nLab
fine sheaf

Context

Topos Theory

topos theory

Background

Toposes

Internal Logic

Topos morphisms

Extra stuff, structure, properties

Cohomology and homotopy

In higher category theory

Theorems

Contents

Definition

Let X be a paracompact Hausdorff space. A sheaf F of groups over X is fine if for every two disjoint closed subsets A,BX, AB=, there is an endomorphism of the sheaf of groups FF which restricts to the identity in a neighborhood of A and to the 0 endomorphism in a neighborhood of B. Every fine sheaf is soft.

A slightly different definition is given in Voisin, in Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I, (definition 4.35):

Discussion

David Speyer asks: Voisin, in Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I, definition 4.35 makes a different definition of fine sheaf. I can see that they are related, but I can’t see precisely what the relation is.

According to Voisin:

A fine sheaf over X is a sheaf of 𝒜-modules, where 𝒜 is a sheaf of rings such that, for every open cover U i of X, there is a partition of unity 1=f i (where the sum is locally finite) subordinate to this covering.

A technical point: I infer from context that, for Voisin, being subordinate to U i means that, for each U i, there is an open set V i such that X=U iV i and f V i=0. This is slightly stronger than requiring that f XU i=0. When working on a regular (T3) space, I believe that, if partitions of unity exist in the weaker sense, than they also exist in the stronger sense.

Zoran: paracompact Hausdorff space is automatically normal (Dieudonne’s theorem) so a fortiori T 3. A partition of unity subordinate to the covering means as usual that for each i there is j such that suppf iU j. Thanks for the other correction.

category: sheaf theory

Revised on March 6, 2013 19:45:01 by Zoran Škoda (161.53.130.104)