Spahn HTT, A.3 simplicial categories (Rev #3, changes)

Skip the Navigation Links | Home Page | All Pages | Latest Revisions | Authors |

Showing changes from revision #2 to #3: Added | Removed | Changed

This is a subentry of a reading guide to HTT.

Contents

Remark

(morphisms in enriched categories)

In a model category AA there are stricly speaking no morphism defined but only hom objects. So if we wish to define the notion of an enriched model category where we expect to have distinguished classes of morphisms we need to refer to an associated (ordinary - i.e. SetSet-enriched) model category where we have morphisms and to qualify our morphisms there as cofibrations, fibrations and weak equivalences, respectively. This is explicated in the following way:

Definition

(Street, Chapter 1.3)

Let VV be a monoidal category. Let V 0V_0 denote the set of objects of VV. Let ℐ\mathcal{I} denote the terminal VV-category ℐ:={0,I}\mathcal{I}:=\{0,I\}; i.e. ℐ\mathcal{I} has precisely one object 00 and the monoidal unit is defined to be the hom object I:=hom(0,0)I:=hom(0,0). Let ** denote the terminal category. Let V:=V 0(I,−):V 0→SetV:=V_0(I,-):V_0\to Set. Let VCatV Cat denote the 2-category of VV-categories. Then there is a functor

(−) 0:=VCat(ℐ,−):{VCat→Cat A↦idA (f:I→A(a,b))↦(*→VA(a,b))(-)_0:=V Cat(\mathcal{I},-):\begin{cases} V Cat\to Cat \\ A\stackrel{id}{\mapsto}A \\ (f:I\to A(a,b))\mapsto (*\to V A(a,b)) \end{cases}

called the underlying set functor.

So if we speak of a cofibration, fibration or weak equivalences f:a→bf:a\to b in an enriched category AA we mean in fact (−) 0(f:I→A(a,b))(-)_0(f:I\to A(a,b)).

A.3.1 Enriched monoidal model categories

A.3.2 The model structure on SS-enriched categories

Definition A.3.1.1

(Quillen bifunctor)
Definition A.3.1.2

(monoidal model category)
Example A.3.1.4

The category sSetsSet is a monoidal model category with respect to the cartesian product and the Kan model structure.
Definition A.3.1.5

(SS-enriched model category)
Remark A.3.1.6

(alternative characterization of the Quillen bifunctor ⊗:A×S→A\otimes:A\times S\to A)
Proposition A.3.1.10

Let CC, DD be SS-enriched model categories. Let (F⊣G):D→GD(F\dashv G):D\stackrel{G}{\to} D be a Quillen adjunction between the underlying model categories. Let every object of CC be cofibrant. Let

β x,s:S⊗F(x)→F(s⊗x)\beta_{x,s}: S\otimes F(x)\to F(s\otimes x)

be a weak equivalence for every pair of cofibrant objects x∈Cx\in C, s∈Ss\in S. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. (F⊣G)(F\dashv G) is a Quillen equivalence.

  2. The restriction of GG determines a weak equivalence of SS-enriched categories D ∘→C ∘D^\circ\to C^\circ.
Corollary A.3.1.12

Let (F⊣G):D→GD(F\dashv G):D\stackrel{G}{\to} D be a Quillen equivalence between simplicial model categories where every object of CC is cofibrant. Let GG be a simplicial functor. Then GG induces an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories N(D ∘)→N(C ∘)N(D^\circ)\to N(C^\circ).

A.3.2 The model structure on SS-enriched categories
Definition A.3.1.5

(SS-enriched model category)

Let SS be a monoidal model category.

A functor F:C→C ′F:C\to C^\prime in sSetCatsSet Cat is called a weak equivalence if the induced functor hC→hC ′h C\to hC^\prime is an equivalence of hShS-enriched categories.

In other words

  1. For every X,Y∈CX,Y\in C, the induced map Map C(X,Y)→Map C ′(F(X),F(Y))Map_C(X,Y)\to Map_{C^\prime}(F(X),F(Y))isaweakequivalencein is a weak equivalence in S$.

  2. FF is essentially surjective on the homotopy categories.

A.3.2.1

A.3.2.24

A.3.2.7 A.3.2.9 A.3.2.16

A.3.3 Model structures on diagram categories

A.3.4 Path spaces in SS-enriched categories

A.3.5 Homotopy colimits in SS-enriched categories

A.3.6 Exponentiation in model categories

A.3.7 Localizations of simplicial model categories

References

Revision on June 26, 2012 at 00:28:48 by Stephan Alexander Spahn?. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.

DiscussNext revision (7 more)Previous revision (2 more)Current version of pageHide changesHistory (9 revisions)Rollback Source