a epimorphism in DD.

X→Y× □Y□XX\to Y\times_{\Box Y} \Box X

The property of being a monomorphism is preserved an by epimorphism right / adjoint monomorphism functors. / isomorphism.

The property of being a epimorphism is preserved by left adjoint functors.

Lemma Proof

Let Every f Z : ∈XH th→Y f:X\to Z\in Y H_th can be a written morphism as in H Z=U×D H Z=U\times D . whereU∈HU\in H and DD is an infinitesimal smooth locus. We compute:

X(U×D)=[U×D,X]=[U,[D,X]] □X(U×D)=[U×D,□X]=[U,[D,□X]]=[U,[⋄D,X]]=[U,X]\array{ X(U\times D)=[U\times D, X]=[U,[D,X]] \\ \Box X(U\times D)=[U\times D,\Box X]=[U,[D,\Box X]]=[U,[\diamond D,X]]=[U,X]}

and analogously for YY.

Étale groupoids

Lemma Theorem

Let XX be an étale simplicial manifold being a Kan fibrant object in the projective model structure on simplicial presheaves equipped with an atlas f:U→Xf:U\to X.

Then ff is □\Box-closed.

Proof

ff is □\Box-closed precisely if UU is equivalent to the homotopy pullback of

□U ↓ □f X →η X □ □X\array{ &&\Box U \\ &&\downarrow^{\Box f} \\ X&\stackrel{\eta^\Box_X}{\to}&\Box X }
Lemma
Theorem (Classical étale groupoids)
Theorem (Formally étale ∞\infty-groupoids are étale simplicial manifolds)

Revision on December 11, 2012 at 19:12:34 by Stephan Alexander Spahn?. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.