Showing changes from revision #2 to #3:
Added | Removed | Changed
Every -category is categorial equivalenct to a minimal -category.
Corollary 2.3.2.2: is a trivial fibration.
Proposition 2.3.4.5: For a simplicial set the following statements are equivalent:
the unit is an isomorphism of simplicial sets.
There is small category and an isomorphism of simpliial sets .
is a 1-category.
is an -category.
For every simplicial set and every pair of maps such that and are homotopic relative to , we have .
Let be an -category and let be a simplicial set. Then is an -category.
Let be an -category. Let .
There exists a simplicial set with the following universal mapping property: .
is an -category.
If is an -category, then the natural map is an isomorphism.
For every -category , composition with is an isomorphism of simplicial sets .
Let be a Kan complex. Then is is equivalent to an -category iff it is -truncated.
-categories as simplicial sets
-categories as categories enriched in
Proposition 1.2.7.3
Definition 4.1: cofinal arrow Proposition 4.1.3.1: Cofinal arrows preserve colimits
Theorem 4.2.4.1: relation of -categorial colimits and homotopy colimits in simplicially enriched categories.
Proposition 4.2.4.4 (and Corollary 4.2.4.7)in a simplicial model category every homotopy coherent diagram is equivalent to a commutative diagram
construction of colimits from basic diagrams
Definition 5.2.2.1
Proposition 5.2.2.6
Proposition 5.2.2.8
Proposition 5.2.2.9
Proposition 5.2.2.12
Proposition 5.2.3.5 Adjoint functors preserve (co)limits