nLab cosheaf

Context

Topos Theory

Could not include topos theory - contents

Contents

Idea

For $C$ a small category, and $PSh(C)$ its presheaf topos, we have (by the discussion at Profunctor – In terms of colimit preserving functors on presheaf categories) that a colimit-preserving functor $PSh(C) \to Set$ is equivalently itself a copresheaf on $C$:

$[PSh(C), Set]_{coc} \simeq CoPSh(C) \,.$

If we replace in this statement presheaves with sheaves, we obtain the notion of cosheaf on $C$:

$[Sh(C), Set]_{coc} \simeq CoSh(C) \,.$

Definition

Definition

Let $C$ be a site. A cosheaf on $C$ is a copresheaf

$F : C \to Set$

such that it takes covers to colimits: for each covering family $\{U_i \to U\}$ in $C$ we have

$F(U) \simeq \lim_{\to} \left( \coprod_{i j} F(U_i \times_{U} U_j) \stackrel{\to}{\to} \coprod_i F(U_i) \right)$

Write $CoSh(C) \subset CoPSh(C)$ for the full subcategory of cosheaves.

Proposition

Proposition

There is a natural equivalence of categories

$CoSh(C) \simeq Func_{coc}(Sh(C), Set) \,,$

where on the left we have the category of cosheaves from def. 1 and on the right we have the category of colimit-preserving functors on the sheaf topos of $C$.

Equivalently: a copresheaf is a cosheaf precisely if its Yoneda extension $PSh(C) \to Set$ factors through the sheafification functor $PSh(C) \to Sh(C)$.

This is (Bunge-Funk 06, prop. 1.4.3).

Examples

In AQFT and higher AQFT

Cosheaves of algebras, or notions similar to this, appear in AQFT as local nets of observables. Similar structures in higher category theory are factorization algebras, factorization homology, and topological chiral homology. Notably the definition of factorization algebra typically explicitly involves the notion of cosheaf.

References

section 1.4 of

• Marta Bunge and Jonathan Funk, Singular coverings of toposes Lecture Notes in Mathematics, (2006) Volume 1890/2006

chapter 1 Lawvere Distributions on Toposes

Revised on July 1, 2013 09:59:46 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.139.146)