Showing changes from revision #1 to #2:
Added | Removed | Changed
The exists a left proper, combinatorial model structure on the category of simplicial sets such that
(C) Cofibrations are precisely monomorphisms
(W) A map is a categorical equivalence iff is an equivalence of simplicial categories. Where denotes the functor induced via Kan extension by the cosimplicial object , Definition 1.1.5.1, HTT.
Compare the following theorem with Theorem 2.4.6.1: Let be a simplicial set. Then is fibrant in the Joyal model structure iff is an -category.
(existence of the Joyal model structure, Quillen equivalence to the model structure on simplicial categories)
The exists a left proper, combinatorial model structure on the category of simplicial sets such that
(C) Cofibrations are precisely monomorphisms
(W) A map is a categorical equivalence iff is an equivalence of simplicial categories. Where denotes the functor induced via Kan extension by the cosimplicial object , Definition 1.1.5.1, HTT.
Any inner anodyne map of simplicial sets is a categorial equivalence.
The Joyal model structure is not right proper.
The horn inclusion is a categorical equivalence but its pullback along the fibration is not.
Let be a categorical equivalence of simplicial sets. Let be a simplicial set.
Then the induced map is a categorical equivalence.
(stated again and proved in 2.2.5)
Let be a simplicial set. Then
(1) For every -category , the simplicial set is an -category.
(2) Let be a categorial equivalence of -categories. Then the induced map is a categorial equivalence.
(3) Let be an -category. Let be a categorial equivalence of simplicial sets. Then the induced map is a categorial equivalence.
(1) is an -category if it is fibrant in the Joyal model structure on . This is the case if has the right lifting property wrt. all acyclic cofibrations.
By Lemma 2.2.5.2 it suffices to show that it has the extension property with respect to every inner anodyne monomorphism .
This lifting problem is equivalent to the assertion that has the right lifting property wrt. the monomorphism .
But is an -category and consequently is a fibration by Theorem 2.4.6.1 and is inner anodyne (Corollary 2.3.2.4).
Let denote the homotopy category of wrt. the Joyal model structure. Let denote the homotopy class of .
For , we have that is a product for and . (If and are fibrant this is a general fact. If not, we take fibrant replacements and apply Proposition 2.2.5.7.)
If is an -category, is a fibrant in by Theorem 2.4.6.1.
By Proposition 2.2.5.7 we identify with the set of equivalence classes of objects in the -category and there are canonical bijections
It follows that is determined up to canonical isomorphism by and in that it is an exponential in . This proves (2) and (3).
(transclusion:
Let be a combinatorial monoidal model category. Let every object of be cofibrant. Let the collection of all weak equivalences in be stable under filtered colimits.
Then there exists a left proper, combinatorial model structure on such that:
(C) The class of cofibrations in is the smallest weakly saturated class of morphisms containing the set of morphisms defined in A.3.2.3. ( is some class of ‘’indicating morphisms’’).
(W) The weak equivalences in are those functors which are essentially surjective on the level of homotopy categories and such that for every .
Recall that equipped with the Kan model structure is an excellent model category.
Let be an excellent model category. Then:
An -enriched category is a fibrant object of iff it is locally fibrant: i.e. for all the hom object is fibrant.
Let be a -enriched functor where is a fibrant object of . Then is a fibration iff is a local fibration.
)
(transclusion: here: give proof of Proposition 1.2.7.3
(stated again and proved in 2.2.5)
Let be a simplicial set. Then
(1) For every -category , the simplicial set is an -category.
(2) Let be a categorial equivalence of -categories. Then the induced map is a categorial equivalence.
(3) Let be an -category. Let be a categorial equivalence of simplicial sets. Then the induced map is a categorial equivalence.
(1) is an -category if it is fibrant in the Joyal model structure.
It suffices to show that it has the extension property with respect to every inner anodyne inclusion .
This is equivalent to the assertion that has the right lifting property wrt. the inclusion .
But is an -category and is inner anodyne (Corollary 2.3.2.4).
Let denote the homotopy category of wrt. the Joyal model structure. Let denote the homotopy class of .
For , we have that is a product for and . (If and are fibrant this is a general fact. If not, we take fibrant replacements and apply Proposition 2.2.5.7.)
If is an -category, is a fibrant in by Theorem 2.4.6.1.
By Proposition 2.2.5.7 we identify and there are canonical bijections
It follows that is determined up to canonical isomorphism by and in that it is an exponential in . This proves (2) and (3).
)