The following lemma improves on the statement
Let be a reflective subcategory of a topos.
Then is a topos if preserves pullbacks in the image of where
is the left adjoint of the Yoneda embedding of .
is the left Kan extension of along the Yoneda embedding of .
The Yoneda embeddings of and both posess left adjoints: and are total: Since is a topos, is total, since is a reflective subcategory of a total category is total. By the adjoint functor theorem for total categories this implies that the Yoneda embeddings of and both posess left adjoints.
We have . If this composite is left exact it exhibits as a left exact localization of a category of presheaves and hence in this case is a topos.
sends colimits to limits, since (as every Yoneda extension) commutes with colimits and as a left adjoint sends colimits to limits.
Hence is left exact iff preserves limits in the image of .
Since a reflector always preserves terminal objects (and all finite limits can be constructed from pullbacks and the terminal object), it is sufficient to check if preserves pullbacks in the image of .
(If denotes a duality and then . Hence if has a left adjoint, then has a right adjoint. Every subcategory of a category of presheaves which is reflective and coreflective is itself a category of presheaves (this is quoted at reflective subcategory as Bashir Velebil). In particular is a topos.)
Last revised on December 10, 2012 at 17:27:14. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.