A topological spectrum is an object in the universal stable (∞,1)-category that “stabilizes” the (∞,1)-category Top or ∞-Grpd of topological spaces or ∞-groupoids: the stable (∞,1)-category of spectra.
Recall that the central characterization of a stable (∞,1)-category is that all objects have a delooping object that is written in this context and called the suspension of . Thus a spectrum is like a topological space or ∞-groupoid that may be delooped indefinitely.
In fact all ordinary topological spaces and ∞-groupoids that have the property that all their deloopings exist give rise to special examples of spectra. These are called the
or infinite loop spaces
Connective spectra form a sub-(∞,1)-category of spectra
There are objects in , though, that do not come from “naively” delooping a space infinitely many times. These are the non-connective spectra. For general spectra there is a notion of homotopy groups of negative degree. The connective ones are precisely those for which all negative degree homotopy groups vanish.
Connective spectra are well familiar in as far as they are in the image of the nerve operation of the Dold-Kan correspondence: this identifies ∞-groupoids that are not only connective spectra but even have a strict symmetric monoidal group structure with non-negatively graded chain complexes of abelian groups.
The homology groups of the chain complex correspond precisely to the homotopy groups of the corresponding topological space or ∞-groupoid.
The free stabilization of the (∞,1)-category of non-negatively graded chain complexes is simpy the stable (∞,1)-category of arbitrary chain complexes. There is a stabilized Dold-Kan correspondence that identifies these with special objects in .
So it is the homologically nontrivial parts of the chain complexes in negative degree that corresponds to the non-connectiveness of a spectrum.
There are many “models” for spectra, all of which present the same homotopy theory (and in fact, nearly all of them are Quillen equivalent model categories).
One fairly simple, and quite useful, approach is to define a spectrum to be a sequence of based spaces , for all natural numbers , together with isomorphisms , where denotes the based loop space. The idea is that contains the information of in dimensions , contains the information of in (but shifted up by one, so that it is modeled by the information in the space ), and so on.
This is called an -spectrum.
A definition of spectrum consisting of spaces indexed by index sets less “coordinatized” than the integers is a
See there for details.
There might be a type of categorical structure related to a spectrum in the same way that -categories are related to -groupoids. In other words, it would contain -cells for all integers , not necessarily invertible. Some people have called this conjectural object a -category. “Connective” -categories could perhaps then be identified with stably monoidal -categories.
One realization of this kind of idea is the notion of combinatorial spectrum.