nLab Sandbox

This nLab page is for developing preliminary notes or making typographical experiments, etc. It may be edited by anybody, anytime. But you don’t necessarily need to delete other people’s ongoing notes here in order to add your own. In any case, overwritten edits may always be recovered from the page history.

If this edit page here is seemingly locked by “Anonymous”, just break the lock, as it is just caused by bot traffic. If the page is locked by an actual user, there is also the alternative Sandbox2.



motivation – local systems in physics:

Hilbert spaces of gapped quantum ground states over classical parameter space PP of topological phases of matter

topological phases are Cπ 0(P)C \in \pi_0(P)

topological orders in phase CC are Rep (π 1(P,C))\mathcal{H} \in Rep_{\mathbb{C}}\big(\pi_1(P,C)\big)

topological orders in any phase are Loc (P)\mathcal{H} \in Loc_{\mathbb{C}}(P)

in fragile crystalline phases: parameter space is crystal lattice couplings reflected in 1-electron Hamiltonians from a space 𝒜\mathcal{A}, hence parameter space is P=Map(T d,𝒜)P = Map(T^d, \mathcal{A})

topological phases are Cπ 0(Map(T d,𝒜))C \in \pi_0 \big( Map(T^d, \mathcal{A})\big)

topological orders in phase CC are Rep 𝒞(π 1(Map(T d,𝒜),C))\mathscr{H} \in Rep_{\mathcal{C}}\Big( \pi_1 \big( Map(T^d,\mathcal{A}), C\big) \Big)

topological orders in any phase are Loc (Map(T d,𝒜))\mathscr{H} \in Loc_{\mathbb{C}}\big(Map(T^d, \mathcal{A})\big)

functorial at least in diffeos of T dT^d (modular functor)

Loc (Map(T d,𝒜)Diff(T d))\mathscr{H} \in Loc_{\mathbb{C}}\big(Map(T^d, \mathcal{A})\sslash Diff(T^d) \big)

for crystalline structure use equivariant maps

translate to TFT language

𝟙Loc (Map(,𝒜)Diff(T d)):BDiff(T d)VecMod \mathbb{1} \longrightarrow Loc_{\mathbb{C}}\big( Map(-, \mathcal{A}) \sslash Diff(T^d) \big) \;\colon\; B Diff(T^d) \longrightarrow Vec Mod

in experiment, such FQ(A)H systems are governed by two effective symmetries

  • supersymmetry

  • area-preserving diffeomorphisms (W W_\infty)

same as characteristic symmetries of super pp-branes

\rightsquigarrow find geometric engineering on M-branes in SuGra

\rightsquigarrow need global IR-completion where topological brane charges are determined

(no string folklore, but actual definitions and proofs)

compare IR completion of Maxwell: B 2×B 2B^2 \mathbb{Z} \times B^2 \mathbb{R} and use Deligne complex…

magnetized M5 @ A1


Theorem

(Milne 2017, Propositions 3.24, 3.25). Let kk be an algebraically closed field. The categories of affine varieties and affine kk-algebras are anti-equivalent.

The following result particularizes the fundamental theorem on morphisms of schemes to prevarieties.

Proposition

Milne 2017, Propositions 5.11. Let kk be an algebraically closed field. Let VV be an algebraic kk-prevariety. Let AA be an affine kk-algebra. Then we have the following natural bijection:

Hom(V,Spm(A))Hom k-algebra(A,Γ(V,𝒪 V)). Hom(V,Spm(A))\cong Hom_{k\text{-algebra}}(A,\Gamma(V,\mathcal{O}_V)).

In other words, the maximal spectrum functor and the global sections functor, defined between the categories of affine kk-algebras and kk-prevarieties, are mutually right adjoint. Note that Milne states the result for quasi-compact varieties, but his proof applies in the general case and never uses quasi-compactness nor separation. Note that from we recover .

For additional information, look at this very related typing graph.

ΓA,;ΓBΓA×B\frac{\Gamma \vdash A ,; \Gamma \vdash B}{\Gamma \vdash A\times B}

Last revised on July 7, 2026 at 07:37:35. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.