Showing changes from revision #1 to #2:
Added | Removed | Changed
A Galois module is a -module for a Galois group? ; i.e. it is an abelian group on which a Galois group acts in a way compatible with the abelian group structure.
The category of -modules is equivalent to the category of modules? over the group ring .
As always is the case, a group representation can equivalently be written as . This is why Galois modules are frequently called Galois representations.
Let be a Galois extension? of a number field .
Then the ring of integers of this extension is a Galois module of .
(see also Hilbert-Speiser theorem?)
(-adic representation)
Let be a prime number. Let be the absolute Galois group? of a number field? . Then a morphism of groups
is called an -adic representation of . Here is either a unite dimensional vector space? over the algebraic closure or a finitely generated module over the integral closure? .
In particular the -adic Tate-module is of this kind.
(-adic Tate module?) Let be a prime number. Let be an abelian group. The -adic Tate module is defined to be the limit
i.e. it is the limit over the directed diagram? . Here the kernel? of the multiplication-with- map is called -torsion? of .
(the Tate-module)
Let denote the separable closure of . Let be the group of roots of unity? of in . Then the -adic Tate-module of the absolute Galois group is called the -adic Tate module of or the -adic cyclotomic character of .
It is equivalently the Tate-module of the multiplicative group scheme .
The Tate-module is endowed with the structure of a -module by .
(-adic Tate module? of an abelian variety)
Let be a prime number. Let be an abelian variety? over a field . Let denote the separable closure of . The -valued points of assemble to an abelian group.
Then there are classical results on the rank? of the Tate-module : For example if the characteristic of is a prime number we have that is a free module of rank .
A special case of the Tate conjecture? can be formulated via Tate-modules:
Let be finitely generated over its prime field of characteristic . Let be two abelian varieties over . Then the conjecture states that
If is a finite field or a number field the conjecture is true.
A Galois module is a -module for a Galois group? ; i.e. it is an abelian group on which a Galois group acts in a way compatible with the abelian group structure.
The category of -modules is equivalent to the category of modules? over the group ring .
As always is the case, a group representation can equivalently be written as . This is why Galois modules are frequently called Galois representations.
Let be a Galois extension? of a number field .
Then the ring of integers of this extension is a Galois module of .
(see also Hilbert-Speiser theorem?)
(-adic representation)
Let be a prime number. Let be the absolute Galois group? of a number field? . Then a morphism of groups
is called an -adic representation of . Here is either a unite dimensional vector space? over the algebraic closure or a finitely generated module over the integral closure? .
In particular the -adic Tate-module is of this kind.
(the Tate-module)
Let denote the separable closure of . Let be the group of roots of unity? of in . Then the -adic Tate-module of the absolute Galois group is called the -adic Tate module of or the -adic cyclotomic character of .
It is equivalently the Tate-module of the multiplicative group scheme .
The Tate-module is endowed with the structure of a -module by .
(-adic Tate module? of an abelian variety)
Let be a prime number. Let be an abelian variety? over a field . Let denote the separable closure of . The -valued points of assemble to an abelian group.
Then there are classical results on the rank? of the Tate-module : For example if the characteristic of is a prime number we have that is a free module of rank .
A special case of the Tate conjecture? can be formulated via Tate-modules:
Let be finitely generated over its prime field of characteristic . Let be two abelian varieties over . Then the conjecture states that
If is a finite field or a number field the conjecture is true.
Bondarko has a few papers about Galois modules over local fields.
Burns is also interested in Galois modules I think
Many things by Snaith et al, for example the book Galois module structure, Fields Inst Monographs 2.
nLab page on Galois module