nLab
infinity-cohesive site

Context

Cohesive -Toposes

cohesive topos

cohesive (∞,1)-topos

cohesive homotopy type theory

Backround

Definition

Presentation over a site

Structures in a cohesive (,1)-topos

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Structures with infinitesimal cohesion

infinitesimal cohesion

Models

Contents

Idea

An (,1)-cohesive site is a site such that the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves over it is a cohesive (∞,1)-topos.

Definition

Definition

A site C is -cohesive over ∞Grpd if it is

In detail this means that C is

Remark

These conditions are stronger than for a cohesive site, which only guarantees cohesiveness of the 1-topos over it.

This definition is supposed to model the following ideas:

  • every object U has an underlying set of points Hom C(*,U). We may think of each U as specifying one way in which there can be cohesion on this underlying set of points;

  • in view of the nerve theorem the condition that lim C(U) is contractible means that U itself is contractible, as seen by the Grothendieck topology on C. This reflects the local aspect of cohesion: we only specify cohesive structure on contractible lumps of points;

  • in view of this, the remaining condition that Hom C(*,C(U)) is contractible is the -analog of the condition on a concrete site that Hom C(*, iU i)Hom C(*,U) is surjective. This expresses that the notion of topology on C and its concreteness over Set are consistent.

Examples

Example

The site for a presheaf topos, hence with trivial topology, is -cohesive if it has finite products.

Proof

All covers {U iU} consist of only the identity morphism {UIdU}. The Cech C{U} is then the simplicial object constant on U and hence satisfies its two conditions above trivially.

Examples/Proposition

The following sites are -cohesive:

More discussion of these two examples is at ∞-Lie groupoid and ∞-Lie algebroid.

Proof

Since every star-shaped region in n is diffeomorphic to an open ball (see there for details) we have that the covers {U iU} on CartSp by convex subsets are good open covers in the strong sense that any finite non-empty intersection is diffeomorphic to an open ball and hence diffeomorphic to a Cartesian space. Therefore these are good open covers in the strong sense of the term and their Cech nerves C(U) are degreewise coproducts of representables.

The fact that lim C(U)* follows from the nerve theorem, using that a Cartesian space regarded as a topological space is contractible.

Properties

Theorem

Let C be an -cohesive site. Then the (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos Sh (,1)(C) over C is a cohesive (∞,1)-topos that satisfies the axiom “discrete objects are concrete” .

If moreover for all objects U of C we have that C(*,U) is inhabited, then the axiom “pieces have points” also holds.

Since the (n,1)-topos over a site for any n arises as the full sub-(∞,1)-category of the (,1)-topos on the n-truncated objects and since the definition of cohesive (n,1)-topos is compatible with such truncation, it follows that

Corollary

Let C be an -cohesive site. Then for all n the (n,1)-topos Sh (n,1)(C) is cohesive.

To prove this, we need to show that

  1. Sh (,1)(C) is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos and a ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos.

This follows with the discussion at ∞-connected site.

  1. Sh (,1)(C) is a local (∞,1)-topos.

    This follows with the discussion at ∞-local site.

  2. The fundamental ∞-groupoid in a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos Π:Sh (,1)(C)Grpd preserves finite (∞,1)-products.

  3. If Γ(U) is not empty for all UC, then pieces have points in Sh (,1)(C).

The last two conditions we demonstrate now.

Proposition

The functor Pi:Sh (,1)(C)Grpd whose existence is guaranteed by the above proposition preserves products:

Π(A×B)Π(A)×Π(B).\Pi(A \times B) \simeq \Pi(A) \times \Pi(B) \,.
Proof

By the discussion at ∞-connected site we have that Π is given by the (∞,1)-colimit lim :PSh (,1)(C)Grpd. By the assumption that C is a cosifted (∞,1)-category, it follows that this operation preserves finite products.

Finally we prove that pieces have points in Sh (,1)(C) if all objects of C have points.

Proof

By the above discussion both Γ and Π are presented by left Quillen functors on the projective model structure [C op,sSet] proj,loc. By Dugger’s cofibrant replacement theorem (see model structure on simplicial presheaves) we have for X any simplicial presheaf that a cofibrant replacement is given by an object that in the lowest two degrees is

U 0U 1X 1U UX 0U,\cdots \stackrel{\to}{\stackrel{\to}{\to}} \coprod_{U_0 \to U_1 \to X_1} U \stackrel{\to}{\to} \coprod_{U \to X_0} U \,,

where the coproduct is over all morphisms out of representable presheaves U i as indicated.

The model for Γ sends this to

U 0U 1X 0C(*,U 0) UX 0C(*,U),\cdots \stackrel{\to}{\stackrel{\to}{\to}}\coprod_{U_0 \to U_1 \to X_0} C(*,U_0) \stackrel{\to}{\to} \coprod_{U \to X_0} C(*,U) \,,

whereas the model for Π sends this to

U 0U 1X 0* UX 0*.\cdots \stackrel{\to}{\stackrel{\to}{\to}}\coprod_{U_0 \to U_1 \to X_0} * \stackrel{\to}{\to} \coprod_{U \to X_0} * \,.

The morphism from the first to the latter is the evident one that componentwise sends C(*,U) to the point. Since by assumption each C(*,U) is nonempty, this is componentwise an epi. Hence the whole morphism is an epi on π 0.

and

Revised on April 24, 2012 09:34:39 by David Corfield (129.12.18.29)